Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

What's "incredible" about that? - For many women, that is all they bring to the table.

Reminds me of how radfems sperg out about misogynist gay men for the way they talk about their digust for vaginas. It upsets them a man doesn't worship at the alter of pussy, that they don't have power over a man because of what's between their legs.
 
Also, a lot of us post our frustrations with generally observable female behaviour here, whereas the other thread is literally fat, ugly lesbians making up things to complain about.
Maybe just make BP DMZ entirely, so they can have their CC/LCF 2.0 they so desperately want, while they conduct raids on other parts of the forum to get male attention when they get bored 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️
 
Why don't men just overthrow and take over things.(in minecraft) I'm genuinely curious. Throughout history you have. What's stopping you? You are the stronger sex.
The time ain't right. Things will have to get worse before they get better

Beautiful.

Maybe just make BP DMZ entirely, so they can have their CC/LCF 2.0 they so desperately want, while they conduct raids on other parts of the forum to get male attention when they get bored 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️
BP has a lot of off-topic threads that don't belong there, so, unless those are removed from it and put into the appropiate sub-forum, that's a bad idea
 
Why don't men just overthrow and take over things.(in minecraft) I'm genuinely curious. Throughout history you have. What's stopping you? You are the stronger sex.
Why bother?
In this utterly impossible hypothetical scenario, men would have to tardwrangle women for at least a good decade before they finally shut up and deal with it. Some men would die to simps. Families would be split up even more than they already are. Children would be under a lot of stress due to the new environment and women going crazy. And all for what? To get laid again? To keep providing for women, like we were already doing before anyway? Genuinely, what would the average man actually get out of assuming all responsibility once more? It's little different than an incel having the nerve to try raping a woman. What would actually change?

you can't put the genie back in the lamp
collapse is coming because retards didn't understand why tradition exists
 
Anyone else notice how when we stick to the rules, don't mention the [REMOVED BY REDDIT] thread, source everything offsite, one of ♀️them♀️ will show up to trauma dump or start a fight?
We can barely get 10 pages without one of the slits coming here to attention whore or deliberately break the rules.

Women seem to think if they have an opinion, and a man wasn't around to hear it, then it didn't happen.

It's because they instinctively know how vacuous and retarded other women are and that female recognition, updoots, and "yass kweens" are just meaningless noise.

They crave male validation and energy.
They yearn for the kitchen
Because deep down they know men’s spaces are better, cooler and inherently more interesting, even when they’re chock full of autism. A bunch of foids bleeding out of their wherevers are simultaneously tyrannical and boring. Our latest foid traitor @fupaballs found that out the hard way when she was caught fraternizing with the enemy.
 
I had an epiphany today on the whole business with women thinking being slutty makes us "intimidated" by their "power" rather than seeing them as cheap, available cum dumpsters. Both sexes have an issue with projecting ourselves onto them.

Take, for example, how many women believed that being accomplished professionals would make them more attractive to men. Why do they think this? Because that makes men more attractive to women. Male sexuality and female sexuality are alien experiences. We are incapable of truly understanding how attraction feels to the other sex. We don't intuit the other sex; we can't.

So that leads us to why women fail to understand how sluttiness is perceived by men. To a woman, a man who has slept with a lot of women is indeed powerful...because he is. Countless women have found him attractive enough to sleep with him, so her attraction to him is validating. He lives by his own rules, which is exciting. And she fantasizes about being his last lay, which would mean she's head and shoulders above the countless women he's slept with.

Sluts imagine that men see the same thing in them. That's where all this crap about "you're just intimidated by a woman in control of her own sexuality" came from. They don't grasp what our perspective even looks like, and how a woman who sleeps around appears as both low effort and low value.
 
Why don't men just overthrow and take over things.(in minecraft) I'm genuinely curious. Throughout history you have. What's stopping you? You are the stronger sex.
The challenge is that women do have an advantage given the environment we live in. There's a reason so many females wind up in middle management positions, because they might be a lot less competent on average, however they're way more consistent and when they ARE dissatisfied they channel it in much "safer" ways.

As I've heard it, women are a lot more likely to show up on time and not hung over.

That therefore gives them a sort of entrenched position within the economy. If men suddenly made women all go back into the kitchen, there would be a tremendous number of these positions left vacant. Women may not be great at them, but in the modern hyper-connected system consistency often trumps talent.
Meanwhile there's a reason that ADHD is diagnosed far more in western men than women (even though women are more likely to go to a psychiatrist). It's just a natural consequence of testosterone that men have greater drive and therefore are less tolerant of idle classroom or office settings.

That also means the establishment likes women more. Women are overall jollier participants in the work <-> consume process; they bleed money vs. men; they're more susceptible to social manipulation; they're more dependent on public support/protection; when they are dissatisfied they tend to attack their neighbors instead of aiming upwards; their "empowerment" often involves self-harm...they're much safer overall.

That means it's an active, ongoing priority to prevent any dissatisfied males from organizing. The media and other interests will identify these pockets of forming dissatisfaction and try to interrupt them.
So long as people are fragmented nothing can happen, you just wind up with freaks going out and shooting random people which only makes the issue worse.

So basically women are agents of the system, comrade. That's why.
 
BP has a lot of off-topic threads that don't belong there, so, unless those are removed from it and put into the appropiate sub-forum, that's a bad idea
Agreed. I don't understand why anything to do with Troons or Pooners is on that part of the site - it is plagued with Wahmens who instantly start brigading when a man says something they don't like i.e. the truth.

Take, for example, how many women believed that being accomplished professionals would make them more attractive to men. Why do they think this? Because that makes men more attractive to women.
It's incredible how many women don't realise that we don't give two fucks about their tenuous achievements. Like, no, women, we don't care about your latest Diversity promotion that you got at the expense of a more qualified man.
 
Why don't men just overthrow and take over things.(in minecraft) I'm genuinely curious. Throughout history you have. What's stopping you? You are the stronger sex.
That would require the total upheaval and (likely) destruction of every institution in Western countries. Women and TPTB benefit too much and in too many ways to let men have power back over the system, It's a great source of all the political strife going on in the post industrialised world right now. Women wont be put back into their proper role in society until after a civilizational collapse and reset or bloody civil war.
 
Agreed. I don't understand why anything to do with Troons or Pooners is on that part of the site - it is plagued with Wahmens who instantly start brigading when a man says something they don't like i.e. the truth.
There's no other group that they can openly hate. I think that it goes back to what @The Ugly One said about women (by and large) trying to protect other women whenever a man appears, regardless of if that woman is of any moral character or not.

Were a man to appear in a discussion that negatively talks about women where women are most of the ones speaking, they would close ranks and try to post "rebuttals" and isolated cases of "the one good [member of a group of largely bad people]" to try and tell you that the group is not that bad. As in modern times said feelings have also extended to regular criminals, niggers, illegals, faggots, kikes, etc, etc, the troons is all they have left, and thus see it as "their thing", which no man should be able to fully touch, much less possess
 
Why don't men just overthrow and take over things.(in minecraft) I'm genuinely curious. Throughout history you have. What's stopping you? You are the stronger sex.
Time's not right for it, it's unironically better for people to be patient and let everyone reap the fruits of their own error. Eventually they'll get sick of sour grapes and start wondering why the women who are faithful to the Lord all seem to be happier than they are, and that's when we'll start to see fireworks.
 
It's incredible how many women don't realise that we don't give two fucks about their tenuous achievements. Like, no, women, we don't care about your latest Diversity promotion that you got at the expense of a more qualified man.
I know some very accomplished women engineers. It's not fake diversity achievement. It's just not in the least bit attractive to me.
 
Last edited:
Why don't men just overthrow and take over things.(in minecraft) I'm genuinely curious. Throughout history you have. What's stopping you? You are the stronger sex.
Strength means nothing in an era where control of information, psychological influence and lawfare reign supreme.
Why bother?
In this utterly impossible hypothetical scenario, men would have to tardwrangle women for at least a good decade before they finally shut up and deal with it. Some men would die to simps. Families would be split up even more than they already are. Children would be under a lot of stress due to the new environment and women going crazy. And all for what? To get laid again? To keep providing for women, like we were already doing before anyway? Genuinely, what would the average man actually get out of assuming all responsibility once more? It's little different than an incel having the nerve to try raping a woman. What would actually change?

you can't put the genie back in the lamp
collapse is coming because retards didn't understand why tradition exists
Correct. It is too expensive to re-impose traditional morals on populations that have been liberated from them. It is far cheaper to replace them with other surplus humans that already adhere to traditional morals. The elites are hedging their bets by importing muslims and others from third-world shitholes. If all else fails, they will have that population to fall back on.
 
Back