The Easy to Track Username Hall of Shame - Reading warning labels are for chumps.

[N9OGL]

Parts of the law may be challenged, but the ones that pertain to what you did will stay, as the content which you have has been ruled to be illegal since the times of Miller V. California and New York V. Feber. You, my man, are fucked, and the best course of action for you (other than killing yourself) is to accept a guilty plea and hope that you don't die of old age before you get out

Sorry your sadly mistaken there is a lot more to my case than what you know.

It will be challenged and it will probably go all the the way to the state Supreme Court or even the US Supreme Court. It will be up to them to determine if it's constitutional or not.

The image that they found on my machine was computer generated and made with Daz3D. It wasn't ai

 

[Toji Suzuhara]

Sorry your sadly mistaken there is a lot more to my case than what you know.

It will be challenged and it will probably go all the the way to the state Supreme Court or even the US Supreme Court. It will be up to them to determine if it's constitutional or not.

The image that they found on my machine was computer generated and made with Daz3D. It wasn't ai

You are delusional old man

 

[Gremperor]

The image that they found on my machine was computer generated and made with Daz3D. It wasn't ai

Can you describe the image for us buddy?

 

[Jarl Varg]

You are delusional old man

He's an auti/pedo who has to be taken care of by his parents. Of course he's delusional, he has shit between his ears.

 

[rel=alternate]

No, he's a pedo. Read his thread.
He's shortly about to be jailed for cp.

These were lines from Alex Rosen/Predator Poachers

Maybe it would have been more obvious if I added that we're only after the real bad guys, the ones who produce the content or try to force the minors and we could really use his help and insights.

 

[thhrang]

No, he's a pedo. Read his thread.
He's shortly about to be jailed for cp.

I just started skimming via highlights and I see him claiming that child pornography "does have redeeming value" and then shortly after writing child rape stories (several). What the fuck.

Can you describe the image for us buddy?

 

[N9OGL]

I said my peace. I do not nor have I EVER supported actually child porn. As for AI it is up to the courts to decide the legality of it. as for my case, this Tuesday it will either be dismissed, or there will be a frank hearing, If the denied the frank hearing I will appeal it.

 

[Markass the Worst]

as for my case, this Tuesday it will either be dismissed, or there will be a frank hearing, If the denied the frank hearing I will appeal it.

Ask Rekieta how his Franks hearing went.

 

[N9OGL]

I just started skimming via highlights and I see him claiming that child pornography "does have redeeming value" and then shortly after writing child rape stories (several). What the fuck.



View attachment 6464866

According to the US Supreme Court in Feber v New York (1982) and Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition (2002) some child porn does have social value. It how it's made that makes it illegal. The law is there to stop how it is made, not what it's showing, that why virtual child pornography is legal because it created by not using real children. The Court also stated that "if there alternative (virtual child porn) then actually child porn would lose it value because a safer alternative is in the market.

Ask Rekieta how his Franks hearing went.

BIG difference between him and me. frank hearings are on a case by case basis.

 

[WelperHelper99]

According to the US Supreme Court in Feber v New York (1982) and Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition (2002) some child porn does have social value. It how it's made that makes it illegal. The law is there to stop how it is made, not what it's showing, that why virtual child pornography is legal because it created by not using real children. The Court also stated that "if there alternative (virtual child porn) then actually child porn would lose it value because a safer alternative is in the market.

A child rape story has "social value"? I guess as toilet paper. Lol, lmao even.

 

[Spoonomancer]

Another pedo trying to have a discussion on how one form of child porn isn't actually child porn has hit the username hall of shame thread.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I do not nor have I ever supported real child porn.

Court documents show otherwise. Enjoy Prison, child molester.

According to the US Supreme Court in Feber v New York (1982) and Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition (2002) some child porn does have social value. It how it's made that makes it illegal. The law is there to stop how it is made, not what it's showing, that why virtual child pornography is legal because it created by not using real children. The Court also stated that "if there alternative (virtual child porn) then actually child porn would lose it value because a safer alternative is in the market.

Fuck off to your own thread pedo.

 

[Glowie]

I do not nor have I ever supported real child porn.

Yet you got arrested for possession of CP.

 

[N9OGL]

For it to be child pornography, it has to be an image or video of a REAL child engaged in sexual activity or it a real child engaged in a lewd act. Writings, painting, sculptures and cartoons cannot be deemed child porn. They can however be obscene under US and state obscenity laws.

Court documents show otherwise. Enjoy Prison, child molester.

Fuck off to your own thread pedo.

really, I would hold your breath.

 

[Whatevermancer]

@N9OGL Go stick a screwdriver in your eye and stop shitting up the thread, you faggot.

 

[thhrang]

really, I would hold your breath.

You should hold yours until your brain stops functioning.

 

[WelperHelper99]

For it to be child pornography, it has to be an image or video of a REAL child engaged in sexual activity or it a real child engaged in a lewd act. Writings, painting, sculptures and cartoons cannot be deemed child porn. They can however be obscene under US and state obscenity laws.

Oh so you do know. You realize you're still fucked all the same right?

 

[Spoonomancer]

For it to be child pornography, it has to be an image or video of a REAL child engaged in sexual activity or it a real child engaged in a lewd act. Writings, painting, sculptures and cartoons cannot be deemed child porn. They can however be obscene under US and state obscenity laws.

really, I would hold your breath.

where do you think that AI generated child porn pulls it's data from you retarded pedophile?

 

[N9OGL]

Yet you got arrested for possession of CP.

NO actually I arrest for a threat against a school. when the charges were dropped, and the warrant was quashed the police with the FBI decide to go through my computer illegally without a warrant. It was then (two to three weeks later after the charges and warrant was quashed) that they found a computer-generated image. The FBI went to get a second warrant which they waited 2 years after the warrant was quashed and the charges were dropped to get.

 

[WelperHelper99]

NO actually I arrest for a threat against a school. when the charges were dropped, and the warrant was quashed the police with the FBI decide to go through my computer illegally without a warrant. It was then (two to three weeks later after the charges and warrant was quashed) that they found a computer-generated image. The FBI went to get a second warrant which they waited 2 years after the warrant was quashed and the charges were dropped to get.

That's called a plain view search. That is completely fucking legal you absolute mongloid. You threatened a school according to you. They would want to know if you had shit like bomb making information on it.