At what point is one too old for a site like this?

Like any fandom for some it's sexual and for some it isn't.
It's a fetish subculture all the way down.
I fully admit that for me there is a sexual element to it as it would be hard to deny that when I've drawn nsfw artwork in my spare time.
See? Was that so hard? Glad to be here for your coming out party. 🥳🎉🎊
 
How could that be? I thought we were known as "terf island" and the NHS was rolling back a lot of things they implemented related to transgendered people.
They are rolling back a lot of the pushes done when it comes to putting kids in hormones and subsidizing the procedures, but if you were to call a troon a man in public you would almost certainly end up in troble with the police. Hell, a dyke was forced to pay 60k because she "misgendered" a "gender-fluid dog"
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/lesbia...ned-for-misgendering-gender-fluid-dog.200741/

Didn't that recent report about trans medical care come from us too? I can't recall the name of it sadly.
Like any fandom for some it's sexual and for some it isn't. I fully admit that for me there is a sexual element to it as it would be hard to deny that when I've drawn nsfw artwork in my spare time.
"For some" being like 90% of all its participants, and those are the ones who show it openly.
>draws pornography in his spare time and says so without the slightest trace of shame
So much for the allegations aganist not being a sexual deviant
 
  • Like
Reactions: UERISIMILITUDO
It's a fetish subculture all the way down.
I strongly disagree with this, but if this is what you believe than you must also believe a lot of fandoms are just a thin veneer over fetishes.
>draws pornography in his spare time and says so without the slightest trace of shame
So much for the allegations aganist not being a sexual deviant
I don't feel any shame in admitting that. Artists all throughout history have drawn pornography and it doesn't indicate they are sexually deviant. Sex is a major focus of art across all mediums whether explicit or implied.
 
I don't feel any shame in admitting that. Artists all throughout history have drawn pornography and it doesn't indicate they are sexually deviant. Sex is a major focus of art across all mediums whether explicit or implied.
>Is a porn addict
>Not a deviant

Sex, and the depiction of sex in art, is not the same as pornography, something that you would know if you didn't have you brain fried by faggotry, furfaggotry, and porn addiction
 
>Is a porn addict
>Not a deviant

Sex, and the depiction of sex in art, is not the same as pornography, something that you would know if you didn't have you brain fried by faggotry, furfaggotry, and porn addiction
Drawing the occasional pornographic piece of art does not make one an addict or a deviant. The vast, vast majority of artwork I've drawn is wholly safe for work

Sex in art and pornography is a difference that only exists within the eyes of the beholder. Many, many people in this world would consider any sexual art to be pornographic and would never make a distinction.
Good to see we're on the same page now.
I was hoping you wouldn't say you actually believed that. How dumb.
 
Drawing the occasional pornographic piece of art does not make one an addict or a deviant. The vast, vast majority of artwork I've drawn is wholly safe for work
Yes it does, normal people don't draw pornography, and normal people sure as hell don't do so because they feel bored. If someone said to you that they drank to not feel bored, would you declare that person to not be an alcoholic?

Sex in art and pornography is a difference that only exists within the eyes of the beholder. Many, many people in this world would consider any sexual art to be pornographic and would never make a distinction.
No, stalker child, it doesn't, and someone who finds pornography "fun" is unable to see the difference anyways.

I was hoping you wouldn't say you actually believed that. How dumb.
A gay therian that's in his 40s, by the way
 
  • Like
Reactions: UERISIMILITUDO
If someone said to you that they drank to not feel bored, would you declare that person to not be an alcoholic?
That depends on the quantity the were drinking, but consuming and creating are not equal ways to spend one's spare time. Creating is inherently better because you have to work and hone skills.
No, stalker child, it doesn't, and someone who finds pornography "fun" is unable to see the difference anyways.
Art is fun and sometimes exploring sex and sexuality in art is fun.
A gay therian that's in his 40s
I have not denied those things.
 
Last edited:
Yes it does, normal people don't draw pornography, and normal people sure as hell don't do so because they feel bored.
I don't think using normal people as a measure is necessarily a good thing. They can be convinced to call men women, and increasingly say stupid shit, fr fr no cap on god.
 
That depends on the quantity the were drinking, but consuming and creating are not equal ways to spend one's spare time. Creating is inherently better because you have to work and hone skills.
There's nothing creative about pornography.

Art is fun and sometimes exploring sex and sexuality in art is fun.
Said like a true porn addict.

I have never denied either of those things.
Yes, but it is rather rich that someone like that dares to call other people's beliefs dumb.

I don't think using normal people as a measure is necessarily a good thing. They can be convinced to call men women, and increasingly say stupid shit, fr fr no cap, on god.
Well, normal is not necessarily the average, but rather the innate reactions and opinions of the common man when living within a civilization. There's a good reason as to why no societies where its own members killed, stole from, raped, etc, each other on a regular basis have lasted for any meaningful period. It's inherently antisocial and destructive behavior, and I would argue that it is the same with the open consumption/creation of sexual material and the partaking in sexual activities, even prostitution
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: UERISIMILITUDO
I don't think using normal people as a measure is necessarily a good thing. They can be convinced to call men women, and increasingly say stupid shit, fr fr no cap on god.
This is completely correct and your opinions are high quality.
There's nothing creative about pornography.
That is objectively false. It's as creative as any other art is, you just happen to not like the subject matter.
 
That doesn’t even make sense, I didn’t say anything about that.
You don’t stop liking Kiwifarms, or furry shit, or whatever else you’re into just because you have the nerve to continue aging.
There's a point in which you have to grow up. A 40yo man liking Teletubbies is weird, and it is weird due to the sole reason that he's 40, a 70yo man liking American Pie the same way a teen does is weird, and it is weird because it is a 70yo man, a 40yo woman dressing like a goth girl is weird, and it is weird because she's 40.

You have to grow up.

That is objectively false. It's as creative as any other art is, you just happen to not like the subject matter.
It is not art and never will be. Its only purpouse is to act as a crude mockery for a sexual relationship for those who don't have them or aren't satisfied with the one they currently have. Nothing more
 
Back