Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.7%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 68 17.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 156 40.5%

  • Total voters
    385
The "real" Nick is probably best seen in that stream where he goes after the mother of his children over the consequences of pregnancy to her body.
That was definitely one of his first mask-off moments as an absolute and utter piece of shit.
Tucker Max had his wild years, then gave up that lifestyle, got married, and had four kids. Tucker Max front-loaded his degeneracy in his 20s, wrote some books that received critical acclaim (and I thought were pretty funny at points even as a Scandinavian prude), and then grew the fuck up.
Tucker Max was definitely a degenerate, though he exaggerated some of that shit, but he was funny. And yes, if you're going to do incredibly dumb shit and maybe die of excess, pick your 20s for that shit. There's still time to get out once you've had your fun. If you're doing that shit in your 40s, when you have responsibilities to your family that you completely shit on by doing that, you're just a fucking loser and you look pathetic, not cool.
Why would anybody ask him shit, when all he does is lie?
That is both why HE wants people to go to him one on one, and why nobody actually wants to do that. Narcs pull that shit a lot. They think they're Machiavellian geniuses who can completely pull a Rasputin on you one on one where there's nobody to counter their stridently shouted lies.

Balldo fucked up doing that in public with SEEEEEEAN! SEAAAAAAAAN! SSSEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAN! and just looked like a retarded yelling psycho.

It's a giant red flag whenever some Balldo man wants to respond to you criticizing shit he did in public by taking it private. Anyone who does that, you can do without in your life because they're fucking scum.

They think they're smooth doing that, when they're basically advertising their evil.
(Interestingly the carveout doesn't explicitly or clearly limit the allowed testimony only to the specific charge(s) - it says it applies to "a criminal action or proceeding for a crime..." against their children (etc.), not just to that alleged crime. I have to think that that's been litigated or there's legislative guidance but idk and not feeling like hunting for that, plus my hand hurts from trying to lay out, align language, and format the privilege stuff - on phone as usual.)
Nice rundown on a complicated privilege hedged about with intensely arcane exceptions. In this post, I quoted a case (State v. Zais) and speculated about this specific issue and why trying to invoke the exception might open up a can of worms if, for instance, the testimony would be admissable as to the endangerment charges while more prejudicial than probative as to the other charges.

I didn't pick that case for being specifically notable but for having a pretty good section outlining the other cases addressing the issue too. I still don't know whether this would even apply or whether it has even been litigated.

I know one fairly common "solution" for a situation like this (if it even applies) is just to give a limiting instruction to the jury that they are only to use this testimony for one limited purpose and disregard it for others, but even with a conscientious jury, the ability of normal people to do this is questionable. Even a judge, presumed to be able to do that and look at matters dispassionately, is probably going to be angered by Balldo's conduct and in actual practice, you can't really disregard facts you know.
 
Last edited:
If you are at one point loyal to him, you are expected to be loyal to him forever and forever, no matter how wrong he is, or awful he gets.
I think it really highlights his dependence on parasocial relationships. Fans of celebrities turn away and move on for a whole range of reasons. Viewing it as an act of disloyalty or personal betrayal is idiotic. A fan owes you nothing.
 
I believe it's been said on the thread that the results, depending on how the test was done, are consistent both with regular use and with one extremely large dose.
I think we have also suggested that until we get the segmented hair results we won't know which one was the case. I assume they did do segmented hair tests, so time will tell when that appears in public. It is looking increasingly likely with the radio silence that crackets might be getting ready to take a plea deal to keep all of this under the rug, sadly.

I still believe that the corruption of the Kandiyohi County court system needs to be exposed, however.
 
I still believe that the corruption of the Kandiyohi County court system needs to be exposed, however.
The fact that Kandiyohi County is prosecuting Nick instead of the real culprit behind all this speaks volumes about how deep the corruption runs. It's frankly inexcusable that they still haven't charged Eric July for leaving that cocaine in Nick's bedroom.
 
I think we have also suggested that until we get the segmented hair results we won't know which one was the case. I assume they did do segmented hair tests, so time will tell when that appears in public. It is looking increasingly likely with the radio silence that crackets might be getting ready to take a plea deal to keep all of this under the rug, sadly.
Those test results are part of the CPS investigation, which is now sealed. We're not getting the results of anything which wasn't public at the time that was sealed.
 
Kayla's benzos are likely prescription drugs so she is taken care of. Aaron in the past has also described how careful Nick and April are that Kayla stays on the Benzos for her "health". April though is a different matter. She seemed really shocked at her hearing on discovering that she would have to stay mostly sober,

I imagine the real hell for all of them is having to keep the house clean, having to do laundry and having to feed the kids all under the eye of CPS. Given Kayla's semi-useless state and Nick's general refusal to do much of anything, its possible to speculate that a fair amount of work is falling on April in that regard

For some reason, while I was reading these paragraphs, I had a daydream/vision thing.

You know how when you were like 12, you and your friend would have a preference on whose house you were going to stay over at on Friday or Saturday night, based off whose parents would be more chill and let you stay up chatting or watching movies or whatever?

So like, getting the police to show up with a warrant was this ultimate dad mode event that made Fagieta’s place uncool to stay over at. It’s still going on but the vibe is dead and if April has to be sober, she’ll be like “fuck this, I’m going home”

As I stated, this isn’t an analysis I’m standing by, just something my brain did to me
 
Nick openly said he did coke in Jamaica in August 2022, but denied liking it.

Nick also said "People don't believe me when I say I don't really like weed. I do it for the memes." which indicates that this is something he has established in the past.

Nick, Weed, and Gummies:

Here is Nick saying he doesn't really like weed after attempting to smoke some on a LOCALS livestream around late September 2023. He makes no distinction as to preference for smoking or ingesting, so one could take this to mean that he just doesn't like weed in general.



Here is Nick in November 2022 on weed. You can see how much he dislikes it:



Of course, these were weed gummies, which Nick seems to have enjoyed regularly because he is "neurodivergent" and things don't impact him the same way it would for normal people (lol):



One might think Nick would be okay with gummies, but they would be wrong.

Here is Nick on his Hedonism II vacation in the summer of 2022 claiming emphatically, in a painfully long story that required numerous edits to tie together, that HE CANNOT EAT ANYTHING JELLY OR GUMMY DUE TO CHILDHOOD TRAUMA. We can even ask Kayla about this, apparently.

He was force-fed one spoonful of Jell-O as a child by a teacher he hated, so the vomited all over himself. During this story, Nick associates Jell-O with black people. This is possibly because Bill Cosby was a spokesperson for the brand, but then he goes on to listing other ethnicities. He then brought up Riley Reid (a pornstar) for no good reason, and also seemed to be in disbelief that the teacher would tell Nick to go clean himself up... as if he expected the teacher to take him to a washroom of some kind and clean him up while he just stood there(?).



Also, the gummy penis reference near the end was because Kayla ate an orange gummy penis sent by a fan. It took her "three business days" and was very satisfying.

Kayla loves gummies.



Conclusion:

Nick seems to enjoy things that he also claims to dislike, and he isn't to be trusted with even his own preferences.
 
Eta- far be it from me to praise Tucker Max, but he not only held onto his initial success money, he flipped into a publishing company (which, iirc, had an interesting statement of core values - I downloaded it at some point as a reference doc for god-knows-what), and is now on the homesteading thing.
I have no issue with you praising Tucker Max. When I was younger, I thought he was funny too. So was pre-Juju Maddox, Seanbaby, and Robert Hamburger (you can tell I'm old).

My main point is IF you insist on letting your freak flag fly, it makes sense to do it like Max did, and not the way Rekieta is. Do it in your 20s, get it out of your system, and then grow the fuck up.
 
What do you think the "A" is for in the only occupied bedroom? Could it be for a sad, lonely 29 year old crack whore?
View attachment 6324735

The human part of me is hoping that that is for his cocaine infused daughter, Audreyrose.

edit: wtf I didn't realize I was responding to a comment from a fucking month ago.
 
the testimony would be admissable as to the endangerment charges while more prejudicial than probative as to the other charges.
They could amend charges but when Nick opposed recording the trial on the ground of "pedophiles," the prosecutor I believe stated there were no victims, children or otherwise. In that sense, I don't think the endangerment charges are "against" the children, at least in how the prosecutor is constructing it. I think the prosecutor would have a really difficult time piercing that privilege after stipulating the children aren't victims.

What's funny and weird is the statute has a felony version of neglect in same subsection which is triggered if there was actual injury - which would seem to need a victim. Would they have to charge a separate crime for the injury ("victim crime") to invoke the felony endangerment ("constructive crime")?
 
Null to get the bodycam footage
two more weeks
And yes, if you're going to do incredibly dumb shit and maybe die of excess, pick your 20s for that shit. There's still time to get out once you've had your fun
the problem is Nick couldn't do that in his 20s because he was such a loser with barely any friends, as people have said. read inbetween the lines and he's a dude who got naked for the other gay cheerleaders and sometimes a woman might be there too, but he spent most of his "teen years" online rather than having those fun 90s teenage days zoomers supposedly missed out out by having smart phones.

Nick doing this in his 40s is because now as king of lawtube he's suddenly the cool chad he wished he was in his teenage years and decided to do the cool things he wanted to do his in 20s. If Nick wanted to go have fun getting drunk and smashing "hot puss" in his 20s he'd quickly find everyone trying to get as far away from him as possible. Being an E-celeb gave him the popularity he craved in his 20s. I'm honestly surprised we don't have some Everquest Forum logs where Nick sperged out and became known for being a loser even among them a la blocklands.

Nick has the sad pathetic life Ferris Bueller feared Cameron would have "being a spineless fag who marries the first used up whore who gives him attention.
 
He also hated swinging and of at one point
He also enthusiastically endorsed Drex's opinion that it is never okay to be a cuck.

This was while he spent months and months insulting Ron Toye for being a cuck with no evidence at all. Ron Toye, despite his cringy statement that he'd rather be a cuck to Monica Rial than be alone, was only ever a metaphorical cuck.

Meanwhile, we now know Nick is an actual, literal cuck in the gross anataomical sense that his wife's vagina has had a foreign to the marriage penis enter it, with his approval, and we assume his frenzied masturbation while that happened.
Nick has the sad pathetic life Ferris Bueller feared Cameron would have "being a spineless fag who marries the first used up whore who gives him attention.
Maybe but once you have five children, their welfare overrules your fucking past the expiration date teen angst. At that point, you need to sack up and be a father to your children. Or just kill yourself.
 
I assume they did do segmented hair tests
I would not think they did this. It would satisfy our curiosity, but the prosecutor would be more practical with the range of results. The physical exam showed no injury from drug use. Urine tests are clean. There are only a few outcome permutations and I don't think any would influence their course of action. The test results would not influence any decisions.

Outcome
1. Comes back completely clean. Does it change the existing charges? Does it change KCHHS conditions for returning kids? Probably not.
2. Comes back as single large dose. Child shows no injury. Change charges? Change conditions for return?
3. Comes back as regular exposure. Change charges? Change conditions for return?

I think they would see no value in the results. Return conditions were set and seem pretty standard. Without establishing an injury, the neglect charges are what they are.

The segmented test would only create FUDD without revealing evidence of additional crimes, generating exculpatory evidence of charged crimes or corroborating accounts of current crimes. I think the prosecutors would see it as a waste of their time/money and I would be surprised if they ordered it.
 
I think they would see no value in the results. Return conditions were set and seem pretty standard. Without establishing an injury, the neglect charges are what they are.
This is what's called res ipsa loquitur. THE THING SPEAKS FOR ITSELF. There is absolutely no way the set of facts where Nick's 9 year old daughter tests positive for cocaine does not involve criminal conduct by Nick himself and his whore of a wife and his side whore.

The very fact of the positive test proves criminal conduct beyond a reasonable doubt, because this shit does NOT happen without criminality being involved.
 
Last edited:
Nick, like a surprising number of people IMO, cannot handle an unstructured life without work. They fall into heavy drinking, drugs and/or degeneracy. Just like Nick did. You see it with retired people who just can't handle retirement. You also see it among the entitled children of wealthy people.
This is something I have a hard time understanding. Many have highly autistic and demanding hobbies. During free hours, we'd just go into autismo mode over them. What kind of miserable life does he have to lack time-demading hobbies? I'm lucky enough to set my own work hours when stuff goes slow. I have met people who just can't do this. It's weird!

But then Balldo's hobbies are sex toys, exhibitionism and snow. They're quite expensive.

He was force-fed one spoonful of Jell-O as a child by a teacher he hated, so the vomited all over himself.
That's one mean teacher. From stealing his transformer toys to sodomising him with jello. What's next, did she shove him in the lockers and spank him with one of those bug zappers? That could explain his FUNNY and WEIRD sexual proclivities. :really:
 
Back