- Joined
- Jun 28, 2024
The reason I don't think that's what happened is that as of the July CHIPS hearing he hadn't completed a substance use assessment. If he wasn't willing to do that, he almost certainly wasn't doing any other treatment activities.if it is a 90 day program it would also line up with his claim that his last drink was june 5, which he claimed in a prior chat. not sure which is more likely except for the fact that the idea of him being sober for 90 days sounds impossible? 30 would be the bare minimum, but a "90 meetings in 90 days" is also possible as a recommendation by the lawyer.
What June 5th does line up with is the first CHIPS hearing, in which we learned that he popped for alcohol. By "hasn't drank since," Nick means he's successfully avoided testing positive for alcohol since then, which is the same thing as not drinking