Argue with Dr. Butt over ethics of revenge pornography, 4th dimensional molestation, and how pedophila is created

[ChromaQuack]

I don't understand when I said Nick is a hero. You must be about five years old to think that agreeing with the price of bail/bond for Aaron = exonerating Balldo. I think violating the boundaries of women is worse than doing drugs and leaving your gun on the floor or wherever. I did not call revenge porn "rape", I referred to the boundary-violoting as "rapey behaviour". Naked photo sharing is in the same category as troons desperate to piss in the women's toilets. Agreeing that bond for being a creepo should be high, is not the same as thinking Rekieta should go free. All these people are fuckups, but it's still bad for society to be nonconsensually sharing gash photos of said fuckups.

You downplay what Rekieta and Kayla did, constantly.

They didn't just 'get high', they neglected their children to the point they were dirty, hungry, missing school and one of them tested positive for cocaine. They invited two other adults (one of whom is the revenge pornographer in question) to be around the house and interact with their kids (Aaron would bring his own children to the Rekietamine household iirc, and either of the coke whores did mention the idea of them becoming a big 'family' of four adults and however many children they have combined).

This isn't daddy and mommy had whiskey and a line to wind down after the kids were sleeping, this was constant abuse and neglect.

And yes, I think constant, sustained child abuse is objectively worse than violating the boundaries of a whore, or even violating the boundaries of a non-whore.

Edit: Aaron's bond being as high as it is comes from him being a repeat offender of what I'll label 'being a creepy weirdo to every single woman in his life', and in the strictly legal sense the disputes he had with his ex-wife (not ape, the other one); the prosecutor choosing to slap him with an extra amount so he understands they won't be fucking around anymore is fine, but this is not what you're arguing, is it? you came here to wag your finger and argue about imagined scenarios that exist only in your head because you're a fucking retard.

 

[repentance]

And that's even before you get into the fact I have precious little sympathy for Kayla, and have trouble keeping a straight face while referring to her as a "victim" here.

The only reason I'm not making hay over this is I think @TherapyMan is right that they might have factored in Aaron's priors in calculating that bail. It's possible that Aaron's higher bail is defensible on that basis.

The judge explained her reasoning. Aaron has breached a restraining order against similar behaviour before. She wanted to set the amount high enough for it to act as a deterrent and have a meaningful impact if he breaches any restraining order again.

 

[Dr. Butt]

This isn't daddy and mommy had whiskey and a line to wind down after the kids were sleeping,

I know. They treated their children like shit. But now that you mention the priors, there you go. A man who's shown the mental proclivity towards shitty crimes has added "boundary violation that indicates a deeper problem" to the list.

I don't give a shit about Kayla. The charge for the naked pictures isn't about her, it's about the criminal potential of the man who spreads them. There are other women in the world, and a guy who acts like him should be held on pretty high bond for their sake.

Quit trying to equivocate Nick and Aaron, they're not the same.

I don't know these men and never said one of these men is worse. What I am, is agreeing that a hypothetical man who has boundary issues with women deserves to be imprisoned.

 

[Desktop User2]

I don't give a shit about Kayla. The charge for the naked pictures isn't about her, it's about the criminal potential of the man who spreads them. There are other women in the world

I can assure you there is a multitude of men and women that show their "prey" for their friends. It gets even worse the younger you go.
If Aaron would´ve done that with the intention to damage her reputation, I could understand what you are talking about; it was CLEARLY not the case.

 

[Dr. Butt]

Then you reach into your bag of feminist cliches like "boundary violating", "boundaries of women" and use a word like "rapey" to imply that revenge porn is the same as rape

A word like "rapey" has a definition more like "rape=esque". You're being very autistic to take this so literally. There are boundaries other than a woman's underpants. You can harass or show disregard for someone's personal safety in ways other than literal rape. You're very sensitive and angry at the English language.

I can assure you there is a multitude of men and women that show their "prey" for their friends. It gets even worse the younger you go.

And those people need to be stopped, possibly executed.

 

[ChromaQuack]

And those people need to be stopped, possibly executed.

Sir/Ma'am, this is the Nick Rekieta thread.

 

[BaddestSeagull]

What I am, is agreeing that a hypothetical man who has boundary issues with women deserves to be imprisoned.

Meh. I honestly don't know a single woman, myself included, who believes that what Aaron did (show a nude he received voluntarily to a friend to brag that a woman he banged has a nice body, especially with how nicely he was talking about Kayla at that time) should land him (or rather, any man) in prison. It's not rapey. It's not especially violating. It's whatever - can potentially range from asshole behavior to *shrug*. He shouldn't have done that, it's dumb and immature and yeah, he most probably broke his state's law. But morally, in the grand scheme of things? Meh.

Nick moved his side piece in and did loads of coke in the same house where his children didn't have clean clothes or easily accessible food. Fuck Nick forever.

 

[Captain Manning]

What the fuck is it with weirdos shitting up this thread lately? This is the second day in a row. Yesterday it was that fool white-knighting Melton.

And those people need to be stopped, possibly executed.

Yeah, that's demented.

I don't condone "revenge pornography," and I think it should carry some penalty in a number of cases, but the thought of imposing capital punishment for it is utterly ridiculous.

You shot yourself in the foot when you came in here arguing that Aaron's crime is worse than Nick's, and now you're digging yourself in deeper by insinuating Aaron might need to be killed. This is just dumb.

This is just Dax not wearing the wig. You aren't fooling me.

Shit. Now I can't unsee it.

 

[Dr. Butt]

You shot yourself in the foot when you came in here arguing that Aaron's crime is worse than Nick's

I'm not ranking crimes, I said I agreed with his higher bond. The photo sharing is indicative of a mental state that facilitates fucked-up actions towards women. If society makes a habit of keeping an eye on these guys and actually punishing them, we won't have to have any more threads about weirdo rapists and pedos full of people commenting "weren't there signs???? couldn't they have done something sooner???" My opinion was based on that and not anything to do with the specifics of this gangbang/social circle.

 

[sallowhal]

i was always told to never take a picture you wouldn't want your grandparents to see. that once you send it or post it, it's out there forever and can get into anyone's hands.

why was kayla never given that talk? i would blame her parents, but she's a grown mother of nearly half a dozen kids. how does she not know better?

considering nick was trying to get keanu in on the qover, i wonder if the picture was shared with consent initially in an attempt to sway her and geno to get in on the action. and only after the polycule ejected aaron did it become an issue they wanted to pursue.

 

[AncientPhosphur]

You shouldn’t take nude photos on a digital device with internet access because the NSA will get them. You shouldn’t send your nude photos to others because you have even less control of where it goes (for example think of all the Indians at the phone company). Revenge porn is also bad because it betrays trust and let’s be honest you’re probably not as hot as you think and no one wants to see that.

I think that covers it all.

 

[DSP for president 2032]

Revenge porn is pedo-adjacent, just like AGP is serial killer-adjacent.

I'm not trying to make any kind of statement about the validity of this argument, but has anyone ever told you that you sound like a complete maniac?

 

[AltisticRight]

I love this title.
Also OP raped me behind an Arby's in 1987. Where is my justice?

 

[Not At All A Lizard]

Being a retard on the internet is being a retard in real life adjacent.