Women will never fight against the homosexuals
Yeah, just like gays will never "fight" against women (feminists). We already had a big-tent movement including a lot of gay men fighting feminism a decade ago, and it was called the anti-SJW sphere. Did Carl Benjamin and his rainbow coalition vanquish feminism? Did Milo? The point isn't that it'll happen, it's that one group is way worse.
Sex weirdos are the permeable membrane between the public-facing world and the world of spooks and blackmail. If you have a significant number of active gays in your organization, that organization is compromised. You can put money on it.
Men love women because we love the woman for who she is independent of the physical. Independent of the woman part. Just as a woman loves a man for who he is.
You've missed the point. It's about the mechanism of understanding, not whether or not the "love" (in this context, warm desire for active understanding) is there. If a man woke up and found out that his wife magically switched sexes overnight, what would he do? Obviously it wouldn't be "romantic"; it'd be through an entirely different mechanism (if he's sane, that is).
How would "romance" advance men's understanding of each other? Romance is a concession to women's disinclination (if not incapacity) to struggle on the same level—mentally or physically—with the man's world of objective, immutable realities. There are vanishingly few female philosophers, engineers, pioneers, and conquerors. That world presses into men like an iron ring into a wax seal; women come to know that world of struggle secondhand, through us.
Men don't need that concession, and we probably don't even have the tools to accept it even if we wanted to. From what I've been reading, it seems to be bound up with women's intuitive capacity in some way.
There's no deep spirituality to this, and women are no more complex than men are, though you no doubt flattered the self-hating women in that thread with such talk.
If women don't have the extra-rational subconscious complexity that I'm describing, and also don't have the intuitive capacity to understand men directly in a more holistic sense, then the fact that they're not equitably able to engage in male modes of interpersonal understanding would mean that it's impossible to connect with them on the same level as with a man.
In this scenario, romantic love for women would be a trick played on men by the lizard-brain, projecting a mirage of depth and splendor onto a half-human flesh-automaton for the purposes of propagating the species.
I understand that this is the gay worldview, but it is not correct.