The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
because I don't use kids for reference because you made all that up.
INTERESTING. I never made that claim. Weird that you thought it pertinent to bring it up. Hmmm.
I have more foundation to claim you have a kid fetish because you're posting photographs of them on this criminal clubhouse forum and drawing hot colors on their legs, you
This is a weak and gay assertion to make. Every pedophile I've called out on this forum has tried to go "NO U" because I pointed out the very shit that showed their pedophilia much like I did for you showing that your fetish extends to children. Just like other pedophiles' fetishes do.
legs, you post in all the OTHER "furry" threads here, you obsessively browse inkbunny, you know what all the characters and fursonas are named,
Every person who hates furries enough to sperg out about them frequently on a forum has had to have some modicum of interaction with furries to develop that hatred. That's why I've posted in other furry threads. I don't obsessively browse inkbunny you disingenous fuckface. This is the same dumb ass argument that your friend
@whurz/
@DiamondTiara made. I've already explained the point of using Inkbunny, to show y'alls disgusting fetishes that can't be seen because some artists choose to hide their shit from guests.
whereas I quit that site entirely even knowing my old account on it could easily be located
LIAR

Having an inkbunny doesn't make you a pedophile. Nowhere does anyone claim it does. As I've started over and over, it's what you post and fav on the site that makes you a pedo. It's your legspreading fetish that is the issue. You favorited images of child ponies with their legs spread. Knowing that you get off to legspreading, that makes you a pedophile despite there being no sexual aspect to NORMAL PEOPLE.
Your brain doesn't have an issue applying that fetish to children in real life. If you see a photo of a child spreading their legs like this
(to non-gymnasts, this is a straddle split that we're taught young)
Your brain's pleasure centers activate because the angle of the legs and the sex of the human satisfy the conditions for your leg spreading fetish. It's not the fact that they're a child that makes it sexually gratifying to you. It's the leg spreading. But because your brain doesn't apply a discriminant to the age of the child, unfortunately that's when pedophiles get their label.
That photo doesn't give me any sexual gratification because I'm not sexually attracted to females nor children nor leg spreading. But I know how your brain works based on your thousands of drawings of leg spreading and reading through hundreds of your dumbass posts regarding leg spreading.
That you think my facebook name is a legitimate alias
You're being a disingenuous fuckface again. We both know that Gretchen wasn't your real name. You were hiding your real name because you didn't actually want to be found despite your claims here that you did. That's why you hid your name on your website after it was discovered, BRENDAN.
I said I don't watch his accounts, not that I shun him forevermore. He is substantially more polite than you are, regardless of our political disagreements
You're okay with being friends with a pedophile. You are retarded.