LawTube - Lawyers sperging at each other on YouTube

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Gentlemen and ladies,
I bring you three Branca videos... Yes he's still doing varied soyjack faces. As with the internet, the comments are always better than the videos so I quoted some I feel would likely be deleted. Now that Nick is no longer really a lolyer (just a wetbrained cow), Sic transit gloria mundi...

First, Branca claims to be a real lawyer and not an "internet lawyer" like Nick Rekieta. Lmao:
Just so you know, the deputy's name is Eddie L. Duran, and I agree with the manslaughter charge - that's not based on feelings but experiences with the negligent Okaloosa County Sheriff's department (the same people from the viral "acorn shooting incident" less than a year prior)... I had a run in with this same deputy myself for a charge I was not actually guilty of, based on one embellished complaint, with essentially no investigation of facts, only a couple months before this incident took place. He falsified a report claiming he could not get a hold of me, which is a lie because I returned his calls, and had me arrested out of county where I, a law-abiding innocent citizen, spent Christmas in jail with no bond due to his warrant which I was unaware of. Also, I was a freshly retired veteran traveling to my homestead and the warrant he requested for my arrest was for no other reason than I was living inside of the base at the time he applied for the warrant... I am convinced he has a personal problem with military personnel, and did gun Airman Fortson down with malice, negligence, and undue regard. If that's not good enough for you, I have reviewed the bodycam footage and looked at it objectively, it is definitively negligent shooting by the deputy, not to mention he went to the incorrect apartment. I sincerely look forward to a conviction/sentence of this loser as is well deserved. Karma is real...
Click to expand...
So a defense attorney is a real lawyer but litigation attorneys aren't? News flash, you're an internet lawyer too
Click to expand...
LOSD has another challenger, looks like another brand new BMW for Branca. How many times does Branca have to teach these fools this lesson!
Click to expand...

Second, we finally get the internet memelord self-defense case we have desperately wanted:
Zionist supporters vs PLO supporters at a protest fighting each other. It's not like either org is going to help your case... Mossad and PLO might turn you into a suicide bomber...
As usual Branca getting dragged by both sides for not bootlicking enough or bootlicking too hard:
Another piss poor analysis. The gun and accessories matter. Even the bullets. It wasnt ground. It was concrete. And his head was against the concrete while getting pummeled. This can EASILY lead to serious injury. Andrew is low IQ and not very observant. Doesn't chise words carefully or accurately analyzing videos.
Click to expand...
The model of the gun and its accessories do matter. I have seen many a prosecutor include in their arguments and presentations to juries, the type of firearm and its accessories, as facts to be used to vote for a conviction. If you disagree, Ill make a hypothetical argument illustrating how a prosecutor can use this information.
Click to expand...
I don't understand how being slammed to the ground on pavement isn't itself potentially deadly and a showing of intent to proceed with more deadly force -- why would you not assume that if you survive being pounded down into the pavement he won't if possible also continue on to slamming your head on the pavement or choking the life out of you? It isn't like the guy punched him and then stood there saying get up waiting to exchange blows...
Click to expand...
Typical Branca shittake. Man is only right when he has a case spoon fed to him like Rittenhouse. If you listen to him for self-defense law, I feel sorry for you.
Click to expand...
Depends if the DA is pro Palestinian or pro Israeli but given who controls the government...
[A reply comment]
Imagine having a DA pro America. That would be unique.
Click to expand...
This one's for the MGTOW crowd :stress:
Woman escalates 1 man shot. 1 man on trial. Ad women to the 3 S list.
Click to expand...


Finally, is one about a resisting a cop who enter your home illegally (don't do it is his answer).
Comments are a lights show
My favorite comment first though:
"There in lies the problem. The government should fear the people not the other way around. MAKE TAR AND FEATHERS GREAT AGAIN":jaceknife:

In light of how poorly US courts have been performing of late, seemingly far too many judges are barely out of college, so they look, sound, and act like what they are, ex-high schoolers, and said judges are overly fond of deferring to govt authority, the COTUS being applicable only in some abstract way (remember the NY black Barbie judge who declared the 2A does not exist in her courtroom), I'm not confident that settling the matter in court is the right way anymore. Duking it out with an armed LEO at the scene is not going to go the citizen's way either, clearly, unless the LEO proves to have been an impersonator, or flagrantly breaking the law while in uniform. None of the traditional options available seem decent or reasonable in today's America. Which saddens me more than I can say. Hope you've made the move to another state Branca, based on what I'm hearing is going on CO. God help us all.
Click to expand...
Thud is why civilians must be able to use force without liability sgsi st rogue cops laws need to changed to protect civilians from cops
Click to expand...
If you watch the lackluster follow-up video on this, it has more video, and shows the rest of the thugs from this department including the Criminal Who burst in originally going through the house. When they did they commented about alcohol in the kitchen, and that none of the children left in the house are over the age of 21. Perhaps this is the rationalization for their contributing charge, is that there was alcohol in an adult's home where there was also children. So apparently, the law enforcement in this city will be arresting 59% of the population.
Click to expand...
Part of this is that judges are overly protective in these (not as bad as this was egregious) situations. If they'd stop the over application of QI and start compensating people, the police would have to think a bit more critically before trying this kind of thing.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: USAroXX, Mexican Molotov Marauder, Coo Coo Bird and 4 others
Potatoherder said:
Joe is having his 100k sub stream and Sean is on now. Kurt and Gosney were on earlier. Seems to be everyone in lawtube.
Click to expand...
Joe they call me tripod and not because of my penis.
Click to expand...
Cause he's third wheeling? I don't even get the joke.... Also fucking hell Nick your audio is shit.
Just start mailing pagers for everybody, that's going to be his 5k grift.
Click to expand...
Someone asked me (Joe) if I tried the Holocaust diet, I said I tried it but it gave me gas.
Click to expand...
The French revolution reign of terror will pale to whats coming
Click to expand...
@elb ~3hr 15 min might of intrest to you right when Nick joins. Joe's talking about how to lean into the joke like old Nick did, nick then fires off a slew of semite jokes faster than he can make a sensible Denny's joke.
@Himedall All-seeing Waifu We've got the L(olcow) Team on this one. Good Lawgic, Branca, Nick, Uncivil, and Gosney.

Gosney's got a shirt that reads "Adorably Dorky" LMAO.
Gonesey.jpg
Also, Craigs from Sidescrollers got a shoutout by the guy with the Sig hat.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: USAroXX, Himedall All-seeing Waifu, TexOffender and 3 others
So... On this Elissa clip video there's a really interesting reply chain. See photo uploaded but not embeded in this post if you want to read the entire chain.
Ineedthatmoney.jpg

Ireallydo.jpg

Quoting the user L_JHN
He NEEDS the money, he owes $177,639 per final judgement signed last week by Judge Roman 9/24/24 He was sued as a lawyer and debt collector and lost all appeals and countersuit.
Click to expand...
@Trevor-08 yes. Levy v. Law Offices Of J. Henry Nierman and last week after 8yrs in court 8yrs and hiring 2 lawyers for himself, Joe still lost.
Click to expand...
Since Nierman is a pretty unusual name it popped up pretty easily. S. District of NY.
Levy v. Law Offices Of J. Henry Nierman (7:17-cv-04022)
Assigned to a Nelson Stephen Roman just like the comment says. A little over 7 years till final judgement...
Edit: LMAO Did Levy win his damages on emotional distress? Fucking A considering how lawtube said that's hard as fuck to prove.

Mcglinchey actually posted one of the orders with a summary (archive). For which I attach the below and the firm's explanation.
In short:
On summary judgment, the court determined that the subpoena was unlawful, awarded judgment to Plaintiff for claims under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692e(5) and 1692e(13), and directed an inquest on emotional distress damages. Following the inquest, Defendants challenged Plaintiff’s standing. However, the court denied Defendants’ motion and found that “Plaintiff has satisfied his burden to establish standing.”
Click to expand...
15 U.S.C. §§ 1692e(5) and (13) fall under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (1978 ) as "False or misleading representations for debt collectors".
Preface:
A debt collector may not use any false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the collection of any debt. Without limiting the general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this section:
Click to expand...
(5)
The threat to take any action that cannot legally be taken or that is not intended to be taken.
Click to expand...
(13)
The false representation or implication that documents are legal process.
Click to expand...
Longer article (Not paywalled):

On May 20, 2024, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a decision holding that legal fees resulting from violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) constitute a cognizable monetary harm for the purpose of establishing constitutional standing.

Case Overview​

In Levy, Plaintiff brought claims for violations of the FDCPA against a debt-collector law firm, its principal, and a company through which the attorney practiced judgment enforcement. Defendants sent Plaintiff, who resided in Florida, a letter and purported post-judgment subpoena duces tecum in relation to a money judgment awarded in a New York City Civil Court case. The subpoena commanded Plaintiff to appear at a deposition in New York City on a federal holiday and to bring comprehensive financial documentation, including bank account statements as well as federal and state tax returns. It stated that failure to comply is punishable as a contempt of court and indicated “FINAL Notice” across each page.

On summary judgment, the court determined that the subpoena was unlawful, awarded judgment to Plaintiff for claims under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692e(5) and 1692e(13), and directed an inquest on emotional distress damages. Following the inquest, Defendants challenged Plaintiff’s standing. However, the court denied Defendants’ motion and found that “Plaintiff has satisfied his burden to establish standing.”

Distinguishing Legal Fees​

The court noted that “[c]ourts in this Circuit have repeatedly found the expense of money, such as legal fees, to determine a course of action in response to a FDCPA violation to not allege a concrete harm.” However, it distinguished the legal fees in those cases from the legal fees incurred by Plaintiff for defense against the judgment, as such fees were for taking action rather than seeking advice, consulting, or determining a course of action in response to an FDCPA violation.

Legal Fees as Monetary Harm​

Moreover, the court observed that Plaintiff’s fees had a clear nexus to the subpoena, which was issued to enforce the judgment, and that Plaintiff faced a sufficient risk of harm in the form of imminent legal action arising from the unlawful subpoena. Thus, the court concluded that “[t]he cost incurred by Plaintiff of hiring an attorney to defend him against the Morrison Judgment is sufficient to satisfy the injury-in-fact requirement” as such legal fees “constitute a cognizable monetary harm.”

Impact of Levy Decision on FDCPA Claims​

The Levy decision indicates that consumers may satisfy their burden of establishing constitutional standing for a claim under the FDCPA merely with legal fees incurred specifically due to an FDCPA violation that presents an imminent threat of legal action to the consumer.


Levy is a generally Jewish surname, so tl;dr:
j_on_j_crime.png
 

Attachments

Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Windy Moors, USAroXX, Himedall All-seeing Waifu and 33 others
♂CANAM productions♂ said:
The subpoena commanded Plaintiff to appear at a deposition in New York City on a federal holiday and to bring comprehensive financial documentation, including bank account statements as well as federal and state tax returns. It stated that failure to comply is punishable as a contempt of court and indicated “FINAL Notice” across each page.
Click to expand...
That is the most jew thing ever and i totally believe Joe would do it.

Info seems to align with the bits and pieces i recall from Joe lore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USAroXX, Third World Aristocrat, Not Who You Think and 1 other person
IANAL, but if I'm reading the attached PDF file correctly then what happened is that Joe of Good Lawgic was operating a debt collection firm which sent a subpoena whose authority was predicated upon a decision having already been rendered towards this man who had an outstanding debt of approximately $14k. This subpoena was received in early December 2016, the debtor hired lawyers on a $3k retainer, and then they spoke with Joe the day after Christmas wherein Joe agreed to send proof that the courts had already rendered this decision on the debt.

At this point, Joe completely ghosted the debtor. They kept reaching out and then ultimately in January 2017, the debtor's $3k counsel found that there was never any decision and the subpoena was illegal & invalid. The debtor then filed THIS lawsuit we're seeing today in May 2017, which has now seen Joe with a judgment of $178k against him (UPDATE: looks more to be $117.6k as detailed below). All over a bogus subpoena to collect a $14k debt.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: USAroXX, Third World Aristocrat, You're MDNWU and 7 others
♂CANAM productions♂ said:
He also "summoned" the plaintiff to show up to a federal courthouse on a federal holiday in NY from Florida...
Click to expand...
Yep, the demands of the subpoena were retardedly insane even if it hypothetically had been predicated upon a real decision on the original debt; I'd omitted that portion because you already did a good job highlighting that detail and didn't want to be too redundant.
 
Harm said:
The debtor then filed THIS lawsuit we're seeing today in May 2017, which has now seen Joe with a judgment of $178k against him. All over a bogus subpoena to collect a $14k debt.
Click to expand...
Maybe. The judgment would have to be pulled off of PACER to confirm that the below YouTube comment is correct. There is a judgment dated September 24, but no confirmation yet of what it contains.

ytcomment.jpg

search.png

UPDATE: The order is apparently posted below and the comment had a typo; the total award was $117k, not $177k.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Mexican Molotov Marauder, Third World Aristocrat, Coo Coo Bird and 7 others
Here is the Order & Opinion from September 24th.
"The Court kindly directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment as follows: Plaintiff is awarded $8,000.00 in actual damages, $500.00 in statutory damages, $103,214.37 in attorney’s fees, and $5,924.87 in costs, for a total award of $117,639.24."
Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • Informative
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: wimzi, USAroXX, Mexican Molotov Marauder and 22 others
Balldo's Gate said:
There is a judgment dated September 24, but no confirmation yet of what it contains.
Click to expand...
Updated to reflect this and the info in @Gobermental Supervisor's post. The Youtube comment apparently typo'd (or deliberately misrepresented; both are possibilities) and put the figure off by an additional $60k.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USAroXX, Himedall All-seeing Waifu and Gobermental Supervisor
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back