Science Evidence of Merlin’s grave unearthed in Scotland: Was King Arthur’s wizard adviser real?

Article / Archive
By Hannah Sparks
Published Sep. 8, 2024, 3:43 p.m. ET

There may be some truth to the myth of Merlin.

On Tuesday, archeologists in Scotland revealed evidence of the legendary wizard’s death in Drumelzier between the 6th and 7th centuries — and the findings could change the way we tell Merlin’s tale.

Merlin was said to have been a loyal advisor to King Arthur amid the Dark Ages before being imprisoned, killed and buried along the river Tweed, according to Vita Merlini Sylvestris (the Life of Merlin of the Forest), a medieval manuscript of his life which is currently held at the British Library.

Merlin’s Grave.JPG
According to Vita Merlini Sylvestris, a medieval manuscript dedicated to the life of Merlin, the wizard was said to have been imprisoned, killed and buried on the banks of river Tweed in Drumelzier.

A new geological survey of the region, near the site of Tinnis Castle, detected a grave-like pit.

Further excavation showed signs of inhabitation during the alleged period of Merlin’s life.

“The Drumelzier legend contains pre-Christian customs, ancient Cumbric names and was associated with local sites where archaeology now shows could credibly have given rise to the story,” lead researcher Ronan Toolis told the National.

According to Toolis, who serves as CEO of GUARD Archaeology in Glasgow, such a prominent grave structure in this region would have been “quite rare” for the period in which it was dated. “It seems to be a remarkable coincidence that the one hillfort associated with this local legend dates to exactly the same time as the story is set,” he noted.

The results of the study two years in the making were published last week in Archeology Reports Online.

Ancient Map.JPG
Merlin’s Drumelzier legend “paints a much darker picture” of the great wizard’s life as a close adviser to King Arthur.

“The new archaeological evidence does not prove that the local story was true but instead demonstrates that the legend likely originated in Drumelzier itself, rather than being brought here by a wandering medieval storyteller who roped in various random sites in the vicinity,” Toolis explained. “Perhaps it originated as a folk memory, to be embellished over the centuries before it spread far and wide and changed out of almost all recognition.”

Their discovery helps “[to paint] a much darker picture” of the wise and revered Arthurian figure, said Toolist. “That of a rather pitiful fellow prone to uttering nonsensical riddles and bewildering prophecies, and kept prisoner by an obscure petty tyrant of a forgotten kingdom, before dying a gruesome death, the victim of royal intrigue.”
 
Their discovery helps “[to paint] a much darker picture” of the wise and revered Arthurian figure, said Toolist. “That of a rather pitiful fellow prone to uttering nonsensical riddles and bewildering prophecies, and kept prisoner by an obscure petty tyrant of a forgotten kingdom, before dying a gruesome death, the victim of royal intrigue.”
This is what they're rewriting King Arthur as?
Based on literally what?
And how do you get all of this from the existence of a hill-fort being confirmed, may I ask? Show your work, Toolist and journo.
That jumped out at me immediately as well.
 
This shit is how you end up cursed. Maybe the island dwellers will start acting right and kick out all of the invaders from the last 30 years or so.
 
Why does it seem like every other year I read something about how king Arthur sucks?
 
Because he's a patriotic and honorable ass-kicker who vowed that nothing would stop him from returning home to save England in its darkest hour.

Naturally we can't have a hero like that in Current Year.
I feel like I've been reading slams for like a decade.
 
There seem to have been several different Merlins, most Scottish but at least one Welsh. This article is absolute shit, though, very unclear and poorly written.
The "Scottish" "Merlins" would actually be Cumbrians, an old tribe related to the Welsh who used to live in like half of Scotland before the ancestors of the Scots defeated them. Some of them fled to the area of modern Wales. All the Arthurian stuff is Welsh-based, which is writing down a centuries old garbled version of pagan myths and records of battles.
Merlin is too real! They found a grave that was from the time Merlin was said to have existed according to this one book. I suppose it's possible that someone else died and was buried sometime during that century but it would be a huge coincidence.
Even 5th-7th century Britain had rich people and powerful chiefs and advisors that said chiefs liked. Why assume they're Merlin?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Taco Santo!
You mean 2014? It should be pretty obvious in hindsight that Clown World didn't suddenly pop into existence one day. We've been headed here since the 2010's.
Oh to be a spring child such as yourself.
 
Yes, because the British people are not allowed myths, let alone history. We must Decolonize the British Isles.
Haven't they started going after Tolkein hard for his attempt to create his own uniquely Anglo-Saxon mythos? Dude may have been a sperg (in ways both good and bad), but he fucking loved his island's history to the point of memorizing and teaching Beowulf in its original Old English.
 
Far less flimsy evidence that this is the tomb of a powerful wizard is required, before claims that it is the resting place of Merlin can be taken seriously.

Are any human remains those of a male over the age of 30? Are the words 'Forever alone' spelled out in runes anywhere on the walls of the barrow? Is there also incredulous graffiti that, when translated, reads: 'The saga of Virgilius who remained chaste for over 40 summers. Surely such a thing cannot be true?'
 
Back