- Joined
- Apr 30, 2023
While there are other points I could pick at, consider that Steam OS is really not a general OS to run on a ton of devices. It's more like Mac OS X(86) of a few years ago where it's designed really only for the Steam Deck hardware at this point, but because the Steam Deck is an X86 computer under the hood it just happens to run on X86 computers -- with compromises, for tinkerers.That’s the thing, PCs are in the unique position where they don’t need a brand identity. Companies tried to make “console” PCs in the past (like Valve teaming up with Alienware to make the first Steam Machines), and it never worked since PC gaming just wasn’t streamlined at all. But now, Steam OS has already been established to provide a strong user experience, and is itself the brand. Think about non-console devices; the software/OS is the number one point of contingency for customers, not the maker of the hardware.
Desktop PCs are Windows (the general purpose OS that’s on a ton of devices) vs. Mac OS (the specialized OS that’s exclusive to one device) vs. Linux (the obscure third choice that only enthusiasts care about).
Phones are Android (the general purpose OS that’s on a ton of devices) vs. iOS (the specialized OS that’s exclusive to one device) vs. ”other” (the obscure third choice that only enthusiasts care about).
In this hypothetical scenario, the new era of consoles would be Steam OS (the general purpose OS that’s on a ton of devices) vs. Nintendo (the specialized OS that’s exclusive to one device) vs. ”other” (the obscure third choice that only enthusiasts care about). Microsoft would either go under the third category or be a competitor in the first category depending on whether they tried to make some gaming-centric version of Windows after the Xbox console’s retirement.
But I want to use that word very deliberately: era. The idea of a consolized PC isn’t new, but we’re finally at the point where, given the right conditions, it can make a serious impact in the gaming landscape.
The most direct parallel would be Windows and previously DOS serving as a general purpose video game OS since before I was born.
What's interesting is how Steam OS might eat Apple's lunch in some ways -- Macintosh had long been an alternative OS for running games, only recently (relatively speaking) did it become an absolute joke for that.
And despite Microsoft's dominance in gaming on a theoretical level, in practice it has almost always (or just always?) been bested by Nintendo or Sega or Sony putting out a special box with special games only for that box.
Why is that? In spite of PCs being better on the top end, the systems most people buy are just not that good at running games. In the old days it was the beige box special, then "you're getting a dell," then whatever basic laptop went for $500. That could change as mid range AMD APUs are actually really good now, but the whole market has shifted away from using computers at all -- many people do not have even laptops anymore.
So I think there's still a big market in the custom special box, especially when the price is reasonable.