Is it normal to like and fap to guro, or am I a sick fuck? - Future serial killer thread

You posted the same argument that pedos use to defend child porn drawings, that's why.
No, they always claim their preferred media of choice is harmless when it isn't and I didn't claim it wasn't. Truthfully I don't know what to do with people like OP since you can't cure a fetish.

I see he's banned now too. That's probably for the best.
 
Enter.jpg
Is it actually gore? Like, genuine, actual human and animal entrails? If so yes, you are fundamentally fucked up. Your brain is lacking essential barriers to basic human interaction and I strongly recommend becoming a light house keeper or focusing heavily on wellness because the only thing keeping you out of the deep end is convenience and lifestyle cost.

Is it anime gore? If so you're just a porn sick weirdo and I wouldn't want you watching my pet goldfish, but not because you'd try to rape it or something. It's probably just a poorly adjusted sadist or humiliation fetish and you've been cooming too much. Back the fuck off for about 2 weeks. I'm not going to tell you to stop watching hentai because you'll replace it with actual people getting fucked up but for gods sake man, learn to hit the reset button.
 
No, they always claim their preferred media of choice is harmless when it isn't and I didn't claim it wasn't. Truthfully I don't know what to do with people like OP since you can't cure a fetish.

I see he's banned now too. That's probably for the best.
Eh, I met some who say that said content keeps them from acting out. In Youtube comments out of all places as well.

Also, I know that that red strikethrought on your name looks sick and all that, but it looks like some new and old posters don't understand the implications of getting one
 
Isn't that just a normal way for forums to show a user is banned? It always used to be, either that or greyed out name. Am I missing something specific to KF?
KF normally didn't show which users were banned, it is until recently that it does, but in the distant past it did so as well
 
I don't know, sometimes I wonder if easy access to questionable material is all that keeps some of these people from acting it out IRL. Perhaps keeping these people staring into the magic black rectangle is a good thing.
Well considering some rancid fags spamming on the internet made this guy develop a fetish as a kid, into seeking the real thing, and publically sharing on a gossip forum, I'll let you be the judge!
 
For a guy that opposses zoos so vehemently you sure are quick to just accept that nothing can be done regarding any other paraphilia/sexual deviancy
My response to him was a joke, don't take things so seriously it'll give you a heart attack.

I don't see what he's suggesting we do short of trying to restrict kids from the internet which would never actually work. Maybe he's suggesting more criminal punishments for what people post online? That would have unintended consequences.

Answer me this @Toji Suzuhara-san: What great solution do you have to the problem that is compatible with current social and legal systems that won't either be misused or have unintended consequences?

Some people are just fucked, maybe the OP's brain is just broken? I'd be happy sticking gurofags in mental hospitals but sadly it's not 1970.
 
Answer me this @Toji Suzuhara-san: What great solution do you have to the problem that is compatible with current social and legal systems that won't either be misused or have unintended consequences?
There's none. Current social and legal systems allowed this to happen, and keep allowing it to happen. Unless society changes, and the laws (or the ways the enforcement of said laws are done) with it, it will keep happening until the end of time.

My response to him was a joke, don't take things so seriously it'll give you a heart attack.
There has been an uptick of weirdos and deviants lately, much more so on the boards that I frequent. It was an 80/20 gamble on whether or not you truly meant it.

I don't see what he's suggesting we do short of trying to restrict kids from the internet which would never actually work. Maybe he's suggesting more criminal punishments for what people post online? That would have unintended consequences.
Restricting kids from the internet is hard because everything nowadays is built around the internet, something that, while good for those mature enough to handle it, has proven very negative for the youth. Laws alone can't solve it either because police can't be everywhere, so the cultural attitude towards kids using the internet must change. No iPad kids being socially acceptable, no giving a phone to a toddler to shut them up, no allowing kids barely self-concious enough to talk spend 14 hours a day doomscrolling on TikTok. Shame said behaviors relentlessly.

And more criminal punishments are not needed, as most laws already exist, they just aren't enforced. An stranger knowingly sharing pornography with a child surely is illegal, and doing so with the intention of having them engage in sexual activities (even sexting) definetely is. I don't see why it being done over the internet would require new laws being passed to address it.

Some people are just fucked, maybe the OP's brain is just broken? I'd be happy sticking gurofags in mental hospitals but sadly it's not 1970.
The abolition of the mental asylum/sanatorium system and its consequences have been a disaster for the autist race
 
Last edited:
Back