Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

[Iron Jaguar]

Apparently it's run really poorly, the mods are all cunts who warn/ban people at the drop of a hat, they go on witch hunts accusing anyone who posts anything against groupthink of being a man who should be banned

So that's why Beauty Parlor originally came into existence

Which is run by the same mods, apparently.

Anyway, I think the concept of a site for women isn't bad....but I just don't see how it would not eventually turn into a feminist echo chamber.

 

[Executive Petrel]

Anyway, I think the concept of a site for women isn't bad....but I just don't see how it would not eventually turn into a feminist echo chamber.

Nothing wrong about it as long as they don't allow troons.

 

[Iron Jaguar]

Nothing wrong about it as long as they don't allow troons.

I fully support that idea...but don't see it happening.

 

[The Ugly One]

Where is the evidence that Teddy Roosevelt was a simp?

He's the guy responsible for getting suffrage as a plank in the Republican Party's platform.

 

[STARS158]

This pathetic "comedienne" is a good example of women being unable to think about consequences or the future. The joke is cringe and pathetic if you have any awareness of the future at all. Like, how long do you think the cat comparisons can last, you mentally stunted slut?

"Aiden just learned to read."
"Aiden made the JV basketball squad."
"Aiden got into the EE program at state."
"Aiden's wedding is this June."
"Aiden is coming to visit this Christmas and is bringing my new grandson!"

Try matching a cat to that, you dumb bitch.

Well considering the requirements for graduating these days

 

[World Famous Quasi Payer]

The only major difference is that these people still buy into the trad shit, whereas I don't see a way that humanity will be able to do so for much longer.

The people who are actually trad, barring serious government crack down, are going to be fine. What won't survive is the neo-trad larping 1950s aesthetics while adopting the post-1960s liberal order. These tend to be the same people who are "conservative" but are just speed-limit liberals.

I think you are overly optimistic in what genetically engineering people is going to allow. Oh yes you can make them faster, stronger, smarter, healthier, longer-lived, but you can't tamper with independence or critical thinking to much and expect to have anything beyond low-iq slaves.

 

[Squishie PP]

The people who are actually trad, barring serious government crack down, are going to be fine. What won't survive is the neo-trad larping 1950s aesthetics while adopting the post-1960s liberal order. These tend to be the same people who are "conservative" but are just speed-limit liberals.

Yeah, I figured as such. Serious government crackdown is definitely in the cards though. The end of the petrodollar and the outstanding debt that the US government owes is going to result in them trying to result in them trying to confiscate as much money from the population as they possibly can. In order to do so, they will rely on both conventional and unconventional means.

I think you are overly optimistic in what genetically engineering people is going to allow. Oh yes you can make them faster, stronger, smarter, healthier, longer-lived, but you can't tamper with independence or critical thinking to much and expect to have anything beyond low-iq slaves.

We can already enhance critical thinking without genetic engineering via pharmaceuticals (Adderall, Ritalin, other "ADHD" meds) while simultaneously reducing the likelihood that the subject will be disruptive. To see this in action, just ask around to see how many parents have their younger boys on said drugs. If it can be done now, the same thing can be done via genetic engineering by simply introducing semi-deleterious or inducible mutations into the molecule responsible for dopamine reuptake. It could even be inducible via electromagnetic radiation-sensitive transcription factors. All sorts of crazy things can be done.
My point about the genetic engineering though isn't that I want it to happen; but that it is going to happen whether any of us like it or not. So I wouldn't really consider my opinion to be optimisitc.

 

[Car Won't Crank]

My point about the genetic engineering though isn't that I want it to happen; but that it is going to happen whether any of us like it or not. So I wouldn't really consider my opinion to be optimisitc.

I would rather choose to put myself in a metal or inorganic body like that of the Silicon Life in Nihei's Blame! manga instead of being an organic biochemical mess if/when humanity gets to that point.

 

[The Ugly One]

I think you are overly optimistic in what genetically engineering people is going to allow. Oh yes you can make them faster, stronger, smarter, healthier, longer-lived, but you can't tamper with independence or critical thinking to much and expect to have anything beyond low-iq slaves.

Genetic engineering doesn't matter if you're still at a 1.1 birth rate.

 

[Squishie PP]

I would rather choose to put myself in a metal or inorganic body like that of the Silicon Life in Nihei's Blame! manga instead of being an organic biochemical mess if/when humanity gets to that point.

I used to want that years ago, but the "Brain of Theseus" problem never seemed to be resolved. In any case, I wouldn't want to be the first one to try that.

 

[Buttigieg2020]

Genetic engineering doesn't matter if you're still at a 1.1 birth rate.

If we ever perfect artificial gestation, Amazon, Foxconn, etc. will be able to make as many workers as necessary to Make the Line Go Up™.

They won’t need to even pretend to care about the family unit.

Blade Runner is a great movie btw.

 

[The Punished Mitch]

I can't wait for foids to opt for four more years of economic and societal demolition over having their ability to kill children being in any way restricted.

 

[The Ugly One]

I can't wait for foids to opt for four more years of economic and societal demolition over having their ability to kill children being in any way restricted.

Way more women live sex-centered lives and care about absolutely nothing as much than their ability to find a dick to ride. If the Republican Party were going to seal the border, stop printing money, stop handing out gibs to niggers, stop pozzing the schools, and shut down the ATF, but also ban condoms, I'd vote for them. I wouldn't even hesitate. Living in a society that isn't turning into a toilet and isn't letting kids get sexually abused by trooning them out is more important sExUaL frEeDom.

 

[Squishie PP]

If we ever perfect artificial gestation, Amazon, Foxconn, etc. will be able to make as many workers as necessary to Make the Line Go Up™.

They won’t need to even pretend to care about the family unit.

Blade Runner is a great movie btw.

Yeah, thats pretty much where I see things headed. The gestation may not even need to be entirely artificial if transgenic females are created with the sole purpose of repeatedly giving birth and absolutely nothing else. I'm genuinely surpised that a "woman hate thread" hasn't ever brought this up, but then again it seems to be a "wifegoys make futile attempts to shame all other parties" thread to some extent.

I can't wait for foids to opt for four more years of economic and societal demolition over having their ability to kill children being in any way restricted.

What can you do with a holocaust-sized quantity of fetal stem cells?

 

[World Famous Quasi Payer]

We can already enhance critical thinking without genetic engineering via pharmaceuticals (Adderall, Ritalin, other "ADHD" meds) while simultaneously reducing the likelihood that the subject will be disruptive. To see this in action, just ask around to see how many parents have their younger boys on said drugs.

Adderall doesn't make you docile. It makes you less impulsive. Getting a boy to focus in school isn't the same as removing or limiting the parts which allows a person to question authority.

My point about the genetic engineering though isn't that I want it to happen; but that it is going to happen whether any of us like it or not. So I wouldn't really consider my opinion to be optimisitc.

I meant in terms of what you think can be done with it. I agree that it is coming regardless if we like it or not.

Yeah, thats pretty much where I see things headed. The gestation may not even need to be entirely artificial if transgenic females are created with the sole purpose of repeatedly giving birth and absolutely nothing else. I'm genuinely surpised that a "woman hate thread" hasn't ever brought this up, but then again it seems to be a "wifegoys make futile attempts to shame all other parties" thread to some extent.

Nobody has brought it up as a solution because it's simply the wrong one, and I don't mean that in a "wife guy" way, but in the overcoming women way. The entire goal of artificial gestation, or non-natural human reproduction is to exclude the woman from it. To remove her completely. Not to imprison her. If that was the goal, ideologies like islam or marxism would be the solution. They aren't.

If we ever perfect artificial gestation, Amazon, Foxconn, etc. will be able to make as many workers as necessary to Make the Line Go Up™.

They won’t need to even pretend to care about the family unit.

Blade Runner is a great movie btw.

Children raised by single parents have worse life outcomes than children raised in two parent households. Children raised in non-traditional households (like gay ones) have worse life outcomes than children raised in traditional households. It makes more sense for Amazon to replace workers with machines than to produce company babies.

I can't wait for foids to opt for four more years of economic and societal demolition over having their ability to kill children being in any way restricted.

I think at this point it is clear to all honest people that women, collectively, have a problem with life or living. Women seem to be keen on anything that harms life or makes life miserable for everyone. Abortion, illegal invaders, soft on crime, high taxation welfare states with horrible service, etc...

 

[Pool's Closed Due to AIDS]

Yeah, thats pretty much where I see things headed.

What's your source on this?
Noting that I do not consider the voices you hear from your microwave telling you to eat your own pubes to be credible or reliable sources.

I'm genuinely surpised that a "woman hate thread" hasn't ever brought this up, but then again it seems to be a "wifegoys make futile attempts to shame all other parties" thread to some extent.

As men who have zero difficulty talking to and having sex with women, we're not fixating on cadaveric tissue tanks from fantasy novels as a distraction from our own failures.
That's why it's not brought up.

You sound like a tranny praying to the cockchop fairies for a uterus transplant.
Artificial wombs will never be a reality.
You have a fundamental misunderstanding of what we can realistically achieve with medicine and technology.

You also seem to lack an understanding of normal male behaviour.
Just because women encourage lunacy, trauma dumping, and fertility cope in their discussion forums (Reddit, Ovarit, or LCF) doesn't mean that should be accepted here.

This is why, even if I was unmarried, I will continue to shame you when you talk like a faggot.

 

[Iron Jaguar]

Children raised by single parents have worse life outcomes than children raised in two parent households.

This is indisputably true and the correlation between Single Mom and Eventual Imprisonment has been well understood for many decades. Any prison officer/public defender will confirm it. Yet if you mention it to women, they'll Reeee until they're blue in the face.

 

[Squishie PP]

Children raised by single parents have worse life outcomes than children raised in two parent households. Children raised in non-traditional households (like gay ones) have worse life outcomes than children raised in traditional households. It makes more sense for Amazon to replace workers with machines than to produce company babies.

You know how many dog breeds have a predisposition to play fetch because they were bred to retrieve hunted objects? Imagine if human beings had genetic predispositions for moving boxes in warehouses, operating construction equipment, or any other tasks meant for the job. Manipulating pyschological predispositions at the genomic level would alleviate a lot of the difficulty of "raising" these empty, semi-human shells.

As for the robot thing: Biological organisms are self-repairing, but if a robot breaks down it requires maintainence. This is the same reason why companies would rather import hordes of third-worlders than invest in robotics. Genetic engineering would also require a large amount of R&D, but would result in a workforce that is even easier to maintain than robots, and that unlike immigrant labor, has much more predictable behavior.

Nobody has brought it up as a solution because it's simply the wrong one, and I don't mean that in a "wife guy" way, but in the overcoming women way. The entire goal of artificial gestation, or non-natural human reproduction is to exclude the woman from it. To remove her completely. Not to imprison her. If that was the goal, ideologies like islam or marxism would be the solution. They aren't.

No, the socioeconomic incentive driving the elites to use artificial gestation would be to produce new workers at a faster rate than women can.
It could go a number of different ways. The example I gave was just to illustrate what the process might start out as, since 100% artificial gestation would require a lot more research and development. In another thread I described another outcome where the MtF trannies currently getting psyop'd into having pregnancy fetishes end up volunteering themselves as lab rats for artificial womb construction as another way to bootstrap the creation of this technology. It could also start at the surrogacy industry, where currently black women are basically being used for this purpose anyways. They have always been lab rats for the biomedical industry, so I wouldn't be surprised if it starts there either.

My point is that I am more focused on the eventual outcome than the way to get there. No matter which way it goes, the transition (lol) process to get there is guaranteed to be gruesome and barbaric. But do we have a choice in the matter?

Edit: Just noticed the "show me anyways" button at the bottom of my screen. Don't know who it is (have several people set to ignore now, and I won't click on the button to see as that defeats the entire purpose,) but if you have given me a reason to block you and are replying to me then you are simply wasting your own time. I like sperging out about shit like this, and if you don't like it you are free to do other things with your life.

 

[Pool's Closed Due to AIDS]

(I) have several people set to ignore now, and I won't click on the button to see as that defeats the entire purpose,) but if you have given me a reason to block you and are replying to me then you are simply wasting your own time.

Bros, this is the next generation.

>tfw NGMI

 

[World Famous Quasi Payer]

Artificial wombs will never be a reality.
You have a fundamental misunderstanding of what we can realistically achieve with medicine and technology.

And people said the exact same things about space flight, heart transplants, nuclear energy/atomic bomb, electricity, mass handheld communication, going to the bottom of the ocean, etc...

Seems to be an awful lot of men who have proven people like you who say something can't be done wrong.

No, the socioeconomic incentive driving the elites to use artificial gestation would be to produce new workers at a faster rate than women can.

The elites incentives for line go up and the incentives of plebians who post are sites like this are two different things. But regardless, the over aching goal is to remove the woman from the process, even if the start of that process involves real women. The ideal is no women involved.