The Easy to Track Username Hall of Shame - Reading warning labels are for chumps.

No, they found the image after those charges were dropped and again without a warrant. I also want to point out the image was computer generated, NOT AI and computer generated is legal (Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition (2002) and in Illinois People of the State of Illinois v Alexander (2003) for full disclosure I belong to a few groups that support the free speech coalition in their case before the US Supreme Court.
You are still a sick fuck who pulls his pud to images of children, computer generated or otherwise it's fucking deviant and you have no place taking the air that belongs to people who DON'T cum to imagining fucking kids. Neck yourself.
 
NO, I didn't make the threat. It's proven my IP was not on that threat, nor was I on the site at the time. More posted by me were being made, while I sat in a jail cell with no internet, proven I was being set up.

I would also suggest looking up United States V Christopher Handley (2008) which strict down two sections of PROTECT Act as unconstitutional.
United States V Dean overruled United States V Christopher Handley as overly broad. Once again you are wrong. The PROTECT Act is very much intact and is about to fuck you in the ass.
 
Correct me if I’m wrong, but generating AI CSAM would require actual CSAM somewhere in the process, so frankly this distinction is meaningless
That why there is an issue with AI. AI uses sets to learn and those set may be actually child porn images.

United States V Dean overruled United States V Christopher Handley as overly broad. Once again you are wrong. The PROTECT Act is very much intact and is about to fuck you in the ass.
actually, the section that was unconstitutional require only ONE of three Miller to deem something obscene the court ruled they have to use all three prongs not just one. In fact, Illinois AI law require all three prongs of Miller test.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That why there is an issue with AI. AI uses sets to learn and those set may be actually child porn images.
The reason possession of CSAM is prosecuted is to mitigate the market, you in a certain sense are doing the same thing by consuming even AI renders of it, assuming that itself isn’t bullshit
 
actually, the section that was unconstitutional require only ONE of three Miller to deem something obscene the court ruled they have to use all three prongs not just one. In fact, Illinois AI law require all three prongs of Miller test.
I literally looked up the case. You're wrong. Also you said it wasn't AI but now it is? Woah BRO, woah!
 
actually, the section that was unconstitutional require only ONE of three Miller to deem something obscene the court ruled they have to use all three prongs not just one. In fact, Illinois AI law require all three prongs of Miller test.
Keep digging deeper, pedo. Your death will come as a welcome improvement to the world.
 
The reason possession of CSAM is prosecuted is to mitigate the market, you in a certain sense are doing the same thing by consuming even AI renders of it, assuming that itself isn’t bullshit
AI and computer-generated images although to some degrees are the same, they are in fact different. AI uses Sets to learn to makes images, those set can, and probable do contain child porn. The computer-generated image they found on my computer was made with Daz3D it is not an AI program, someone created the image from scratch. I have Daz3d on that computer that the police have; as well AutoDesk Maya a 4,000 dollar (that what I paid for it back in 2007) professional 3D software for creating realistic characters and blockbuster-worthy effects.
 
AI and computer-generated images although to some degrees are the same, they are in fact different. AI uses Sets to learn to makes images, those set can, and probable do contain child porn. The computer-generated image they found on my computer was made with Daz3D it is not an AI program, someone created the image from scratch. I have Daz3d on that computer that the police have; as well AutoDesk Maya a 4,000 dollar (that what I paid for it back in 2007) professional 3D software for creating realistic characters and blockbuster-worthy effects.
None of what you said here is important to the point at hand nor helpful to your own situation
 
Still haven't answered WHY you had child porn on your device, other than you being a pedophile. The President himself could deem the image legal, but the fact remains that you are a pedo who has child porn. Even if it's fake, it's an image of a child, a clearly visible and identifiable child, engaging in sexual activity, which is only enjoyed by pedophiles, which you are one, even if you have a group goon sesh in DC advocating for you, and you should cease existing.
 
Every fucking chomo nigger always pulls this level of technicality whenever it's revealed they're into pedophilic shit

1727554058012.gif

"Uh actually refer to the LEGALITY of this case here, ok, look at this case from decades back that's 100% applicable here and I did not read wrong; look that's something different ok? That's something completely different"
Die in a fucking fire
 
Back