State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

  • 🔧 Actively working on site again.

Will Nicholas Rekieta take the plea deal offered to him?


  • Total voters
    1,268
  • Poll closed .
I believe Ms. Sweep stated that he specifically showed her the artwork that the casing supposedly came from, when she was visiting the house after they were released. Because it was in the bedroom and she weirdly had to wait outside for him to bring it to her. I don't remember in which document that testimony is, unfortunately.

I don't see why he would go through all that trouble and actually have a physical object like that to show, unless it was actually where it came from. She also didn't really give a fuck and it mostly highlighted him being paranoid about seeing the bedroom, but that's beside the point.
 
Notice to remove the initial judge was late by three days. Nick's response to Null's request to film was late by 20-30 minutes. Nick's response to the state was late by a day. Nick's notice of appeal in his defamation case on the lower level was off by some 10 hours. The discovery plan was off by 2 hours. I'm sure there's more.
But most of them are not proof of any delay, since there's no date of when they appeared on MCRO, only when they were posted here.

The time difference between the documents being posted here is not an indication of how "late" they were, it is an UPPER BOUND on the delay, since there is an additional time difference between the time the documents appear on MCRO and when they are actually posted here.

This time difference is unknown since MCRO only displays the filing timestamp, not the timestamp it appeared on MCRO.

Therefore, unless some filing was expected to appear and was being actively checked by people on the thread, the upper bound is unlikely to have much relation to the actual delay in documents appearing.

Based on your own summary, it appears in past instances where a filing was actively expected, it was almost always posted within an hour.

The only two cases where there was appears to have been a delay are both circumstances where Nick has filed something late at night on a Friday deadline and it appeared the following Monday.

There you go, those are the likely circumstances when a delay occurs. There's no evidence of delays there's no evidence of delays not on the weekend.

The discovery plan was off by 2 hours.
Incorrect. It was posted at 9:04am Central time and it has a filing date of 8:15am. This means that it was delayed by less than 49 minutes.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Sam Losco
This time difference is unknown since MCRO only displays the filing timestamp, not the timestamp it appeared on MCRO.
I think the time difference we're actually talking about is the time between some court clerk receiving a document and them actually filing it. I do not presume any time difference between something getting filed and it appearing, but to cherry-pick an example, I think it's pretty clear that KR's bail notice sat in someone's inbox for a couple days before they got around to entering it in to MCRO.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Catgirl Tyranid
Someone please remind me why the MCRO having a measurable delay between filings being submitted and subsequently being viewable on the system actually matters to non-lawfags who are here to watch Nick get his teeth caved in by the circumstances he brought on himself?
It doesn't, but I made the mistake of mentioning that it happens.
 
Someone please remind me why the MCRO having a measurable delay between filings being submitted and subsequently being viewable on the system actually matters to non-lawfags who are here to watch Nick get his teeth caved in by the circumstances he brought on himself?
If Kiwis would accept that MCRO has delays, they might sperg out less with a party "misses" a deadline.
 
Judge Fischer has decided to RECUSE herself from April's case.

Note that this is a recusal by her rather than April exercising her right to get a new judge assignment through a notice of removal, as happened in Nick and Kayla's cases.

Unfortunately, Fischer did not state a reason for why she is recusing herself.

recusal.png

EDIT:
For clarity, there is no new judge assigned yet.

I think the time difference we're actually talking about is the time between some court clerk receiving a document and them actually filing it. I do not presume any time difference between something getting filed and it appearing, but to cherry-pick an example, I think it's pretty clear that KR's bail notice sat in someone's inbox for a couple days before they got around to entering it in to MCRO.
The timestamp appears to be the time the document is filed electronically through the EFS system; it appears (based on two instances) that there may be some sort of issue where MCRO does not intake documents from the filing system during the weekend, or it might have to be manually approved (for some reason) and for that reason wouldn't appear during weekends. I tend to believe Kayla's sat somewhere earlier in the process based on what Nick said, but he may be wrong.

The jab aside, I think we both made our points. I will not further entertain this discussion.
That's fine. I wasn't naive enough to be laboring under the delusion of you "entertaining" changing your mind in the first place.
 
Last edited:
Judge Fischer has decided to RECUSE herself from April's case.

Note that this is a recusal by her rather than April exercising her right to get a new judge assignment through a notice of removal, as happened in Nick and Kayla's cases.

Unfortunately, Fischer did not state a reason for why she is recusing herself.

View attachment 6437492

EDIT:
For clarity, there is no new judge assigned yet.


The timestamp appears to be the time the document is filed electronically through the EFS system; it appears (based on two instances) that there may be some sort of issue where MCRO does not intake documents from the filing system during the weekend, or it might have to be manually approved (for some reason) and for that reason wouldn't appear during weekends. I tend to believe Kayla's sat somewhere earlier in the process based on what Nick said, but he may be wrong.


That's fine. I wasn't naive enough to be laboring under the delusion of you "entertaining" changing your mind in the first place.

INB4 Nick uses this as PROOF of corruption and a total Balldo victory...

My theory is that Nick made enough of a stink about being involved that Fischer just wanted to be rid of the whole mess and appearance of bias after being removed from Nick's case.
 
My theory is that Nick made enough of a stink about being involved that Fischer just wanted to be rid of the whole mess and appearance of bias after being removed from Nick's case.
What if she saw the absolute shit show that Nick's lawyer is cooking, and pre-emptively said "fuck this shit, I'm out".
 
What if she saw the absolute shit show that Nick's lawyer is cooking, and pre-emptively said "fuck this shit, I'm out".
What if she smelled the courtroom a couple hours after Ethan Ralph was sitting in the gallery and pre-emptively said "fuck this shit, I'm out"?
 
What if she smelled the courtroom a couple hours after Ethan Ralph was sitting in the gallery and pre-emptively said "fuck this shit, I'm out"?
Just another reason why the trial should be livestreamed. Maybe we could get her affidavit on Ralph's odors. Or if that doesn't work, pack the gallery with a Kiwi Stink Squad and hold everyone hostage.

Can you smell so bad in court you catch a contempt charge? Is there precedent for this? All I can find are articles on Trump farting in court.
 
Someone please remind me why the MCRO having a measurable delay between filings being submitted and subsequently being viewable on the system actually matters to non-lawfags who are here to watch Nick get his teeth caved in by the circumstances he brought on himself?
It doesn't. I was just tired of seeing a couple of people talk past each other for several pages and hoped that I could maybe end the whole thing by explaining the situation in a way that I hoped that both of them could agree with.
 
I wonder if they just proactively move all the 3 cases under same judge. As it is pretty much one big case and not three separate cases, or at least those cases affect each other.
Could be an agreement behind closed doors for this. Especially if the judge currently handling Rekeita is more willing to handle bullshit. Maybe he gets some sort of amusement out of it.
 
Very possible I’m late and gay, but this YouTube video was suggested to me, which gives a brief overview of the criminal case (plus a mention of the Montagraph case). It mentioned Kiwi Farms as a source several times without any negative connotations. As the site continues to repair the damage made by Keffals and others through disseminating misinformation about the site, I was pleased to see the site referred to as a source and not a harassment website. @Null had recently mentioned on a recent Mad at the Internet building the reputation of the site in this direction so things like the current Wikipedia page can be updated/changed. I’m poorly paraphrasing, but that’s the gist of what was said.
 
Back