Because this continued on the now-last page:
It's always like that. In every cult, the most ardent followers are women. Even under Communism it was notable that the worst excesses were by women.
You're a gay furry.
A lot of modern cults have female membership because these women are pushed out of organized religion.
Some cults are founded by straight men (Nexium) and only recruit females, for obvious reasons.
Some cults are founded by gay men and only recruit males and sometimes female prostitutes, for equally obvious reasons.
Raelism is a sex cult which praises sluts and opposes modern feminism, it has twice as many men as women. Many men are faggots AND TROONS and the women are often prostitutes.
Theosophists were majority male and worshiped an ugly fat woman. Edison was a worshiper.
Yukio Mishima's followers were men.
Notable
Unification Church (Moonite) supporters are majority male.
Aum Shinrikyo perpetrators of the Tokyo subway sarin attack are/were all male and were successful in life.
Heaven's Gate members who killed themselves were 21 women and 18 men, but soon after 3 more male members offed themselves, thus making it even, and 1 non-member male committed a copycat suicide to hop a ride.
For whatever reason, I can't get the sex breakdown of the Branch Davidians, but a significant amount were married men who joined the cult as a family, with their wives and children, and willingly got cucked by Koresh.
Historically, Christianity and Buddhism, two cults that exalted weakness and compassion, were initially supported by wealthy widows.
Once they gained power, the priesthood had been historically male, until the liberalization that the gay furry would decry as heresy.
The most ardent followers of religions that worship strength have been men.
Buddhist nuns are rare, some branches of Buddhism do not allow nuns.
Cathars, an insidious secret cult, had notable female membership, and spread between women and from women to their men.
Russian orthodox monks outnumbered Russian orthodox nuns 4:1.
Most associations (consisting of a leader and followers) have have male followers; the women, if any, were property of specific men and had no choice whether to "follow" them or not.
Freemasons were (are) male and spiritually homosexual.
Medieval guilds were male, and grew out of church fraternities.
The Mormon Church was male head + male followers + the women they individually owned.
Communism exalts strength, so of course the greatest Communists have been men -- not because women are bad but because history is short, there was one generation from the illiteracy, retardation, and incest of tsarism and the subsequent Revolution and WW1.5 to the GPW, all three overwhelmingly fought by men. For every Maria Oktyabrskaya, there were dozens of Pokryshkins. Lenin's wife, the revolutionary Nadezhda Krupskaya, became a teacher and education official and stayed out of politics (once, after Lenin's death, she spoke out against Stalin and was told to stfu). Stalin's daughter was a liberal slut. There were only 4 women throughout the history of the Politburo. While the gay furry knows plenty of Western liberal women to accuse of being Communists (e.g. Kamala Harris), and perhaps a few female Soviet "investigators" (spies) active in the West, he would be hard-pressed to name a female Communist who lived
under Communism.
The best and the most ardent followers in history are soldiers, who historically have been men -- for reasons of pure physical strength and reproductive role, but gay furry scrotes will insist, that no, it's


psychology


, women are selfish, unreliable, hysterical thots,
men make better followers!!!111oneoneone, until they have a fap and their brain randomly reboots and loads a different buggy OS. It is tautologically true that, for a gay furry, women's organizations are by definition evil cults made up of retarded followers, and men's organizations are by definition virtuous and made up of stronk leaders.
Also,
@Iron Jaguar, stop fantasizing about gay wolves. Wolf families are matriarchal.
edit: finally (can't believe I missed this), while the distribution of heroism varies, the most evil people in an evil group are always its leaders. Leaders, being the brains, must sometimes abstain from heroism, but a follower by definition can't commit "the worst excesses" of anything. If the furry's gay screed is taken to be true, (1) Communist women are natural leaders, or (2) Communism is actually virtuous, at least one of these (or both!) must be true.
TL;DR solzhenitsyn lies as always.