Last edited:
US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians
- Thread starter SeniorFuckFace
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2017
Done, and apologies to you for not doing so earlier. Thank you!
Liquid Merlon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2024
I don’t think Jill Stein is what this country needs, not one bit, but I can at least respect her because she actually fights for what she believes in. She can’t win elections when Democrats sue her off the ballot.
She wasn’t on the ballot in Wisconsin in 2020, which Biden ‘won’ by 10,000 votes. She is this time around, however, so I predict Wisconsin will go to Trump. Who am I kidding, they will just rig harder lol.
Coptakhenaten
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2022
I always had a degree of respect for her since 2016 because she always stood by her kooky pinkoism without selling out or making it a clear power play like 99% of any other socialist, namely Bernie Sanders in that election.
- Joined
- May 31, 2020
No, the polish population is far larger than Jewish population.
Interesting news out of Massachusetts
Regardless if you agree with Hayes political views, he did everything right. The DA did not see it this way.
Apparently shooting someone who is actively trying to hurt you is now a violation of a constitutional right? The police investigation isn't even over and he's already being charged.
Liquid Merlon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2024
Back then it was ridiculous, and it’s just straight absurd. Now, the Greens are the epitome of Cultural Marxism, really, they even support disbanding the military for God’s sake. And I don’t just respect her because she siphons votes from Democrats. I like her because she’s not controlled opposition. Before, she was able to get on the ballot with ease because the Democrats were certain Hillary had it in the bag, so they didn’t see Jill as a threat. Now, they’re using relentless law fare against the third parties; it’s almost like they want to control who you can vote. Party of democracy, everyone! Cut a democrat and a fascist bleeds…
The ballot laws are far too stringent and were written to prevent third parties from ever making it. After Ross Perot happened in 1992 they had to make sure it wouldn’t happen again. And even without these ballot laws I doubt the current third parties would make it far. Lolberts are broadly popular with psusedointellectuals and Redditors and the like, but are market fundamentalists. Greens are radical marxists. Constitutionists are ultra anti abortion. And there’s a million other communist parties I can think of which are all essentially the same with slightly different shades of red paint.
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2024
Because the Isao Okawa, the head of Sega, died! He was basically bankrolling Sega at the time. The Dreamcast was his baby. He was even on the box in Japan. At least at the start. I bought the Japanese Dreamcast at launch and my box has him on it. He died on March 16th 2001 and Sega discontinued the Dreamcast on March 31st. If he hadn't died at that time maybe videogame history would have turned out different.
She's hot when she gets mad. Although I wish she'd put on a little more weight and a little less make-up.
She didn't say anything to remember. Just mostly lies about Trump and how she'll fix everything if she's elected. While at the same time pretending everything is great.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
It's the screaming that gets me. You can tell it's a kitten and not a cat, and there's an instinctive, primal reaction people have to a young creature in pain.
At least humans have that reaction. Haitians apparently find it fucking delicious. Yum yum! Kill them all. Total orc death.
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2022
Gee, I'm real glad we got the totally valid and absolutely human response from user-pj6lu9lh1y.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2019
Hahahah, this is the best one. Tracey hassles former*-LBFM and jewish war against Iraq amputee Tammy Duckworth about what she thinks of Dick Cheney endorsing Harris.
* (very much former)
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2016
I saw another comment that said white people don't get stereotyped as cannibals because of Jeffrey Dahmer. No, they get stereotyped as serial killers because of Dahmer, Bundy, Gacy, and others.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2024
nigel p poppycock
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2024
Throw all the funky stickers at me that you want, but is there some way to talk about the Haitian stuff without discussing the ritualistic (because that's what it is) animal practices anymore? It's a dead horse now and it's getting gross and disturbing in here. Not trying to be a janny I'm just done with the details and imagery. Thankyouverymuchandhaveaniceday.
Mind blown at the stolen valor OG Blumenthal right now. He actually called it an assassination attempt and hammered home that there are massive failures in the DHS and SS. Never thought I'd see the day.
Mind blown at the stolen valor OG Blumenthal right now. He actually called it an assassination attempt and hammered home that there are massive failures in the DHS and SS. Never thought I'd see the day.
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2016
Welcome to Whitepill Friday, with your host, Diana Moon Glampers.
What a debate! We all saw it, we all cringed at the moderation, we all watched the pundits proclaim victory for Harris.
So why can't anyone remember anything she said?
Ask about a sound bite at this debate and it's Trump, over and over. Even the ones that Democrats are portraying as negative about cat-eating, it's still Trump's words. Trump got the last word at the debate, both literally and metaphorically.
I can never tell if Trump really is playing 4-D chess or just has the Mandate of Heaven, so this next part, I can't tell how intentional it was:
The Springfield stuff is turning out to have been a masterstroke.
How do libtards and progs and leftys respond if you show them something absolutely true and shocking that ought to disturb their worldview (e.g. male pedo rapists in women's prisons due to gender ID, Trump assassination attempt)?
They turn their heads away, react angrily, even claim there's some conspiracy in the other direction. The more obvious the truth you tell them, the more they have to overreact immediately in the opposite direction. You ask about males in women's prisons and they immediately call you hateful. Trump's own people had him shot, they'll say with a straight face. They just won't even talk about something like Sam Brinton's habit of stealing black immigrant women's designer clothes.
But you know what they love? Deboonking. Deboonking will make them go do their own research, search thousands of tweets to prove you wrong. The truth creates a wall and pushback. Exaggerating something, though, will make them go find out "the real story." They're all a little army of fact-checkers.
But here's what a deboonker finds looking into the situation:
So no one's (yet) gotten a video of pets hanging from trees and it's just one woman saying it at a city council meeting. OK, so I usually believe women, but clearly this one is confused or in the bag for Trump. Keep going, next vide...oh my god, that man's cooking a cat on a stove. Oh, this likely didn't happen in Ohio. Oh my god, that woman killed a cat in Ohio! ...oh, thank God, she wasn't Haitian. Hm, there's this police report...oh, but the Haitians aren't killing pet cats and dogs, they're killing geese, which lots of white hunters do, ha ha! Oh, here's a video from a factory owner that says he actually wants even more Haitians! Well, I didn't used to be on the side of the factory owners, but this one sure sounds anti-racist.
The more they see, the more they take in to debunk, the more cognitive dissonance they put into themselves. The ones who are slightly more independently minded start to realize "ok, the cat thing isn't proven yet, but this town is going to shit due to the insane policy of filling it up with immigrants and they're recalling the entire city council because residents are so mad." Even the total retards might start to think about how it's really weird they're on the side of factory owners and Dick Cheney now.
They would never have gone looking for that information if Trump had carefully laid out the exact things that had already been proven. They'd have waited for talking points from their favorite lib pundits and been satisfied with that. Give them something to deboonk and they'll break through the conditioning in order to show themselves the depths of your supposed deception.
I've had liberal friends on the less retarded side talking quietly to me about how yeah, it looks like the cat/dog stuff was a lie, but that town has gotten dogfucked by this immigration wave. On the more retarded side, other prog friends have said that now it's likely there will be cat/dog deaths and eating documented in Springfield, but it'll be a false flag where Republicans kill pets to frame the innocent Haitians. They're pre-bunking. This means they fully expect, these paragons of progressivism and anti-racism, for the videos to come out that prove all of this was correct. They're already prepared, when truth comes out, with a way to stop it.
So maybe the only way past that conditioning is to tell a story that's too good to be true, and let people normally beholden to the party line go investigate for themselves. Maybe we've been doing the trans prison thing all wrong, too. Maybe we should say 50% of trans prisoners are incarcerated for pedophilia and the other 50% for violence against women. "ACKSHULLY, only half of them are sex offenders, chud!"
The "ackshully" response has been so deeply trained into them that it's causing them to accidentally find out truth.
I can never tell if it's deliberate. I don't think it was. But somehow, I think it worked.
By the way, the Democratic donation texts came fast and furious all through the debate, to a point where it was very, very obvious that the fix was in. Those messages are written out days in advance, they're not typed on the fly. They had already decided Kamala was a girlboss yasqueen bravely standing up to Trump's lies before any of it ever happened. Lends credence to the idea that Kamala was given questions (or similar questions as "samples") in advance and told that Trump would be "fact-checked."
They've turned their whole horde into an army of fact-checkers. So the right thing now is to find something where the facts are unconscionable, exaggerate it until they triumphantly tell all their friends how really, the Haitians are only killing the geese at the parks, which are free, I have 835 geese....and at least some of their friends go, "well, that doesn't seem great either TBH."
More than anything from the debate, though, it's important to remember that no one can recall a thing Kamala said. They remember her expressions. But she didn't get in any really good jabs that someone can tweet. The best anyone can say is that she didn't cry or have any huge fumbles. At the same time, some of the closest-to-memorable parts, for many constituents, were things like her "I love Israel" answer.
Even the Democrats wish she'd gotten to speak for longer. They haven't heard her talk enough about issues that matter. They're hungry for some red meat and real ideas, after four years of a do-nothing president who can't be seen in public. They haven't gotten it. While their story will be "Trump too scared to ever see Kamala again," inwardly they're seething that they're not getting a chance to actually vet their own candidate or hear any depth about any of her now-proposed policies. She had just put a policy page onto the website about 24 hours before the debate...so why didn't any of that come up? Why wasn't it important to her to discuss a little depth or detail for any one of those policies? Those are the questions Democrats are asking themselves. It's not enough to make them turn to Trump, but it's making them question whether Kamala is worth pulling the lever for.
If it does turn out the Senate can prove Secret Service/DHS involvement in the Trump assassination attempt, I strongly believe it will cause some old boomers who hate Trump to just sit on their hands and not vote for president. Anyone old enough to remember JFK and RFK Sr. will know how serious this is. They'll think about Cheney and the neocon endorsements being happily shouted to applause. And something in them will tell them that the great switch is happening, or has happened, and that a vote for Kamala isn't actually a vote for what they wanted it to be.
Happy Friday, and that's it from your Whitepill host. See you next week!
What a debate! We all saw it, we all cringed at the moderation, we all watched the pundits proclaim victory for Harris.
So why can't anyone remember anything she said?
Ask about a sound bite at this debate and it's Trump, over and over. Even the ones that Democrats are portraying as negative about cat-eating, it's still Trump's words. Trump got the last word at the debate, both literally and metaphorically.
I can never tell if Trump really is playing 4-D chess or just has the Mandate of Heaven, so this next part, I can't tell how intentional it was:
The Springfield stuff is turning out to have been a masterstroke.
How do libtards and progs and leftys respond if you show them something absolutely true and shocking that ought to disturb their worldview (e.g. male pedo rapists in women's prisons due to gender ID, Trump assassination attempt)?
They turn their heads away, react angrily, even claim there's some conspiracy in the other direction. The more obvious the truth you tell them, the more they have to overreact immediately in the opposite direction. You ask about males in women's prisons and they immediately call you hateful. Trump's own people had him shot, they'll say with a straight face. They just won't even talk about something like Sam Brinton's habit of stealing black immigrant women's designer clothes.
But you know what they love? Deboonking. Deboonking will make them go do their own research, search thousands of tweets to prove you wrong. The truth creates a wall and pushback. Exaggerating something, though, will make them go find out "the real story." They're all a little army of fact-checkers.
But here's what a deboonker finds looking into the situation:
So no one's (yet) gotten a video of pets hanging from trees and it's just one woman saying it at a city council meeting. OK, so I usually believe women, but clearly this one is confused or in the bag for Trump. Keep going, next vide...oh my god, that man's cooking a cat on a stove. Oh, this likely didn't happen in Ohio. Oh my god, that woman killed a cat in Ohio! ...oh, thank God, she wasn't Haitian. Hm, there's this police report...oh, but the Haitians aren't killing pet cats and dogs, they're killing geese, which lots of white hunters do, ha ha! Oh, here's a video from a factory owner that says he actually wants even more Haitians! Well, I didn't used to be on the side of the factory owners, but this one sure sounds anti-racist.
The more they see, the more they take in to debunk, the more cognitive dissonance they put into themselves. The ones who are slightly more independently minded start to realize "ok, the cat thing isn't proven yet, but this town is going to shit due to the insane policy of filling it up with immigrants and they're recalling the entire city council because residents are so mad." Even the total retards might start to think about how it's really weird they're on the side of factory owners and Dick Cheney now.
They would never have gone looking for that information if Trump had carefully laid out the exact things that had already been proven. They'd have waited for talking points from their favorite lib pundits and been satisfied with that. Give them something to deboonk and they'll break through the conditioning in order to show themselves the depths of your supposed deception.
I've had liberal friends on the less retarded side talking quietly to me about how yeah, it looks like the cat/dog stuff was a lie, but that town has gotten dogfucked by this immigration wave. On the more retarded side, other prog friends have said that now it's likely there will be cat/dog deaths and eating documented in Springfield, but it'll be a false flag where Republicans kill pets to frame the innocent Haitians. They're pre-bunking. This means they fully expect, these paragons of progressivism and anti-racism, for the videos to come out that prove all of this was correct. They're already prepared, when truth comes out, with a way to stop it.
So maybe the only way past that conditioning is to tell a story that's too good to be true, and let people normally beholden to the party line go investigate for themselves. Maybe we've been doing the trans prison thing all wrong, too. Maybe we should say 50% of trans prisoners are incarcerated for pedophilia and the other 50% for violence against women. "ACKSHULLY, only half of them are sex offenders, chud!"
The "ackshully" response has been so deeply trained into them that it's causing them to accidentally find out truth.
I can never tell if it's deliberate. I don't think it was. But somehow, I think it worked.
By the way, the Democratic donation texts came fast and furious all through the debate, to a point where it was very, very obvious that the fix was in. Those messages are written out days in advance, they're not typed on the fly. They had already decided Kamala was a girlboss yasqueen bravely standing up to Trump's lies before any of it ever happened. Lends credence to the idea that Kamala was given questions (or similar questions as "samples") in advance and told that Trump would be "fact-checked."
They've turned their whole horde into an army of fact-checkers. So the right thing now is to find something where the facts are unconscionable, exaggerate it until they triumphantly tell all their friends how really, the Haitians are only killing the geese at the parks, which are free, I have 835 geese....and at least some of their friends go, "well, that doesn't seem great either TBH."
More than anything from the debate, though, it's important to remember that no one can recall a thing Kamala said. They remember her expressions. But she didn't get in any really good jabs that someone can tweet. The best anyone can say is that she didn't cry or have any huge fumbles. At the same time, some of the closest-to-memorable parts, for many constituents, were things like her "I love Israel" answer.
Even the Democrats wish she'd gotten to speak for longer. They haven't heard her talk enough about issues that matter. They're hungry for some red meat and real ideas, after four years of a do-nothing president who can't be seen in public. They haven't gotten it. While their story will be "Trump too scared to ever see Kamala again," inwardly they're seething that they're not getting a chance to actually vet their own candidate or hear any depth about any of her now-proposed policies. She had just put a policy page onto the website about 24 hours before the debate...so why didn't any of that come up? Why wasn't it important to her to discuss a little depth or detail for any one of those policies? Those are the questions Democrats are asking themselves. It's not enough to make them turn to Trump, but it's making them question whether Kamala is worth pulling the lever for.
If it does turn out the Senate can prove Secret Service/DHS involvement in the Trump assassination attempt, I strongly believe it will cause some old boomers who hate Trump to just sit on their hands and not vote for president. Anyone old enough to remember JFK and RFK Sr. will know how serious this is. They'll think about Cheney and the neocon endorsements being happily shouted to applause. And something in them will tell them that the great switch is happening, or has happened, and that a vote for Kamala isn't actually a vote for what they wanted it to be.
Happy Friday, and that's it from your Whitepill host. See you next week!
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2024
Learn what a joke is you autistic spaz and then stop tagging me with this retarded nonsense. Nobody actually thinks “just be yourself” is magically going to get some 0/10 hills have eyes person a girlfriend.
Because income, as it’s defined for federal tax purposes, is exceedingly broad. Pretty much anytime you get money, property, or a service it’s actually income for tax purposes.
It’s retarded and I don’t like that, but that’s the state of the law.
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Not to alarm anyone, but for some reason US army is suddently very concerned about the effects of nuclear war on agriculture
https://sam.gov/opp/505b2b2cb4c140239c054f39ef333f81/view
https://sam.gov/opp/505b2b2cb4c140239c054f39ef333f81/view
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2019
Had a thought on the "big vibes" of the cheney endorsement. These people get their worldview from tv and movies. The big-truck hunter jock saying he wants to date the smart and demure debate club girl is such an uplifting unexpected moment, cue the coldplay track. Its also sorta part of their "irony is everything" in the same way one wears a trucker hat, drinks PBR to counter signal that one is so above the mouthbreathing underclass clods that one can easily take on their product to consoom with zero fear of being labeled as one of them. It's kinda holding up their captured flag or wearing an ear necklace of them.
Also re: the current ot taxes. I saw mention of higher tax rates for ot. Way I understand it, this is your paycheck processor taking more for the .govs not the .govs taking more. if you make 50k/yr and get a bunch of ot on one check, so much it looks like a check that a 90k/yr guy gets, the check processor taxes that whole check at the 90k/yr rate gives it to the .gov. You get back the extra that was taken out the next year when you file and true everything up. The ot is just simple income to the IRS, not taxed higher itself unless it is the little bit that pushes you into a higher bracket, then only that little bit is taxed at the higher bracket rate.
Also re: the current ot taxes. I saw mention of higher tax rates for ot. Way I understand it, this is your paycheck processor taking more for the .govs not the .govs taking more. if you make 50k/yr and get a bunch of ot on one check, so much it looks like a check that a 90k/yr guy gets, the check processor taxes that whole check at the 90k/yr rate gives it to the .gov. You get back the extra that was taken out the next year when you file and true everything up. The ot is just simple income to the IRS, not taxed higher itself unless it is the little bit that pushes you into a higher bracket, then only that little bit is taxed at the higher bracket rate.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2023
And then one day, for no reason at all, people voted Hitler into power.
- Joined
- May 25, 2018
Personally, the more I think about the debate and the more clips I rewatch of it, I think that Trump did better than I originally thought (especially when considering it was 3 against 1 on Thursday night). His biggest blunder of the night was taking the bait when Kamala mentioned crowd sizes, which took him off topic and created some big missed opportunities for him.
That said ... He had some really good "gotcha" moments in regards to abortion (by putting Kamala in a corner about whether she supports late term abortions), in regards to foreign policy (by exposing that she's never spoken to Putin and hasn't tried diplomacy), and in his closing statements (which I think will resonate with the average voter much better than Kamala's word salad).
I also think that Trump's "They're eating the dogs and cats" quote is already aging well, considering what has been exposed in the past 48-ish hours about the shithole that is Haiti (and its culture), considering what has come to light about Springfield, Ohio, and ... The TikTok memes.
In contrast, Kamala's entire attitude throughout the debate was dismissive, smarmy, and condescending (especially in her body language). This did not go over well in focus groups whatsoever. Men and women, on average, really hate arrogant and smug women. Kamala's attitude on Thursday night was Hillary Clinton on steroids, and it's going to backfire on her.
On top of that, the dumb bitch keeps touting the Dick Cheney and Goldman Sachs endorsements, the moderators of the debate were SO biased that even normies have noticed it, and that bias from the moderators prevented Kamala from actually speaking about herself as a candidate and politician (since every "answer" of hers was a straight-up non-answer or so vague that it might as well be a non-answer).
Kankichi Ryotsu
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2022
Even Biden put on a Trump 2024 hat. That speaks of how low Harris is.
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2024
The US government has already extensively studied the effects of nuclear weapons on everything, and the results were conclusive: "yer fucked, kid."
This looks like it's part of a federal academic grant system meant to encourage people to continue studying agricultural sciences. Believe it or not, there are some excellent schools for this field of study, and these people do serious scholarship. It makes sense for a country that has so much farmland.
- Status