LawTube - Lawyers sperging at each other on YouTube

Anyway considering the law has indeed changed since that suit, and in the direction Kurt was pushing, he may indeed have been on to something.
I took a quick gander at the PDF, he is indeed attacking the law on the same vein as it applies post-change 2014, and also as the two cases in Florida and Texas currently.

A few notes:

1) He is arguing the lawn of the federal complex is not part of the "building", therefore he cannot be banned from carrying a firearm there as a defense to the per 16 U.S. Code § 1a–7b,
Congress did amend the law in 2014 with 54 U.S.C. 104906 or a policy change now reflects that. I'm not sure how the law reading "National Wildlife refuge" plays into that.

2) He is arguing that is 1) moot because under the plain text reading of 18 U.SC. § 930 (d) he would be lawfully carrying for a purpose (attending a venue), and therefore have met the qualifications laid out in statue. Therefore the policy of a blanket firearms ban by the NPS is unconstitutional. This is the argument in current FPC Inc v. Garland and US. v. Ayala, Kurt's case was denied as it was still under the logic of D.C v. Heller and not NYSRPA v. Bruen for the "Historical analogue review" that now has been modified by (again) U.S v. Rahimi.

3) His relief is to enjoin the gov from banning firearms from being carried in the center and as the court sees equitable and necessary.

4) He has a Virginia CHL and therefore meets the burden to lawfully carry in the state of Virginia

5) He has a Florida non-resident CHL so Kurt's behavior is explained by him being an honorary Florida man. :jaceknife:

18 U.SC. § 930 (d)
(d)Subsection (a) shall not apply to—
the lawful carrying of firearms or other dangerous weapons in a Federal facility incident to hunting or other lawful purposes.
16 U.S. Code § 1a–7b
(b)Protection of right of individuals to bear arms in units of the National Wildlife Refuge System The Secretary shall not promulgate or enforce any regulation that prohibits an individual from possessing a firearm, including an assembled or functional firearm, in any unit of the National Wildlife Refuge System if—
(1)
the individual is not otherwise prohibited by law from possessing the firearm; and
(2)
the possession of the firearm is in compliance with the law of the State in which the unit of the National Wildlife Refuge System is located.
 
Archive for when he inevitably realizes how bad this makes him look:


View attachment 6433439
Why is this smug pieces of shit pretending to be a heckin stunning and brave disabled person? He didn't seem that disabled all these times.
Here's a special one from when him and Kurt were gay lovers.
 
Why is this smug pieces of shit pretending to be a heckin stunning and brave disabled person? He didn't seem that disabled all these times.
I'm 90% sure his cope is he's either autistic (an adult diagnosis no doubt), or he has "muh anxiety". Either way, he speaks like a Tumblr addicted High School girl from 2016. I don't think I have heard anyone whine about having "panic attacks" for something so petty since I was a teenager surrounded by the "daddy's little princess" types.

1726795559446.png
I'm going to update the CH post, but I forgot to include that he didn't even tell the program what is disability was. He just wanted to be excused from using the assigned tech.

The other thing that pisses me off is "I just want a basic *human* accommodation" and "They didn't treat me with basic human dignity". Bitch, they let you use your keyboard. They just wanted you to follow the constraints of the other students if possible. You're the one blasting "Nadia from 42 Luxemburg" for hurting your feelings - completely oblivious to the fact that you're unleashing an internet hate mob on this woman. I'm sure there's only one or two Nadia's at this company, and I'm sure they're hiding their LinkedIn right now out of fear of what your people are going to do them.
 
Last edited:
I don't think anybody here is simping for Kurt. Several people, self included, have acknowledged that Kurt is a minor lolcow.
It just kind of weirds me out that the instant someone shows up with some actually kind of interesting stuff on Kurt, everyone is piling on insisting it's Nick or a balldowasher. Maybe he is, I don't know. I think it would be weird and funny if it actually is Nick, but I don't see Nick being even remotely critical of himself in his current state.

I think it's obvious it isn't Nick, or if it is, he actually has gotten sober and regained some brain function.

Balldowasher? Maybe. But those are so retarded these days I don't see any of them being coherent.

Someone with a grudge against Kurt particularly? Maybe. That's a lot more likely.

But I honestly don't care. The content has been good. I sometimes randomly do searches on people for no particular reason and find something fun. This was fun.

While the patent examiner promotion case makes him look like an angry clown, the Wolf Trap suit actually raised some issues that while Kurt didn't win them, the whole total ban on concealed carry in national parks thing does seem to have fallen. Not every litigant is going to win these cases that ultimately win.
 
It just kind of weirds me out that the instant someone shows up with some actually kind of interesting stuff on Kurt, everyone is piling on insisting it's Nick or a balldowasher.
Blame the Balldowashers. They've been working overtime since May trying to rescue their dying God from himself.

You are right though. In fairness, it could be somebody who just doesn't like like Kurt.

I think @John Andrews Stan was just pointing out it's interesting this case from 2016 gets posted here after Kurt leaves Team Nick.
 
It just kind of weirds me out that the instant someone shows up with some actually kind of interesting stuff on Kurt, everyone is piling on insisting it's Nick or a balldowasher.
I sure failed to read the room!

People are quite entitled to speculate about my motives for making the post and have fun at my expense. It's plausible that someone supporting Rekieta, or Balldo Man himself, might behave as I have.

For what it's worth, I don't think the information I shared about Kurt's case weakens his modest contribution to the Balldoverse Collapse. His analysis of Rekieta's case stands on its merits and is consistent with, albeit less entertaining than, commentary from experienced defence attorneys like Potentially Criminal.

Another common theme in discussion of my posts is that Rekieta's actions are worse than anything Kurt ever did. I heartily agree.

As far as I know, the worst harm Kurt has inflicted on others is making women uncomfortable by subjecting them to his advances and wasting taxpayer dollars due to his militant incompetence as a Patent Examiner.

In contrast, Rekieta's selfish pleasure-seeking has caused acute distress to his children--including exposing at least one of them to cocaine--which is bound to cause long-term psychological, and probably physical, harm. Rekieta has also left an online legacy that will haunt his children indefinitely.

I apologise unreservedly to any farmers whose experience of the forum has been negatively impacted by my clumsy attempt to participate.
 
Another common theme in discussion of my posts is that Rekieta's actions are worse than anything Kurt ever did. I heartily agree.
Dude what about all those prostitutes that Kurt allegedly chopped up and dumped into the back of his Accord? Allegedly.
 
As far as I know, the worst harm Kurt has inflicted on others is making women uncomfortable by subjecting them to his advances and wasting taxpayer dollars due to his militant incompetence as a Patent Examiner.
So what was that incompetence though? His lolsuit was mainly about him contesting the idea of him having committed clear error to the point highers-up had to overrule his decisions. He wanted to be given full power to grant or deny patents. That's sort of a kooky demand given his record.

But what direction were his clear errors? Did he grant patents in error, or did he deny patents in "error" because current patent policy is utterly insane and garbage patents are often granted.

Was he right or wrong? He was obviously wrong in patent policy terms, because his decisions were overruled. But was he really wrong?

Because normal people view patent policy, as it currently exists, as completely retarded.
 
So what was that incompetence though? His lolsuit was mainly about him contesting the idea of him having committed clear error to the point highers-up had to overrule his decisions. He wanted to be given full power to grant or deny patents. That's sort of a kooky demand given his record.

But what direction were his clear errors? Did he grant patents in error, or did he deny patents in "error" because current patent policy is utterly insane and garbage patents are often granted.

Was he right or wrong? He was obviously wrong in patent policy terms, because his decisions were overruled. But was he really wrong?

Because normal people view patent policy, as it currently exists, as completely retarded.
The "militant incompetence" line was my attempt at humour. Objectively, it is unfair to characterise Kurt's performance that way.

The errors (Cat 2 from memory) were denying patents that should have proceeded further. An error rate, for that type error, of a bit over 6% was acceptable over the several months of probation. This worked out to two allowable errors. Kurt made 8 (but, if I understand correctly, haggled them down from 12).

The errors seemed to relate to understanding technical information about the operation of the programs (Kurt's division focused on databases) that were being examined in order to correctly apply policies and procedures of the Patent Office.

Candidates are allowed to attempt the program several times, so, if I'm fair, failing on the first go can't reasonably be described as 'incompetence'.

I'll stand by the 'militant' part of my gag, though. Rather than take advantage of the opportunity to review the errors with his supervisor and learn for his next attempt, Kurt dug in. He insisted he knew better and continued fighting pro se after his union withdrew representation.

I found reading the correspondence in the Exhibits funny because Kurt seemed to be seething at the Patent Office the same way he seethes at his chat.
 
I apologise unreservedly to any farmers whose experience of the forum has been negatively impacted by my clumsy attempt to participate.
You're cool. Don't worry about it. Your revelation seemed to be overall very well-received.

It's just that I think some people are being hyper vigilant since Nick declared total retard war on the Farms and like half the world. He's got some real scum in his corner doing his dirty work too.

Like I said, the strategy of both he and and his allies right now seems to be one of lashing out and trying to discredit his enemies and critics. It's a big lame whataboutism and you got the side eye because of that.

Dude what about all those prostitutes that Kurt allegedly chopped up and dumped into the back of his Accord?
Wait, he drives a Honda Accord? Okay, that tears it. Kurt thread now. Total lolcow! Worse than Nick!
 
Last edited:
Rather than take advantage of the opportunity to review the errors with his supervisor and learn for his next attempt, Kurt dug in.
Gosh, that doesn’t sound like Kurt!

These revelations made me consider the possibility that — if it’s true he was chimping over criticism to the point of baseless federal lawsuits against his employer — the Kurt Mueller we know and side-eye today might just be the result of significant personal growth. That’s hilarious.
 
Leonard french went to 42 luxemburg and had a less than ideal experience
A bit of a PL, but I have a bit of insider knowledge about how the 42 school works: you're told before youre even accepted that you have to adapt to whatever keyboard layout the establishment wants you to use specifically for exams (ie, QWERTY in France where AZERTY is the norm) and he had the entire piscine (the entrance exam kinda thing) to adapt to QWERTZ.
And from what I heard from the video, if other students avoid him it's really only his problem if they think he's difficult to deal with.
TLDR: what a loser lol
 
Last edited:
That said, I suspect his stock has gone up considerably since he's broken away from Nick.
I am not saying you are wrong, but what makes you say that Kurt has broken away from Nick?

Is it just because he covered the motions of Rekieta's case, or did you feel he showed a lack of sympathy to Nick in tearing into the motions?

In Kurt's autism riddled mind, could he not have given a thought to how Nick would perceive Kurt rubbishing Rekieta's motions, as technically it wasn't Rekieta who drafted the motions, but instead it was the Barneswalker, Frank White, and Kurt still regards himself as being on Team Balldo?
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: JDS
Is he unable to practice law anymore? What the fuck is he doing throwing this tantrum over some free software development school?
He's still licensed and in good standing with the bar. I'm a bit surprised he's continued his CLE, but Kurt is autistic like that.

But did he ever really practice the law? Not to throw shade at patent examiners, but it's not like you're a Sean Martin.
 
But did he ever really practice the law?
Some enterprising reporter should do a deep dive into how many self-appointed “law popes” are not even practicing attorneys. Nick loves to position himself as an innovator, but I suspect he’s far from the only fraud who’s managed to hoodwink people — if only for a while — and part fools with their money online.
 
Back