US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Whose only experience with violence is situations where they have overwhelming force, whether it be close air support, qualified immunity, their gated community, or the blind loyalty of their flock, respectively. As soon as they face any adversity equal to that they perpetuate through their violence, they become quivering messes begging for escape, like a huge part of Afghanistan veterans going to the special Russian operation experienced.

They are far worse than cowards, because their morals only stand when they know they can be the enforcers of it. Everything goes out the window when they’re on the recieving end.
You may as well have posted "there's no way you silly Republicucks can beat the US military with its machine guns, jets, and tanks."
 
Newly minted doctors "swear" the Hippocratic Oath at their graduation ceremonies from med school. Once they pass their boards, the individual state-issued licence follows. Don't break the law or commit serious malpractice and you'll generally keep your licence, irrespective of whether you've might have done  some harm.

Attorneys, OTOH, make no pledge at all when graduating from law school. But once you've passed the bar, you have an official swearing-in ceremony in which you take an Oath to uphold the US Constitution and your state constitution. Failure in doing so can lead to disciplinary actions, including disbarment.
So this explains how doctors can perform gender reassignment surgeries on minors?
 
Secret Service is trying to charge Elon Musk for making fun of them, Bloomberg's FOIA requests reveal. They are attempting to charge him with trying to assassinate Biden-Harris
View attachment 6432445
View attachment 6432451
View attachment 6432452
View attachment 6432453


SEC is also trying to charge Trump for complaining about investors manipulating his stock.
View attachment 6432455


For both:
Elon I know you're autistic and were just saying this as a rhetorical question and not trying to cause any violence but holy shit you can't say that you sperg.
 
vitiligo glasses?
I think it's cow print. They're cute enough, but don't seem like the glasses you want to wear to a congressional hearing. They look... okay, on her. I'm more worried about the stuff coming out of her mouth than the glasses on her face. I think fully black frames would look better on her.

Fashion sperging is still on-topic if it's about politicians and politician adjacent people, right?

I highly recommend people watch the Margaret Qu video posted in here, just 10 minutes and it gives a good general summary on why Kamala Harris is fucking insane when it comes to finances. Plus her voice is kind of goofy and I find that very endearing.
 
I showed someone the Haitians eating cats videos and at first he tried saying they were AI but after it clearly was not he really hit me with the "so what?" argument. It was bizarre to witness that in person. Its like you can see the gears turning and their mind being so close to changing until the brainwashing shuts those thoughts down.
Don't be so pessimistic. People only change their minds on their convictions after long deliberation by themselves. Some people will of course never be swayed, but plenty of people can be. Even a seed of doubt may sprout and bear fruit.
 
I think it's cow print. They're cute enough, but don't seem like the glasses you want to wear to a congressional hearing. They look... okay, on her.
they don't work for a government hearing
they don't work for her face
they don't work for her hair
they don't work for that jacket

they could be a fun accessory as your club gear or something but def not serious shit like this
 
they don't work for a government hearing
they don't work for her face
they don't work for her hair
they don't work for that jacket

they could be a fun accessory as your club gear or something but def not serious shit like this
Well based on what she was saying, I don't think she was taking the hearing about the policies of Biden-Harris very seriously.

In fact, it seemed like a whole bunch of them were having a hard time remaining focused on what the hearing was about.

Cow print bitch Cbat or whatever her name is had the nerve to say the congressional approval rating is 16% while providing nothing of substance to the conversation.

Sad!
 
It's really weird how every leftist political entity simultaneously spreads two messages:
1. Do not every think about or consider violence no matter what we do to you, it is always wrong, we're always watching you.
2. Trump voters are insane hyper-violent lunatics who want to kill everyone and they must be exterminated for The Greater Good.

It's like they want to provoke you without actually experiencing the results of their provocation. It's exactly like how a Borderline Personality Disorder woman acts.

It seems like libtards are trying to create a scenario where the only way for completely normal, average, everyday people to survive - not get ahead, just survive - is a complete, violent overthrow of the US government. Why would you do this?

The only explanation I can think of is that a foreign power like China who has lots of compromising information on everyone in Washington DC is trying to cause a civil war in the USA, presumably to take Taiwan peacefully or maybe just purely to stir shit and because they can get away with it. I think this because I know for a fact that it would not be that hard to completely fuck up the government, so who benefits? Clearly not the government, if they're all hanging from lamp posts or trying to run past a blockaded bridge in their libtard city while the chuds who cut the power, water, and internet to that city take potshots at them.

Clearly the chuds would benefit in the medium and long term, but we're not pushing for this at all. We literally just want to live our lives with 0% inflation, functioning resource extraction, manufacturing, and farming sectors, no immigration, and less bureaucracy. We don't really care about fags or trannies or whatever as long as they do that shit far away from us. With such an economic policy, even libtards would benefit as they'd be living in something that makes the 90s seem like the Great Depression.
If I could give you two semper fis, I would.

The elites decided they want the world to look like china. Communism infused with Corporatism. Everyone works 996. You make and have barely anything. Immigration flows through for the jobs people turn their nose up at (Sanitation et. al). They make even less than the natives. The media goes on about how global warming / climate crisis is real while the next story is of the rich and famous having their vacation half way across the world with a 50 car convoy. They've taken all your god given rights away and still want more.

You step out of line, you get black bagged and never seen again. If you so much as look at the elite the wrong way, you get killed. Everything is falling apart because the elites salted the earth for any competent person to rise in power.

If you assume that the CIA are and always were Communists, this makes sense but in reverse. The CIA is a Chinese consulate.
The CIA only looks out for themselves. Its been rogue since the 60s. At first that was fine since they were still helping America. But now, not so much.
 
And it forces the Kamala Campaign to spend resources in these places to shore them up instead of the battleground states. This is how Trump won in 2016

I remember one of the issues with Hillary's campaign in the final weeks was people noting she was going to the states she already pretty much had in the bag but not returning to states that could of used a last moment rally like Michigan

But yes, part of this is for the fans and part of it is to force Kamala to do more than hide away, because some blue voters might start to notice if she's hiding away too much
 
28% of Democrats polled say that America would have been better off if Trump had been assassinated. Another 24% were unsure.

As a general rule, around 25 percent of people will choose the wrong answer in a poll. Learned this from Scott Adams a few years ago and he is more or less correct.

You can bet that on any issue, around 25 percent will totally fuck up the answer. The real trick is to minimize how often you are a part of that 25 percent. So when you see a poll like this where an insane answer gets about a quarter of the vote, don't disregard the result but know that those people are mostly idiots on that issue.
 
Total Cartel Death 2024. Surprisingly level-headed take from a leftist crazy, or nonsense from a confused woman? You decide, America.
It's a retarded take. It isn't even possible, let alone our responsibility, to turn every shithole country in the world into a 1st-world country. What we can do is police our own border.
 
It's fascinating they're so unwilling to identify themselves or be recorded.
I just saw this, so apologies for the late response.

Many federal field agents do not want their identity publicly disclosed because, in the age of the Internet, that means they can never, ever work undercover. I think that some feds also know that being what they are makes them unpopular with certain people and they do not want to be harassed in their private lives.

Also, there are no laws requiring federal agents to identify themselves. They will not do things they aren't required to do. If they deem it necessary for an investigation or for their own personal safety, they will not identify themselves.

Many people also sperg out because they think having a camera protects them. It does not - only you obeying the law protects you. These agents probably wanted to wait and see what the guy would do. When it became obvious that he wasn't going to talk and he wasn't going to make a mistake, they left.

A lot of the time, law enforcement relies on compliance to get their way. "May I come in?" Now they can enter your house and, if they see something "suspicious," they can look around. "Can we talk?" Now you're in a conversation with them and they will use anything you say against you in their investigation.

The guy taking the video should have asked: "do you have a warrant or do you have papers to serve me?" The second those agents said no, or refused to answer, he should have gone back inside. This is what everyone should do. Never interact with police unless you must. If you must, be non-violent, polite, and shut the fuck up unless you need food, water, or a toilet. Only speak to a lawyer. Doing anything else is evidence that the police can use against you.

I got out of a lot of trouble as a teenager by simply remaining silent.
 
Today in retarded DNC shill whores, what the fuck even is down ballot races.
View attachment 6432678
I think these rallies are good moves for Trump for various reasons:

1. This year, Trump and Vance have been eager to go to enemy territory, highly contrasting with the Dems strategy of an echo chamber. He’s showing that he’s bold, he’s serious, and that he can compromise in a unity government (whatever that means).
2. It emboldens conservatives. For eight years you’ve basically had to hide that you support Trump, and these events show that supporting Trump is not only a reasonable choice, but that you shouldn’t be ashamed of it.
3. NY and DC are close to NJ and MD, respectively. Some people believe that Trump has a chance of winning those states, and a lot of are willing to travel closer for a rally.
4. They get a lot of press. Yesterday’s event was highly hyped because Trump was doing the impossible. It was in high spirits. This helps energize Trump voters but also get his message across a lot more independents. Remember that many watch rallies, or clips of rallies, from anywhere in the country.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back