Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Strix454]

'd be more worried about mouthing off about the program for the CHIPS case though. if they're convinced he has an issue and wanted him to go into a recovery program, but he's now publicly proclaimed that he never had an issue and the recovery program was a waste of time, that might potentially be seen as noncompliance, or at least grounds for keeping him away from the kids.

Yeah. That is the one I would really worry about. Especially if he or his attorney said something very different in court or to CPS or in the evaluations he would have to during the CPS process. The danger for him in family court would be creating an impression of doing things in bad faith.

But I don't know how this is going to play out. I've heard of people going through the process in bad faith plenty of times. But I've never heard anyone BRAG OPENLY in public about doing the process in bad faith in the middle of a CPS case. At the very least, Nick has created a very compelling argument for his drug testing in the CPS case to be intense and very long term.

In some CPS cases I think reaction to Nick making the statements he made would be to order him to take even more recovery classes.

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

Unless he testifies, his credibility isn't really at issue.

But if he doesn't testify, the evidence against him is overwhelming. Unless he knocks out the cocaine he's fucked.

That cocaine isn't disappearing. I'm definitely not a lawyer, but I don't see a magic legal trick that makes a judge say "The coke ain't legit, the court must acquit".

 

[Vibralldo]

That cocaine isn't disappearing. I'm definitely not a lawyer, but I don't see a magic legal trick that makes a judge say "The coke ain't legit, the court must acquit".

He thinks the "the video's got a watermark, the warrant is invalid!" is that magic legal trick.

He can't make the coke go away, so he can try making it not admissable in court. It won't work, but he can try.

 

[August Levasseur]

That cocaine isn't disappearing. I'm definitely not a lawyer, but I don't see a magic legal trick that makes a judge say "The coke ain't legit, the court must acquit".

The "legal magic trick" would be knocking out the warrant. If the warrant is deemed invalid, any evidence that came from it is automatically inadmissible, this includes all of the drugs they found at his house.
This is why he's been so insistent on a Frank's hearing to challenge the warrant, his entire case relies on it. If (when) that fails, he's completely and utterly fucked and there's no longer anything he can reasonably do to win the case.

 

[AnOminous]

The "legal magic trick" would be knocking out the warrant. If the warrant is deemed invalid, any evidence that came from it is automatically inadmissible, this includes all of the drugs they found at his house.
This is why he's been so insistent on a Frank's hearing to challenge the warrant, his entire case relies on it. If (when) that fails, he's completely and utterly fucked and there's no longer anything he can reasonably do to win the case.

And he's not asking for that hearing because it's a really fantastic slam-dunk either, it's just that the warrant is clearly facially valid (that is the text in it more than adequately states probable cause). In an ordinary hearing like the omnibus, you don't get to argue outside the four corners of the document and introduce extraneous evidence.

You can only do that in a Franks hearing or some other kind of evidentiary hearing challenging the way the warrant was obtained, and it must involve deliberate or more than merely negligent misrepresentations to the court about material facts used to obtain the warrant.

So I don't think this is going to work, but it's really the only way it could work for him. Pure Hail Mary shit. Unless he has something way better than "hurr durr muh watermark" it doesn't fly.

 

[IDF]

No doubt participation in the recovery program itself is protected, but is mouthing off about the program protected as well?

Generally you sign releases for everything that goes on in treatment, at least after being sentenced to such things. If he's doing this for CPS I would assume they would have get access to the progress/results and what the clinicians actually thought about his participation otherwise it wouldn't really do him much good as far the government's evaluation would be concerned.

 

[The Internet Dick]

Nick keeps mighty strange company these days, and spends money on really weird shit. I guess you kinda have to when you're scum.

There are very old (and very cliché) sayings addressing this phenomenon; e.g., 'Water seeks out its own level', 'Birds of a feather flock together'. Lowlife scumbags of all stripes gravitate toward each other. They find each other and congregate. The inverse is true, too. The Bible talks about the men and women who matter in every community, the good ones, the ones who keep it going and make it work.

Rekieta and his wife had a choice. They could've (if they had wanted) been those people who matter: looked up to, liked, respected. Instead, they chose to become one with that hive of scum and villainy we call The Sektur, which is mainly occupied by narcissistic con men, pedophiles, perverts, and every variety of dysfunctional attention whore.

Too bad for the kids. I hope Rekieta and his wife get time. I know it isn't likely but both deserve it.

 

[Major]

Nick is clearly starting to panic that his case isn't going the way he thought it would. He really probably thought he could get the whole thing thrown out on a technicality and save his ego, but that's looking less and less likely.

Having to plead guilty for a reduced sentence will cripple his reputation (not that he has one) and that's just too much for him; that's what all the talk of 'eating a bullet' was about. The stress is getting to him.

 

[repentance]

This graphic is kind of interesting. When I got my driver's license the instructor told us that regardless of what you actually do alcohol never leaves you system quicker or slower. The degredation is always the same. So if you have drunk so much you have a high alcohol level you need a certain time. What DOES help is your tolerance level. You might have a rather high alcohol level in your blood but you can actually function and not be a drooling mess

It definitely depends on how much you've drunk. They don't give values there but plenty of drink driving campaigns do give values. Plenty of people will blow 0.0 after less than 12 hours if they haven't been binge drinking.

 

[Boingboingboingboi]

And he's not asking for that hearing because it's a really fantastic slam-dunk either, it's just that the warrant is clearly facially valid (that is the text in it more than adequately states probable cause). In an ordinary hearing like the omnibus, you don't get to argue outside the four corners of the document and introduce extraneous evidence.

You can only do that in a Franks hearing or some other kind of evidentiary hearing challenging the way the warrant was obtained, and it must involve deliberate or more than merely negligent misrepresentations to the court about material facts used to obtain the warrant.

So I don't think this is going to work, but it's really the only way it could work for him. Pure Hail Mary shit. Unless he has something way better than "hurr durr muh watermark" it doesn't fly.

i think you mentioned it in the past that one reason (and perhaps the only reason) to grant the franks hearing at this stage might be to head off grounds for appeal. have your thoughts changed on this?

i'm skeptical because it seems like a bad precedent to have such a low bar for a franks hearing, and nick's griping about the "editing" of the video is the makings of a bonafide retard lunatic. it was so pathetic they didn't even file a response to the state (they didn't file a response, right?). granting a franks hearing "just in case" seems unnecessary, a waste of state resources, and setting a bad precedent, given how solid the warrant is. but i could be wrong.

 

[AnOminous]

This graphic is kind of interesting. When I got my driver's license the instructor told us that regardless of what you actually do alcohol never leaves you system quicker or slower. The degredation is always the same.

Unless you have serious liver disease and can't metabolize for shit.

i think you mentioned it in the past that one reason (and perhaps the only reason) to grant the franks hearing at this stage might be to head off grounds for appeal. have your thoughts changed on this?

Not really. I still don't think he's really stated a good case for having one, but I wouldn't get too bent out of shape if he gets it anyway.

I hope he gets it and testifies because I suspect he might come out of the hearing feeling like the walls are closing in if he takes the stand and gets utterly wrecked.

I suppose it's possible he has some ace in the hole and has somehow had the restraint not to gloat about it, but it's just not seeming likely to me. I think the two most likely possibilities, without putting them in any order, is that either the Franks hearing is outright denied because he hasn't made a good argument for one, or it's granted but he loses, with the least likely possibility being he actually somehow wins.

I'd be interested if anyone, especially anyone who knows Minnesota law, thinks there's a real avenue to him winning this.

 

[Peace Through Power]

That’s @iheartnick that Nick was replying to. Maybe she will give us some insight on the cereal comment if she’s not threadbanned. She hasn’t been on site for several weeks but has been chatting shit to & about Nick on X. Nothing about cereal though.

I had no idea that @iheartnick is Evie Warner. That's hilarious. This is her in the video preview on her channel

Himedall looked into her earlier in the lawsuit thread

EDIT: Upon inspection it looks like Evie Warner is a (literal) retarded woman who makes films and hates Nick.

Maybe she doesn't know how cereal works, although she looks like she has been able to figure it out

 

[Xander from the Future]

No streams, but still going down without the reminder to unsubscribe.

View attachment 6418577
View attachment 6418583

Honestly I think it's just natural drop off from his reputation declining.
How much has he lost so far?

 

[John Andrews Stan]

I've heard of people going through the process in bad faith plenty of times. But I've never heard anyone BRAG OPENLY in public about doing the process in bad faith in the middle of a CPS case.

I love that Nick thinks “I fucked up my entire life and my kids’ lives without any help from drugs or alcohol” is something to brag about.

 

[LiquidKid]

As someone whose rarely consumes alcohol I appreciate this information. I see them in the supermarket in the same location as the, er, normal can size.

They’re not “just for mixing with liquor” nor are they “just sold by liquor stores.”
People buy the tiny cans because they want to cut back on soda intake and/or don’t want to drink diet soda. They’re also commonly used on airplanes and as a complimentary soda at certain businesses. I see them get purchased and drank all the time, but never once have I seen them used for mixers.
I’m sure people do use them for mixers, but that’s far from the primary function. Coca Cola themselves advertise them as the “healthy” alternative

 

[John Andrews Stan]

They’re not “just for mixing with liquor” nor are the “just sold by liquor stores.”

Yeah, that was a bizarre claim. I’m sure Nick just prefers smaller vessels that his delicate lady-hands can grip more easily than a standard soda can.

 

[Mandatory User Name]

Nick's attempts to appeal to sympathy with "my life isn't a game" and the suicide baiting etc. are hilarious, especially in the context of who he is.

All that time he was using the Kiwifarms to relentlessly mock lolcows, did he not realize what type of person he was being? did he not realize who he was getting in bed with? did he not realize the audience he was cultivating? or does Nick just believe himself to once again be the exception to the rule like he always believes he's the exception?

You created an audience of people who mock lolcows and then you became a lolcow, what did you think was going to happen Nick? Your life IS a game Nick, the same game as Maddox, the same game as Russel Greer, the same game as Jack Murphy, Ralph or Tonkasaw. You can't now get mad at the game just because you're losing it.

 

[repentance]

Generally you sign releases for everything that goes on in treatment, at least after being sentenced to such things. If he's doing this for CPS I would assume they would have get access to the progress/results and what the clinicians actually thought about his participation otherwise it wouldn't really do him much good as far the government's evaluation would be concerned.

Child protection services usually have enormous caseloads and don't have a lot of resources for anything other than ticking off the checklists they've made when creating the plan for the family.

Rehab services in general don't have a great success rate and the rehab industry itself has normalised the idea that relapse is a normal part of recovery.

 

[Father Balldo]

How Is Rehab Different From Recovery?​

Drug rehab refers specifically to substance abuse treatment. Recovery, on the other hand, is a process that can often, but not always, begin with accessing a treatment program.

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) defines recovery as “a process of change through which individuals improve their health and wellness, live self-directed lives, and strive to reach their full potential.”

According to SAMHSA, the four dimensions of recovery are:

• community
• purpose
• health
• home

What Does Recovery Look Like?​

What recovery looks like is different for everyone. This will often involve addressing health-related effects of addiction, as well as other areas of life affected by substance use.

What you might address during the recovery process:

• relationships with family members
• marriage/romantic partnership
• ability to care for children/dependents
• feeling of self-worth
• employment status
• school life
• friendships
• housing situation
• criminal justice-related issues

https://bedrockrecoverycenter.com/articles/rehab-vs-recovery/

 

[Pagan Min]

Nick is clearly starting to panic that his case isn't going the way he thought it would. He really probably thought he could get the whole thing thrown out on a technicality and save his ego, but that's looking less and less likely.

Having to plead guilty for a reduced sentence will cripple his reputation (not that he has one) and that's just too much for him; that's what all the talk of 'eating a bullet' was about. The stress is getting to him.

Since his head doesn't have an extra massively-gaping hole in it, I'd say the stress hasn't gotten to him enough yet. Ah, but one can always hope, can't one...

In any case, this disingenuous fucker bringing up the suicide-baiting is just demonstrating once again that he's nothing more than a manipulative, lying cunt who'll say anything he can in order to mislead/confuse/beguile his remaining morons, er, I mean fans. If they're STILL ridin' with Rackets at this point, there's absolutely no hope for any of these brain-dead buffoons.