PEI gender advocate and school counsellor charged with sexually assaulting minor - The thing that never happens keeps happening, many such cases, etc.

Link

A woman who was a prominent gender identity advocate and school counsellor has been charged by the PEI RCMP’s Major Crimes Unit with several serious sexual and other offences involving a minor.

The charges were filed at the provincial court in Charlottetown, and include sexual assault, sexual interference, and invitation to sexual touching, which were revealed through an investigation initiated by the RCMP’s Major Crime Unit on Sept. 14.

Bethany Jean Toombs, who until recently was listed on the East Wiltshire Intermediate School’s website as a counsellor within the student services team, was arrested on September 24. According to CBC, her name was removed from the school’s staff list by the following morning.

As an activist, she has been a vocal advocate for topics related to gender ideology and has contributed to various educational modules in the Grade 9 PEI wellness and relationship choices curriculum, focusing on subjects like consent, gender stereotypes, and sexual assault.

“Through this presentation and lesson plan, students will develop a deeper understanding of sexual violence and the importance of consent through an exploration of gender (norms, stereotypes, roles, and expectations),” a model in which Toombs is listed as a contributor reads.

“Specifically, students will understand how complex social factors contribute sexual violence in our communities while also working to identify safe and effective alternatives to abusive behaviour.”

CBC News also featured Toombs as an expert on parenting children with anxiety.

“I think when we think of anxiety, we think of the traditional worrier and so we definitely see worrying happening with children at school,” said Toombs.

“Whether it’s the way that they’re talking, or trying to avoid things that scare them. So we definitely see that happening with elementary children including students refusing to come to school or coming to school and saying they need to come home.”

In 2013, Toombs was also listed as hosting an “interactive workshop” and sexual education for youth discussed “potential strategies for ensuring youth have the knowledge and skills they need for healthy decision-making regarding sexuality.”

Former students, identifying themselves on Reddit, have also mentioned Toombs’ role as the head of a Gay Straight Alliance, highlighting her influential position in discussions surrounding youth sexuality and identity.

Adding to the severity of her charges, Toombs faces an additional count of permitting a person under 19 to consume cannabis, contrary to the Cannabis Control Act.

True North reached out to Toombs via social media to allow her to respond to the charges.

The RCMP has reassured the public that they believe the case is isolated to one victim, and there is no ongoing threat to the broader community.

Toombs is scheduled to appear in court again on October 28.
 
Is this a woman or a "woman?" Funny how that's my first thought whenever I hear about cases like this nowadays. Funnier how often my suspicions are confirmed.

Former students, identifying themselves on Reddit, have also mentioned Toombs’ role as the head of a Gay Straight Alliance, highlighting her influential position in discussions surrounding youth sexuality and identity.
I can't find any discussion of this on Reddit. Either I suck at searching (and I do) or the jannies did a cleanup on aisle 6 (which wouldn't surprise me one bit).

Dear Canada...
The charges were filed at the provincial court in Charlottetown, and include sexual assault, sexual interference, and invitation to sexual touching,

Adding to the severity of her charges, Toombs faces an additional count of permitting a person under 19 to consume cannabis, contrary to the Cannabis Control Act.


The RCMP has reassured the public that they believe the case is isolated to one victim, and there is no ongoing threat to the broader community.
...WTF? Seriously. Sounds like she or "she" is out and abooot (to channel Canuckspeak), doesn't it? Despite acting in a predatory fashion by quite possibly softening the victim up with weed before before moving in for the sexual assault.
 
Is this a woman or a "woman?" Funny how that's my first thought whenever I hear about cases like this nowadays. Funnier how often my suspicions are confirmed.


I can't find any discussion of this on Reddit. Either I suck at searching (and I do) or the jannies did a cleanup on aisle 6 (which wouldn't surprise me one bit).

Dear Canada...






...WTF? Seriously. Sounds like she or "she" is out and abooot (to channel Canuckspeak), doesn't it? Despite acting in a predatory fashion by quite possibly softening the victim up with weed before before moving in for the sexual assault.
I was reading a discussion earlier on r/PEI but maybe it was jannied. Some of the people actually had her as a teacher and based on what they were saying it seems like she was an actual woman. But Reddit is full of leftist fag pronoun respecters and they were all downvoting and chastising anyone suggesting her ideology and job were connected to her being a sexual predator so who knows?
 
Is this a woman or a "woman?"
It's a woman. Married to a man, and also obsessed with abortion:

1727505615406.png



1727505672643.png1727505876961.png

This is her husband:
 

Attachments

  • 1727505711531.png
    1727505711531.png
    917.6 KB · Views: 5
  • 1727505711531.png
    1727505711531.png
    917.6 KB · Views: 4
The RCMP has reassured the public that they believe the case is isolated to one victim, and there is no ongoing threat to the broader community
Ahahabahahhahaa

Sure there is no threat to the greater community. Have you done computer drivers check? What about phone checks anyone involved in that gay straight alliance org?

Pedos always congregate together.
 
The other direction from woke DEI shit-lib demonology. Admittedly, I have no clue how to actually articulate that otherwise, what would you suggest?
Just wondering what your specific concern was, because usually when people say that, they are worrying that in order to roll back this part of the insanity, they will have to sacrifice some form of progress ("progress," usually) they thought was good. It's understandable.

I think it might not be fixable except through the most extreme regressions, something pretty much no one wants.

I'm not even a papist, but I can see how wrenching apart human sexuality from human reproduction, mid-20th century with the contraceptive pill, was the turning point for all of this. You don't have to oppose it for religious reasons or anything like that. You can even see how it's reasonable and helpful to be able to space out births. But those things were apparently paired up for a reason and having violently unpaired them, modern man (and woman) has been on a downward spiral of depravity and degeneration.

Without that technology, we would have none of this. It would be unthinkable. You teach school, you get married, you start having babies, you go home and raise them, you come back a middle aged marm.

The whole idea that it is "medical help" to cut up reproductive systems would be unthinkable if we still understood them as "organs of generation" and not just "organs of pleasure."

Like I said, I'm not one of those trad catholics who fantasizes about everyone having to have an econoline van full of kids, or else. I just see that we thought we could reason our way around nature, but maybe things got completely and irretrevably fucked up.
 
The entirety of the field of "gender studies" and gender identity was started by a man who sexually abused two young boys, all of this happening is just the natural state of things for the field
And the one who was "gender switched" reverted in disgust on finding out what had been done to him and both of them ended up committing suicide.
 
There really is no way out of this that isn't extremely conservative, is there?
The only solution is a deep cleansing throughout society, Cambodia style. You get hooked up to a polygraph and asked how you feel about importing niggers, killing children, acceptance of faggots and trannies - any level of agreeableness to any of these leads to a quick spike to the neck, cattle style. Only in this way can we be free.
 
The entirety of the field of "gender studies" and gender identity was started by a man who sexually abused two young boys, all of this happening is just the natural state of things for the field

Don't forget Gayle Rubin, the author of queer theory, who openly admitted to wanting to normalize all sexual perversions, including pedophilia.

And wrote that we meanie chuds would eventually feel "ashamed" for persecuting pedophiles as hard as we do now.
 
Just wondering what your specific concern was, because usually when people say that, they are worrying that in order to roll back this part of the insanity, they will have to sacrifice some form of progress ("progress," usually) they thought was good. It's understandable.

I think it might not be fixable except through the most extreme regressions, something pretty much no one wants.

I'm not even a papist, but I can see how wrenching apart human sexuality from human reproduction, mid-20th century with the contraceptive pill, was the turning point for all of this. You don't have to oppose it for religious reasons or anything like that. You can even see how it's reasonable and helpful to be able to space out births. But those things were apparently paired up for a reason and having violently unpaired them, modern man (and woman) has been on a downward spiral of depravity and degeneration.

Without that technology, we would have none of this. It would be unthinkable. You teach school, you get married, you start having babies, you go home and raise them, you come back a middle aged marm.

The whole idea that it is "medical help" to cut up reproductive systems would be unthinkable if we still understood them as "organs of generation" and not just "organs of pleasure."

Like I said, I'm not one of those trad catholics who fantasizes about everyone having to have an econoline van full of kids, or else. I just see that we thought we could reason our way around nature, but maybe things got completely and irretrevably fucked up.

Ah, we're at the semantic argument stage. Good! First, we must define "progress".

Freedoms? Technologies? I'm not against that. What I am against is when people are unaccountable, something that should, but does not, go hand in hand with freedom. Unaccountable freedom, toxic agency, whatever sound byte works best, is what I am against.

This will be seen as regressive, and may even be regressive in the twisted definitions and minds of the progressive, the commie, the shitlib, the nigger, the troon, the yass queen, but I would certainly think it is actually true progress to give people exactly as much agency as they can actually handle.

When people have power they can't handle, when there's no accountability to them for their mistakes, and when systems are reconfigured and fail, and a solution as simple as "don't give people control they can't handle" presents itself, what is that? Seems natural, obvious; it seems that the naivety of liberalism, that everyone is totally equal (stop studying if people are equal please) is the problem.

Actual accountability works quickly to deal with the troon problem. The issue is that we've made troons a fucking elevated shaman class for the godless. The Cass Review speaks for itself as does what happened in the wake of it being read by countries functional enough to do so.

No, I'm not a catholic either - the orthodox church is appealing in ways, not because of the endless messaging and psyopping and contrarian shit, but because of how it treats community and its approach to sin. I do agree that we need to be honest and open when we reason about our natures, as men and women, as individuals who might be more or less mature, and limit people to their actual understanding and ability to comprehend and be held to account.

I know that will be cast as conservative, so I lean into it. I see it as the next step, post liberalism: "people should be as free as they can handle, and it's unfair to them as much as society to give a nigger agency he can't understand." In Kiwi Farms terms, at least.

As far as the woman in this thread goes? I'll go there. I think she probably meant well and was so wrapped up and soaked and marinated and pickled in wokeness that it seeped into her brain and she thought the shit she did was good for the kid and inherently good and progressive and transgressive and blah blah blah.

Evaluating people to be therapists should entail screening and testing so we know how deep their critical thought goes and we should limit their scope accordingly. She might have good empathy for talking to kids, but she clearly shouldn't be coming up with her own plans - her actions speak for themselves.

I do not think all women are like this. I think that a minority of men and women, in a distribution that is unlikely to be equal among sexes, or cultures, or races, can actually handle full intellectual freedom. This woman is clearly impressionable, and might even lack self control. In either case, in a better world, we'd see her as what she is and give her enough slack for what she's good at but not so long a lead as to let this happen.
 
Back