Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

but jews don't have boobies and make my peepee feel silly

Does that mean jewish women are superjews? 🤔🤔

johnandkozenra.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
but if i give her a billion dollars in capital and don't subject her company to anything resembling due diligence and put her on the cover of forbes maybe she will touch my peepee
I assume you are talking about Elizabeth Holmes. That company's extremely secretive practices and initial positive (((media))) treatment out of absolutely nowhere give me the hebrew-jeebies. A company that collects blood samples and runs them through close-guarded proprietary technology? Something tells me they were doing something else with those samples that wasn't disclosed.
And what do you know, turns out that there is a rabbit hole after all: https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Theranos
I would say women are the jews of the world. They don't fight in wars, they screech and call you names when you point out the consequences of their actions, and they rely on others to physically protect them and financially provide for them (Israel).

shut_it_down_the_boyim_know-png.6157529
fucken saved
Does that mean jewish women are superjews? 🤔🤔

View attachment 6409312
Prompt: 1girl, (israeli:0.2), brown hair, shiny bikini, (large breasts:0.9), standing in a hotel room, female, highres, professional photography

I just assume any picture of a woman I see on the Internet is AI-generated or AI-augmented at this point. Pygmalion strikes again.
 
Prompt: 1girl, (israeli:0.2), brown hair, shiny bikini, (large breasts:0.9), standing in a hotel room, female, highres, professional photography

I just assume any picture of a woman I see on the Internet is AI-generated or AI-augmented at this point. Pygmalion strikes again.
looks like there's a computer on the table on the left and some garden chairs on the right. ai doesn't get that detail and it also doesn't like making slightly ugly people. see her mouth breathing chin/jaw, disproportionately large lower lip, and jew nose.

anyway, you don't hate women enough. you think you do but you don't
 
looks like there's a computer on the table on the left and some garden chairs on the right. ai doesn't get that detail and it also doesn't like making slightly ugly people. see her mouth breathing chin/jaw, disproportionately large lower lip, and jew nose.

anyway, you don't hate women enough. you think you do but you don't
A lot of the mistakes of AI are related to feature decompression errors as a result of using an autoencoder. There are many ways of fixing these errors (inpainting, upscaling, simply generating at a higher resolution, etc.) Realistic imperfections can be affected by the the sampling method used as well.

Even if this wasn't true, the huge flood of AI imagery everywhere has made me default to believing that an image is fake until proven otherwise.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Neurotypical Mantis
I would feel more for fmoids getting turned into news headlines by their husbands if they didn't also incessantly insist they can sniff out creeps just by looking at them and can sense that you have a bad personality from across the room with their psychic powers.

Women have evolved for a billion years to detect potential abusers, this ability is crucial for their survival, but it goes straight out the window immediately when a hot guy enters their peripheral vision.
 
Nah, it's not.
The ones we have for humans are just fancier isolettes for premature births.
Even the people involved in the research do not see these as being a viable alternative to pregnancy:
"We've been extremely successful in replacing the conditions in the womb in our lamb model," says Alan Flake,
"What we tried to do is develop a system that mimics the environment of the womb as closely as possible," Flake says. "It's basically an artificial womb."
Jay Greenspan, a pediatrician at Thomas Jefferson University, called the device a "technological miracle" that marks "a huge step to try to do something that we've been trying to do for many years."
"I think this is a major breakthrough," Shaffer says.
Some worry that others could take this technology further. Other scientists are already keeping embryos alive in their labs longer then ever before, and trying to create human sperm, eggs and even embryo-like entities out of stem cells. One group recently created an artificial version of the female reproductive system in the lab.
Lmao, could you be any less retarded for a change? The Flake fellow saying "we're doing this just for premature babies and aren't looking to go all the way" doesn't mean somebody else can't do it.

The can of worms isn't just ethical concerns from women with abortion lust, it's creating tard babies.
At worst we'll get tard babies regardless as the average age of first birth a woman has gets pushed back further and further. At best we won't.

Even if I'm wrong and they are successful, only the extremely wealthy will be able to afford it and it will be a niche for them.
It would be for the ones who don't trust or want to pay Oksana or Daciana to do surrogacy. It will not be an option for men who can't get girlfriends unless those men are extremely wealthy.
In which case, just use a surrogate.
Far less chance of getting a retard.
Every other technological breakthrough in society was at one point expensive and solely the purview of the rich. Commercial surrogacy for example was unheard of a decade ago, for example. Cars, wireless phones, color tv, flying, so on and so on.

But this is the Woman-Hate thread, not a cope/grief thread.
If they can do this for premature babies at 23 weeks, than what's to say they can't do it from conception to birth in another decade? There is coping and than there is looking at the progression technology.
 
Lmao, could you be any less retarded for a change? The Flake fellow saying "we're doing this just for premature babies and aren't looking to go all the way" doesn't mean somebody else can't do it.
No point in debating people like this. The backfire effect is likely in full swing in his head. He doesn't want to be wrong, because that would threaten his entire premise of "anyone not being married and having children is a beta faggot," which he is already too psychologically invested in to give up.

Edit: It is also possible that he has bought into "doubt every possibility until it has run through fact-checking" mentality that has infected the scientific community in the past few decades. While the scientific method is excellent for testing hypotheses, it was never intended to be used for formulating them. An example of this is the discovery of hexagonal chemical structure of Benzene. The guy who discovered it had a dream about the alchemical symbol ouroboros, a snake eating its own tail. Upon awakening he remembered his dream, and realized that Benzene, just like ouroboros, did not necessarily have to be linear but could be cyclical instead.
Shut up bitch.
heh. I'm not judging you, we can't help what we like. But there is a time and place for everything.
 
Last edited:
The VMA's have literally turned into Requiem for a Dream 😳🤯
Pretty sure the whole thing is the fault of some pornsick moid who corrupted these two genuine, virginal ladies to perform like that.
He must be found and punished.
On second thought, I am anxious that with so many moids ogling them, these two ladies might poon out.
 
Pretty sure the whole thing is the fault of some pornsick moid who corrupted these two genuine, virginal ladies to perform like that.
He must be found and punished.
On second thought, I am anxious that with so many moids ogling them, these two ladies might poon out.
What is Monarch Programming?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: AgendaPoster
This is because outliers have a negligible impact. Sure there are some women here and there who aren't total neurotic retards who are actually capable people (Grace Hopper, inventor of COBOL, was brought up elsewhere on the forum,) but they are sadly a rounding error when talking about women in general.
This is dependent on the type of women you have surrounding you. In my experience, it is like 60/40 (Where the 40 is the bad female stereotypes). But then, when you discount for the married/taken women (of which some are in the 40% too), the left is like 20% overall. Even then, the odds are not bad - people just have different things they are attracted to. So you might know a good woman, but you just find her physically unattractive.

I have a couple of women, who are unfortunately waiting for me. I say unfortunately, because I have shown no interest on my side and have said as much even. And this is not because they are physically unattractive, but since they are not fitting my taste in women.
But this is definitely because I have more options than some. If I didn't, I likely would've settled.
The reason why I am saying this is because this is the experience for a lot of women (Taking into account stories from female friends, relatives etc).
 
While I have no doubt that monarch conditioning is a thing, I think for most female 'entertainers' the promise of success and attention is enough to get them to do that shit.

I forget which philosopher said it but generally you can get whatever you want if you correctly appeal to female vanity.

Theres been podcasts where rappers have brought up that some of them have been drugged and raped prior to signing the big contract, so the company has dirt on you to release. Because they are a corporation, they made an investment in you, and they want a return. But you are a human, so you have to be controlled somehow.

This also extends to Epstein and Politicians. They don't want you going rogue.

If the MKULTRA was so effective, the blackmail operations wouldn't even be necessary 🤷‍♂️ 🤷‍♂️
 
Women like being hot. It's cliche, but seriously, look at how much of our economy is dedicated to making women look and feel hot. Even those stupid Dove ads are really about trying to make ugly women feel hot. Women like feeling hot and like every man in the world wants to have sex with them, but not in a rapey gross dangerous way, just in an empowering and liberating way.

Radical feminists hate how much they want to be hot, mainly because they'll never be hot and because men, who they wish they were, don't spend nearly as much energy on looking hot as women do. So they flip back and forth between fuming and raging at "the male gaze" for making them want to be hot and shrieking with outrage when "the handmaid's tale patriarchs" say even the mildest negative comment about the whore twerking on TV in her thong.
 
Back