Lolcow Todd Daugherty / N9OGL / Fox Smith / Doc Dot - Domestic terrorist, ham radio sperg, self-described hikikomori, confirmed pedophile

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
This is no bullshit. Todd's parents are not only out of $12,500 in the bond money they had to put up (10%) but they also paid the full cost of those so called first amendment lawyers. Toad even said his parents (we) were running out of money.

It be a bitch of the DA would ask to cross-examine them in a trial, Toad's parents would have to pay the full cost of it because they are defense witnesses. Since they are running out of money.... well.....

Life is good. We win even when Toad thinks he wins.
 
This is no bullshit. Todd's parents are not only out of $12,500 in the bond money they had to put up (10%) but they also paid the full cost of those so called first amendment lawyers. Toad even said his parents (we) were running out of money.

It be a bitch of the DA would ask to cross-examine them in a trial, Toad's parents would have to pay the full cost of it because they are defense witnesses. Since they are running out of money.... well.....

Life is good. We win even when Toad thinks he wins.
His parents should have thrown in the towel a long time ago. Best place for him is prison, since he's going to be there eventually. Why fight it? 3 squares, healthcare, roof over his head, and new "friends" to make? The burden will be off of his parents, and they can maybe finally have some peace and joy in their later years.
 
"Here, although the government initially obtained a warrant for the device in question on March 21, 2018, by, March 29, 2018, the government knew they no longer had probable cause to prosecute Daugherty. That is when police learned that neither Daugherty's IP address, nor his MAC address had been used to post on hateandflame.com during the time of the threatening post. Instead, they learned that the IP address responsible for the threatening post was associated with the TOR network and was therefore anonymous. Further, police learned that 90% of people posting on the website were using Tor or proxy sites; no registration was required; no email addresses were checked; as a result of all this anybody could post as anybody else and impersonation is part of the status quo for the board."
Lame @N9OGL why are you so out of shape? Legit question.
Actually I've lost weight
 
From a defense attorney
a motion to suppress is to suppress evidence obtained illegally: insufficient basis for a search warrant; lack of probable cause; lack of articulable suspicion; defective consent; unreasonable stop, search and seizure, ect..
now there's an issue, they had probable cause and suspicion. Not to mention this is quite common with attorney's so don't think this is a hail mary to get you out of prison time or at the very least being put on the sex registry. Judges will often side with the officers when a crime has clearly been done.

This attorney also doesn't seem to be paying much attention to the case as they referred to the minor multiple times as a male when it's female. She also doesn't understand informants to the FBI. Some easy to digest information on this matter for anyone not retarded like Todd

basically long as you know of the persons actions such as knowing them well compared to just hearing gossip about someone. People know of Todd's pedophilia as he's posted about it himself.

Also, she does cite this case which she didn't seem to read the whole thing

Specifically, in the case of Illinois v. Gates, the U.S. Supreme Court saw that judges were relying too heavily on the two-part Aguilar-Spinelli test. The Court got concerned that judges were forgetting to take into account all aspects of a police investigation when figuring out whether probable cause existed in any given situation.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court created the current standard, which asks judges too look at all the facts of a case – i.e., the “totality of the circumstances” – to make a call on whether probable cause existed to support a search warrant.

This more flexible standard did not stop judges from using the two-part Aguilar-Spinelli test. Yet, it allowed judges to consider the whole scenario, rather than focusing too much on just the two-part test.
If I can find more on this I'll post about it if I remember.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: John Badman
The image that was found turned out to be computer generated, NOT real child porn. The state police officer lied about the image; we have evidence to prove it, that evidence comes for the FBI.
The officers have literally said it was a child and the then 17 year old was known to officers and her mother also knows what happened. You need to stop lying.
The evidence was posted in April or May if I recall, I'm sure @Dirty Harry remembers.
Crankin’ the hog to loli porn will do that. Too bad there’s no cure for stupid.
I strongly disagree. He can either use rope or a bullet to the head.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: John Badman
"Here, although the government initially obtained a warrant for the device in question on March 21, 2018, by, March 29, 2018, the government knew they no longer had probable cause to prosecute Daugherty. That is when police learned that neither Daugherty's IP address, nor his MAC address had been used to post on hateandflame.com during the time of the threatening post. Instead, they learned that the IP address responsible for the threatening post was associated with the TOR network and was therefore anonymous. Further, police learned that 90% of people posting on the website were using Tor or proxy sites; no registration was required; no email addresses were checked; as a result of all this anybody could post as anybody else and impersonation is part of the status quo for the board."

Actually I've lost weight
Uh cool? I don't see how any of that has to do with the fact that you yourself admitted to have sent in threats to a school that were credible enough to get the police to investigate your parent's house and search through your computer. Threatening any school kind of turned your case into a potential threat on the lives of several children and made whatever case you had into a case that didn't really demand that cops get a warrant for searching your belongings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: John Badman
The officers have literally said it was a child and the then 17 year old was known to officers and her mother also knows what happened. You need to stop lying.
The evidence was posted in April or May if I recall, I'm sure @Dirty Harry remembers.

I strongly disagree. He can either use rope or a bullet to the head.
That was before I knew it was computer generated

Uh cool? I don't see how any of that has to do with the fact that you yourself admitted to have sent in threats to a school
No where have I stated or admitted to making the threat Quite the opposite.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No where have I stated or admitted to making the threat Quite the opposite.
Have you achieved anything noteworthy with your life and use your skills? Perhaps publish a game or two on itch.io
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Jarl Varg
Back