What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

Sargon's wife's son said:
different religion the Hebrews of the Bible in the Old Testament are different than the modern religion of Judaism Jesus should stop denying the divinity of Christ and no Jews for Jesus are just Protestants with extra steps
Click to expand...
The mental gymnastics that some christfaggots go through regarding the origin of their religion are honestly hilarious.
Quence said:
Yep, it’s all there

View attachment 6446686
Click to expand...
Antarctica has been used as a blackmail storage vault for the last 100 years or so, and all the hyperborea shit is just well-poisoning to cover that up.
There may also be a giant electromagnetic weapon disguised as a particle detector there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IceCube_Neutrino_Observatory
 
If you've been following the Diddy arrest on freak-out parties for blackmail and Justin Bieber, that's turned into a rabbit hole 🤔🤔




GYH3_Q3W0AAMsH2.jpg




GYGgSRPbkAAcEtJ.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chi, Mao Hao Hao, Otterly and 4 others
STARS158 said:
If you've been following the Diddy arrest on freak-out parties for blackmail and Justin Bieber, that's turned into a rabbit hole 🤔🤔
Click to expand...
I assume most conspiracy people are following it closely, but aren't sharing opinions until there's more transparency. It looks like the most insane, unbelievable shit from the average person's standpoint.

Seriously, the man had sex slaves on IV drips and two royal beds in a basketball court. Diddygate is Pizzagate, except the evidence is overwhelming and widely accepted.
Mr. Racewar1488 said:
I'm gonna get in on it early: #PiddyDidn'tKillHimself. Within a month he'll be suicided.
Click to expand...
My assumption is that he'll give them some leads on patsies, then die. They've already been saying he's suicidal.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Battery Low
Bonesjones said:
The reason they never show the stars in space is because you can independently verify their location using them.
Click to expand...
Sure. Sure. And there are no stars in this photo for the same reason: football is obviously fake (and gay) and if they added stars you could "independently verify" them.

featured-b-cc-walter-johnson-544x408.png

It's definitely not because this is just how cameras work. Oh no, that can't be it.

There are three things I love about the apollo hoax conspiracy theory. The first thing is that it's totally unfalsifiable. For years people said, "why don't you just point Hubble at the moon and show us the hardware!" When people explained that Hubble doesn't have the resolution, conspiracy believers said, "Ha!! You're hiding the fact that there's no hardware there because you never went to the moon!!!"

Then later, when multiple countries sent probes to orbit the moon and they took photos of the hardware, conspiracy believers say, "That doesn't prove humans went - it could have been unmanned missions!"

There's literally no evidence you'll accept. You whine about the stars not being visible when it's super obvious that there shouldn't be stars. Literally, if there were stars visible in every photo that would be evidence that it's fake!

The second thing I love is that none of you who believe it's fake ever concede anything. For example, you just said it's fake because no stars. Now I've explained to you (what you should have already known - I assume you've used a camera at least once in your life) - what are you going to do? Are you going to say, "hmm, good point, the lack of stars is not evidence that it's fake" or are you just going to ignore this? Spoiler: you'll ignore it. It cracks me up.

The third things is how you believe things that are mutually exclusive. I'll give an example if anyone cares.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Autistic
Reactions: Yugica, Lowlife Adventures, naaaaiiiiillllll!!! and 12 others
byron said:
Sure. Sure. And there are no stars in this photo for the same reason: football is obviously fake (and gay) and if they added stars you could "independently verify" them.

View attachment 6460682

It's definitely not because this is just how cameras work. Oh no, that can't be it.

There are three things I love about the apollo hoax conspiracy theory. The first thing is that it's totally unfalsifiable. For years people said, "why don't you just point Hubble at the moon and show us the hardware!" When people explained that Hubble doesn't have the resolution, conspiracy believers said, "Ha!! You're hiding the fact that there's no hardware there because you never went to the moon!!!"

Then later, when multiple countries sent probes to orbit the moon and they took photos of the hardware, conspiracy believers say, "That doesn't prove humans went - it could have been unmanned missions!"

There's literally no evidence you'll accept. You whine about the stars not being visible when it's super obvious that there shouldn't be stars. Literally, if there were stars visible in every photo that would be evidence that it's fake!

The second thing I love is that none of you who believe it's fake ever concede anything. For example, you just said it's fake because no stars. Now I've explained to you (what you should have already known - I assume you've used a camera at least once in your life) - what are you going to do? Are you going to say, "hmm, good point, the lack of stars is not evidence that it's fake" or are you just going to ignore this? Spoiler: you'll ignore it. It cracks me up.

The third things is how you believe things that are mutually exclusive. I'll give an example if anyone cares.
Click to expand...
While I would concede that maybe one doesn't immediately think about exposure times or the fact that it's very bright on the Moon (during the lunar day at least) when reading these conspiracy theories, once explained it should be immediately obvious. Those fancy gold visors on the spacesuits are not just because they look cool.
So just to reiterate, the stars are not visible in the Apollo pictures or in most space pictures in general because they're very dim compared to everything else. Everything in direct sunlight is going to be extremely bright (mind you, there's no atmosphere on the Moon, so the day on the Moon is going to be brighter than the brightest Earth day, the entire time), and the Moon is covered in fine, bright dust. Everything is extremely bright up there, and thus a picture must be taken with very short exposure times. Stars in the background are just too dim to be seen in that, the dynamic range in the picture is too large to capture everything.
Now, who can deny this?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yugica, The Foxtrot and cactus
Meriasek said:
the Moon is covered in fine, bright dust.
Click to expand...
It's actually quite dark. It's about the same color as asphalt. It looks so bright in photos because, as you said, the sun is bright.

In general, in my experience, people who think it was faked haven't looked into it very deeply. They've only watched youtube videos that make baseless claims. I can tell that's the case when I hear them repeat easily-debunkable claims.

For example @Wuornos mentioned "wrapped in tinfoil." Hoax believers will take a quick look at a piece of hardware and, with absolutely no technical understanding, conclude that it """looks fake""" - here's an example. This is a lunar module on display in Chicago.

MSC-16_at_Museum_of_Science_and_Industry,_Chicago,_IL.jpg

- wrapped in tin foil
- the parts that aren't wrapped look flimsy.

How can this thing possibly survive in space? If you believe it was a hoax, you are content to look (and think) no further.

But if you want to know the truth, I can explain it to you easily. The outer skin has only one purpose: thermal protection. That's it. It's basically like a sun shade for a car:

Screen Shot 2024-09-27 at 11.04.34 AM.png

...except that in space, you would put the shade on the outside of the car - not like there's wind up there.

What no hoax believer has ever thought to do is ask, "what does the LEM look like without it's thermal protection?" Well, here you go:

At_the_Cradle_of_Aviation_Museum_2023_158.jpg

Anyone who says "lololol tinfoil!!" without also showing you this pic, is either ignorant or they're manipulating you.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Yugica, Male Idiot, The Foxtrot and 7 others
while we're talking about the moon landing i want to bring up the contradictions about the video camera, because it's always bugged me.

apollo 11 used a unique slow scan camera for the moonwalk footage. apollo 12 was the first use of the 30 fps color camera but they immediately fried it. apollo 14 and onwards have live 30 fps full color video. this is easy to just explain as a technical advancement and they're forthcoming with how they accomplished it, so i've never really doubted that they actually landed on the moon, but there's a lot of things that simply do not add up about completely minor technical details.

i was just reading about the cameras to make sure i didn't get any information wrong, and found out that they apparently used the color camera on apollo 10 and apollo 11, but it was only used in the crew module. that completely contradicts what i had been reading for years, and also the idea that they had to use a slow scan black and white camera on apollo 11 to save on bandwidth if they were literally already using the fancy color camera on apollo 10. i understand there is probably a perfectly reasonable explanation for why that is the case, but what i'm getting at is that all of these explanations are a constant march of contradicting one another and 'new information' that does actually leave a considerable amount of doubt that many people don't consider because it's auxilary to an anambiguously retarded conspiracy theory

personally? i think they faked the television broadcast for apollo 11 so they could completely control public perception of the event, and all of these details that don't add up are just the remnants of that
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: melty, Otterly, Fleece Johnson and 1 other person
big pauper said:
personally? i think they faked the television broadcast for apollo 11 so they could completely control public perception of the event, and all of these details that don't add up are just the remnants of that
Click to expand...
That’s kind of my thing.
I believe we went to the Moon, but I’m not sure how much or if any of the footage is real. The footage is odd, NASA has a still ongoing history of faking images, they faked other Apollo pictures, IDK what space does to film or cameras, and it’s possible that some of it is BS.
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: ita, AFAB and Flan Handler
VeteranOfTheRetardWars said:
That’s kind of my thing.
I believe we went to the Moon, but I’m not sure how much or if any of the footage is real. The footage is odd, NASA has a still ongoing history of faking images, they faked other Apollo pictures, IDK what space does to film or cameras, and it’s possible that some of it is BS.
Click to expand...
there's such a ridiculous volume of material and the propaganda complex at the time had no problems faking things, i think it's highly likely that they faked some things for the sake of narrative convenience. but that's because they had to balance their public image with top secret military politicking, not because they hit some wall that they had to scramble to lie about overcoming. lying to keep up the facade of exponential growth was ultimately what led to the failure of the space shuttle so there are likely countless examples of them following that pattern of behavior if you look back at the apollo program - but even if all of those things are true in the worst ways, those incongruencies don't really invalidate the large quantity of evidence that we landed on the moon
 
  • Like
Reactions: ita, NoReturn and VeteranOfTheRetardWars
So much shit has been exposed about Hollywood that I believe the conspiracy that there is a secret Moloch (or whatever god) cult that sacrifices children and the Hollywood elite is part of it. Weinstein, Epstein, Tom Cruise and Scientology, Gwyneth Paltrow's Goop cult, widespread pedophilia and so on. Child sacrifice and unholy rituals wouldn't be surprising at all.

I would like to know who is part of it and if whatever they are doing is working. Is it just a bunch of sick Hollywood fucks believing in an ancient god or gods and doing terrible things but it's all a delusion or do they know something the majority doesn't.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: ita, Dynamite Bean, goh and 6 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back