Russian Special Military Operation in the Ukraine - Mark IV: The Partitioning of Discussion

What was I saying about American long-range missiles literally a week or two ago that I was apparently doomering over?
Don't worry, it sounds like doomsday is neigh but read this closely:
They will give them the 300 mile one, never the 500s and they want to strap them to mig-29s :story: .
It's the same as usual: Promise super duper weapons but then give them something that's just a smidgen short of what's actually needed, so they keep fighting and draining on the russians like good little lemmings while still hoping for the actual long range ones and more of those fancy, stealthy western jets to then end up with surplus crap strapped to their own flying soviet tincans which the russians can spot an shoot down easily before ever getting into launch range for moscow.
 
Last edited:
Don't worry, it sounds like doomsday is neigh but read this closely:

They will give them the 300 mile one, never the 500s and they want to strap them to mig-29s :story: .
It's the same as usual: Promise super duper weapons but then give them something that's just a smidgen short of what's actually needed, so they keep fighting and draining on the russians like good little lemmings while still hoping for the actual long range ones and more of those fancy, stealthy western jets to then end up with surplus crap strapped to their own flying soviet tincans which the russians can spot an shoot down easily before ever getting into launch range for moscow.

Eh, its more like they won't give them enough to matter. Just like the F-16s or the Abrams. It will be too little too late. That could be the official NATO MOTTO at this point.
 
Don't worry, it sounds like doomsday is neigh but read this closely:

They will give them the 300 mile one, never the 500s and they want to strap them to mig-29s :story: .
It's the same as usual: Promise super duper weapons but then give them something that's just a smidgen short of what's actually needed, so they keep fighting and draining on the russians like good little lemmings while still hoping for the actual long range ones and more of those fancy, stealthy western jets to then end up with surplus crap strapped to their own flying soviet tincans which the russians can spot an shoot down easily before ever getting into launch range for moscow.
That's some serious Clanner logic. As opposed to actual military thinking.
 
MASSIVE SWEDEN L! SWEDCUCKS KEEP LOSING!

IMG_8091.jpeg
IMG_8092.jpeg


IMG_8089.jpeg
IMG_8090.jpeg

Oh noes! I’m sure it couldn’t have happened to a nicer group of NATO hirelings.

Their wives probably getting extra blacked tonight to get over this.
 
Wut? Elucidate plz.
"What?! You dare refuse my Batchall?!"

So, the Clanners in Battletech, despite having superior technology, elect to fight fairly with their opponents by betting how little resources they need to accomplish their objectives. So, if they have F-22s and F-35s and the opponent does not have stealth fighter jets, they don't use them. Instead, Ukraine is given weapons that were perfectly fine in 1991 and in tiny amounts to save on resources. They can't have a modern M-1 Abrams with the newest armor, that would be unfair, so they get the export version the Saudis also get. And NATO is surprised Ukraine is losing.
 
"What?! You dare refuse my Batchall?!"

So, the Clanners in Battletech, despite having superior technology, elect to fight fairly with their opponents by betting how little resources they need to accomplish their objectives. So, if they have F-22s and F-35s and the opponent does not have stealth fighter jets, they don't use them. Instead, Ukraine is given weapons that were perfectly fine in 1991 and in tiny amounts to save on resources. They can't have a modern M-1 Abrams with the newest armor, that would be unfair, so they get the export version the Saudis also get. And NATO is surprised Ukraine is losing.
NATO would rather kill off all the Ukrainian men and replace them.
NATO would rather test Russia's capabilities by slow rolling the deployment of western weapons.
NATO would rather bleed Russia now and continue to antagonize rather than invade Russia as a "team".

The goal is to collapse Russia, not defend Ukraine. This has ALWAYS been the goal.
 
NATO would rather kill off all the Ukrainian men and replace them.
NATO would rather test Russia's capabilities by slow rolling the deployment of western weapons.
NATO would rather bleed Russia now and continue to antagonize rather than invade Russia as a "team".

The goal is to collapse Russia, not defend Ukraine. This has ALWAYS been the goal.
And they do so very poorly. If NATO fought all out, they actually would have a chance of achieving this goal. They don't because they don't actually have a unified population willing to go to war and would collapse harder than the Ukrainians are now.
 
And they do so very poorly. If NATO fought all out, they actually would have a chance of achieving this goal. They don't because they don't actually have a unified population willing to go to war and would collapse harder than the Ukrainians are now.
Lol, if they ever try to draft il take the basic training and then go to jail.
 
Probably yet another case of Ukraine trying to claim a Russian accomplishment as their own.

Regardless, I just get baffled at the normalised blood lust and brutality of celebrating flesh-melting weapons by the Western media. I thought we all agreed things like Agent Orange and white phosphors was bad?

I think we're not far off a Ukrainian suicide bomber being declared a good thing.
 
NATO would rather kill off all the Ukrainian men and replace them.
NATO would rather test Russia's capabilities by slow rolling the deployment of western weapons.
NATO would rather bleed Russia now and continue to antagonize rather than invade Russia as a "team".

The goal is to collapse Russia, not defend Ukraine. This has ALWAYS been the goal.


Replacement of white Europeans has been the standard since World War I. I'd argue that European countries still haven't recovered from that unnecessary war. White nations should not be fighting wars against other white nations. Russians and Ukrainians have been targeted since time immemorial because they are mostly Orthodox Christians.
 
Regardless, I just get baffled at the normalised blood lust and brutality of celebrating flesh-melting weapons by the Western media. I thought we all agreed things like Agent Orange and white phosphors was bad?

I think we're not far off a Ukrainian suicide bomber being declared a good thing.
Just a month ago NAFO fags and the Western media were jerking off over innocent beach vacationers being on the receiving end of a cluster missile strike in the Crimea. Western hypocrisy knows no boundaries or shame.
 
Back