Diseased Open Source Software Community - it's about ethics in Code of Conducts

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
"Here's the thing, you are not going to force all of us to learn rust." It sounded confrontational to me, and sounded like something defensively said to just shut down Rust in Linux as opposed to a good faith argument since no one was claiming that everyone needed to learn Rust.
If what they are saying will force everyone to learn rust as a logical consequence of the responsibility it is trying to take over, then you may weep and moan about how 'nobody is saying that' all you want as the latest wedge being driven into the kernel is jettisoned
 
If what they are saying will force everyone to learn rust as a logical consequence of the responsibility it is trying to take over, then you may weep and moan about how 'nobody is saying that' all you want as the latest wedge being driven into the kernel is jettisoned
"B-b-b-but muh right side of histry. REEE!" Argument from inevitability is probably the dumbest logical fallacy SJW retards have popularized.
 
Okay, so it's not being worked on.
The specification team already decided that the plan was for the reference to become the specification. You can see that the reference is being worked on by checking the github repo for it.
If you really need a specification there already exists a 3rd party specification for Rust at https://spec.ferrocene.dev/.
 
Is it feasible to make a fork, declare it as exclusively nontranny and nonmarxist. Considering all the people kicked there should be plenty of recruiting ground for new members?
You would run afoul of point 5 of the Open Source Definition (archive.is, Ghost Archive) , as published by the Open Source Initiative:
Open Source Initiative said:

5. No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups​

The license must not discriminate against any person or group of persons.

If you went around trying to exclude troons from your project while claiming it is open source, expect all manner of attack, up to and including lawfare. I don't recall if OSI has "Open Source" trademarked or not, but if they do, you could reasonably expect lawfare form them. Even if they're not fully pozzed yet (and there have been open attempts to to do so), trademarks have to be legally defended, or they will be lost. So, even if a majority of the board agree that troons are cancer, per their own rules, troon exclusion != Open Source. Therefore, someone claiming to do Open Source while violating point 5 would quite possibly be doing trademark dilution, and the OSI would have to attack that legally, or risk losing claim to the trademark.

To be clear, I am not a lawyer, I am too retarded to ever become a lolyer like Rekieta or Legal Eagle, much less a real lawyer, and thus my opinion above is probably complete bullshit. If our astute legal scholars local lawfags like @AnOminous or Matthew Hardin @Useful_Mistake declare that I am a retarded faggot for holding it, you should believe them.

This is the skit they're freaking about if anyone is wondering.
Of course they have their panties in a twist over the time when SNL was still funny.
 
Last edited:
If you went around trying to exclude troons from your project while claiming it is open source, expect all manner of attack, up to and including lawfare.
There's a difference between prohibiting certain people from using software, and telling them to fuck off when they try to join in on development. I distinctly remember seeing some people bitching and moaning about how those pesky volunteers can't be forced to accept women and niggers by law, unlike corporations paying people to write proprietary software. In conclusion, open source sucks, and long live Free Software.
 
I don't recall if OSI has "Open Source" trademarked or not
"Open Source" in fact not trademarked because it was used before them. Which is also why technically FUTO wanting to call their paid, but open source program Open Source, is legitimate, but not in the spirit of the definition and could cause confusion.

So they chose "Source First" so they can trademark it and define it as they wish.
 
There's a difference between prohibiting certain people from using software, and telling them to fuck off when they try to join in on development. I distinctly remember seeing some people bitching and moaning about how those pesky volunteers can't be forced to accept women and niggers by law, unlike corporations paying people to write proprietary software. In conclusion, open source sucks, and long live Free Software.
While a volunteer operation may not be subject to the same legal obligations as an employer, NGO(s) can still enforce compliance with the prevailing Western corporate homoculture by witholding funds.

ETA: Not saying I agree with this, just pointing out that these litigious assholes have side channels for getting their way while still pretending a project is "community run".

You would run afoul of point 5 of the Open Source Definition (archive.is, Ghost Archive) , as published by the Open Source Initiative
GPL+NIGGER solves this. Anyone can (re)use the software, they just have to include a naughty word in their COPYING file. :smug:
 
Last edited:
sounded like something defensively said to just shut down Rust in Linux as opposed to a good faith argument since no one was claiming that everyone needed to learn Rust
Except that kind of is what they're doing. Imagine you're a contributor to a part of the Kernel which Rust integration is targetting. If you want to continue contributing to that part of the Kernel you must learn Rust. They are telling long time contributors to learn Rust or fuck off even if they aren't saying that out loud.
 
GNOME Foundation Accepting Applications For New Executive Director





René Rebe, a Linux developer and streamer (RARE) gets swatted for no apparent reason. This is fucking retarded, imagine being the sperg who decided to target a obscure civilian chilling in his own lane:
Archive.today didn't do anything for that video. Anyway, Tom's Hardware of all places published an article before anybody else:

Linux dev swatted and handcuffed live during a development video stream — perps remain unidentified (archive)
Speculation is still abound as to who did this. Thirty minutes before the stream was interrupted, René did have to ban an angry troll, whom he mentions in a YouTube comment as one possible perpetrator. Others think someone from the Rust (programming language, not video game) development community was responsible due to how critical René has been of that project, but those claims are entirely unsubstantiated.
 
Last edited:
Something that has been really pissing me off lately is the shilling of the GOO ENGINE by ProfessorGoo/DillonGoo, from retards that don't know what they're talking about (Tiktok and Instagram retards, for example).

To summarize, this chink took blender source code, added some NPR node and edited the eevee engine a bit, and then paywalled it.
Blender is under GPLv3, so he's also required to provide the source, which he technically does. Except that you can't use that source code to build jack. He doesn't provide help, since the discord is behind the paywall, and even if he claims that you're paying for "just the built version", although I believe he's lying on multiple terms and breaching GPL, also the Build instructions are just for Blender, which wouldn't an issue if it wasn't for the fact that the built product doesn't work.
For starters, the github code only build a bunch of useless shit and a "blender-launcher.exe" with the goo engine logo. If you were to start it, it doesn't boot up because it's missing files it doesn't builds. If you try to put that blender-launcher.exe on an existing version of blender, it just launcher blender. I seriously hope someone catches wind of this Chinese Jew, because he's making some bank. I would be less livid if this annoying asshole would've been helping the upstream or at least joined the blender fund. Instead, he's telling people that he's done a "different blender" while all this thing is, is a glorified paid addon. This asshole even brags about Mihoyo being his client, so he's also using that fork for commercial use, so money isn't exactly an issue for this dev.

Like, you can even add other render engines, AMD did that with the ProRender (because AMD's drivers are so shit they wouldn't work with Cycles half the time)

I won't do any call to action, despite my contempt for this retard. I just wish the only action people would take is to go and join the blender fund.
Maybe I'm wrong and he's doing nothing wrong, but I can't help notice that he's refusing to help the master branch in all ways: he did an half attempt a while ago (not even a push commit, just a comment) and now all he does is excuses on why it wouldn't be accepted, why this can't be merged, for all sorts of retarded reasons. Again, this would work with the master branch, even as a plugin.
 
Last edited:
Allow me to tell you a story: I saw some programming news lately, and was reading the comments. I thought the programmer in question was a man, but someone corrected a commentator who referred to him as such, confusing me for a moment until I kept reading.

He trooned out since I last spoke to him.
:lossmanjack:
 
It's funny/devastating how trannyism has become sort of a religion/cult in these circles. Many of these computer touchers are lonely people that spend all of their time online (which comes with things like social media and porn addiction and general desensitization) and I feel it's most of all like a herd/group they can belong to. It's extra convenient that that group tells them that all their problems with other people aren't the result of poor social skills, or adaption, or sometimes frankly just being an asshole that does not put any work into getting along with other people, but that they never were quite the "right" person to begin with. When they join the cult then, the goalposts are moved and then other people don't get along with them because they are *phobic and it's always about that and not about individual shortfalls and then it's reinforced through other members of the cult defending them against the "cruel outside that will never truly understand them" (it's actually quite the opposite, these people are quite transparent; they just don't really like what other people see in them) while never questioning them about their e.g. misogynistic or generally misanthropic views, poor lifestyle choices, "difficult" personalities or lack of proper goals in life.

There's not a universal reason why a particular person decides to join the cult but the more I think about it the more I feel especially in these circles the portrayal of the computer toucher as a lonely, weird genius in popular culture plants the seed in many young people. The portrayal of the hacker that is also a socially successful and well integrated member of society is incredibly rare. These people then fall into that role very young as children like to emulate archetypes, to belong. Then of course there is also the rampant grooming on an industrial scale through social media like discord, where perverts then snatch these people up at a very young age. I really wonder when this will end. It won't end with Gen Z, that much seems to be clear. On the other hand, it doesn't feel exactly sustainable either.
 
There's not a universal reason why a particular person decides to join the cult but the more I think about it the more I feel especially in these circles the portrayal of the computer toucher as a lonely, weird genius in popular culture plants the seed in many young people. The portrayal of the hacker that is also a socially successful and well integrated member of society is incredibly rare.
This is an good observation. The major hacker movies (Matrix franchise, Hackers) and anime (Lain) portrays the hacker protagonists as extremely different from the society. Hackers characters are lightly bending gender stereotypes, which troons immediately pulled over the line to say it's queer and trans symbolism - which I don't agree with, because despite the costumes, the gender/sex of the characters is clear cut:
1726940261814.png
Even Cereal (Matthew Lillard, 2nd from the right) is not even close to how a troon looks and behaves today, despite being the flamboyant gay character in the movie he is still masculine.

Then you have the Matrix - there is one theory that the Matrix is an allegory of transsexualism but I think that came up much later, when the Wachowski brothers became sisters, I don't agree with that theory at all and I don't see it like that. It came up years later, but the cult turns facts into opinions and the other way around.

And finally Lain is portrayed as a socially inept girl child spending all day long in PJs, so all the tech trannies immediately go "literally me" because it validates their three deepest desires, to be a child, to be left alone by the scary society and three to be a girl. All these three are connected because these people never managed to mentally grow up, they are afraid of the adult life and are actively fighting against it.

I'm not sure how the characters in Mr Robot are, I did not watch it, maybe someone here can share some thoughts.
 
Back