Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

[JoseRaulChupacabra]

Professional/Academic success is like a conditional multiplier for women's attractiveness in that you'd have to already be attracted to her to actually be drawn to the fact that she's a doctor/lawyer/engineer.

 

[Iron Jaguar]

I know some very accomplished women engineers. It's not fake diversity achievement. It's just not in the least bit attractive to me.

I have seen two or three woman engineers (Femgineers? Enginesses? Enginas?). They were competent but also ugly as fuck and dressed like boilermakers.
Most women in STEM these days are not there because of competence; they're there for the free ride. They'll never be held accountable, no matter how much they screw up.

 

[GumballFapper]

Women are overall jollier participants in the work <-> consume process; they bleed money vs. men; they're more susceptible to social manipulation; they're more dependent on public support/protection

Studying the history of advertising and Edward Bernays is a massive blackpill. It's all about jerking off the female vanity and they'll happily throw their their husband's and father's money at you. One of the first examples of this was when he ran a psyop paid for by cigarette companies in the 1920s to encourage female smoking. Sure, they did manage to break the female smoking taboo, but what actual empowerment did women gain from it? Nothing. The capitalist war on foid psyches has intensified tenfold since then. "Consumer feminism" is the word, wimmin believe the consooming the latest products/fads is empowering and liberating


Even null admitted that the majority of KF donations come from wimmin. Foids are the perfect consoomers and capitalists' wet dream. It's also why they're OFFENDED at minimalist male spaces, it's not filled with tens of thousands of dollars of decorative junk so their brain will short circuit

 

[The Ugly One]

Professional/Academic success is like a conditional multiplier for women's attractiveness in that you'd have to already be attracted to her to actually be drawn to the fact that she's a doctor/lawyer/engineer.

It's nice to have a woman that is within a delta of your intellectual ability, but it's still not attractive. When a woman interacts with a man of status and high achievement, it makes her feel all tingly and silly, the way a woman with big boobs and pouty lips batting her eyes at a guy makes him retarded.

Even null admitted that the majority of KF donations come from wimmin.

No, he didn't. He made a joke about most of the site's profits coming from women. The site makes zero profit. Most of zero is zero. Haha, funny joke, but apparently most KFers are too innumerate to understand it. This has been explained countless times.

 

[Ibanez RG 350EX]

It's also why they're OFFENDED at minimalist male spaces, it's not filled with tens of thousands of dollars of decorative junk so their brain will short circuit

View attachment 6445335

Men are totally content with the simplest of creature comforts. Women would sleep on a bed of nails if their peer group considered it enviable and glamorous to do so.

It sounds like such a miserable, exhausting way to live.

 

[STARS158]

Strength means nothing in an era where control of information, psychological influence and lawfare reign supreme.

I forgot who said it but someone mentioned social media has magnified womens social power a hundredfold, I never used to read news stories on 10 yr old girls hanging themselves before due to bullying, but I'm sure the power for young girls to socially go after other girls semi-anonymously is probably it.

 

[anustart76]

If men suddenly made women all go back into the kitchen, there would be a tremendous number of these positions left vacant.

The vast majority of these positions are worthless to most people anyway.

 

[JoseRaulChupacabra]

t's nice to have a woman that is within a delta of your intellectual ability

No amount of intellectual ability or education stops a woman from worshipping things the media tells her to worship - from Obama to Taytay to the New Zealand horsewoman.

If anything, education enables her to tweet more about Merkel and make excuses for migrant rape.

 

[STARS158]

Me reading womens advice thread:

 

[Ser Prize]

So basically women are agents of the system, comrade. That's why.

I forgot who said it; but didn't one of the OG communists say women are the best targets?

 

[World Famous Quasi Payer]

If a man spoke this way about attraction, and was telling you he was straight, you'd immediately assume he was deep in denial about not being into women. It's possible that the difference here is that women have a harder time divorcing sexual attraction from perception of personality than men do, which would explain why it's so odd-sounding as a man; that interpretation takes a lot of charity, though.

In general their descriptions of lesbian romantic attraction all sound like a deep friendship at most, which from what I've gathered may be harder for women to get into. I wouldn't be surprised if they're more inclined to interpret it "romantically" when it does happen, in the same way that they do that for their yaoi slop. I'm not sure if they've reached even that, however.

A part of the reason I was in there was that in the way I've been conceptualizing "romance", there didn't seem to be room for female homosexuality in the same way that there's room for male homosexuality. It really seems as though you need at least one man to make it work, no matter who the other person is. You also can't make fraternity incestuous when there's no fraternity. Maybe the rare ones who reach something like "fraternity" can go gay, but that's the generous interpretation.

I'm not sure what kind of bond women have that'd even be possible to sexualize.

I personally believe the "romantic" aspect is more important than the physical sexual aspect of sexuality. Physical stimulation is going to inevitably be pleasing because that's what sexual organs do, but I don't think you could do the same for emotional bonding, you can't force that,even if you tried to manipulate someone emotionally it would need time and effort to imitate an emotional bond. Sexual gratification is pretty much free. If you as a man only see women as a sexual object and dont even consider having a more long term relationship or at least some kind of formal responsibility with them I don't really think you are into women at all, what would be the difference between a woman and a fleshlight?. But again that's just how I see it and I have nothing to back this so take this last bit with a grain of salt. I am not a man and I don't know how attraction works in their case i can only speculate and assume things

She confuses feelings of friendship for romantic feelings. Sad.

Why don't men just overthrow and take over things.(in minecraft) I'm genuinely curious. Throughout history you have. What's stopping you? You are the stronger sex.

Most men don't hate women. Most men actually do love women and want to be with them. Just as most people refuse to accept differences between the races or even the existence of race. Most men refuse to accept fundamental differences between men and women or that there is more to us than what we have between our legs. Most men don't want to hurt women, and think men who even suggest men be allowed to defend themselves against a woman are monsters.

There's no other group that they can openly hate.

the troons is all they have left, and thus see it as "their thing", which no man should be able to fully touch, much less possess

Problem is they aren't allowed to hate troons. Remember that's why they're on this website or some other obscure website instead of reddit, where they would rather much be. They hate men talking about troons because most men rightfully come to the conclusion troons are the fault of feminism. Whereas most of these women are terfs who are desperate to pretend troons are the fault of MRAs, rich gay men or the nebulous patriarchy. They refuse to accept the call is coming from inside the house.

 

[David Kirk Ginder]

Men are totally content with the simplest of creature comforts. Women would sleep on a bed of nails if their peer group considered it enviable and glamorous to do so.

It sounds like such a miserable, exhausting way to live.

High-heel shoes (which are objectively uncomfortable to wear) are basically nails.

A woman with high-heel shoes is like a woman with an accomplished career: men don't really give too much of a shit when looking for one.

 

[The Ugly One]

A woman with high-heel shoes is like a woman with an accomplished career: men don't really give too much of a shit when looking for one.

High-heeled shoes enhance and draw attention to the secondary sex characteristics men give a shit about, which is why they exist. If something didn't actually get attention, it wouldn't have any staying power in women's fashion. Strippers don't wear 6" heels with platforms for themselves, or for other women. They wear them because men throw more money at them when they do.

She confuses feelings friendship for romantic feelings. Sad.

Camille Paglia once said to male writer, somebody like Christopher Hitchens (I don't remember), she finds men physically attractive, but can't emotionally connect to us. He responded, "Well, yeah. That's what a lesbian is."

 

[Pomniman]

I forgot who said it; but didn't one of the OG communists say women are the best targets?

Engels, so it can easily be argued that feminism as a whole has been a marxist enterprise from the start.

 

[KittyGremlin]

Because deep down they know men’s spaces are better, cooler and inherently more interesting, even when they’re chock full of autism. A bunch of foids bleeding out of their wherevers are simultaneously tyrannical and boring. Our latest foid traitor @fupaballs found that out the hard way when she was caught fraternizing with the enemy.

That explains why they're a little nicer to us lately. It would seem that the harder Jersh locks down BP the more of them flock here.

 

[Iron Jaguar]

They hate men talking about troons because most men rightfully come to the conclusion troons are the fault of feminism. Whereas most of these women are terfs who are desperate to pretend troons are the fault of MRAs, rich gay men or the nebulous patriarchy. They refuse to accept the call is coming from inside the house.

*OrsonWellesClapping.gif*

 

[Dante Alighieri]

Awww yeah, who cares about anything other than murdering babies?

 

[Ser Prize]

Awww yeah, who cares about anything other than murdering babies?
View attachment 6447502

Women worship abortion. It is as sacred as religion to them.

 

[Felis Meanis]

I forgot who said it; but didn't one of the OG communists say women are the best targets?

Engels, so it can easily be argued that feminism as a whole has been a marxist enterprise from the start.

Well apparently it was Engels, according to mr./ms. Likely, but I am reminded of this quote from George Orwell's "1984" (how many times since its inception has this novel of his been quoted? I read in the preamble to "The Road to Wigan Pier"
that civilians and soliders in the Soviet Union were amazed by how well Orwell grasped and detailed the intricate workings of the communist propaganda and dictatorship, and so I suppose it naturally follows that the man intimately knew what he was talking about):

“Winston had disliked her from the very first moment of seeing her. He knew the reason. It was because of the atmosphere of hockey−fields and cold baths and community hikes and general clean−mindedness which she managed to carry about with her. He disliked nearly all women, and especially the young and pretty ones. It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy.”

The phrase "he disliked nearly all women" is very much on the nose, and rather misogynistic at face value, of course. Then again, the following sentence of "It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy." does strike home in Current Year™. The setting of the story gives these comments all the necessary context, though.

Whether or not it was Engels who outright said it or Orwell who described this communist sentiment, it's all the same. Orwell was a socialist (back in the first half of the 20th century, mind, which certainly makes him a different kind of socialist than contemporary ones), it's true, but he did hate (or dislike, at the very least) communists something fierce. The fact that he felt the need to include this commentary of women in his work should give everyone pause, feminists and non-feminists alike.

 

[God of Nothing]

Women worship abortion. It is as sacred as religion to them.

killing one's own offspring and denying it is the ultimate denial of responsibility