Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 155 40.7%

  • Total voters
    381
DENIED

Time for a drunken cokestream Nick. You need to tell this so-called judge and all the rest of them what you really think. Lay down some real truth those damn no-nothing Kiwi Incel prudes, fat Sean, Aaron and all the rest of them

Its NOT your FAULT Nick. Barneswalker Frank FAILED you in court. All the facts were on your side. Your constitutional rights and such.

And you need to Appeal this all the way to the US Supreme Court if necessary. HIRE BARNES! Put all Grandpa's money into this. There is no other way.
I'm betting he calls the Judge a PDF File. And a Furry.
The judge reviewed the video because Nick made him. He fucked himself on a scale that is hard to describe.


Damn, if only someone could have predicted this outcome. So weird, no actual changes to the video.



Gotta hand it to Meme Copium and Sean who both did a frame comparison to show that the videos were identical. The judge concurs.



The fucking morons argued that Pomplun never watched the entire video, while it was explicitly stated that he did. And the judge calls them out for it.
lmao, they are so fucked.



I really can't even right now.
Nick made the Judge watch the full length and breadth of Exibit 10. Which means he watched the "Judge Pussy Liquor" rant himself, first hand. I'm betting he let her know. He might have been ethically required to inform her that she had that potential conflict time bomb out there while she was still hearing related cases. As always Nick is his own worst enemy.
I get the distinct impression this judge is Officially Tired of Nick's (and his attorney's) shit. This reeks of "you had your chance, pal, and you blew it" gavel banging to me.
I'm thinking making the Judge watch Exibit 10 before the trial did Nick no favors. What was his lawyer thinking? Had he not bothered to watch the video himself?
 
I too want to believe we're going to get the funniest outcome.

But SURELY Nick isn't so fucking booze brain retarded to think he has a shot at actually making it through trial? ...right?
Nick believes he can persuade anybody of anything. That's what the shower calls are all about. He might genuinely think he can persuade 12 randomly selected people to vote not guilty.

His brain is fried.

View attachment 6451466
(Xeet / Archive)
View attachment 6451482
Well Nick. Who were the retarded one all along?
Wow that tweet aged REALLY well, didn't it?

We're well beyond the point where Nick should spare himself additional embarrassment, and just shut the fuck up.

He won't though.
 
IMG_0159.jpeg

Seems like a great day to receive and post my commemorative license plate.
 
I pointed out just yesterday that would have been an exercise in futility. The arrest warrant is clearly and obviously facially valid and it isn't even borderline. It lays out more than adequately the basis for probable cause for the purpose of finding illegal drugs. The Franks hearing was really the only way to rebut that.

I thought Nick might try (and he still might) to exclude the evidence in some pretrial motion like a motion in limine, although I can't see any reason for that unless there's some silver bullet in the bodycam video (there are no silver bullets). However, the court seems to have slammed the door in his face on that one by ruling everything he didn't raise in the omnibus is waived. That may be the most brutal part of this ruling.

The judge basically said enough of your bullshit, Balldo Man, we're moving forward.
No silver bullets, only cocaine bullets now
 
I genuinely think he's gonna plea, he would have to be not just retarded but one of the stupidest people that has a thread on this forum to not take the plea. bossman would fucking plea, the literal crackhead gambling addict wouldn't take those chances.

I know he's an egomaniac and a serial liar and malicious but he can't be that fucking deranged or retarded, he has to have enough mental faculties to manipulate the way he does. SURELY he knows that there is probably not a judge that likes him in the entire fucking county and the jury will convinct but the judge will pass sentence. With that gun charge that sentence can include prison time if you make them do a full trial. I used to be a fan of his and maybe some remnant of that is within me making me say this, but there's just no way he's THAT far gone.
 
I feel sad for Nick as he’s speed running drilling to the center of the earth and bringing his whole family with him.

Nick please plea out and stop streaming and chauffeur your kids around sober.
I might have felt bad if immediately after the arrest he showed any sign of wanting to change or improve, him being a smug cunt about it just makes me want to hand him a bigger drill.
 
I thought Nick might try (and he still might) to exclude the evidence in some pretrial motion like a motion in limine, although I can't see any reason for that unless there's some silver bullet in the bodycam video (there are no silver bullets). However, the court seems to have slammed the door in his face on that one by ruling everything he didn't raise in the omnibus is waived. That may be the most brutal part of this ruling.
I believe they did raise one evidentiary issue, April's bodycam footage, and the judge said that "this would be for motions in limine".
So I think this "slamming of the door" only covers issues that should have been raised in the Omnibus and are not typically argued in motion in limine, which those mostly are as I understand it.

So while you might be right and this shuts the door, the bodycam footage might still be on the table, but only in the case of April not testifying.
 
I wonder if that's how Judge Fischer found out about its vile contents and the repulsive shit Nick said.
I think ol' Judge Steve might have felt legally obligated to inform her. She was still hearing to Nick related cases. "Judge Pussy Liquor" was a poison pill that he had out there. If she ruled against him he would claim bias against him because he ranted about her. Even though she likely never knew about it. So good old Steve told her and cleared the potential conflict, removing an issue for appeal. And then Steve, with absolutely no conflicts or prejudice, bent Nick over and fucked him in the ass dry.
 
All these people I see here saying "surely, he's gonna take a plea now."

Have you all been reading this thread? Even just as recently as late May?

YES, it would be the smartest move.
YES, he might have a moment of clarity, not act like a complete retard for once, and plea out.

But NO, with Nick, that is far from a sure thing. I sure as hell wouldn't put money on it.
 
Gee our law takes were so totally retarded, we kiwifags got so felted. It's like Nick's right every single time, and we're just never anything but wrong.
Gotta wonder if his lawyer now has a "frank" and "come to Jesus" discussion with him. That the state's case is incredibly strong. That Barnes is full of shit and has no chance of prevailing on any challenge with this judge. And that he needs to entertain a plea deal so he doesn't face this judge after a guilty verdict and no agreement. That ruling today was terse and complete. The judge couldn't make the writing on the wall more clear. Lets see if balldo lolcow lives up to his reputation and believes Barnes at least one more time.
 
I think ol' Judge Steve might have felt legally obligated to inform her. She was still hearing to Nick related cases. "Judge Pussy Liquor" was a poison pill that he had out there. If she ruled against him he would claim bias against him because he ranted about her. Even though she likely never knew about it. So good old Steve told her and cleared the potential conflict, removing an issue for appeal. And then Steve, with absolutely no conflicts or prejudice, bent Nick over and fucked him in the ass dry.
I might be wrong and anyone that knows better is welcome to correct me, but there has to be a 0% chance that calling a judge names after she rules against you will have any bearing on appeals.

Judge rules against you? Just say she has pussy liquor and get a new judge. The next one rules against you? Just say he has dick liquor. Infinite do-over cheat code.
 
I think ol' Judge Steve might have felt legally obligated to inform her. She was still hearing to Nick related cases. "Judge Pussy Liquor" was a poison pill that he had out there. If she ruled against him he would claim bias against him because he ranted about her. Even though she likely never knew about it. So good old Steve told her and cleared the potential conflict, removing an issue for appeal. And then Steve, with absolutely no conflicts or prejudice, bent Nick over and fucked him in the ass dry.
So you're saying if he talked shit about every judge he would have no one left to convict him.

Time to fire up a 24/7 judge bashing stream
 
Back