Not Just Bikes / r/fuckcars / Urbanists / New Urbanism / Car-Free / Anti-Car - People and grifters who hate personal transport, freedom, cars, roads, suburbs, and are obsessed with city planning and urban design

But then stuff happened like rapid inflation (and a bunch of poultry farm fires) and decided to pull the plug on their "commitment" in the early 2020s.

In other cases, they don't decide to make changes and prices shoot up. Ironically, these progressive policies just end up fucking over the lower-income brackets anyway.
They're always looking for a soundbite, but the follow-through is always lacking. The urbanist crowd is the same way - plenty of noise about walkable and carless (not even the more reasonable less-car) transport, very little talking about the density requirements of transit and the difficulties of right-of-way and large-scale construction.
Of course they will, eventually. At least here in Europe they're openly saying they will - "Don't worry about the new insane emission standards/mandatory EVs etc., if it turns out to be implausible they'll just revise the laws!" Well except, I or anyone who isn't insane could tell you were implausible years ago when they were first proposed, and carmakers are still having to spend eye-watering amounts of money trying to meet them, it's not something you do at once. All that money is being wasted, and the costs are obviously being passed on to customers.
Old, correct quote: "Politics is the art of the possible."
Modern, incorrect interpretation: "Policies demand the impossible."
 
The Threads Urbanist continues to be crazy:
1726620389569.png
1726620353931.png
Source (Archive)

1726620702485.png
1726620644718.png
Source (Archive)
 
Their obsession with trying to prove the viability of the cargo bike never fails to astound me. It's impossible for them to just admit that this isn't the most effective way to do this. Shifting the center of gravity off of the front wheel, what could possibly go wrong?

He has more trust in that ratchet strap holding that ladder than Jason does in the stability of his marriage.
 
Flowers are delicate and anything sold commercially has been pampered and carefully treated to make sure it looks nice when it goes to the supermarket floral department or gets delivered to your wife/mother/girlfriend/etc.

Strapping them to a bicycle like that guarantees that half the petals will be gone by the time you get them home.
 
Their obsession with trying to prove the viability of the cargo bike never fails to astound me. It's impossible for them to just admit that this isn't the most effective way to do this. Shifting the center of gravity off of the front wheel, what could possibly go wrong?

He has more trust in that ratchet strap holding that ladder than Jason does in the stability of his marriage.
This has about the same energy as the guy with a driving down the interstate with a queen-sized mattress strapped to the top of his Honda Civic with bungee cords. Oh sure, it's secure right now, but the margin of safety is so razor-narrow that just one minor error could result in a total loss of control.

I'd be less annoyed with him if he had the ladder on one of those bicycle cargo trailers with proper flags & markings. That would at least show he's willing to consider the safety of others around him. Believe it or not, even at the low speeds of a bicycle, a loss of cargo absolutely can cause injury to others and damage to property.
 
Legally speaking, in the UK any E-bike putting out over 250w is classified as being a motorbike of equal power but since it's so easy to slap one together it's pretty much impossible to enforce.
That's quite a low number, especially given that 1hp = 0.75kW (working from memory here), and a middling 50cc bike (the other type, lol) puts out about 5hp. Looks a bit like classic UK catch-all legislation.

I actually saw an e-bike yesterday (Dutch brand I've never heard of before), and it looks like South Africa does the same thing - to buy it you needed to have a motorcycle license and it had a number plate and registration disk. (This means under 16s can't drive it and you have to renew the registration every year).

The owner of the shop told me there was zero interest in the thing (There are almost no public charging points here, so if your battery goes flat you have a lot of dead weight to pedal home. Also, the price was very high - comparable to a new motorbike)

@reptile baht spaniard rid wrote:
You see it everytime a carfucker encounters an actual bike enjoyer who has improved their town, they hate each other almost instantly
That would be because Mr. Fuckcars is stuck behind the wheel of the motor vehicle he drives (strictly for medical reasons, I assure you - he's so fat any bicycle he mounts will crumple into uselessness), and is seething with jealousy.

I am almost 100% convinced that that subreddit is chock-full of posers looking for a socially acceptable way to vent their road rage.
 
The owner of the shop told me there was zero interest in the thing (There are almost no public charging points here, so if your battery goes flat you have a lot of dead weight to pedal home. Also, the price was very high - comparable to a new motorbike)
I would imagine loadshedding also puts a hamper on ebikes in SA.
 
Imagine being so poor and living in such a tiny house that you rent an extension ladder.

I mean really? https://www.homedepot.com/p/Werner-...apacity-Type-II-Duty-Rating-D1216-3/203070980 (a)

Also I'm not sure that's actually an extension ladder, it looks to be an A-frame-type folding ladder that doesn't extend much if at all. Appears to be european homosexuality, in either case.
He probably could afford and store more stuff at home, but he strikes me as the type who'd explicitly and deliberately try to own less and rent more because he's just that much of a euphoric bugman. He owns nothing, and he IS happy.
 
He probably could afford and store more stuff at home, but he strikes me as the type who'd explicitly and deliberately try to own less and rent more because he's just that much of a euphoric bugman. He owns nothing, and he IS happy.
Oh sure, there's a definite rent vs own calculus (I usually say rent it the first TWO times, if you're thinking about a third, buy it - depends on the item and cost, of course - always rent a plane or boat).

He's just somewhere weird with it. It's certainly one of my guilty pleasures, the urbanist "it fits in a cargo bike" subsection. They make fun of themselves and I don't even have to do anything!
 
Oh sure, there's a definite rent vs own calculus (I usually say rent it the first TWO times, if you're thinking about a third, buy it - depends on the item and cost, of course - always rent a plane or boat).

He's just somewhere weird with it. It's certainly one of my guilty pleasures, the urbanist "it fits in a cargo bike" subsection. They make fun of themselves and I don't even have to do anything!
I don't think it's even an explicit calculus for him. He sees car owners actually owning things. He wants to be countercultural and decided to not own such things because others do own things.
 
They're leftist so hating guns is part of their MO. However I have noticed with some lefties it's changed to "only we should be the ones who own guns".
Lefties and guns have a few flavors. You have the no gunz crowd, the fudds who grew up with gun that have the got mine mindset and think you should only have a bolt action and a 10 shot pistol, and the communsts, which want guns for the revolution.
Of course they will, eventually. At least here in Europe they're openly saying they will - "Don't worry about the new insane emission standards/mandatory EVs etc., if it turns out to be implausible they'll just revise the laws!" Well except, I or anyone who isn't insane could tell you were implausible years ago when they were first proposed, and carmakers are still having to spend eye-watering amounts of money trying to meet them, it's not something you do at once. All that money is being wasted, and the costs are obviously being passed on to customers.
The EV push is such a grift. Even the laws that mandate them always get pushed back timeline wise, because it is a utopian ideal that can never be met when it smashes back into reality.
 
This has about the same energy as the guy with a driving down the interstate with a queen-sized mattress strapped to the top of his Honda Civic with bungee cords. Oh sure, it's secure right now, but the margin of safety is so razor-narrow that just one minor error could result in a total loss of control.
That and the handling characteristics of the bike change drastically when the weight and inertia are changed because the bike itself is so light. As an experiment try walking around with a steel tube jutting out in front of you. Notice how much more resistant your body is to making turns. Same principle applies to a bike.

Motorcyclists know when you're riding with another person on the back you have to accommodate for them by adjusting your riding style.
 
As far as hating on pedestrian infrastructure and people who actually like cycling I made a quick picture of this phenomenon (I used Dallas but this is common just about everywhere with any city with a river).

View attachment 6428785
It'd be hilarious if they got rid of that "car centric infrastructure" and forced the cyclists to ford the river.

The other interesting thing about Dallas urbanists is that they constantly gush about a highway cap park:
1726670049948.png

That was paid for by this guy:

Curiously, I've never heard any of them complain about it being funded by Big Oil and Trump supporters...
 
Back