Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

[There Is Light At The End]

"The End" could be tomorrow or another millennium

We are very close to the third world war, so yeah

 

[Party Hat Wurmple]

Lol. Lmao even - "childless cat lady"

Those Haitians bout to make her just a childless lady.

 

[saintJogger]

Regardless, I think we can all agree that the nignog is dumber than she is evil.

Then again, the woman is the nigger of the world. It is a perfect expression, isn't it? Both are impulsive and unable to see the consequences of their actions in the long term due to the inability to think above what they're feeling right now in this very moment.

 

[KittyGremlin]

Then again, the woman is the nigger of the world. It is a perfect expression, isn't it? Both are impulsive and unable to see the consequences of their actions in the long term due to the inability to think above what they're feeling right now in this very moment.

But if someone is a stupid nigger, do they have the moral agency to be evil, and thus, be something you can hate?

 

[DavidS877]

whenever i have sex i intentionally make sure the woman does not orgasm

That's not a nice thing to do to your mom...or your sister.

I don't think they care as long as you leave the payment on the nightstand.

 

[Squishie PP]

Do women even have any existential reflection on the meaning of growing up and leaving childhood behind?

If the age regression community is any indication, at least some of them do. Then again a lot of those are trannies, so who really knows.

Looking at Taylor Swift vs virtually any male pop act is a nice exercise into just how completely women's lives revolve around their relationships with men. Every single track on Swift's megahit album, 1989, is about boys. Let's look at another pop rock album, Human Clay, Creed's 1999 megahit. I'm intentionally looking at pop rock instead of something intentionally niche and cerebral. Here's what each song is about:

Taylor Shreck..er I mean Swift was absolutely manufactured specifically for the purpose of controlling the behavior tree of women, just like many other (((mainstream music industry))) puppets. There is a lot of weird shit surrounding her rise to stardom that is beyond the scope of this thread.

 

[Kujo Jotaro]

the woman is the nigger of the world

If the woman is the nigger of the world, does that make niggers the woman of the world?

Are you saying we should break bucks?

 

[Towoman]

the woman is the nigger of the world

No women are the jewish gender. A nigger has a concept of honor and may face confrontation headon without immedietly falling back on backhanded tactics.

 

[World Famous Quasi Payer]

You're ignoring that the average IQ is now decreasing in Western societies due to the importation of infinity niggers, the physical health of the average person declining due to fatness, academia and science research being controlled by certain interests, and, instead of studying hard like Tesla, autists now cope on the Kiwifarms when they're too beta to pick up chicks.

The state being able to mass produce new citizens so line goes up is something the "certain interests" are absolutely interested in. You also forget IQ decline isn't happening in Japan, or South Korea. I say the artificial womb is more likely than not.

The ruling class won’t stop at mass-producing people in vats.

What is presently painted as women’s liberation will, in the end, constitute women’s obsoletion, aside from a tiny minority who will belong to immensely powerful dynastic families of permanent rentier manor lords that control all of the actual material wealth, and who will basically be obligated to be housewives and produce successive generations of oligarch children.

If they can grow people in vats, than their is no reason for the rich powerful women to produce children. Unless you somehow think your elites will abandon the liberal principles that make them into tyrants in the first place.

Women: "tee-hee, I got this guy to do manual labour for me and didn't even give him anything in return, I'm so quirky"
Also women: "boo-hoo, why won't the guy who fucked me answer my texts, this is borderline rape"

That's really on him. His ass went over there. His ass put together the ikea shit for free. Should have hit it before hand.

 

[The Ugly One]

If they can grow people in vats, than their is no reason for the rich powerful women to produce children.

There's no reason for rich, powerful women or any women at all to exist. Women do not have a single advantage over men for any task that is unrelated to nurturing new life.

 

[saintJogger]

But if someone is a stupid nigger, do they have the moral agency to be evil, and thus, be something you can hate?

That's actually a very good question, I hadn't thought about that. Do I hate a great white shark for chewing up a surfer? No, I don't, because sharks don't intentionally attack people, they only do that when they mistake a human for a school of fish. Do I hate one of those chimpanzees they use in movies for going apeshit and tearing apart some dude in the filming crew limb for limb? No, because they only do that when mistreated, although they tend to do that at a drop of a hat. Both of those are animals and widely known not to have any agency. But we do put down chimpanzees and dogs and elephants and whatnot for attacking humans. Not out of hate, or because we think they're evil, but because their life is less valuable for us for obvious reasons.

It does get more complicated when we're talking about niggers or women. They are considered as humans, after all, and thus should hold moral agency. But then again, you may want to look at some gore sites and find an abundance of content from Africa where they necklace each other for petty things, or just in general torture each other with things like gas-powered weed cutters. Does that sound like something a society filled with people who have moral agency does? No, it doesn't. Women torture people too, it's just in their nature to lean on the side of psychological torture, unless the subject is a child, or otherwise in a position of not being able to physically defend themselves. Both do these aforementioned things just like the sharks and chimpanzees, in a frenzy of the moment, without any pre-formed plan. This would seem, in fact, indicate no agency, moral or otherwise, which I guess is to say, that their actions are not evil in the purest, actual sense of the concept.

But they are both considered as people, which is why they should have at least learned to emulate holding agency, and why I feel comfortable hating both groups.

 

[Squishie PP]

The state being able to mass produce new citizens so line goes up is something the "certain interests" are absolutely interested in. You also forget IQ decline isn't happening in Japan, or South Korea. I say the artificial womb is more likely than not.

Or China for that matter. They are heavily invested in biotech and AI/bioinformatics tech (both of which are necessary for this endeavour,) and will continue to develop those. The West can deteriorate into oblivion for all they care; did blocked guy really think the research was going to be done here? Hell no. We are now the guinea pigs, not the scientists running the show.

There's no reason for rich, powerful women or any women at all to exist. Women do not have a single advantage over men for any task that is unrelated to nurturing new life.

Knowing the elite, they will want to genetically engineer women who never physically mature at all in order to fulfill their pedophilic desires.

 

[popnloch ness monster]

A nigger has a concept of honor

 

[saintJogger]

That's really on him. His ass went over there. His ass put together the ikea shit for free. Should have hit it before hand.

That is true. I'd say I hope he learned his lesson, but niggers and learning don't seem to work well together.

 

[Squishie PP]

gotta get dat chase sheeeit

 

[Biggie Smalls' Taint]

If the woman is the nigger of the world, does that make niggers the woman of the world?

Are you saying we should break bucks?

Niggers are female coded. Hear me out:
>Obsessed with their hair
>Way too into shoes
>They wear jewelry and designer clothes as status symbols
>always late
>emotional, prone to extreme mood swings
>allergic to consequences
>bad at math

 

[Unyielding Stupidity]

Maybe like @Pool's Closed Due to AIDS said it's just part of the male lizard brain to protect women at any cost no matter whatever retarded shit they do and say. As long as we males keep shielding women's retarded thoughts and actions and not let them get a reality check everything is going to get worse.

It's a prisoner's dilemma situation. Sure, if every single single man stopped protecting women from having any amount of accountability, then they might actually learn to take some. But all it takes is a few men breaking the ranks and becoming simps in a desperate attempt to get pussy, and the whole plan falls apart.

The guys I know who had the most sex were often rampant misogynists. Sure they had other things going for them, but their low opinion of women never got in the way of pulling them -- and a lot of them were decent women that guys would consider wife material. The poster brought up some good points and you deflected with boomer wife guy material and lame admonishments.

Checks out. Knew one guy who was relatively attractive and had great success with women, and he basically admitted that he'd love-bomb chicks and pretend he wanted a long-term relationship so they'd have sex with him, and then he'd ghost them the moment they started asking for actual commitment. Also had a habit of repeatedly calling women sluts/whores (despite being a manwhore himself), and mentioned how he'd specifically go after "mid" women because they were, in his words, "super easy".
Apparently the detectors women use to detect bad men weren't calibrated for him.

 

[The Ugly One]

Checks out. Knew one guy who was relatively attractive and had great success with women, and he basically admitted that he'd love-bomb chicks and pretend he wanted a long-term relationship so they'd have sex with him, and then he'd ghost them the moment they started asking for actual commitment. Also had a habit of repeatedly calling women sluts/whores (despite being a manwhore himself), and mentioned how he'd specifically go after "mid" women because they were, in his words, "super easy".
Apparently the detectors women use to detect bad men weren't calibrated for him.

Huh. After we stopped "fetishizing virginity" and "liberated" women to "take control of their sexuality," they ended up more likely to be manipulated and used by some jerk who doesn't give a shit about them and will tell any lie he has to in order to get in their pants. Nobody could have predicted this!

 

[Hazel Motes]

But if someone is a stupid nigger, do they have the moral agency to be evil, and thus, be something you can hate?

Hating women is like hating the fire that burns down your house. I mean, it did burn it down, but that is what fire does when it spreads and gets out of control. It is sad and disheartening to see your life go up in smoke, but it is irrational to hate the fire because of it. It had no choice in burning or not. And anyway, fire has its uses. It keeps people warm at night and lights up dark paths when it is controlled.

Now hating and seeking to punish the arsonist who started the blaze...

Moral philosophy is a man's game made by the male (or God's) mind. It should be expected women do not care for it. Men are all about winning and losing in life. The search for truth, moral and spiritual, is a male urge, not a woman's longing. Nevertheless, society, which is made for women, can only survive with strong moral foundations. And women thrive in that area. Church Ladies are the backbone of any congregation. The greatest female novelist, Jane Austen, is so great because she is fully imbedded to the social aspects of people's actions and the unconscious match making involved in those little nations, the family. Goethe, with his weeping heroes who commit suicide, questions and inspires adventure. He is on the fringes and he has nothing to say about the inner workings of a successful marriage (his last novel is no exception. Bad advice all around). But society needs boundary pushers to understand its own limits and to state that society is not everything a man should inspire for.

If anyone reads Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley (the mother of the Frankenstein creator) then one realises that what the first feminists wanted was women to cease being women and become men (she is very explicit about it). That way, they could be moral upstanding and pursue virtuous actions. Plato had very similar views in The Republic. I don't think that is healthy position as successful manish women and successful womanish men (not troons) are rare and usually lacking something in character.

People who genuinely hate women expect them to be something they are not. They wish them to be an ideal that never existed save for bad novels written by perverts, for perverts are usually the quickest to venerate women-kind. Once reality turns them down, then they become scorned, thinking love was only made for fairytales. Real erotic romances, are either like Tristian and Isolde, Romeo and Juliet, Hero and Leander, where the young and passionate couple die before there is any thoughts of marriage. Or they are like Kate and Petruchio in the Taming of the Shrew, where you have to look at the humour and the natural combative attitude of it all to enjoy it.

The truth will set you free. Once you realise that, then the problem is on you to come to terms with it. And the further we climb the colder nature reveals herself to our feelings, but we can never go back down, not without some mighty fine cope to lather over ourselves. Would we want to do that anyway? I look back on my teenage notions of love as quite disingenuous. I may have thought myself romantic but we all know how easily we lie to ourselves and I would have happily been content with just getting my leg over a few more times. I am not going pretend however, because I think it is for the best to be honest with yourself, that I do not still have some feeling of childish romance flooding my mind when I meet a certain type of woman. That is just who I am. I emphasis with anyone that feels similar, but it is not something worth becoming angry about.

 

[Drain Todger]

If they can grow people in vats, than their is no reason for the rich powerful women to produce children. Unless you somehow think your elites will abandon the liberal principles that make them into tyrants in the first place.

That may be so, but for the ruling class, it has been my observation that those liberal principles are just something they pay lip service to, which don’t have any real substance or weight among their own kind. Oligarch families are, as a rule, very patriarchal and have few female representatives. There are exceptions (Lynn Forester de Rothschild comes to mind), but most of them are just there to provide heirs, and I doubt they’d use any technology on their own bloodlines that they didn’t trust implicitly.