US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
...


If you presented a Boomer with a traitor and an enemy and handed them a pistol with two bullets they would turn around and shoot their child twice.
Bro the boomers didn't cut those things because they hate their kids. They cut those things because the school spent all their money on administrative bloat and it was either cut home ec and band and shop class or cut learning to read.
 
Haven't watched it yet but here you go.


View attachment 6378034
First time archiving video so let me know if I did something stupid.
>48 minutes
What's the tl;dw?
CIA glow in the darks continue to ruin everything by silencing truth and information when it hurts their goals or the public's morale. Educating journalists to become assets to stop wrongthink. NATO also involved.

Imagine my FUCKING SHOCK when finding out it's the feds doing supremely evil shit again.
 
Last edited:
Joe and the hoe's admin are threatening to sue two small towns in Wisconsin because they refuse to use electronic voting machines

The Biden-Harris Department of Justice has threatened to sue two small towns in Wisconsin over their refusal to use electronic voting machines to cast and tabulate votes, the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reported.

In July, Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke threatened to file a lawsuit against the State of Wisconsin, the state Elections Commission and Administrator Meagan Wolfe, and the towns of Thornapple and Lawrence, as well as the towns’ clerks and boards of supervisors, because the towns allegedly did not offer voting equipment at their polling places in the April presidential primary election.

Clarke warned the potential plaintiffs in a letter that by not offering voting equipment for people with disabilities, they were in violation of the Help America Vote Act of 2002.

Among the federal requirements is that each voting system must be “accessible for individuals with disabilities, including nonvisual accessibility for the blind and visually impaired, in a manner that provides the same opportunity for access and participation (including privacy and independence) as for other voters,” the letter states.

Voting systems used for federal elections therefore have to have “at least one direct recording electronic voting system or other voting system equipped for individuals with disabilities at each polling place,” the letter said.

The letter went on to state that federal investigators had determined that the towns had failed to make “at least one direct recording electronic voting system or other voting system equipped for individuals with disabilities available at each polling place, including during the April 2, 2024, federal primary election.”

Clark said to avoid litigation, town officials needed to negotiate a “consent decree” with the federal government.

“We hope to resolve this matter amicably and to avoid protracted litigation. Accordingly, we are prepared to delay filing the complaint briefly to permit us time to negotiate a consent decree to be filed with the complaint,” she wrote.

Despite this warning, Thornapple, population 8,297, allegedly conducted the August primary election using only hand-counted, paper ballots. The Thornapple township board reportedly voted to eliminate electronic voting machines last Spring. In Wisconsin, most voters use paper ballots that are tabulated by electronic counting machines.

Suzanne Pinnow, Thornapple’s Treasurer, has disputed that voters with disabilities were unable to use an accessible voting machine during the April election. “No one’s been turned away,” she told the Journal- Sentinel in May.

Pinnow also told Votebeat that nobody in the town had been unable to vote because of the decision not to have accessible voting machines.

“I wish I could talk. I wish I could,” Pinnow said. “I wish I could because I think more people need to hear and understand and know why. But at this time, I can’t … because if it for some reason would go to litigation, I don’t want anything out there that I’m spewing this or that or saying something that I didn’t say.”

The Wisconsin Elections Commission issued a guidance in June mandating that accessible voting equipment must be provided for all elections administered by a municipality, in addition to federal elections.

A Complaint filed this week with the commission alleged that Thornapple is breaking the law by refusing to make voting machines available to voters with disabilities during the April and August primaries.

“By ceasing to use electronic voting equipment and, instead, exclusively using paper ballots completed and tabulated by hand, Respondents are no longer using voting systems that are accessible for individuals with disabilities in a manner that provides the same opportunity for access and participation (including privacy and independence) as for other voters,” the complainant, Disability Rights Wisconsin (DRW) argued.

The left-wing disability rights group asked the Wisconsin Elections Commission to order Thornapple to make accessible voting machines available.

DRW Director of Legal and Advocacy Services Kit Kerschensteiner told Wisconsin Public Radio (WPR) that “the goal is to ensure all town residents are able to cast private ballots in the November presidential election.”

“This is not the situation of a machine that just isn’t functioning that day at the polling place,” Kerschensteiner said. “This is a place that has chosen specifically, knowing that they were disenfranchising individuals with disabilities, and choosing to go ahead and do that, which we find to be unacceptable.”

Thornapple Town Board Supervisor Tom Zelm told the Journal-Sentinel in May that the decision to pull voting machines was made in June 2023.

Town voter and Rusk County Democratic Party chair Erin Webster told the paper she believed the decision was tied to former President and current GOP nominee Donald Trump’s claims about the rigged 2020 presidential election.

Webster posted on YouTube a recording of her phone call with town Supervisor Jack Zupan, in which he said the board believes that “there was a stolen election and the computers have to go because they are full of error.”

“There are court cases right now that show that anybody can hack into and manipulate that machine within a matter of just a couple of minutes,” Zupan added.

“Oh, so you’re also a conspiracy believer!” Webster retorted.

But it’s true that there are court cases have been examining these claims. In the Colorado Vs. Tina Peters case, for instance, “nationally recognized computer cybersecurity experts” who examined forensic images from the hard drives of Dominion voting systems computers independently concluded:

Dominion voting systems (1) are not auditable, as required by federal and state law (2) they can connect to the internet during elections, which violates federal and state law; and (3) they are capable of manipulating ballots and vote tabulations, which violates federal and state law; (4) the software overwrites Windows Operating System log files that are recorded during elections, which are required by federal and state law to be preserved. All these deficiencies make Dominion voting systems illegal to use in Colorado elections.

In fact, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued a report in 2020 on the security and vulnerabilities of “Election Infrastructure” throughout the country ahead of the election that year. Election infrastructure includes voter registration databases and IT systems, voting machines and systems, and software used for casting votes.

According to CISA:

• 76% of EI entities for which CISA performed a Risk and Vulnerability Assessment (RVA) had spearphishing weaknesses, which provide an entry point for adversaries to launch
attacks;
• 48% of entities had a critical or high severity vulnerability on at least one internetaccessible host,4 providing potential attack vectors to adversaries;
• 39% of entities ran at least one risky service on an internet-accessible host, providing the opportunity for threat actors to attack otherwise legitimate services; and
• 34% of entities ran unsupported operating systems (OSs) on at least one internet accessible host, which exposes entities to compromise.

CISA said election entities could “significantly reduce their cybersecurity risk by performing additional investigation and analysis of the findings described in this report. CISA encourages entities to implement
standard cyber hygiene practices and applicable mitigations identified in this report to reduce their exposure.”
 
View attachment 6377993

The delusion of this one poster aside, this is interesting, it's usually not what a party does, especially when they should have their own money to give to these races. A rising tide lifts all boats and Kamabla is in no way dealing with what Trump faced with the unresponsive RNC who was trying to sabotage him and MAGA so people turned off the taps.
That.. doesn’t seem like someone confident in a win, I gotta be honest. It sounds like they’re giving ground in the national race to try and not lose down ticket. And it COULD be because fraud or overconfidence, but… it doesn’t seem that way to me.
 
Last edited:
It's how they train reporters and journalists how to handle disinformation or malinformation as they call it by using what they call the 4 D's. The ones in charge of this are literally former glownigger directors.

The 4 D's are: Dismiss, distort, distract and dismay.

They are told to dismiss facts as disinformation if it dismisses another truth, if it distorts what's known as truth, if it distracts from a larger truth or if causes dismay even if those facts are true.
And 2 decades ago they were using the tactics already and even submerging with titles like 'an inconvenient truth'. Whenever the left talks about 'truth', run for the hills.

(I wonder how many $ trillions were shaved off the GNP just on Al gore's fantasies alone.. Probably about half the national debt worth by now)
 
Doocy has seriously been so awesome. Only reason to watch any of the press conferences at all for 4 years.
View attachment 6378104
kumhola code switching.PNG
When Kumhola does it, it's called codeswitching. But when Trump goes out in front of a black audience and says "Sheeeiit"....
 
Joe and the hoe's admin are threatening to sue two small towns in Wisconsin because they refuse to use electronic voting machines
"Weh! Weh! You can't use manual voting, it goes against our interests! Weh! Weh! And stop having watchdogs near the ballots! Wehhhh! Stop noticing things!"
Grow the fuck up you gargantuan losers. You got caught, people noticed, you can't get uncaught, and the glowies / interns reading this thread need to update the firmware so the administration can know that this is severely retarded and just adding on to the suspicion.

But they won't. So more content for us I guess?
 
Last edited:
View attachment 6378230
When Kumhola does it, it's called codeswitching. But when Trump goes out in front of a black audience and says "Sheeeiit"....
Marxist do it to. We share the same vocab, but not the same dictionary. So they slip in words which means one thing to them but to everyone else means something entirely different.
 
Nothing will be done. Kamala has the biggest "get out of jail free" card in the entire country (pussy pass + nigger pass)
The absolute comedy of her not really being a nigger but still gets the pass somehow makes it even funnier to me. Missed opportunity for the "niggas for trump" to lean in on this too. Imagine the pure comedy of actual niggers saying trump is more nigger than kamala.. Talk about how kamala was locking up niggers and Trump wants to get them OUT of jail.
 
Haven't watched it yet but here you go.


View attachment 6378034
First time archiving video so let me know if I did something stupid.

TL; DW - The government pays for an NGO called the Atlantic Council to train journalists and social media censors around the world how to properly spin information and censor the internet in a way that aligns with globohomo interests.
 
Since it's mentioned the original story isn't changing, this could just be revealing that a candy coated psychological horror is staying a psychological horror. It wasn't made with kids in mind, but if parents are going to let them watch, they will probably see some creepy things. (And not necessarily sexual. Challenging ones place in the world and value of life can be pretty heavy.)

Like renting your children Watership Down in the 90s because it has cute bunnies on the cover, not necessarily Fritz the cat. They might not have been ready for that film and it could cause nightmares.

Kids were allowed to watch the pilot of a web series because it's fairly inoffensive at this time and well made, but without knowing where it's going you can't be certain it will have a message your kids are ready for. I guess a responsible parent would pre-watch it before giving the go ahead for children to see it.
Best defense is to watch children's shows with your kids. It also means watching a lot of children's shows, but children's shows need to do better anyways.
Seriously though, and I say this as a Gen Xer, I really feel that Gen X is the first generation to really hit the infantilization machine hard and it's been downhill for every generation after we set the example.
And unlike Millenials, who are (fairly) called faggots, Gen X gets to decide popular culture and what is deemed "correct" ways of thinking about media.
The only way to get an adult child to learn how to do shit is to kick them out of the house. You don't have to cut them out of your life, but they have to become responsible for themselves.

They have to learn what it is to get a job and have enough for a shitty apartment. They might need to learn how to cohabitate with friends or a girlfriend to afford a nicer place. If they don't cook, they won't eat.

Self-reliance is something you learn in the absence of other choices, and once learned it is freeing.
Don't be surprised when your children don't come back and put you in a home like in 60 minutes.

 
> code switching

Everything about a minority's status as a minority and their quirky fun minority-specific behaviors are all sacred and magical as fuck and mayos would do well to not speak of or question these things.

(A hole of a proper shade is all she's got lol)

E: didn't herman cain "talk black" full time and not code switch like some untrustable subversive. Surely there are more black pols like him vs her.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back