Official Kiwifarms Faggot-Hate thread

[WTBOnlineFather]

You didn't answer anything? I have a mum, a wife, a daughter, and many other women in my life? Why are they to blame for homos having 500 sex partners and prolapsed rectums? It makes zero fucking sense, dude.

Are you retarded or just pretending? I answered your question twice already. Maybe Tiktok is more your speed than a web forum if you have issues with reading comprehension.

And here is a different analysis for you: Traditionally it was every real man's duty to be the provider for a family. To abscond from said duty made you a whorecarl, a hedonist and a bum.

Gay men are all that. They dislike women and they are incurable hedonists, who lives their life without commitment to a family and to a woman. But gay men are not the only men who are like that. A lot of dumb woman haters on this site are no better.

It's as if implicating women in any way, even going out of my way to mention that men are also at fault, just immediately shorts out the wires in your NPC brain. Woman good, faggot bad, woman love faggot??? Does not compute. Online man bad, say bad thing!

I won't openly speculate as to why.

I admire your polite restraint because damn man I am tempted.

 

[Lidl Drip]

TIL men just always want to fuck each other in the ass and it's entirely up to women to prevent this from happening, because I guess everything men do entirely depends on wether or not women will approve of it. lmfao.

Men have always fucked other men and children, they do it even in societies where it's punishable by death and women have no rights. They just can't help themselves but stick their dicks into dirty buttholes.

Next time I see a fag I'll make sure to scoldingly wag my finger at him so he'll be cured.

@m1ddl3m4rch

NO! Bad faggot! No more bumming!

 

[Cherry Eyed Hamster]

I would like to throw in here that cultures where women weren’t/aren’t allowed to partake in any aspect of society other than staying home and raising the children are more open to engaging in pedastry. Ancient Greece, Rome, and Islamic empires/countries are noteworthy examples.

Not going to comment more on the issue because frankly I am sick to death of interesting conversation degenerating into gender-wars bullshit.

Really wonder if HIV/AIDS was mother nature's way of trying to stop the rot before it set in.

Mother Nature doesn’t follow a will, it just is. Having multiple sexual partners increases your chances of catching a STD, simple as. Viruses are a way of culling a large population, and before vaccinations and modern medicine they were quite effective.

Also it really just isn’t a good idea to have back-to-back-to-back sexual activity in a single night with multiple partners in a bathhouse, which is how HIV was able to proliferate amongst homosexual populations in the big cities.

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

Because it lets faggots deflect from the fact that fucking other men in the ass is a choice.

Anal is disgusting, but that aside, if women don't want us and we don't want women, what should we choose. Switch the sexes and same question regarding dykes.

If it's all women's fault then they don't have to take any accountability.

The projection is staggering.

it's entirely up to women to prevent this from happening, because I guess everything men do entirely depends on wether or not women will approve of it. lmfao.

The newly enfranchised are capable of ruining the franchise. Suffrage can cause suffering.

 

[Sperg Coalition]

Yet again, big pharma only making things worse.

Ultimately big pharmaceutical companies want to make a profit while having almost zero morals. If selling condoms or PREP pills makes them money, they will do it.
Also, daily reminder:

Every single time people bash trannies but feel sorry for pooners. I really hate how there is a double standard for this bullshit. Both are either teenagers that got groomed, literal sex pests, etc.

Not going to comment more on the issue because frankly I am sick to death of interesting conversation degenerating into gender-wars bullshit.

Yeah I agree. Your posts with statistical data about LGBT people have been very informative so far and I would like to remain on topic as possible. I came here to hate the LGBT cult not to engage in the gender-wars: the appropriate threads already exist.

 

[Carrier Pigeon]

I am a gay man who hates faggy/sissy gays and supports LGB drop the T, there, I said it

 

[Otis Mallebrok]

Nobody has said a woman physically forces a man to sodomize another man or directly causes the development of homosexual attraction. Why are you pretending this anybody's position that needs defending?

But I think that is exactly their position: Everything bad that happens is women's fault, because woman bad and me-no-gf. It's really quite pathetic.

 

[Hubelublub]

Ultimately big pharmaceutical companies want to make a profit while having almost zero morals. If selling condoms or PREP pills makes them money, they will do it.

No shit. HIV meds, PREP, covid vaccines, Vioxx, Zantac, Fenphen, whatever the fuck they prescribe for bullshit ADHD diagnoses, I'm sure there's more I'm forgetting. Keeping alive the worst sectors of society, so the rest of us can suffer.

 

[Lidl Drip]

Anal is disgusting, but that aside, if women don't want us and we don't want women, what should we choose. Switch the sexes and same question regarding dykes.

The projection is staggering.

The newly enfranchised are capable of ruining the franchise. Suffrage can cause suffering.

Stop being gay, I don't approve!

 

[Sperg Coalition]

Vioxx, Zantac, Fenphen

And to think that there are people that blindly trust doctors and take (legal) drugs without thinking if it can be dangerous or not... Pretty scary.

 

[UnsufficentBoobage]

I would like to throw in here that cultures where women weren’t/aren’t allowed to partake in any aspect of society other than staying home and raising the children are more open to engaging in pedastry. Ancient Greece, Rome, and Islamic empires/countries are noteworthy examples

Yes, it is a thing, but I'd argue it is cause, ultimately, cause men love women and tucking them out of sight completely rots the mind and makes one put on pedestal the next vaguely womanish thing.
But this does not make the fact women in USA voted gay rights in untrue.

Everything bad that happens is women's fault, because woman bad and me-no-gf. It's really quite pathetic.

How did you not starve being this retarded?

I'd argue that fag hags and troon handmaids feel flattered at what they think is men trying to become them, the perfect, mystical, pure girls, and that prideful view blinds them to all the actual truths of those being the very same low, pedo-y and degenerate dregs of mankind they vocally oppose.

 

[Cherry Eyed Hamster]

Yes, it is a thing, but I'd argue it is cause, ultimately, cause men love women and tucking them out of sight completely rots the mind and makes one put on pedestal the next vaguely womanish thing.

So instead of putting women on a pedestal, it was better they did it with underage boys instead?

 

[The Ugly One]

But I think that is exactly their position: Everything bad that happens is women's fault, because woman bad and me-no-gf. It's really quite pathetic.

"I think," i.e., "I imagine." So you're not arguing against what anyone said, you're imagining what you are certain other people would say if they said what you imagine they truly believe.

Since you admit you're trying to get people to defend a position you imagined on their behalf, not their actual stated positions, why are you surprised that people are declining to engage with the imaginary straw-man version of themselves you've constructed?

 

[UnsufficentBoobage]

So instead of putting women on a pedestal, it was better they did it with underage boys instead?

How do you even come to this conclusion?

I was literally saying that too little female presence in society is bad and harms men. You know what? I actually do not believe this, I think all the normalised homo societies consisted of creepy inbreds. And that you are a retard for even bringing them up in context of the modern world. It is like spreading pajeet rape statistics to white men, just does not relate to issue at hand but is sure used by gross leftied enough.

 

[Cherry Eyed Hamster]

How do you even come to this conclusion?

I was literally saying that too little female presence in society is bad and harms men. You know what? I actually do not believe this, I think all the normalised homo societies consisted of creepy inbreds. And that you are a retard for even bringing them up in context of the modern world. It is like spreading pajeet rape statistics to white men, just does not relate to issue at hand but is sure used by gross leftied enough.

I’ll be honest, I didn’t know what you meant but I thought you were saying that Greeks were sequestering women for their own good. Sorry if I misunderstood.

 

[UnsufficentBoobage]

I’ll be honest, I didn’t know what you meant

When I get mad, my english skills suffer. (Probably happened to the text after this line)

I recalled one thing related to this thread, how, apparently, little boys liking things marks them as "pre-gay", I quoted person espousing this here:

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/insane-parents-of-transgender-kids.30908/page-127#post-8772332

That is clearly bullshit, as not only there somehow is not corresponding "pre-dyke" behaviours, the person clearly thought it was a neutral and non-politised thing.

I am all for equal rights for both sexes, but not for men being robbed of having creative pursuits cause "girls can do anything" translated into "men are barred from this thing and this thing and this thing...unless they are girls? *winks*".
I saw so much of that gross wink shit in Tumblr and art site spaces. Grotesque mean girls literally saying that men should only occur in gay bestie or trans girlfriend and boys are icky...Lusting for Desmond-is-amazing, and such...

Equal is equal, or we are back to square one.
Mean girls get to do shit men get jailed for and shrug it off as nbd.

And then "of course girls did nothing! Men do that to themselves!"

If you wanna get treated like a person, shoulder some responsibility. I know I do (and then do not get treated as a woman, but that is my problem outside of this context).

 

[Otis Mallebrok]

How did you not starve being this retarded?

The thing is, even if I were too retarded to eat, I wouldn't starve, because I have a wife and family who loves me. Do you?

Since you admit you're trying to get people to defend a position you imagined on their behalf, not their actual stated positions, why are you surprised that people are declining to engage with the imaginary straw-man version of themselves you've constructed?

It's not a strawman, buddy. If you can blame women for the gay excesses of gay men doing gay shit with zero women involved, then you are a pathological women-blamer.

 

[The Ugly One]

Everyone who lived through 1990s saw the shift where fags were no longer dangerous predators looking to rape teenage boys or give porn to kids, but instead were portrayed as fashion accessories for women. We all know there's no male equivalent of a "fag hag." I've never met a man with a pet dyke the way I've met women with pet faggots. The TV portrayed fags as masters of fashion; there was no similar movement to portray lesbians as the experts in any male interest.

We all know that Drag Queen Story Hour was concocted by the nearly all-female American Library Association. We've all noticed the number of fathers pooning out their daughters is somewhere in the neighborhood of zero. We can all look at the polls and see critical mass of support for gay rights was led by women. We all know how many men buy "In this house we believe..." signs.

Nobody's actually claiming any of the above statements is false. Liberals brag about it. They are proud about this. They litter their tacky houses with yard signs bragging about it. The numbers back them up.

It's not a strawman, buddy. If you can blame women for the gay excesses of gay men doing gay shit with zero women involved, then you are a pathological women-blamer.

Actually, yes, ignoring what someone said and arguing with what you imagine they are secretly thinking is exactly what a strawman is. Imagining it even harder and more angrily won't make it come true. Why don't you just engage with what people actually said instead of buying your strawman a breastplate and a sword to make him look more fearsome?

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

The thing is, even if I were too retarded to eat, I wouldn't starve, because I have a wife and family who loves me. Do you?

Aren't you like 70? You benefitted from the better societal conditions of earlier decades. You can point to the cake you won in the cakewalk all you want, but it's not a cakewalk anymore, grandpa. We were born after decades of dismantling of marriage and the family.

It's not a strawman, buddy. If you can blame women for the gay excesses of gay men doing gay shit with zero women involved, then you are a pathological women-blamer.

Ackowledging the impact of women's voting trends isn't pathological women-blame. Women are not a monolith but their majority is observable.

 

[Lidl Drip]

Ackowledging the impact of women's voting trends isn't pathological women-blame. Women are not a monolith but their majority is observable.

Hey, are you still gay? Cause I told you to cut it out and as a woman you have to respect my authority on this issue.