Aaron Imholte / Steel Toe Morning/Evening Show / "The Toe Boys" / r/steeltoeboringshow - Disgraced Minnesotan radio host turned racist Internet shock jock. Cuckold chef de Spaghetti-os, "2-2" boxing "coach". Has a legion of a-logs. Lost his wife to a coke addict he played "Strip Twister" with. Fined $50 for sharing nudes of Kayla Rekieta.

Someone on one of the Reddits did the math; if he hit the goal on every stream, every time, at the end of the year he'd have earned roughly $50,000 dollars.

He's putting himself through all of this shit in hopes of maybe earning as much as the typical 9-5 office job.

How pathetic. I make double that and never have to talk to anyone aside from the shipping office and one coworker. Then again, faggot only has to sit in a chair and bicker on camera a few hours.
 
Interesting thought. Iirc, the stream topic was tattoos, then hours later, Aaron made the “ya boy didn’t do too bad” comment once Geno saw the text. There is the question of intent
There is no intent for the GM other than intent to send the image.

raised under the art angle, which makes Nicks charges
They are the state's charges.

need to be gone over with a fine toothed comb, as the charges currently claim felony harassment when Geno’s response to the alleged pic in question was, “I like tattoos.
Geno's response has virtually nothing to do with intent to harass ("Harass" means an act that would cause a substantial adverse effect on the safety, security, or privacy of a reasonable person." - that said, as mentioned, before I think the harassment aspect is a stretch...except that it's all pretty circularly defined, so ambiguity.)

Things can definitely be inferred from the video clip, but, there is an artistic merit
Bc Geno said "nice tats"?

argument to be had on top of the single reality Nick Rekieta, & his Qover Gorls have painted. Other open litigation against Nick, Kayla, & April needs to be considered too.
Not really relevant for a determination of whether Aaron's actions violated the statute. Accused felons are people, too, womp, womp. Sad but true. And Kayla is the only victim.

It’s obvious Nick is using his money to shut Aaron up about his drug charges as well as their previous intimate relationship together.
Agree he is being a vindictive bitch. Quelle suprise. True to form. But Aaron handed this to him.

regarding the obscenity angle
The statute does not refer to obscenity, but to intimate images shared with a reasonable expectation of privacy.

, which leads to the revenge porn & felony harassment angles, which isn’t the whole truth from what has been seen. Aaron didn’t set out to harass
That is just the felony charge.

Nick just thinks he hit bingo with any charge he can get turned up to the max.
True.

He took an incredibly stupid chance that his buddy wouldn't save it and upload it to the internet himself, or pass it on to someone else who would pass it on.
That's not an element of any charge here.

In Minnesota, all of these women showing dick picture to their friends would be guilty of the same exact revenge pornography statute IF 1) someone cared enough to report them to the police & 2) They did it in such a way that they could be caught by the police.
Right. And all those speeders out there are still breaking speed limit laws. Too bad if you're the one pulled over.

Either way, this is bad state and county to be Ethan Ralph-tier misogynist.
The political climate in Stearns County, MN is moderately conservative.

In Stearns County, MN 37.6% of the people voted Democrat in the last presidential election, 60.1% voted for the Republican Party, and the remaining 2.4% voted Independent.

In the last Presidential election, Stearns county remained overwhelmingly Republican, 60.1% to 37.6%.
Stearns county voted Republican in every Presidential election since 2000.
1725419671624.jpeg
 
Bc Geno said "nice tats"?
Not quite. When my post isn’t cut up into multiple little parts that don’t contain my point by themselves, it’s clear that I’m speculating about the art vs pornography laws in the US & not focusing on the actual happenings atm in the case.

Nicks case relies heavily on Geno saying what type of photo he received to bump this to felony harassment. What if, not a nude, but an artful shot of a tattoo, and the nudity was blah blah blah. See where I was going? Speculating on that idea based on the post I quoted posing questions on that topic. The reality of what was said & done versus the heavy claims Nick is making in his complaint do seem relevant to what charges Aaron will plead to in the end. Aaron will most likely be pleading to something as he did share a photo with nudity to Geno. I don’t think the art thing is much of an argument, for the record either. Just mildly interesting to ponder for a moment.
Agree he is being a vindictive bitch. Quelle suprise. True to form. But Aaron handed this to him.
Aaron is dumb for sending that pic to another, & on air. I think we probably agree here. Imo, Nicks charges, (or the states if that’s what term you prefer, regardless of lawbook correct terminology) are not as ironclad as he thinks because he only fed partial info to the authorites in Stearns. He didn’t mention anything going on in Kandiyohi county, which is highly relevant to the nature of alleged harassment & what exactly happened on Aaron’s show the night in question. The main reason I say there’s big info missing is because Nick is revenge filing on Aaron to shut his ass up.

My personal opinion is that it’s all scummy.. Nick is full of shit & Aaron is a dumb sonovabitch.
 
Sean on his Aaron arraignment stream yesterday was baffled about what exculpatory information the prosecution may have in its discovery disclosure.

Whatever it is, the prosecution seems confident that preponderance of incriminating info trumps whatever may pass as exculpatory. Unless Kayla explicitly said "Aaron, this here nude pic is your hall pass to share to the world", Aaron's royally fucked six ways from Sunday.

Only things I can theorize (a.k.a pull outta my ass) that may pass for 'exculpatory' would be:

- A ton of Kayla's nudes (and snow angels) on Aaron's phone which were sent and taken between them, outside the foursome's Signal group chat, and they can't zero in on which one was screenshotted for Geno. Context may factor in if Kayla and Aaron had such an active nudie pics exchange between them that it bordered on exhibitionism.

- Evidence (via texts and phone calls) of cordial Kayla-Aaron communications post-arrest/post-nudes, or at worst Aaron apologizing to Kayla for posting it live on-air to Geno, which would contradict the 'falling out' they've claimed to have had at the time.

- Discrepancy between Aaron's and Geno/his cunt gf Keanu's accounts about sending the photo.......was the pic thoroughly memory-holed by both parties? Are they convicting Aaron based on him scrolling through his phone on-air then flexing to tattoo connoisseur Geno "ya boy didn't do bad, heh?" and forgot to say that it was 'all a bit'.
 

Attachments

  • Prosecution Exculpatory.jpg
    Prosecution Exculpatory.jpg
    384.4 KB · Views: 14
Last edited:

Circa 23 mins in, Aaron confirms the speculations that Rekieta, or someone he knows, has connections at Fox 9 to push the Aaron story.
And later, that there is an investigation going on into it.
Idk about that. It would mean Nick making sure someone else got more attention than himself.

Am I the only one who thinks this dude looks like Dwight Schrute?
 
Sean on his Aaron arraignment stream yesterday was baffled about what exculpatory information the prosecution may have in its discovery disclosure.

Whatever it is, the prosecution seems confident that preponderance of incriminating info trumps whatever may pass as exculpatory. Unless Kayla explicitly said "Aaron, this here nude pic is your hall pass to share to the world", Aaron's royally fucked six ways from Sunday.

Only things I can theorize (a.k.a pull outta my ass) that may pass for 'exculpatory' would be:

- A ton of Kayla's nudes (and snow angels) on Aaron's phone which were sent and taken between them, outside the foursome's Signal group chat, and they can't zero in on which one was screenshotted for Geno. Context may factor in if Kayla and Aaron had such an active nudie pics exchange between them that it bordered on exhibitionism.

- Evidence (via texts and phone calls) of cordial Kayla-Aaron communications post-arrest/post-nudes, or at worst Aaron apologizing to Kayla for posting it live on-air to Geno, which would contradict the 'falling out' they've claimed to have had at the time.

- Discrepancy between Aaron's and Geno/his cunt gf Keanu's accounts about sending the photo.......was the pic thoroughly memory-holed by both parties? Are they convicting Aaron based on him scrolling through his phone on-air then flexing to tattoo connoisseur Geno "ya boy didn't do bad, heh?" and forgot to say that it was 'all a bit'.

Sean on his Aaron arraignment stream yesterday was baffled about what exculpatory information the prosecution may have in its discovery disclosure.

Whatever it is, the prosecution seems confident that preponderance of incriminating info trumps whatever may pass as exculpatory. Unless Kayla explicitly said "Aaron, this here nude pic is your hall pass to share to the world", Aaron's royally fucked six ways from Sunday.

Only things I can theorize (a.k.a pull outta my ass) that may pass for 'exculpatory' would be:

- A ton of Kayla's nudes (and snow angels) on Aaron's phone which were sent and taken between them, outside the foursome's Signal group chat, and they can't zero in on which one was screenshotted for Geno. Context may factor in if Kayla and Aaron had such an active nudie pics exchange between them that it bordered on exhibitionism.

- Evidence (via texts and phone calls) of cordial Kayla-Aaron communications post-arrest/post-nudes, or at worst Aaron apologizing to Kayla for posting it live on-air to Geno, which would contradict the 'falling out' they've claimed to have had at the time.

- Discrepancy between Aaron's and Geno/his cunt gf Keanu's accounts about sending the photo.......was the pic thoroughly memory-holed by both parties? Are they convicting Aaron based on him scrolling through his phone on-air then flexing to tattoo connoisseur Geno "ya boy didn't do bad, heh?" and forgot to say that it was 'all a bit'.

I think something else. The charging document doesn't mention a lot:

Nature of relationship
The fact they all 3 face Felony drug charges
The fact Aaron is a witness.

Essentially, what did the cop know and not mention and what didn't she know? If that information is presented does it change the charges?
 
- A ton of Kayla's nudes (and snow angels) on Aaron's phone which were sent and taken between them, outside the foursome's Signal group chat, and they can't zero in on which one was screenshotted for Geno. Context may factor in if Kayla and Aaron had such an active nudie pics exchange between them that it bordered on exhibitionism.

- Evidence (via texts and phone calls) of cordial Kayla-Aaron communications post-arrest/post-nudes, or at worst Aaron apologizing to Kayla for posting it live on-air to Geno, which would contradict the 'falling out' they've claimed to have had at the time.
No mention is made of them examining the phones of anyone from the polycule. The prosecution had to rely on the descriptions of the image given by Kayla, Geno and Keanwhore to formulate the complaint, so not even that the image in question was shown to the police. They all had plenty of time between the sending of the image by Aaron and the filing of the complaint to scrub their phones and it's doubtful the police would waste resources on trying to restore deleted data in such a minor case.
 
No mention is made of them examining the phones of anyone from the polycule. The prosecution had to rely on the descriptions of the image given by Kayla, Geno and Keanwhore to formulate the complaint, so not even that the image in question was shown to the police. They all had plenty of time between the sending of the image by Aaron and the filing of the complaint to scrub their phones and it's doubtful the police would waste resources on trying to restore deleted data in such a minor case.
Holy crap, I forgot it was like a 6-7 week period between the alleged offence and the police report.

All parties were free to do whatever tf they want to with their phone and its contents during that period because:
1. They weren't subpoenaed (duh)
2. The St Cloud PD didn't include a DeLorean in their budget.
 
Last edited:
Holy crap, I forgot it was like a 6-7 week period between the alleged offence and the police report.

All parties were free to do whatever tf they want to with their phone and its contents during that period because:
1. They weren't subpoenaed (duh)
2. The St Cloud PD didn't include a DeLorean in their budget.
And Geno said live on air that April contacted him, so you already know they tried to coordinate this and Geno was not happy being implicated in this bullshit.
I really do not see him being available to testify.
 
Back