Oh, Terrence broke up with his wife. She seemed like a handmaiden, but I guess she couldn't take it anymore. All the people in this thread who thought he was one of the good ones can get fucking owned.
Man, people need to stop saying they can dix pooners because they can't - only self realization will fix women like that. So if they're too self centered or crazy, that means never. The more appropriate thing will always be "I CAN FUCK HER" which is highly likely as long as you call her man and boy and gay and homo and whatever. Sorry to ruin your joke, just had to get thatt off my chest.
This is the correct way to react in public to the troon. Do not speak to them. Do not look at them. Do not react to them in any way. Practice your neutral expression in the mirror, and if you are a social person also develop a thousand-yard stare that you can use in the event a troon engages you. The effect you want is as if you are looking straight through them as if they are not filling the space in front of you. If you can disengage safely and without fucking up your plans, do so, and when you do so do not say anything. Do not do anything. Do not do much as make eye contact or breathe in their direction. They do not exist. Dehumanizing them in this way opens the door to zero reprisal. No matter who they complain to, what are they going to say? “This person is aggressively ignoring me”?
If you must interact with one in a professional capacity, do your best to pretend they are a cop who’s pulled you over for a traffic stop, or like you are being questioned in court. You say as little as possible and give only the information requested. If they ask “do you know what time it is?”, you don’t give them the time. You say yes or no. Do not editorialize or explain anything not directly necessary. End the interaction as quickly as possible. You must ice these people out at every opportunity.
Oh, Terrence broke up with his wife. She seemed like a handmaiden, but I guess she couldn't take it anymore. All the people in this thread who thought he was one of the good ones can get fucking owned.
Here's an old one from Terf twitter that I don't think is posted here Some months ago posh supermarket had a page in their staff magazine celebrating "Ruby" (although the signature at the bottom seems to read "Chris").
Here's an old one from Terf twitter that I don't think is posted here Some months ago posh supermarket had a page in their staff magazine celebrating "Ruby" (although the signature at the bottom seems to read "Chris").
See, this is why you don't make a music video while trooning, you look like a fucking spaz.
And horrifyingly, he does use "dolls" in his speech.
The company is managed by at least 2 troons.
The sad part? There was a much more normal game here. It's gone now.
Somewhat generic but still better than the dip they did into purposely shallow new aesthetic, specifically called "girlypop". The game also had a different story, the new one focusing on overthrowing a corporate overlord while the old one is more OG Unreal.
The problem with this "girlypop" "aesthetic" is that it is completely missing what it was originally. Originally, it was how marketing and music companies advertised to young girls and dance club patrons.
Adult women, likely cis women, who grew up in the time period can sense that this is wrong. Things are overtextured from their previous version of their game, spilling glitter over a complex board making it even more chaotic. If they wanted to make a game "girlypop", they would have needed to start with something smooth, simple, and friendly when they first were making the game. Something more on the iPod side of sleek of that era. As is now, their game is a nightmare of unreadable shapes and colors that get lost in each other, the exact thing I don't want in my movement shooter. This is what happens when you change art directions mid development too fast, you want to hold on to your old assets but they don't work so the audience gets artistic whiplash. There's no cute cartoony creatures or Space Station 5 look, there's just a weirdly retextured autistic kid's models. They feel like those really shitty 3d models porn and fetish artists make, where the artist cannot sense the uncanny valley nature and is focusing on the part that appeals to them the most.
What I'm trying to say is that this game is horribly offputting because it misses the main design aspect of the "girlypop" version of the y2k cyberpop aesthetic: smooth clear lines, smooth clear shapes, bold and non-muddy colors. This game fails at all 3. Somehow, this makes it even more shallow of a costume than the original shallow "girly"cyberpop look they are going for, since they don't even understand the basic fucking principles and go with the part that appeals to them (textures! glitter! shiny! bubbles!). The team might think this makes their game better because they were going for shallow, but it gives the same unsettling feeling as looking at the coomer models I said earlier. This game will only appeal to "Women" and some autists out there, it won't be for born with XX chromosomes women. Hell, some autistic movement shooter lovers will be put off by the sensory overload.
Imagine saying you made Doom for girls but without the badassery or the cohesive game feeling. This is an insult to women who enjoy these types of games. All 5 of us women, probably. Women still deserve better.
Nah, it's the tog's watermark and it says 'Chris Jepson Photography'.
I spent my formative years in Sussex and when I still lived in the area I both had some limited contact with Chris through the photography scene (nice guy) and I believe once got served by this troon (likely not a nice guy)... although it's Brighton, so tbh it could have just been another tranner with similarly awful personal presentation, this is going back a good decade and this man's egg probably hadn't yet cracked, or else he'd surely have learned some of the basics of makeup and hair by now?!
"Why are boomer shooters always red and brown? Why aren't they pink? With a Y2k girlypop aesthetic?"
Because, in the early 2000s, shooters were aggressively and deliberately marketed towards boys, not girls. That's why you like them and feel nostalgic for them. Because you were part of that demographic.
Now, you're attempting to superimpose an aesthetic from that time period that was marketed towards another, different demographic that you were NOT a part of (and can NEVER be), onto the thing you nostalgically remember, regardless of the fact that in so doing, you're creating a hideous anachronistic chimera that would not have existed in the early 2000s.
Small personal tranny I've watched transition from an autistic-looking fuck to a depressed autistic-looking fuck with longer hair and make-up. Feel bad for his husband who for some reason stays.
Very fascinating how they always seem much happier before the "trans joy" sets in.
The sad thing is, the more I think about it, I think you probably could make a girly first person shooter and, y'know, it could work, if you did it right. And could potentially be very trendy. That sort of aesthetic is kind of cool now - pink and girly, but with a violent edge. Hello Kitty with a butcher knife. Give it a cool soundtrack, maybe some Zheani or something, that'd sell gangbusters.
But first of all, it would have to actually be made by women, and it would have to be made from the ground up with the goal of creating 'Doom for Girls' in mind, rather than just putting a pink girlypop skin over some dorky old models created by you when you were an autistic 15 year old boy.
That's actually quite a good metaphor from modern trans ideology, isn't it, thinking about it?
Just slap a pink, girly skin over a nerdy boy.
That's because you look like a girl with a chin-strap pube beard.
You "boyed too hard" not due to your appearance, but to your dogged persistence in getting all your information memory holed. Congrats, now go be cannon fodder for Ukraine.
I am a woman, now of a certain age, who is extremely feminine and ladylike (looking). I have never been called ma'am or miss or anything like that. I have never heard anyone called sir.
Point- people are doing the 'misgendering' on purpose 100 percent of the time. Ok, the south does exist so the average across the United States is not 100 but 90 percent of the time.