Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 16.9%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 96 25.8%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 63 16.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 146 39.2%

  • Total voters
    372
@Null chances of getting the bodycam footage going way up to the moon?
He's likely unable to appeal this ruling unless he goes to trial and loses. In general, Rekieta would be forced to sign away the ability to appeal it as part of any plea deal.

If he goes to trial, likely the bulk of it comes in.
 
Preview of Nick streaming about how this is actually a big win, or whatever:
winning.png
 
I will try to summarize it in 1 word

DENIED

Nick Rekieta lost on EVERYTHING at the omnibus stage, including any issues his bumbling Barneswalking lawyer failed to argue with particularity or otherwise specifically identify.
Gee our law takes were so totally retarded, we kiwifags got so felted. It's like Nick's right every single time, and we're just never anything but wrong.
smug-balldo-color.png
 
I will try to summarize it in 1 word

DENIED

Nick Rekieta lost on EVERYTHING at the omnibus stage, including any issues his bumbling Barneswalking lawyer failed to argue with particularity or otherwise specifically identify.
Wrong again Scandinavian Prude Kiwicel, this was my plan all along to ensure the the bodycam footage is released so it proves that I don't live in a crack shack without jeopardizing muh kidz case. It is you who has lost on everything
 
Last edited:
I wonder if that's how Judge Fischer found out about its vile contents and the repulsive shit Nick said.
That would make a lot of sense. As an officer of the court he might be ethically bound to inform her of a potential conflict.
I keep forgetting this phrase about that just appearance of impropriety is enough for a recusal.
 
(Nick's lawyer fucked up so bad the judge viewed any general probable cause challenge, as opposed to requesting a Franks hearing, waived)
I pointed out just yesterday that would have been an exercise in futility. The arrest warrant is clearly and obviously facially valid and it isn't even borderline. It lays out more than adequately the basis for probable cause for the purpose of finding illegal drugs. The Franks hearing was really the only way to rebut that.

I thought Nick might try (and he still might) to exclude the evidence in some pretrial motion like a motion in limine, although I can't see any reason for that unless there's some silver bullet in the bodycam video (there are no silver bullets). However, the court seems to have slammed the door in his face on that one by ruling everything he didn't raise in the omnibus is waived. That may be the most brutal part of this ruling.

The judge basically said enough of your bullshit, Balldo Man, we're moving forward.
 
But SURELY Nick isn't so fucking booze brain retarded to think he has a shot at actually making it through trial? ...right?
No, but his ego and narcissism are both telling him he does have a shot. "Six in one hand, half dozen in the other" kind of thing.

he can plead out without having to admit guilt
I do this in traffic court all the time. Should work just fine for Rackets. I mean really, how much of a difference is there between speeding in a schoolzone and schooling your kids in the speedzone?
 
Nick, you did nothing wrong. You did everything correct. It's not your fault. There was nothing you could do. You asked for justice and the judge dropped your input. It's these Kiwifags online pattern spamming. You couldn't do anything. This is bullshit.
 

Nate and Uncivil are livestreaming the judge's decision. If you'd prefer to watch on Uncivil's channel, you can do so HERE (it's the same stream).
the video where nick is arguing against his own take on the video is very funny, but the rest of it was pretty good.

From the other lawyers takes and the little I know it feels like the three options nick has is double down on corruption and try and shame the county into dropping it (insane), go to trial and try and blame it all on Aaron (stupid and risky) and essentially take a deal, claim responsibility and save his wife and side ho by taking all responsibility. (ego blow, but you look the best in the long run and the safest option) the smartest thing nick can do is take the deal and try and be the hero for the two women. people remember the begginings of things and the end of things, if you have a good ending you can make psople forget most of the middle bit.

There is a small part of me that really really wants him to go to trial but for the kids sake atleast I hope he spares the two women and really pushes for bettering himself. For gods sake take whatever deal you can..
 
Back