Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Because it’s a good thing in and of itself. None of us would be here if not for our parents. All you can do is be careful unfortunately.
Would you rather risk having kids and be severed from everything you have made for yourself? Or keep all your stuff and your sanity but never have children? In the current legal climate, starting a family is a very high-risk but high-reward option. Sure it is a morally good thing to do, but at what cost?
 
Would you rather risk having kids and be severed from everything you have made for yourself? Or keep all your stuff and your sanity but never have children? In the current legal climate, starting a family is a very high-risk but high-reward option. Sure it is a morally good thing to do, but at what cost?
you just need to make sure that you and your partner agree to put family first

at the end of the day your material possessions should be the means rather than the end, and unless you're pursuing a higher purpose (political, scientific, etc) the best thing you can do with your possessions is to promote the well-being of your family

nice house? yeah, for my family to live in it
nice car? sure, gets the kids to school
highly-paid job? yep, means the wife doesn't have to work

even if you end up splitting one day, so long as there's a mutual understanding that the primary beneficiaries of your combined income should be your kids, it's still doing far more good than if you were hoarding it in a bachelor pad like a cheeto-stained Smaug

unless one of those P's stands for "Pharaoh", it's not as if you're gonna take any of that shit with you when you go
 
Would you rather risk having kids and be severed from everything you have made for yourself? Or keep all your stuff and your sanity but never have children? In the current legal climate, starting a family is a very high-risk but high-reward option. Sure it is a morally good thing to do, but at what cost?
There's nothing wrong with abstaining from having kids if you don't feel like you would able to give them a happy and stable upbringing. (also things can change)

If you think you're able to do it and have happy healthy kids, then do it.

Even divorcee dads that have been ultra mega divorce raped either have no purpose in life or their children are their purpose.

Even in the worst case scenario where you get ultra divorce rape by things outside of your contorl, you still have your children.

I remember talking with someone that had great grandchildren and asking them how it felt.

He said: having children feels good but it's a responsability, having grandchildren feels great with few responsability+ you see your children florish but great grandchildren is seeing the positive impact you made on this world and being okay with letting life go.
 
Based Japs at it again
View attachment 6376398
actually an old story from 2018 but I came across it recently
Giga based. I come to this thread to autistically sperg about how sociology is just downstream from biology. And laugh at fat woman.
Nah, I don't want their friendship or pussy and I'm not a feminist. Settle down and stop being porn addict lolicon enablers. Stop proving their point about how there are now few men who offer the bare minimum of what a husband and father should be.
I mean, why? They don't offer the bare minimum of what a wife and mother should be.

There is no logical reason for one side to surrender when both sides benefit from the outcome, assuming you live in a proper Islamic society where you aren't divorced to never see your kids, and only pay for them?

Men have to risk the divorce, and pay for the kids, and men has to make themselves high value. Men only. Its like one side pays for the lottery ticket but they split the money 50-50. It is a raw deal.

This also connects to the fact that in YE OLDE TIMES, grandpaw and granmaw lived near the kids and the kids helped them out when they got frail and old. Now they just get shoved in the old folks home to die alone. The only logical reason for any man today to reproduce is purely "MUST PRESERVE THE ARYAN RACE!" and that's it. Unless you are a bible-sperg or a dye in the wool Chuddie, you can get your rocks off with an onahole or a prostitute and save yourself all that trouble.

It isn't just man-woman relations that is broken, but also parent-child. The social contract is totally void. You raise them when, if we use Android Raptor dictionary, just grubs that can only wail like a siren and shit everywhere and make your life miserable. Instead of cooking with mom and fixing the car with dad, they go to Skool for tranny propaganda, than do homework all day, and you can't even raise them right or you get the FBI mad about homeschooling. Then instead of being around you when you are old, they fuck off 5 states over and never see you again, if you somehow avoided the divorce. Boomers aren't blameless either, instead of giving their savings to their kids to enhance the efficiency of the family line they splurge it on everything and leave nothing behind. It is a right down clusterfuck.

So even if your marriage went to shit, your kids could be relied on to at least keep being around you, even if the Household dragon made your life miserable.

Imagine if you got a shitty set of tools, and someone else has a shitty shed. You can make a shitty car repair station together. But only your name is on the mortgage, and only her name on the deed. Would you do that transaction? Sure men and women are not as good as they both used to be, but one side gets the shittier deal by far.
 
Last edited:
The duality of a thread
There's nothing wrong with abstaining from having kids if you don't feel like you would able to give them a happy and stable upbringing. (also things can change)

If you think you're able to do it and have happy healthy kids, then do it.

Even divorcee dads that have been ultra mega divorce raped either have no purpose in life or their children are their purpose.

Even in the worst case scenario where you get ultra divorce rape by things outside of your contorl, you still have your children.

I remember talking with someone that had great grandchildren and asking them how it felt.

He said: having children feels good but it's a responsability, having grandchildren feels great with few responsability+ you see your children florish but great grandchildren is seeing the positive impact you made on this world and being okay with letting life go.
white pill
I mean, why? They don't offer the bare minimum of what a wife and mother should be.

There is no logical reason for one side to surrender when both sides benefit from the outcome, assuming you live in a proper Islamic society where you aren't divorced to never see your kids, and only pay for them?

Men have to risk the divorce, and pay for the kids, and men has to make themselves high value. Men only. Its like one side pays for the lottery ticket but they split the money 50-50. It is a raw deal.

This also connects to the fact that in YE OLDE TIMES, grandpaw and granmaw lived near the kids and the kids helped them out when they got frail and old. Now they just get shoved in the old folks home to die alone. The only logical reason for any man today to reproduce is purely "MUST PRESERVE THE ARYAN RACE!" and that's it. Unless you are a bible-sperg or a dye in the wool Chuddie, you can get your rocks off with an onahole or a prostitute and save yourself all that trouble.

It isn't just man-woman relations that is broken, but also parent-child. The social contract is totally void. You raise them when, if we use Android Raptor dictionary, just grubs that can only wail like a siren and shit everywhere and make your life miserable. Instead of cooking with mom and fixing the car with dad, they go to Skool for tranny propaganda, than do homework all day, and you can't even raise them right or you get the FBI mad about homeschooling. Then instead of being around you when you are old, they fuck off 5 states over and never see you again, if you somehow avoided the divorce. Boomers aren't blameless either, instead of giving their savings to their kids to enhance the efficiency of the family line they splurge it on everything and leave nothing behind. It is a right down clusterfuck.

So even if your marriage went to shit, your kids could be relied on to at least keep being around you, even if the Household dragon made your life miserable.

Imagine if you got a shitty set of tools, and someone else has a shitty shed. You can make a shitty car repair station together. But only your name is on the mortgage, and only her name on the deed. Would you do that transaction? Sure men and women are not as good as they both used to be, but one side gets the shittier deal by far.
black pill
 
The irony of me posting this is damning, but there seems to be some kind of pattern to this happening seasonally in this this thread.
Either way, I get to post this funny quote with it being semi-ontopic to the small time discussion at hand:
@Cold Root Beer has never posted on this thread, and he isn't banned either. He just got mad at Null due to something about starting a family or shit like that and got a one-month-long temp
 
Would you rather risk having kids and be severed from everything you have made for yourself? Or keep all your stuff and your sanity but never have children? In the current legal climate, starting a family is a very high-risk but high-reward option. Sure it is a morally good thing to do, but at what cost?

The list of stuff that you can buy that's better than having your own grown sons is zero.
 
To my knowledge, women have to face harder tests than men for medical professions since a long time. This is designed to deter them from studying it. This stems from Japans experience that many women study medicine, only for them to to practice it only a couple of years before marrying and settling. Since Japans needs these medical doctors, they rather want to have men studying it, who don't do that.
That's a fair point, since when hiring a women you have a big chance of them marrying and becoming a housewife, or at least 2 years of maternity leave.
 
I will miss this thread a lot. I don't really engage in the catty in-fighting, but I like talking about the negative impact women's actions have had on society, and you can't really talk about that in other parts of the farms without being negrate brigaded and having the conversation stifled.

Maybe fighting the 'troon' menace will mellow TERFs out for a time, but TERFs will never be a friend or ally to any self respecting man, because they hate men. They hate men on a fundamental and visceral level that I imagine only a few posters here manage in reverse. Because at the end of the day this isn't the Woman Hate Thread where we talk about how we should sterilize all women fat women and imprison high value ones to be used as baby factories or whatever deranged shit you can read in other places.

No, this is the Official Kiwifarms Woman Disappointment thread where we just wish we could fucking stop this shitshow, but the only offered solution is become a ball-less male 'ally' woman respecter. It's like saying "let's compromise by you doing everything I want". It's not how it fucking works.
 
The duality of a thread

Yeah and I said why old folks getting into the boomer mindset and the kids cutting them off is a bad thing. The happy grandpa playing with the kids thing is mostly gone, sadly.

Imagine that instead of hiring a baby sitter who maybe a chomo, and not free, there is a free granny-grandpa where you can drop the kidds off for daycare. All that money can go into your savings for the kids.
 
No, this is the Official Kiwifarms Woman Disappointment thread where we just wish we could fucking stop this shitshow, but the only offered solution is become a ball-less male 'ally' woman respecter. It's like saying "let's compromise by you doing everything I want". It's not how it fucking works.
Push for the normalization of AI use in your workplace. Women hate AI because they know it has the potential to take most of their jobs, the majority of which are literally just typing words on a keyboard.
 
Push for the normalization of AI use in your workplace. Women hate AI because they know it has the potential to take most of their jobs, the majority of which are literally just typing words on a keyboard.
I've always had a positive opinion of AI because of that one time cops used an AI to calculate the most efficient patrol routes only for the AI to put the most patrols in black areas. Led to the AI getting cancelled for racism and reprogrammed.

AI doesn't give a shit about whatever womanism is currently keeping the rapist/drug dealer/whatever on the streets("inherited trauma/social economical factors/etc") and out of a gas chamber. AI sees the problem and draws the conclusion.
 
Back