- Joined
- Aug 17, 2018
As anemic as Nintendo is, they do adapt a forward-thinking strategy with their product launches. They considered the Nintendo DS a "third pillar" from their Game Boy Advance and GameCube IF the DS failed to attract an audience. For the Wii U's failings, it did inspire Nintendo to create their powerhouse known as the Switch. Let's not forget that the Wii sold like hotcakes during the seventh generation despite its inferiority from the PS3 and Xbox 360.And see my screed about Nintendo being the only ones who are profitable right now earlier. So if Nintendo turns off the lights, that’s the end of the industry. Period. It'll still keep going on the PC, since PC being an open platform seems to give it some immunity, but console gaming will be well and fully dead at that point.
Chief among Nintendo's success in the console market are their exclusives and low barrier entry for consumers and families. Let's pivot back to Call of Duty. Nintendo did not need Call of Duty on their platforms. But, Activision wanted to capitalize on the surprise install base of the Wii/DS. They can afford to experiment from their established goodwill. Sony/Microsoft are approaching diminishing returns with their gaming strategies.
I remember when Sony had mascots from the PS1/PS2 eras through more intensive platformers (Crash, Ratchet, Sly) leading into a more mature audience with Uncharted, Killzone, God of War. Now, they don't have ANYTHING to sell their PlayStation brand themselves. Third parties can only get you so far when you can get those offerings elsewhere as well. Sony is not even "family-friendly" anymore; they're appeasing to the lowest common denominator: the blind, loyal consumer. It's only a matter of time before that bubble bursts.