War California moves to crack down on snacks like Flamin' Hot Cheetos, Takis

The California Legislature passed a bill that prohibits schools from serving snacks that contain certain synthetic food dyes because, according to lawmakers, those dyes can cause behavioral and developmental problems in children.

Assembly Bill 2316, which was sent to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk last week, would require snack-makers to remove the dyes from their products if they want them served in California schools. The additives are used in Flamin’ Hot Cheetos, Takis and other colorful snacks.

Assemblymember Jesse Gabriel, a Democrat from Encino, sponsored the measure. In a news release, he said the issue was personal to him because of his own experience with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and he cited research from the California Environmental Protection Agency, which found that eating synthetic food dyes can worsen hyperactivity and other neurobehavioral problems in some kids.

“As a lawmaker, a parent, and someone who struggled with ADHD, I find it unacceptable that we allow schools to serve foods with additives that are linked to hyperactivity and neurobehavioral harms,” Gabriel said in the release. “This bill will empower schools to better protect the health and wellbeing of our kids and encourage manufacturers to stop using these harmful additives.”

Newsom needs to sign the bill before it becomes law.

The six synthetic dyes Gabriel’s bill is targeting are yellow 5, yellow 6, blue 1, blue 2, green 3 and red 40. Those dyes can be found in snacks ranging from gummy worms to chocolate bars.

Gabriel was also the author of a bill that made headlines last year. Initially, Gabriel wanted to ban foods that contained titanium dioxide, an ingredient found in Skittles. However, that provision was eventually removed from Assembly Bill 418, and the resulting legislation prohibited the manufacture and sale of foods that contained four other common food additives.

In his news release, Gabriel stressed that his bill would not ban snacks like Flamin’ Hot Cheetos and Twinkies outright: “AB 2316 would not ban specific foods or products, but rather encourage companies to make minor modifications to products sold in California and could help prompt a nationwide transition to safer alternative ingredients.” Kids would also be free to bring such snacks with them to school.

Gabriel said his bill is the first of its kind in the nation. The legislation has been endorsed by California State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond.

“Healthy, safe school meals are foundational to our students’ wellness and ability to learn,” Thurmond said in the release. “As someone who depended on school meals growing up, I know how critical it is that our children receive food at school that is nutritious and is never harmful.”

 
The last time this bill came up I said the same thing. Schools already should NOT be selling Cheetos or Takis because there are existing rules from both CDE and the USDA regarding nutrition standards for competitive foods. Cheetos and Takis far exceed the sodium and total fat percentage allowed. I really don't understand the point of this legislation, it's just one dude sperging about food dyes and picking the obvious but pointless target.

(Note: kids can still bring these items with them, they just can't buy them AT school.)
 
One example is titanium dioxide, which is allowed in NA, not allowed in EU, and known to damage DNA. All it does is make food marginally brighter. Left has it, right does not.
Titanium dioxide is just the most common white pigment we commonly use, it's in everything you think of as white. If it was harmful at all we'd have all died a century ago.
What is the fucking point? Side by side with pickles that didn't use yellow 4 (they used turmeric for color instead) looked identical, so what's the point?
Because the dye is cheaper than the spice?

If they get rid of hot chip, then what's next lies? Twerking? Being bisexual? Charging they phone?
 
I hate ultra processed food but there has to be an actual cultural shift to make a change. Start by showing people exactly what’s in these foods and how they’re made to make them revolted by those foods. Show them what these foods can lead to other than obesity. (Which is obvious) otherwise they’ll never get banned because it’s far too profitable.
I’m not against this. The bar should have always been much higher for approving “cosmetic” food additives.

It’s dumb that California is doing this. Isn’t this supposed to be the job of the FDA to keep the food supply clean?

Oh wait, the FDA is a retarded rubber stamp organization.
The FDA knows what poison is in these foods but doesn’t do anything about it because it’s intentional. A fat and stupid population is easier to control.
 
Last edited:
The California Legislature passed a bill that prohibits schools from serving snacks that contain certain synthetic food dyes because, according to lawmakers, those dyes can cause behavioral and developmental problems in children.
That is pseudoscience, the dyes don't do anything to kids. However, growing up with too much processed food in general might. But it should be the parent's role to provide healthy choices and not the schools trying to force it on kids.
They're not going to die or be unhealthy just from having chips and a pizza slice for a school lunch. Maybe the schools could have both healthy and unhealthy meals and people can choose what they feel like.
 
Synthetic dyes only exist to make this slop more appealing to us.
I think it's also so that the film crew hired by marketing doesn't pull their hair out (further) putting up and fixing the lighting to make it look good on camera. Helps just a hair.

I want off this ride.
 
No big deal, will still be available, just not sold at school. Don't eat that spicy shit anyway. Also pick out all the red and blue M&Ms when I eat M&M's, those dyes taste nasty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neo-Nazi Rich Evans
Its true ....cut these processed shit completely. American School lunches are the worst in the world. You go to any other school lunches in Asia and you get a variety of selections .....all fresh.

And the school lunches aren't cheap either. You'd think processed shit should cost less but it doesn't.
This is largely because school lunch is contracted out to Aramark. I'm old enough (or rural enough) to remember when school cafeterias were bulk-stewing beans in the back and just hired grandmas and retired military cooks whose grandchildren typically attended the school.
 
California is the stopped clock on this one. I can't disagree, as someone who is experiencing an awakening when it comes to processed food and nutrition. I see nothing bad with this, hopefully it leads to more. People should have freedom to eat shit if they want, but don't force it on kids in school.
 
Titanium dioxide is just the most common white pigment we commonly use, it's in everything you think of as white. If it was harmful at all we'd have all died a century ago.

Because the dye is cheaper than the spice?

If they get rid of hot chip, then what's next lies? Twerking? Being bisexual? Charging they phone?
It's like California Prop 65 or for those who aren't familiar "It is known in the State of California to cause cancer," and all. This doesn't come from expert opinions, it's literal from a board of bureaucrats that decide whether or not things are banned for sale in Cali based on some study they read that may or may not be shit. Like the time they almost banned styrene gas completely in Cali. Styrene gas is hazardous in extremely large concentrations, typically only found in the production of polystyrene, which the plastics industry already deals with, but the allowed quantity would have been smaller than what foam off gasses just sitting around. They'd have banned every white foam cooler in the state and only stopped when the industry wrote enough letters politely pointing out that the state was being retarded based off a single bad study.

I'm not saying Cali is wrong for this, I'm saying Cali is too retarded to trust with this.
 
im amazed that schools sell this stuff to kids, i recall at my school we never had the option to buy this stuff. the only thing we got was the standard lunch tray, with maybe a few choices about do you want green beans or corn, that sort of thing.

This is largely because school lunch is contracted out to Aramark. I'm old enough (or rural enough) to remember when school cafeterias were bulk-stewing beans in the back and just hired grandmas and retired military cooks whose grandchildren typically attended the school.
must be very old then, i was in school 20 years ago, rural one at that, and it was all contracted out slop.
 
must be very old then, i was in school 20 years ago, rural one at that, and it was all contracted out slop.

I was in school in the late 2000's. The food was nothing but that and uncrustables. Also super donuts, which I love.

Very early 90's for me, and the elementary school I went to still had actual industrial kitchen appliances (for lack of a better term because I don't know what they are called) and prepared vegetables, bread, and other actual food things rather than microwaving shit or heating up a giant sheet of chicken patties. By the time I reached high school however, they were serving what I assume was the Aramark slop.
 
The California Legislature passed a bill that prohibits schools from serving snacks that contain certain synthetic food dyes because, according to lawmakers, those dyes can cause behavioral and developmental problems in children.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
That's whats causing problems for the kids, Caliniggers; food dye?

I cannot pray hard enough for the complete and absolute nuclear annihilation of Southern California. No survivors.
 
Back