Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Owlbear]

Like I said, these guys got arrested in May on memorial day weekend. That's just over three months ago. It wasn't that long ago. Just getting to the decision to divorce is a long, grueling process. Anyone who writes off divorce from happening just because it hasn't happened yet is fucking retarded. The Cocaine Arc hasn't even been finished yet. Once they all get sentenced, they'll see where they stand and if status quos need to change or not.

My money is still on the divorce arc coming next. Then the troon arc.

 

[not william stenchever]

Ergo, monogamous -- I suck only one dick at a time.

That's some weak sauce shit. Daddy Juju could take at least three guys at once (if their dicks were big enough)

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

Now that Nick stopped streaming, we can declare that KIWI FARMS HAS WON.

Wow, it sure is nice to have epically owned Nick Rekieta once and for all.
It appears that us, Kiwi Farms users, sure are on top of our game.
We convinced everyone that we were right all along.
With nobody around to correct the record, we sure have won completely and totally over Nick Rekieta.
Joyous day, Kiwi Farms users.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

While we languish in a drought of Nick content, I have been working to update the OP and specifically the supplemental posts that will (eventually) sit beneath it. I am starting with more comprehensive narratives explaining Nick's main story arcs to act as a digestible chronicle of events in his career that may be pointed to to catch up those who are just discovering him.

If anyone has time to review and supply input/corrections/suggestion to the first 3 arcs (1st on Maddox/LOLSuit mostly done, 2nd with Weeb Wars needs more media and links, and 3rd on Hedonism II needs another few editing passes), it would be appreciated. You might be able to fill in gaps I missed, or even learn something new about old Nick: DRAFT

 

[Anticipointment]

I really don't think they had any prep whatsoever because Nick obviously thought there was no situation where anyone would come into his house. If he even considered that for one second, he would not have had drugs everywhere out in the open.

That may be true but after the arrest and before the kids hair testing came back Nick had a statement prepared in the event that a kid tested positive. So he at least suspected that would be the case and was trying to get ahead of it by giving out an excuse.

 

[IDF]

Then the troon arc.

It's his physiognomical destiny.

 

[Captain Manning]

His new thing is doing monosyllabic replies on Twitter. His longest tweet in a while was this:

Link / Archive

Yeah, he did say something vaguely like that early on when the degeneracy started to show.

Then it got way worse.
Then he fucked April.
And Arron fucked Kayla.

It says a lot that even Coomalot is not buying this shit. Even as he defends Nick's actual behavior, he's not buying Nick's lies. He's even been congratulating Nick on getting with April.

Coomalot amuses me because he's in no way critical of Nick, but he tells the truth about Nick. You can't reasonably claim he's a-logging Nick, but he's doing a lot of damage to Nick.

Whatever he's up to, he's too busy to tell his paying Locals members what's going on:

These people are absolute morons for continuing to give him money.

But I suppose I'm just repeating myself now.

I'm gonna cut Ana some slack because unlike a lot of Leftists she's at least had the guts to admit when she's fucked up, I don't know what happened to her but she seems to have had her eyes opened to how hypocritical her (former?) side is.

Ana is a lot like J.K. Rowling at this point. She's likely gonna continue to be liberal on 95% of all issues she confronts, but put her foot down on the top 5% that is utterly insane. Mainly the transgender crap. She's essentially a TERF now in all the ways that matter.

 

[Pelican Bones]

While we languish in a drought of Nick content, I have been working to update the OP and specifically the supplemental posts that will (eventually) sit beneath it. I am starting with more comprehensive narratives explaining Nick's main story arcs to act as a digestible chronicle of events in his career that may be pointed to to catch up those who are just discovering him.

If anyone has time to review and supply input/corrections/suggestion to the first 3 arcs (1st on Maddox/LOLSuit mostly done, 2nd with Weeb Wars needs more media and links, and 3rd on Hedonism II needs another few editing passes), it would be appreciated. You might be able to fill in gaps I missed, or even learn something new about old Nick: DRAFT

It's a well known fact that having you work on revising the OP has been the most sure fire way of getting a new glut of Nick content.

Fingers crossed.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

While we languish in a drought of Nick content

Just open yourself another beer and toast the monitor with a Kiwi Farms logo.

We won, Nick has surrendered and is no longer defending the indefensible.
Even his "friends" and helpers have shut the fuck up, Barnes is no longer ranting about the corrupt police and violation of constitutional rights.

Any day now Null will publish the unconditional surrender mailed in by Lord Balldo.

 

[joebobmurphy]

She can't. MN law prohibits one spouse from testifying against the other except for very limited exceptions which don't apply here.

That's one of those bullshit lawisms people get from Law & Order. Spouses can't be compelled to testify against each other, but they can sure as shit voluntarily do so. If anyone wants to argue, I would simply ask what the fuck a woman is supposed to do if her husband beats, rapes, or commits some other crime against her? Would it be like Islam where she needs 4 male witnesses?

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Just open yourself another beer and toast the monitor with a Kiwi Farms logo.

We won, Nick has surrendered and is no longer defending the indefensible.
Even his "friends" and helpers have shut the fuck up, Barnes is no longer ranting about the corrupt police and violation of constitutional rights.

Any day now Null will publish the unconditional surrender mailed in by Lord Balldo.

If that is the case, I'll be able to pivot to a definitive Nicholas Rekieta documentation effort without fear that anything will change.

 

[Pelican Bones]

That's one of those bullshit lawisms people get from Law & Order. Spouses can't be compelled to testify against each other, but they can sure as shit voluntarily do so. If anyone wants to argue, I would simply ask what the fuck a woman is supposed to do if her husband beats, rapes, or commits some other crime against her? Would it be like Islam where she needs 4 male witnesses?

This has been discussed at length:

Ahem. In MN,

• Current spouses can be prevented by* their spouse from testifying about** events at all and about private communications that occurred during the marriage. Current spouses can choose to testify about communications before or after marriage.
• Former spouses can be prevented by the other former spouse from testifying about communications (statements) made during the marriage. Former spouses can choose to testify about any events (before, during, and after the marriage), and about communications before and after the marriage.

* In MN it is the non-testifying spouse who can assert the privilege.

** In MN the testimonial privilege relates to testimony either for or against a current spouse (see statutory language below).

The marital privilege is construed narrowly in MN.

In addition, in MN, at least, there are some qualifiers, and crimes against the spouse or children are one (MN Stat. 595.02) (emphasis mine):

a) A husband cannot be examined for or against his wife without her consent, nor a wife for or against her husband without his consent, nor can either, during the marriage or afterwards, without the consent of the other, be examined as to any communication made by one to the other during the marriage. This exception does not apply to a civil action or proceeding by one against the other, nor to a criminal action or proceeding for a crime committed by one against the other or against a child of either or against a child under the care of either spouse, nor to a criminal action or proceeding in which one is charged with homicide or an attempt to commit homicide and the date of the marriage of the defendant is subsequent to the date of the offense, nor to an action or proceeding for nonsupport, neglect, dependency, or termination of parental rights.
And while a sham marriage can gut spousal privilege, the bar is high to prove it was enough of a sham to do so. Random case, which also differentiates MN's statutory privilege (rooted in common law) from Federal law, which is just common

 

[RodgerDodger]

I know there are a lot of theories - the kid getting into it unbeknownst to Nick, Nick dosing the kid because he thought it treated ADHD, whatever. At this point, however, I truthfully and unironically believe that he was giving his kid coke and molesting her. I just think it's the most plausible and least complicated explanation, especially given his weird fixation with American Beauty and porn stars that try to look as young as possible (super petite with braces and pigtails, for example).

That would have been the first question CPS asked on seeing that kids lab results. The fact that Nick was not re-arrested and denied bail is a sign that they don't think that's what happened.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

We won, Nick has surrendered and is no longer defending the indefensible.

He's an lolcow. His udders will eventually fill to an uncomfortable volume and they will explode with a deluge of wrath and spergatorical outrage. It is written.

 

[joebobmurphy]

*sorry I can't reply directly

@Pelican Bones Okay, but unless I'm misreading it seems that there is an exception to crimes committed against the spouse or children. Since one of the charges is child neglect and endangerment I imagine that qualifier applies. I mean, that would be pretty fucked up if a wife couldn't testify that she saw her husband raping their kid in the ass because it was a "private communication". Plus, it says that a spouse CAN be prevented from testifying, not that they will. I imagine the judge could just tell the defense to eat shit and prepare for a dicking. Oh, you're gonna appeal? Scary.

 

[Fapcop]

My money is still on the divorce arc coming next. Then the troon arc.

Three months isn’t a long time. Especially when you’re dropping benzos all day.

One day just slides into another day and then a week and suddenly it’s autumn and not spring and you have no idea where time went or what you’ve been doing.

Benzos have likely massively increased Kayla’s bullshit threshold. But you can only numb your emotions for so long. At some point the dam will break.

I know there are a lot of theories - the kid getting into it unbeknownst to Nick, Nick dosing the kid because he thought it treated ADHD, whatever. At this point, however, I truthfully and unironically believe that he was giving his kid coke and molesting her. I just think it's the most plausible and least complicated explanation, especially given his weird fixation with American Beauty and porn stars that try to look as young as possible (super petite with braces and pigtails, for example).

I’m not even going to go: “Surely Nick would never…” because he frankly ran out of those a long ass time ago.

The only flaw here I see, is that it’s cocaine.

Coke is hardly what you’d give a kid to molest them. An opiate or a benzo maybe, but coke? I can see you lure some 16 year old fatherless party chick with some coke or crack but a prepubescent kid?!

It doesn’t exactly jive.

 

[Anticipointment]

I know there are a lot of theories - the kid getting into it unbeknownst to Nick, Nick dosing the kid because he thought it treated ADHD, whatever. At this point, however, I truthfully and unironically believe that he was giving his kid coke and molesting her. I just think it's the most plausible and least complicated explanation, especially given his weird fixation with American Beauty and porn stars that try to look as young as possible (super petite with braces and pigtails, for example).

I’d rather not jump to the worst scenario. If not an accidental ingestion, it’s more likely that the kid was being dosed for “medicinal” purposes. That’s bad enough and doesn’t need further speculation.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

it seems that there is an exception to crimes committed against the spouse or children.

This has been brought up and explained multiple times.
The exclusion rule is that married couples cannot be played by police or DA's into selling each other out.

If the crime is against each other or children it is different.

 

[Vibralldo]

Barnes is no longer ranting about the corrupt police and violation of constitutional rights.

Do you think Nick sent out a secret "shut the fuck up" order to all his friends too?

 

[Dimension Sniper]

At this point, however, I truthfully and unironically believe that he was giving his kid coke and molesting her. I just think it's the most plausible and least complicated explanation, especially given his weird fixation with American Beauty and porn stars that try to look as young as possible (super petite with braces and pigtails, for example).

Why is this a more plausible explanation than the kid getting into coke that had been carelessly left where they could access it, especially given Aaron’s story about the bullet Nick dropped in his couch?

I won’t disagree that Nick seems to have a proclivity for young women/women pretending to look young, but the kid who tested positive is 9. Nick also likes tits and she’s not going to have those yet. If the kid who’d tested positive was high school aged this theory might seem more plausible, but pre-pubescent kids don’t seem to line up with what he’s demonstrated so far that he finds attractive.

Also, I don’t understand how cocaine would make a child more compliant for molestation, and I don’t think a 9 year old kid would be open to exchanging coke for sex the same way April is.