Encounters With SJWs/Tumblristas Offline or In Unusual Communities

LazarusOwenhart said:
2658972.main_image.jpg

I see that and raise you Louise Mench, former conservative MP for Corby.
Click to expand...
Phwoar. I'd show her my MP. If you know what I mean :tomgirl:
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: cappaint, chocolatesaltyballs, DirkBloodStormKing and 3 others
Ruin said:
Just found out through a mutual friend that a sjw I've clashed with on multiple occasions wants to hatelez with me.

Insert vomiting gif here.
Click to expand...

That's actually a really good way of shutting up Tumblrinas and SJWs and soapbox sadies in real life. The more aeriated they get towards you and passionate about how they're right and you're a shitlord, the more susceptible they are to a lecherous wink and a "You fancy me don't you?"

Normally this makes then storm off reeeeeing or try to slap you or knee you in the knackers but either way it shuts them the fuck up.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: Lizard Pope, UnsufficentBoobage, Meowthkip and 3 others
AnOminous said:
Despite all my rage I am still just dumb and under-age.
Click to expand...
smellymarine said:
I don't know if this is the best place to put it, but a search for 'Rhodes' turned up nothing, so:
One of the leaders of the 'Rhodes Must Fall' campaign (dedicated to getting a statue of colonialist, diamond magnate and scholarship founder Cecil Rhodes removed from an Oxford college he donated to) has posted an insane racist rant on Facebook:
LOL wow unable to stop smiling because something so black, wonderful & LIT just happened! And of course, the catalyst was a radical non-binary trans black activist - Wandile Dlamini - from the Rhodes Must Fall movement. Because trans activists have BEEN the ultimate blessers of this decolonial struggle!

To cut the long story short, we are out at Obz Cafe with the said activist, and the time for the bill comes. Our waitress is a white woman. I ask the said activist what the going rate for tips/gratuity is in these shores. They look at me very reluctantly and they say 'give me the slip, I'll sort that out'. I give them the slip.

They take a pen & slip in a note where the gratuity/tip amount is supposed to be entered. The note reads in bold: "WE WILL GIVE TIP WHEN YOU RETURN THE LAND". The waitress comes to us with a card machine for the bill to be sorted out. She sees the note & starts shaking. She leaves us & bursts into typical white tears (like why are you crying when all we've done is make a kind request? lol!). Anyways, so this white woman goes to her colleagues who are furious. She exits to cry at the back & a white male colleague of hers reluctantly comes out to address us & to annoy us more with his own white tears telling us that he finds our act "racist".

We then start breaking it down for this white man & ask him why they are catching feelings when we haven't even started (like the part where we take up arms hasn't even come & yall are already out here drowning us in your white tears? Really white people? Wow.). We start drawing him to the political nature of the act & why we couldn't be bothered that they decided to catch feelings from the note. We tell him it's great that business as usual has stopped & the pressing issue of land is now on the agenda in that space - seeing the cowntry was celebrating 'Freedom Day' yesterday. We then chase him back to do his job. And continue with our conversation before exiting the café.

Moral of the story: the time has come when no white person will be absolved. We are tired of "not all white people" and all other bullshit. We are here, and we want the stolen land back. No white person will be out here living their best life while we are out here being a landless and dispossessed black mass. NO white person shall rest. It is irrelevant whether you personally have land/wealth or you don't. Go to your fellow white people & mobilise for them to give us the land back. That will be the starting point of all our interactions from now. We will agitate all our spaces with the big question: WHERE IS THE LAND?

Thank you to all the non binary, trans & all other black bodies who have been at the helm of this decolonial moment in the settler colony known as South Afrika. NOTHING will ever be the same again. Alibuye Izwe Lethu!
Bear in mind I only have this second-hand from here, though.

That just reminds me of Bill from the infamous "Hank gets raped by a dolphin" episode of King in the Hill. "It happened to me! Six years ago! And four years ago!"
Click to expand...
Man, fuck people who don't tip. They are rich asshole scum.

Sorry for the A-logging.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Disagree
Reactions: Fart, BestUserName, Yhwach and 10 others
A girl in my class at Law School last year walked out of the criminal law exam because she was triggered by a question on rape and sexual assault. She then proceeded to email the assessments office and ask them for a paper without a sexual assault question on it. She was politely told to fuck off and given a failing grade. Goodthing too - the last thing we need are lawyers who can't handle a case because of "muh triggers".
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Fart, Purple Stuff, BestUserName and 29 others
TheImportantFart said:
A girl in my class at Law School last year walked out of the criminal law exam because she was triggered by a question on rape and sexual assault. She then proceeded to email the assessments office and ask them for a paper without a sexual assault question on it. She was politely told to fuck off and given a failing grade. Goodthing too - the last thing we need are lawyers who can't handle a case because of "muh triggers".
Click to expand...

One of my lecturers told me a story about how when she was studying a friend of hers hung herself, so she went to the library, got every case about hanging and read through them all. Just so in a real case she would be able to cope. She was awesome, understanding of issues, but wouldn't let you use them as an excuse. Good on your uni for dealing with that well.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Kaker Cake, Asa_Spades60 and 14 others
TheImportantFart said:
A girl in my class at Law School last year walked out of the criminal law exam because she was triggered by a question on rape and sexual assault. She then proceeded to email the assessments office and ask them for a paper without a sexual assault question on it. She was politely told to fuck off and given a failing grade. Goodthing too - the last thing we need are lawyers who can't handle a case because of "muh triggers".
Click to expand...

My Criminal Evidence class in my last year (2007-8) at university had a sort of proto-trigger warning on it. "This course is not for the faint-hearted. The volume of reading and case law is very large and the cases often deal with difficult or unpleasant situations."

Thankfully nobody complained but I suspect the previous year someone may have on the basis of the syllabus containing stuff on whether you can quiz rape victims on their sexual history. "MUH SLUT SHAMING." We were all too hard nosed.

I'd be interested to e-mail the tutor of that course and ask him if his chapter on "Vulnerable and suspect witnesses" is still taught or whether it's been trigger-warninged and safe-spaced into oblivion.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Honeybunny, Yhwach and 4 others
Ginger Piglet said:
My Criminal Evidence class in my last year (2007-8) at university had a sort of proto-trigger warning on it. "This course is not for the faint-hearted. The volume of reading and case law is very large and the cases often deal with difficult or unpleasant situations."
Click to expand...

I actually don't see a problem with presenting it like this. Sometimes it is necessary to give it to people up front so they can decide if they're on the right track. With some things you either hack it or you don't. The problem with trigger warnings today is they coddle pansies instead of discouraging them.
 
  • Agree
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Purple Stuff, UnsufficentBoobage, BR55 and 20 others
Today I found out the same guy I posted about before is into healing stones

He's also done tarot on a few people before, including me, but it seemed more of a hobby at the time

The more I learn the more I kinda want to back away

TheImportantFart said:
A girl in my class at Law School last year walked out of the criminal law exam because she was triggered by a question on rape and sexual assault. She then proceeded to email the assessments office and ask them for a paper without a sexual assault question on it. She was politely told to fuck off and given a failing grade. Goodthing too - the last thing we need are lawyers who can't handle a case because of "muh triggers".
Click to expand...

How tf did she make it to law school??? And WHY was she in law school??? What was she planning to learn?????????
 
Lurkette said:
How tf did she make it to law school??? And WHY was she in law school??? What was she planning to learn?????????
Click to expand...
I don't think she was planning on doing criminal law professionally, she just forgot you have to do it as part of the course. We could tell she was kind of an SJW because her Facebook timeline was full of crap from Black Lives Matter and other left wing """news sources""", but even we didn't expect her to pull that one. She had of course never been raped or sexually assaulted - she just didn't want to deal with a topic that made her uncomfortable, something you have to, y'know, do all the time as a lawyer. She was also from an insanely wealthy family so very much a champagne socialist.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: BestUserName, UnsufficentBoobage, Meowthkip and 4 others
Unusual community, I think, fits the bill.
So, mild powerlevel here, but I'm a 40k player. For those who don't know, Warhammer 40,000 is set in a grimdark dystopian sci fi far future. Humanity is beset from all sides and war is the only constant. The SJW in question was a newcomer at my usual game shop, since the owner took a minute or two to greet him and he doesn't usually do that for regulars. I wave, being polite, and turn back to the group I was setting up a game with. SJW sits near us to watch, since he expressed interest in maybe learning the rules and playing a game. My opponent says yes, and I'm not too bothered so what the hell, right?

Now, by this point we had finished up deployment and our armies were mostly deployed. His army was Imperial Guard, Night Lords for me. What I can only imagine caught SJW's eye is the smattering of third party minis scattered in my opponent's force. To be specific, he had auxiliary forces and second line units made from female minis. They were rather well done and nicely painted to fit in with the rest of his force, but still a relative minority in his force since his front line units were Cadian minis and there were quite a few on the board. We start playing, and SJW occasionally asks clarification on rules and whatnot, all the new player stuff. Second turn rolls around, and it happens. I deep strike a unit of close combat specialists into his second line and send them on a merry hunt for his lovely female minis with lightning claws and chain weapons.
Cue SJW: Why are you attacking them?
Me: I'm trying to win and his second line has heavy weapons.
SJW: No, why are you attacking the female characters?
Me: ... I just told you.
My opponent: The ladies are soldiers too in this regiment. What's wrong with that?
SJW started a mini rant at this point about how my strategy was sexist. Sexist, because I wanted to win. Sexist, because the mortars crewed by the womenfolk were shredding my cultists and I wanted them silenced. My opponent stops what he was doing and looks sideways at SJW, with the shop owner watching us since SJW is doing nothing to keep their voice down. At this point, I ask SJW what they would do in my situation since I've lost my patience. I get told that I shouldn't move infantry up the middle where mortars can shoot them. What about when I'm near the guns, I ask. Take the crews prisoner, I get back. I say that there isn't a rule for that, and it would be stupid to have. The resulting mini rant had some version of, "killing women at all is sexist and therefore bad" somewhere in it. Now the shop owner comes up and asks SJW to leave because the ranting has distracted three other RPG groups from their games. SJW huffs and what I can only describe as half stomps his way out the door.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Stuff, UnsufficentBoobage, Begemot and 22 others
ADN_VIII said:
Unusual community, I think, fits the bill.
So, mild powerlevel here, but I'm a 40k player. For those who don't know, Warhammer 40,000 is set in a grimdark dystopian sci fi far future. Humanity is beset from all sides and war is the only constant. The SJW in question was a newcomer at my usual game shop, since the owner took a minute or two to greet him and he doesn't usually do that for regulars. I wave, being polite, and turn back to the group I was setting up a game with. SJW sits near us to watch, since he expressed interest in maybe learning the rules and playing a game. My opponent says yes, and I'm not too bothered so what the hell, right?

Now, by this point we had finished up deployment and our armies were mostly deployed. His army was Imperial Guard, Night Lords for me. What I can only imagine caught SJW's eye is the smattering of third party minis scattered in my opponent's force. To be specific, he had auxiliary forces and second line units made from female minis. They were rather well done and nicely painted to fit in with the rest of his force, but still a relative minority in his force since his front line units were Cadian minis and there were quite a few on the board. We start playing, and SJW occasionally asks clarification on rules and whatnot, all the new player stuff. Second turn rolls around, and it happens. I deep strike a unit of close combat specialists into his second line and send them on a merry hunt for his lovely female minis with lightning claws and chain weapons.
Cue SJW: Why are you attacking them?
Me: I'm trying to win and his second line has heavy weapons.
SJW: No, why are you attacking the female characters?
Me: ... I just told you.
My opponent: The ladies are soldiers too in this regiment. What's wrong with that?
SJW started a mini rant at this point about how my strategy was sexist. Sexist, because I wanted to win. Sexist, because the mortars crewed by the womenfolk were shredding my cultists and I wanted them silenced. My opponent stops what he was doing and looks sideways at SJW, with the shop owner watching us since SJW is doing nothing to keep their voice down. At this point, I ask SJW what they would do in my situation since I've lost my patience. I get told that I shouldn't move infantry up the middle where mortars can shoot them. What about when I'm near the guns, I ask. Take the crews prisoner, I get back. I say that there isn't a rule for that, and it would be stupid to have. The resulting mini rant had some version of, "killing women at all is sexist and therefore bad" somewhere in it. Now the shop owner comes up and asks SJW to leave because the ranting has distracted three other RPG groups from their games. SJW huffs and what I can only describe as half stomps his way out the door.
Click to expand...

That is a seriously exceptional individual. I mean I know it's a game, so extra special exceptionalism was sprinkled on, but does this idiot assume enemies refuse to shoot at women in real life militaries because sexism?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: George Wood, Ravelord, DirkBloodStormKing and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back