US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Probably just a scare tactic to shut him up, plus that's how lawfare works. File bullshit ad nauseum and watch your opponent's money dissapear.

I can't find this Xeet, where did you get it?
I proposed this a while back but there's nothing stopping people taking a few thousand bucks and paying tons of homeless people to file pro se lawsuits against politicians/NGOS they hate over and over. At least nothing that I know of.
 
Reuters/IPSOS poll
47 Harris/ 40 Trump / 3 Other

There is no place in the world that has Trump by 40. Truly astonishing that they released this.

View attachment 6451385
This is how Ipsos conducts their polls:

Ipsos uses its proprietary "KnowledgePanel," a representative sample of Americans aged 18 and over.
Participants are selected through a postal address-based sampling method that includes all U.S. households. They are polled online. Respondents who do not already have internet access are provided with internet service and a tablet at no cost.
The data is weighted to reflect U.S. Census data on how the broader U.S. population breaks down by factors including gender, age, race, Hispanic ethnicity (people of Hispanic descent are the nation's second largest ethnic group), education, household income and census region.
Data may also be weighted to account for political composition using self-reported 2020 presidential vote choice (benchmarked to election results) or partisan self-identification (benchmarked to the Pew Research NPORS study).

So they bias their sample by providing an incentive for dirt-poor retards in the form of a free Internet connection, and then weigh by the Census instead of by the projected electorate, which will naturally over-represent minorities since they make up a smaller portion of the electorate than they do the population.

They're a total dogshit poll.
 
A cop got fired due to a "Let's Go Brandon" bumper sticker.
>In October 2023, Moon told his inquiring supervisors that he had no idea that the sticker could be seen as vulgar to some or was in any way political. He reportedly told them that he had only bought the sticker to support another police officer’s son who had suffered health problems but was now okay.

>However, body camera footage showed Moon talking to other police officers about the meaning of the sticker.

The cover up is always worse then the crime. He turned what could have been a "counseling" about department policy in to a career altering event because he lied and gave a smart ass explanation.
 
So apparently you don't get an actual plastic license day-of when you go to renew in my state. You get a printout of your "new" license or ID which uses the same photo from your last one (wut) but with any updated info like address or what have you. Then they get processed in CALIFORNIA and mailed to you. My guy just got back from the DMV and showed me his papers and relayed the information.

How? Why? What is even happening anymore?

eta: when you renew online then your photo is reused, they take a photo when you go into the DMV personally. I just clarified that fact, seemed too weird. Either way, you still have to wait for the actual license to arrive from Cali.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
Dude didn't read the Hatch Act.
Hatch Act refers to Federal Civil Servants. Washington may have their own rule. Also, pretty fucking dumb that he put it on a police car instead of his PV. I don't go slapping stickers on my rig. It's not mine.

That being said, his first mistake was living in Washington.
 
Probably referring to how foreigners funnel most of the cash they earn out of the country by sending it back home. It's not an American job if the cash leaves America.
I distinctly remember call centers and factories moving to states like Georgia and Alabama during Trump presidency because the taxes were so much lower.
 
View attachment 6451237

Has anyone posted this? I didn't see it on search, last mention of a teleprompter that I saw was from August

Apparently Kamala had a teleprompter during the town hall with Oprah
Imagine being so awful that even the dementia patient looks more competent reading a prompter than you.

They should have just rode it out with Joe.
 
Ah, good point. They tied it into federal funding to limit the speech of millions of people. That seems retarded. You either work for the federal government, or you don't.

Edit: I'm just opining here, but I wonder how SCOTUS would rule on the Hatch Act covering so broadly, especially given its conflict with the 1st Ammendment. Everything touches federal funding these days.
 
This is what I don't get about TDSers: it doesn't matter what Trump says or does, it's always bad. If he makes a nice gesture and gets complimented for it, it's always suspect and the complimenter gets accused of having zero critical thinking skills and just hoovers in the propaganda. The all or nothing accusation.

Again, if Kamala or Biden or even one famous Democrat paid for someone's groceries, bought hamburgers for a whole restaurant, or took over car payments for six months for a single mother of five, that would be a great gesture, regardless of the intent. Again, it wouldn't change my vote, but I would see the objective good will in something like that happening. I can also look at Trump paying for someone's groceries as a good thing, and still not agree with everything he does or stands for. I can even vote for him because his values and policy as a whole line up more with mine than the other side.

I always go back to that study where they discovered that conservatives and independents can see the other side, while liberals can only see their side and project it onto the other side. The times I've seen that proven wrong in both public and personal life is when the liberal isn't a true, die hard liberal. Tulsi, RFK, most recently the Mayor of Hammtrammck (I've been there several times and can never spell it). They've been able to set aside idealogical differences to pursue what they think is a better policy for the country.
Oh, that's easy.

This is something called "repressive tolerance" by Marcuse, a literal graduate from the Frankfurt school, aka, "that historically confirmed to exist group of subversive as fuck Weimar Republic era Jewish Cultural Marxists we're banned from even suggesting exist on Wikipedia."

Cultural Marxism is half of Wokeism. It's "Ok, Marxism doesn't work for economics but what if we applied the victim/victimizer mentality to cultural things, such as Race relations?" (The other half of Wokeism is Post-Modernism, the Marxism-as-religion thing, "I know Marxism doesn't work in reality but I feel that it should, and aren't my feelings just as valid as your facts?")

Repressive Tolerance is a pretty simple trick. "Everything our side is good. Everything the other side is evil. Since our side is inherently good, anything bad we do doesn't exist or has an excuse. Since the other side is inherently evil, everything good they do doesn't exist or is an accident."

It's part of the demoralization of the West. It's how they program culture warriors, because it's a very simple programming and can be reused forever by just redefining who the enemy is at will.

The "Chuds" are inherently evil, so even if the evil GamerGaters are donating money to cancer treatment charities, they're only doing it because they're evil and thus must be stopped, even if it harms the charities, because even if it appears to be good, the evil people are doing it so it must be evil. The woke black queens are inherently good, so when you see them stealing, cheating, assaulting people, or trolling online, then either they're just doing it because your evil oppression forced the poor innocents to do so, or it's all trolling from the evil side -- i.e., you -- and didn't really happen, and you must stop seeing it and stop people from talking about it, because they're inherently good and any disagreement with this is evil.

Trump is inherently evil. Thus it doesn't matter what he does or says or thinks, it MUST be an evil act. ObamaClintonBidenKamala is inherently good. Thus it doesn't matter what they do or say or think, it MUST be a good act. Any evidence that deviates from this black and white paradigm must be ignored, handwaved away, or suppressed.

I don't know the way out of this. The academic disciplines that would be instrumental in doing so -- psychology, education, media, communications -- were the FIRST they targeted for subversion and destruction, and for good reason. The situation we are in is not accidental, it is intentional.

But we need to find a way out before these people decide that since we're irredeemably evil, it's their moral duty -- an absolute moral good in fact, since they're the ones doing it -- to start killing us. They were ready and willing to do so in the 70s, and when we had the chance to end this for good, the powers that be blinked, thinking the hippy daughter of some influential Jewish senator who might have helped smuggle some pipe bombs into a police station can't do any harm in college learning how to teach kids. They've had 50 years to simmer, stir, and decide that the real problem was the pipe bombs weren't big enough and didn't harm enough civilians to break down "white comfort."
 
so does anyone else find it kind of weird how the relatives of high profile shooters have a tendency to get arrested for CP after coming out to the media? like beyond the 2nd trump shooter's son didn't the brother of the las Vegas shooting also get arrested for CP shortly after going on media tour also?

I'm not sure it's a conspiracy or anything, you don't do shit like that without having family issues after all and I'm sure the feds look thoroughly into everyone around them as a general rule but it's still odd.
 
Last edited:
so does anyone else find it kind of weird how the relatives of high profile shooters have a tendency to get arrested for CP after coming out to the media? like beyond the 2nd trump shooter's son didn't the brother of the las Vegas shooting also get arrested for CP shortly after going on media tour also?

I'm not sure it's a conspiracy or anything, you don't do shit that without having family issues after all and I'm sure the feds look thoroughly into everyone around them as a general rule but it's still odd.
I don't want to sound like a blackpilled schizo, but I'm under the impression that pedophilia is a gigantic problem in this country way more so than we'd think. Not outward rapes, but it seems there's so many sneaky faggots with some form of CSAM on their devices now. I simply do not trust any adult males who were born with internet access now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back