Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

Received some tips that this thread is interesting again and I have not posted for ages in it, so here goes nothing
View attachment 6430329
Gonna guess that some (((lawyers))) reached out to her, likely on contingency, and convinced her this is the case. If they try to process the lawsuit in France, they can just pretend it’s legitimate because Atlanticism is all about saying fuck having laws and borders and shit.
 
Onlyfans was made to replace wealth-extraction marriages because those in charge noticed fewer men falling for the trap. Maybe the lawfare will really be ramped up that much though. I hope not.
women pay no tax.jpg
 
I gave this some thought in the shower just now, and I'll do you one better: I'd rather make common cause with women against gays than with gays against women.
This is like the US teaming up with the USSR to fight the Viet Cong in Vietnam...

Women will never fight against the homosexuals. Either because those homosexuals are other women or because women get off to the idea of two men. Just look at troons. Troons are a class of homosexual that has usurped female sports, education, politics, and social organizations. Do you know whose doing the hard work of fighting troons and actually winning against them? Conservative men. Not liberal women, definitely not terf women.

If it sounds a little fruity, please bear in mind the original intended audience of lesbians:
Men love women because we love the woman for who she is independent of the physical. Independent of the woman part. Just as a woman loves a man for who he is. There's no deep spirituality to this, and women are no more complex than men are, though you no doubt flattered the self-hating women in that thread with such talk.

I don't know what lesbians are up to or how that works for them, which is why I was in the thread asking.
It doesn't work. Lesbians are self-hating women who reject their natural role for a life of debauchery and loneliness. It is with great irony that gay men, who everyone thinks as the sex-crazed group (they are) are the ones more likely to get married, and stay married than lesbians. Even straights are more likely to get married and stay married than lesbians. The divorce rates for gay women are in the 70 percentile. Even the word lesbian itself shows you how hollow these women are. Do gay men have a special term for themselves? No. Why can't lesbians just be gay women? Because they have to be something special. They have to be "more" than the sad misanthropic creatures they really are.

Gays and feminism are two sides of the same bullet. It's all about obfuscating human understanding of each other,
You ascribe to both an intelligence neither deserves. Gay is just sexual desire corrupted twisted into a crude mockery of God's perfection. Feminism is like wise a corruption or exploitation of men's natural desire to appease women. "I'm hungry" so the man goes out and slays a deer for her to eat. "I'm cold" so the man goes out and gathers fire wood to build a fire to warm her with. "I'm bored" so the man tells her jokes or a story to entertain her. "I'm lonely" so the man spends time with her. "I'm horny" so the man has sex with her. All feminism is, at its core, is a woman whining for a man to do something for her. "Give me: an education, the vote, a job, homo rights, abortion, transgenderism."
 
Women will never fight against the homosexuals
Yeah, just like gays will never "fight" against women (feminists). We already had a big-tent movement including a lot of gay men fighting feminism a decade ago, and it was called the anti-SJW sphere. Did Carl Benjamin and his rainbow coalition vanquish feminism? Did Milo? The point isn't that it'll happen, it's that one group is way worse.

Sex weirdos are the permeable membrane between the public-facing world and the world of spooks and blackmail. If you have a significant number of active gays in your organization, that organization is compromised. You can put money on it.

Men love women because we love the woman for who she is independent of the physical. Independent of the woman part. Just as a woman loves a man for who he is.
You've missed the point. It's about the mechanism of understanding, not whether or not the "love" (in this context, warm desire for active understanding) is there. If a man woke up and found out that his wife magically switched sexes overnight, what would he do? Obviously it wouldn't be "romantic"; it'd be through an entirely different mechanism (if he's sane, that is).

How would "romance" advance men's understanding of each other? Romance is a concession to women's disinclination (if not incapacity) to struggle on the same level—mentally or physically—with the man's world of objective, immutable realities. There are vanishingly few female philosophers, engineers, pioneers, and conquerors. That world presses into men like an iron ring into a wax seal; women come to know that world of struggle secondhand, through us.

Men don't need that concession, and we probably don't even have the tools to accept it even if we wanted to. From what I've been reading, it seems to be bound up with women's intuitive capacity in some way.

There's no deep spirituality to this, and women are no more complex than men are, though you no doubt flattered the self-hating women in that thread with such talk.
If women don't have the extra-rational subconscious complexity that I'm describing, and also don't have the intuitive capacity to understand men directly in a more holistic sense, then the fact that they're not equitably able to engage in male modes of interpersonal understanding would mean that it's impossible to connect with them on the same level as with a man.

In this scenario, romantic love for women would be a trick played on men by the lizard-brain, projecting a mirage of depth and splendor onto a half-human flesh-automaton for the purposes of propagating the species.

I understand that this is the gay worldview, but it is not correct.
 
Last edited:
Even the word lesbian itself shows you how hollow these women are. Do gay men have a special term for themselves? No. Why can't lesbians just be gay women? Because they have to be something special. They have to be "more" than the sad misanthropic creatures they really are.
I disagree. I like the word "gay" in its original sense, portraying something positive and joyful, and I hate that it's been coopted by faggots and is now used exclusively to describe shit pushers. In comparison, "lesbian" is a term derived from Greek mythology ages ago that I don't really give a single fuck about. Language hasn't suffered as a result of its adoption.
 
Yeah, just like gays will never "fight" against women (feminists). We already had a big-tent movement including a lot of gay men fighting feminism a decade ago, and it was called the anti-SJW sphere. Did Carl Benjamin and his rainbow coalition vanquish feminism? Did Milo? The point isn't that it'll happen,
Anti-SJWs weren't anti-feminist. They were/are liberals trying to fight against the more insane parts of their ideology.

it's that one group is way worse.
With gays we get aids and child rape. With feminism we get porn, abortion, gays and troons. I'd say feminism is worse.

I disagree. I like the word "gay" in its original sense, portraying something positive and joyful, and I hate that it's been coopted by faggots and is now used exclusively to describe shit pushers. In comparison, "lesbian" is a term derived from Greek mythology ages ago that I don't really give a single fuck about. Language hasn't suffered as a result of its adoption.
The word lesbian comes from the word lesbos, an island in the Aegean sea. Literally a corruption of name of an island people live on. It may be less used than the word gay, but its still a corruption. It makes more sense for them to adopt the term Sappho after the lesbian poet who lived on that island, than the name of the island itself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Male Idiot
Yeah, just like gays will never "fight" against women (feminists). We already had a big-tent movement including a lot of gay men fighting feminism a decade ago, and it was called the anti-SJW sphere. Did Carl Benjamin and his rainbow coalition vanquish feminism? Did Milo? The point isn't that it'll happen, it's that one group is way worse.

Gays are worse than women, but they get their political power from women. They will never betray their handmaidens because if we had a male-only government, we would once again crack down on the fags because for men, protecting our children from rape trumps being nice. That's not true for women. All of the pro-child-rape politics in the modern world, from open borders to gay rights to troonism, are advanced primarily by women.

So the problem with the whole "anti-SJW" thing is in the name. It had no positive vision and no diagnosis of today's ills. It wanted liberalism and progressivism, just not the really noxious, extremist version that's taken over. They even wanted their feminism, just not the really hardcore, nasty, man-hating feminism. It went nowhere because SJWs are just progressives who fully commit themselves to the cause. There's currently no right-wing movement with that kind of positive vision.
 
I don't know what lesbians are up to or how that works for them
They're "up to" unmitigated levels of cope to the point of mental retardation. So-called lesbians will tell you about their girlfriend and how much they're attracted to women before getting you to empty your balls inside them repeatedly and begging you to stick around. It's all a joke.
 
Wow I just highlight cruised this thread and what a trip.

What’s up with millennial and younger women taking up veganism and deciding they no longer need protein? They’re always insufferable as fuck about it too. They go on and on about how all farming for animals is horrible at every level. It’s like they can’t accept that the world is just as much an ugly place as it is a beautiful place.

PETA2 was as much of a disaster for women as Reddit was in the sense that they fell for all the slopaganda that was pushed.
 
Any sane cishet male would use these groups against each other
And then take on the winning group and dismantle it.
Absolutely not. A wise cishet male would allow the gays to get into power and then use their rugged appearance to manipulate the homos into giving them influence the same way women do with straight men (homos have a thing for masculine looking straight men and are indifferent to women, so I theorize that would work out).

Then the feminists could be correctively raped, which they'd actually enjoy, thus making it regular rough intercourse. The act of dominance would calm them, causing them to put on dresses and embrace their trad instincts while the homos would all die of AIDS, leaving straight men the victor.

Bam, patriarchy restored.

Wow I just highlight cruised this thread and what a trip.

What’s up with millennial and younger women taking up veganism and deciding they no longer need protein? They’re always insufferable as fuck about it too. They go on and on about how all farming for animals is horrible at every level. It’s like they can’t accept that the world is just as much an ugly place as it is a beautiful place.

PETA2 was as much of a disaster for women as Reddit was in the sense that they fell for all the slopaganda that was pushed.
You have to figure it at least encourages them to not be fat.
Then again I actually have known some fat older women who are into it too, and they convince themselves that somehow eating gross hyper-processed fake meat products and loads of carbs will still cause them to be healthy and superior purely because they aren't eating meat or cheese.

Idk, I think maybe it's because women are so used to lacking discipline that the idea of them having it for once feels novel and euphoric to them.
 
Wow I just highlight cruised this thread and what a trip.

What’s up with millennial and younger women taking up veganism and deciding they no longer need protein? They’re always insufferable as fuck about it too. They go on and on about how all farming for animals is horrible at every level. It’s like they can’t accept that the world is just as much an ugly place as it is a beautiful place.

PETA2 was as much of a disaster for women as Reddit was in the sense that they fell for all the slopaganda that was pushed.
Women have easily hijackable empathy. Here is how veganism gets pushed:
1) A subset of women are shown vegan propaganda featuring dead farm animals in their social media feeds. This causes their extremely overprotective maternal instincts to kick in, and demand that the animals be saved.
2) These indoctrinated women adopt veganism, and start shrieking "meat is murder" in their social circles, which are mainly comprised of other women.
3) Other women in the same social circles (virtual or real) have their subconscious consensus detection mechanism kick in, and they start to follow along too.

This was not only done for veganism, but for a lot of other female-driven socio-cultural phenomena too.
 
Women have easily hijackable empathy. Here is how veganism gets pushed:
1) A subset of women are shown vegan propaganda featuring dead farm animals in their social media feeds. This causes their extremely overprotective maternal instincts to kick in, and demand that the animals be saved.
2) These indoctrinated women adopt veganism, and start shrieking "meat is murder" in their social circles, which are mainly comprised of other women.
3) Other women in the same social circles (virtual or real) have their subconscious consensus detection mechanism kick in, and they start to follow along too.

This was not only done for veganism, but for a lot of other female-driven socio-cultural phenomena too.

I was watching that thing where the farmers were talking to vegans and they had to tell them how many animals die for their avocados and nuts just to keep pests away. Then animals getting caught in harvesters 😬😬
 
Back