Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"B-but it's not illegal" yeah because that's called a fucking LOOPHOLE you dumb fucking whore. Imagine having a position like hers, must be slimy as Hell spewing shit from your mouth and knowing all you do is lie for propaganda sake.
I loved that literal glownigger. He was in my top three characters right behind Stanley and Dale.cancelled because it was too based and true for this world.
Lore dump:
The military industrial complex and the intel agencies nuke the biggest cities in the US (except NYC where NYPD foiled the plot) during the state of the union to decapitate the US government and take over. One of the main characters is a glow in the dark CIA literal nigger who was in on the plot and keeps a nuke hidden in his garden shed.
The town has to deal with roving bands of bandits disguised as the military and a warlord from the next town over, and eventually face off with "ravenrock" mercenaries (clearly a blackwater stand-in). As the story progresses we learn that the conspiracy didn't go to plan and the US is now 3 countries: the ASA which is all states west (based out of Cheyenne) of the Mississippi and the rump USA (capitol Columbus OH) and a independent Texas. the show was cancelled before the impending civil war started.
it had surprisingly good lore for a 2006 CBS show
I ain't into stalking but can confirm that multiple women have stalked ME in the past, and one is doing so right now as I speak. She's Palestinian too..damn, and the one before that was Jewish.I agree with you. Fuck those people. If you can share, why shouldn't you?
So, when was the last time you stalked someone?
Theyve had how many years now to try and understand how their enemy's mind works?The glowies are trying their level best to disrupt the Haitians narrative:
View attachment 6417181
This thing reads like a lifetime movie on what a leftist think a KKK member sounds like.
I'm going to say that it's some sort of leftover cuckold brainwashing.JD Vance makes twitter posts that could have been straight out of MPC and he bullies the press on their own shows and some of you all are blackpilling?
I see we are still pretending the KKK wasn't taken over by the Feds decades ago.The glowies are trying their level best to disrupt the Haitians narrative:
View attachment 6417181
This thing reads like a lifetime movie on what a hard leftist think a KKK member sounds like.
>Maysville, KentuckyThe glowies are trying their level best to disrupt the Haitians narrative:
View attachment 6417181
This thing reads like a lifetime movie on what a leftist think a KKK member sounds like.
To MAGA-era conservatives, there is no crime more unforgivable than for a traditional, Reagan-era Republican to endorse voting for Vice President Kamala Harris. You won’t find any such endorsement here: I care less about whom you’re voting for than you should care about for whom I’m casting my ballot.
Of course Harris can’t keep the price of food and clothing down by setting up a ridiculous “price gouging” law (and if she could, why hasn’t the Biden/Harris administration done so yet?). Obviously giving $25,000 to first-time homebuyers would increase demand and drive up housing prices. And taxing unrealized gains would be economically catastrophic, bureaucratically unworkable and almost certainly unconstitutional.
But it’s not like Republicans have spent the past nine years defending the bedrock principles of free-market conservatism. Slowly but surely, most of them have contorted themselves into endorsing whatever former President Donald Trump thinks “economic populism” is.
That’s why, with less than two months until the election, there should be an honest discussion of whether a Trump loss would be best in the long term for “conservatism” as traditionally understood. In a sense, a Harris presidency could serve as a type of political chemotherapy: a poisonous injection meant to eradicate a tumor in order to keep a major political party alive.
What happens to traditional free-market, low-tax conservatism if Trump were to win in November? One could argue the classical liberalism horse has already jumped the fence, never to return. But if America gives up and returns Trump to the presidency, “conservatism” as many of us understood it for the past half-century would simply become a museum piece, gathering dust on library shelves.
A second Trump term would mean that for the next four years, conservatism would continue its descent into whatever Trump decides it is based on the last person to whom he spoke. He would continue to insist tariffs are paid by other countries, when in fact economists are nearly unanimous in their belief those costs are borne by American consumers. Trump would continue to fumble the abortion issue, dragging Republicans into becoming the maybe-pro-life-sometimes-when-it’s-politically-convenient party. And he would destroy faith in American elections, but conveniently only in states in which he loses.
Further, if Trump were to win, the right would have permanently ceded any moral ground to the left.
Over the past four decades, the GOP’s defense of morality, family values and patriotism was the sinew that held the party together. These were fundamental ties that held together religious conservatives, libertarian-leaning Americans worried about taxes and the economy and national defense hawks.
But Trump believes in none of these things. On the personal side, his amoral predilections are well-known and have been for 40 years (and have cost him dearly in courts around America).
Publicly, his idea of strength is to demean the presidency by cozying up with dictators and strongmen around the world. He mocks great American cities for their crime problems while he himself is carrying dozens of felonies on his ledger. Exactly what limited government principle was Trump “conserving” when he called for the “termination” of certain parts of the Constitution in order to return himself to the presidency?
Granted, it is rarely beneficial for a political party to occupy the minority in American politics, but the GOP’s best chance at regaining its conservative heritage may be to mold itself in opposition to Harris’ positions. This would allow those truly interested in liberty to oppose taxes, regulations, court-packing and “green” mandates instead of obsessing over whether Harris is Black or Indian, whether photos of her crowds have been doctored with artificial intelligence or whether America is overrun by single women who enjoy the companionship of felines.
America has had good presidents and bad presidents. It has survived Democrats and Republicans, conservatives and progressives. Each time it has come out on the other side, electing a new administration that corrects the course of the previous one.
But Donald Trump isn’t a true member of a party, nor does he clutter his mind with any ideological knowledge or allegiances. He is simply a political movement unto himself who responds with ridicule and scorn to any attempts to undergird his mercurial instincts with a cogent philosophy. He doesn’t recognize the rules that have kept America a functioning republic for nearly 250 years, which has left the nation in the inconceivable position of either electing a man to the presidency or potentially sending him to prison for most of the remainder of his life.
Conversely, Kamala Harris is a standard, run-of-the-mill Democrat with bad ideas. Her administration would prompt groans and eye-rolls among conscious conservatives while sending the deranged fringes of the Republican Party into full conspiracy mode.
A Harris administration would be a painful four years for Republicans in the way America muddled through terms by Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and Joe Biden. But pain is also the way the body teaches you a lesson. And the lesson in this case is that the sooner Republicans cut out the Trump tumor, the quicker they can once again become a healthy political party.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
is that before or after they defended the black guy from the jew who was responsible for the founding of the ADL?I see we are still pretending the KKK wasn't taken over by the Feds decades ago.
Either that, or you're schizophrenic. Kinda unsure which is more likely, but I'm going to lean toward the one that doesn't presume a female vying for your attention.I ain't into stalking but can confirm that multiple women have stalked ME in the past, and one is doing so right now as I speak. She's Palestinian too..damn, and the one before that was Jewish.
Actually come to think of it the Jewish one is probably still stalking me but got more subtle about it
Seeing this, I have no idea how my friend who said that Kamala wrecked Trump in the debate could possibly think that Vance would similarly get wrecked by Walz just because he's an established politician and Vance is a newcomer to the game.
I see we are still pretending the KKK wasn't taken over by the Feds decades ago.
I suspect you belong here.I ain't into stalking but can confirm that multiple women have stalked ME in the past, and one is doing so right now as I speak. She's Palestinian too..damn, and the one before that was Jewish.
Actually come to think of it the Jewish one is probably still stalking me but got more subtle about it
They would have at least got "beasts of the field" right.Im sure anyone in this thread could write a believable leftist flier if they tried
Sounds like some Q bullshit. reminder, the only people who believe in that shit are mentally defective boomers and leftistCan someone explain the "Stand back and stand by" thing to me? It's from a 2020 debate and TDS retards are trying to claim it's a reason why whenever Trump complains about anything it's a dogwhistle to burn shit down.
The dynamic works out pretty well. Trump is the memey ridiculous shitposter of a candidate, while Vance does the more traditional politicking.Bro if Trump could speak 1/10 as good as JD, the Dems would be utterly doomed.