Cyber Bowling
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2017
I was pleasantly surprised by Joon's documentary, so he definitely gets props for that. But I think because the documentary was so well, it kinda defeats the point of interviewing him. Like...based on the documentary, we know what he thinks about Phil, I'm not sure what else there really is to say. I don't think it's a shock that if someone asked Joon "do you think DSP has changed" or "do you believe he actually sold his Champions account" the answer is going to be no.After watching BOWLTH Joon interviews (DSP/AgentProper), surely TBS can do a better job. In regards to execution and entertainment, the bar is awfully low at the moment. Fucking hell.
If I absolutely had to interview him, I think the best I could do is ask if there's any additional Phil sections/lore he wanted to include but cut due to time/it feeling redundant. But even then, I think that can carry like, a few minutes of conversation at best because if that stuff wasn't included in the first place, it probably isn't all that interesting or it's something that's already known and has been discussed to death. But otherwise, if you want to know how he feels about Phil, he basically spent 4 hours doing that in the documentary.
Generally, when documentary makers are interviewed, they'll talk about the filming process, like...the challenges of going out to some remote area to get footage, or the dangers of speaking with a known drug lord or whatever else. But there's not a lot of interesting behind the scenes for a documentary on an internet personality. Even asking about his process can't really generate conversations because it basically boils down to "I watched clips of Phil."
Basically, I think the documentary is good enough that it speaks for itself.