Meet the people suing Ozempic maker for wrecking their bodies: 'I will never eat solid food again'

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Hundreds of Americans have jumped on a multi-state lawsuit alleging that the makers of Ozempic and Mounjaro caused them life-altering injuries.

The suit was filed against Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly, the two pharma giants that have raked in billions thanks to the blockbuster weight-loss meds.

Ohio native and grandmother of seven Dana Filmore can no longer eat solid foods and has to blend her meals. Louisville’s Jacqueline Barber threw up so much she became dangerously malnourished.

Tennessee oil rig worker Bob Tuttle was forced to quit his job because the stomach pain was unbearable. And Philadelphia-born Debbie Kirtz believed she would never make it out of the hospital alive.

They and many others argue in the suit that Lilly and Novo failed to warn its millions of eager customers about the very real risk of severe gastrointestinal injury, including stomach paralysis, gallbladder issues, colon removal, and more, as well as making misleading statements about the drugs’ safety.


1727543315708.png

  • Dana Filmore of Columbus, Ohio, now subsists on a diet of protein shakes and Jell-O. Her stomach paralysis tied to Ozempic prevents her from eating solid foods

Dana Filmore, a 55-year-old diabetic, was uncomfortable with the prospect of having to stick herself with a needle every week when her doctor suggested she try Ozempic to manage her type 2 diabetes.

For about two years, the medicine did what it was approved to do – lower her blood sugar levels. But in the last six months that she was on it, the severe nausea kicked in. It gradually worsened, and she had to burn through her vacation time to recuperate.

It got to a point where she became scared to eat solid foods, because a few bites would send her to the bathroom.

She told USA Today: ‘The solids are really difficult on me. My body just rejects it.’

She was recently diagnosed with gastroparesis, or paralysis of the stomach.

It causes muscle contractions in the stomach to become too weak to digest food and pass it along to the intestines, causing food to stay in the stomach for longer than it should.

When the stomach does release the food, rather than doing so gradually in a steady manner, the stomach empties in larger, unprocessed bursts, causing chaotic diarrhea.

Mrs Filmore, who has had to excuse herself mere minutes after starting a meal, said: ‘You never know what will set it off.’

It has even disrupted her 35-minute commute to her job, where she manages a team of technicians at a mechanical company.

She said: ‘Halfway to work, I have to stop into a restaurant or to a gas station. My stomach doesn’t give me that long to really decide where I'm going to go.’

Her diet now consists mostly of protein shakes and Jell-O. It’s the only meal plan that keeps her from running to the bathroom.

In Louisville, Kentucky, Jacqueline Barber, another plaintiff in the case, has also been diagnosed with gastroparesis that threatened her life.

She was prescribed Ozempic for her type 2 diabetes in 2021, but spent every night for over a year sleeping on the couch next to a garbage can to manage her uncontrollable vomiting.

The 48-year-old said: ‘To lay on the couch and throw up nonstop, can't hardly make it to walk, go anywhere, it's very depressing.’

Alls she could keep down were peanuts, peanut butter crackers, and peanut butter cookies.

‘I ended up losing 140 pounds. I was down to around 87 pounds, couldn't walk or get around, couldn't get off the couch. Nobody knew what was going on. No one put the two together.’
1727543349659.png
1727543356559.png


Jacqueline Barber of Louisville, Kentucky was diagnosed with stomach paralysis after taking Ozempic to manage her diabetes

Ms Barber had to be placed on a feeding tube.

‘My stomach was paralyzed,’ she said. ‘I couldn't tolerate anything.’

Meanwhile, Tennessee-native Bob Tuttle, 60, was 60 miles offshore on an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico when he had to be airlifted in a helicopter to the emergency room after four days of not being able to keep food down.

He was diagnosed with stomach paralysis within the week tied to the Ozempic he had been prescribed in 2018.

Mr Tuttle, a safety and environmental advisor on the rig, was healthy and fit – a necessity for the job, which includes plenty of stairs and running around.

The drug successfully managed his A1C levels and kept his diabetes under control. But gradually, he began to lose weight without intending to. He became increasingly fatigued and, later, severely nauseous.

He got his diagnosis just a few days after leaving the oil rig: ‘Gastroparesis, in laymen’s terms, is just the inability of the stomach to process solids or liquids that one ingests.

‘My stomach was processing some of the liquids, but none of the solids during the tests that they ran on me in the hospital.’

1727543366392.png

  • Bob Tuttle of Tennessee became so sick from his stomach paralysis that he had to quit his job as a safety advisor on an oil rig

1727543387910.png


  • Mr Tuttle had to be airlifted off the rig in the Gulf of Mexico after four days of being unable to keep food down. He was diagnosed with stomach paralysis within the week
Now off the drug and no longer chronically nauseas, Mr Tuttle still had to quit his job to deal with the illness.

Mr Tuttle has joined the lawsuit against the companies.

Novo and Lilly have denied allegations that their medicines cause stomach paralysis.

A spokesperson for Novo Nordisk said they are without merit and risks of semaglutide, the active ingredient in Ozempic, are clearly stated on the label.

They added: ‘Novo Nordisk stands behind the safety and efficacy of all of our GLP-1 medicines when they are used as indicated and when they are taken under the care of a licensed healthcare professional.’

Ozempic’s FDA-approved warning label mentions ‘gastrointestinal adverse reactions’, and none of those listed include gastroparesis.

Nearly 22,000 adverse reactions to Ozempic have been recorded in the FDA’s voluntary Adverse Event Reporting System. Gastrointestinal conditions such as stomach paralysis make up 43 percent of those reports.

That doesn't mean all 22,000 injuries were actually caused by the drugs. And considering millions are taking the drugs every day, doctors say the side effect panel of the shots is pretty safe.

Now that a few years have passed since the introduction of Ozempic for people with diabetes, researchers are better able to track the longer-term effects of taking the drug beyond helping people shed some weight.

Researchers from the University of British Columbia studied a tranche of health records between 2006 and 2020 of people taking liraglutide, another diabetes drug, semaglutide, and another drug called bupropion-naltrexone.

The researchers found that people using semaglutide for weight loss, which works by binding to GLP-1 receptors in the pancreas and brain to reduce appetite and control cravings, were 9.1 times more likely to develop pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas), a condition that can sometimes require surgery.

Additionally, semaglutide users were 4.22 times more likely to experience bowel obstruction, a potentially life-threatening condition, and had a 3.67 times higher risk of developing gastroparesis (often called 'stomach paralysis'), which slows or stops the movement of food from the stomach to the small intestine.

In a trio of studies into the effects of GLP-1 agonists – a class that includes Ozempic and Wegovy – on GI health, researchers examined real-world data for patients prescribed one of the drugs between 2021 and 2022. They compared them to a control group of either diabetic or obese people who were not prescribed the drugs.

Patients taking a GLP-1 were 66 percent more likely to be diagnosed with gastroparesis compared to those not taking the drugs.
 
Because part of it is that diets haven't changed all that much in proportion, at least among 'normal' fat people who don't get reality TV shows. There's instead some evidence that cross contamination with packaging materials(plastics) can fuck up how the body processes the calories, which is also why zoo animals are getting fat despite having strict diets.

Link for the curious: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/apr/07/plastic-packaging-obesity-hormone-disruption
In vitro. Not even animal studies. The "some" in "some evidence" is doing a lot of work here, at least as far as this study goes.
 
I hate to say "I was right" because this is horrifying, but...
Genetic diabetes is type 1, not type 2.
Type 1 is weird because it’s not only genetic predispostion, but environmental/viral factors that can cause it. In my mom’s case she caught it from a mysterious virus that went through her town and never popped up again. Before the age of 15 she was normally healthy.
Type 1 diabetes is genetic and usually you are born with it, but it can "activate" at any time. I know a guy who was normal and healthy until his 20's when he started chugging water like nobody's business and looking pale as a ghost. He went to the hospital and they said he was a hair away from a potentially lethal diabetic coma. You can get type 1 even if you do all the right things.

Type 2 diabetes is almost always acquired by being a fat fuck, but it is possible to acquire it even if you're otherwise thin. People with sub-30 BMIs (thus not clinically obese) can get type 2 diabetes if they have a large amount of visceral (belly) fat, eat a shit diet, and don't exercise. It's much less likely, but it does happen. The simplest way to avoid type 2 diabetes is to eat a healthy diet, avoid consuming tons of sugar for years, and get a little bit of exercise every day.

Alcoholism counts as consuming tons of sugar for years.
 
Last edited:
The Newcastle protocol is now endorsed by the nhs. Basically a vlcd to start with to lose 10% or do which kick starts remission, then slower weight loss. It works, it’s probably quite hard to stick to, it’s 800kcal (?) a day. I’d struggle with that little if I’m honest. I think if the GLP1 s are used as they should be then they’re a net benefit. As in, use it as a tool to lose excess weight AND SIMULTANEOUSLY reset your relationship with food so you can wean off and remain healthy. I am not sure I’d want to be on something like that permanently. The gut has a lot of feedback and remodels itself in response to starvation or feeding. I wonder if long term use is putting the body into an artificial starvation and gut degenerative mode?
Intermittent fasting is great, you get the benefits and you need to refeed as well to make sure you’re still getting energy and nutrients. In the uk it’s quite popular - mile mosely popularised it.
Good for them I guess but any medically supervised "protocol" is going to be shitty and half-assed for people compared to taking control of your own life and figuring it out yourself. That's why the study results are so dismal. That's why the weight always piles back on. That's why the protocols have to go completely off the chain (years of eating 800 cal per day? lol) to get anywhere at all.

This is a behavioral problem and not the kind that can be solved by a nice lady with a master's degree holding someone's hand and doing a manualized therapy program, either. You either figure out that you aren't going to die of hunger, and you get hungry enough regularly enough that you lose weight. Or you don't, you stay in the "I need permission from daddy doctor and mommy dietician to change anything."

I have an extremely grim view of these medically supervised weight loss "protocols." People who are too afraid to starve themselves like an honest man, without permission from an authority figure, are ngmi.
 
50/50 truth. More muscle = higher metabolic rate = more calories burned per day. If you eat the same amount of calories per day but proceed to build muscle with exercise, you will lose weight over time due to that extra muscle.
It's a negligible increase. Your metabolic demands increase a little with increased muscle mass, but that demand goes toward maintaining your new muscle, not towards "burning fat". Don't get me wrong: any muscle increase is a good thing and ought to be encouraged but muscle increase (and/or cardio) alone will not significantly decrease your fat, especially visceral fat.
If muscle mass made a real difference to basal metabolic rate, Eddie Hall would be the most shredded man in the world.

@Otterly
I wonder if long term use is putting the body into an artificial starvation and gut degenerative mode?

That comes down to the length of your fast. I have been fasting from 5pm to 7/8am every night for quite a while now and I can do it indefinitely.

@Larry David's Opera Cape
This is a behavioral problem and not the kind that can be solved by a nice lady with a master's degree holding someone's hand and doing a manualized therapy program, either. You either figure out that you aren't going to die of hunger, and you get hungry enough regularly enough that you lose weight. Or you don't, you stay in the "I need permission from daddy doctor and mommy dietician to change anything."

Correct. And it doesn't even take long to adjust to "being hungry" (they're not actually hungry, they just aren't used to the feeling of not being constantly full), it takes two to three weeks, after which you get used to it and your stomach shrinks, so you cannot eat as much anyway. It's actually really simple and really easy...but most people have no self-discipline.
 
Last edited:
Again stomach paralisis was not a side effect in the label, the company even says that in the article.

Why do people here like to suck big pharma dick so much? If they can sue why shouldn't they? It seems some people here think only normal people should suffer the consequences of their actions but if big pharma fucks up ( like not mentioning a possible side effect) they should be left alone. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

It isn't sucking big pharma dick to point out that nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, constipation, and diarrhea are all clearly listed on the fucking label as the most common adverse reactions. Pharmaceutical companies do shady shit all the time and I don't consider them any different from any other drug cartel, I just don't care for whiny litigious retards with entitlement issues or ambulance-chasing scumfucks, either, and I don't especially care about them all tearing chunks out of each other as part of their round-robin grift. But think about it: Big pharma wouldn't even be able to exist in the form it does if people weren't spineless, whiny, entitled, victimhood worshippers desperately willing to place all responsibility for their own shortcomings on others, demand instant fixes for their problems that require zero work on their end, and consider it a grave injustice to ever experience the slightest hint of discomfort ever. There is plenty of shit to be slung at the "healthcare" industry at pretty much every level, big pharma egregiously so, but let's not pretend it isn't a thoroughly symbiotic relationship with contemptible niggercattle.
 
It's a negligible increase. Your metabolic demands increase a little with increased muscle mass, but that demand goes toward maintaining your new muscle, not towards "burning fat". Don't get me wrong: any muscle increase is a good thing and ought to be encouraged but muscle increase (and/or cardio) alone will not significantly decrease your fat, especially visceral fat.
What's starting to be frustrating is that med school doesn't teach you updated things. I was told you'll have a higher metabolic rate with more muscle but after looking at more recent studies from your claim, yeah it doesn't do much. bruh how are we supposed to be the most educated of new generation of doctors if they're still teaching outdated shit from 20 years ago.
 
What's starting to be frustrating is that med school doesn't teach you updated things. I was told you'll have a higher metabolic rate with more muscle but after looking at more recent studies from your claim, yeah it doesn't do much. bruh how are we supposed to be the most educated of new generation of doctors if they're still teaching outdated shit from 20 years ago.
Because we've left science behind and we've reached Soyence™️, metabolism and nutrition probably are one of the fields with the most "settled science" around, so much so that questioning anything about these fields is considered sacrilegious.

The other issue is the rampant fraud in the publishing industry, we've been chasing phantoms with alzheimer's for 20 years because some dumb fuck falsified data, and it was considered to be settled science, nobody was allowed to question it even remotely, and so, any new theories about alzheimer's (like alzheimer's as a glucose problem, or alzheimer's as a sleep problem) weren't just dismissed, they were actively shunned and discouraged from being pursued.

The only solution I can personally see to that is to just take science away from academia.
 
It's a negligible increase. Your metabolic demands increase a little with increased muscle mass, but that demand goes toward maintaining your new muscle, not towards "burning fat". Don't get me wrong: any muscle increase is a good thing and ought to be encouraged but muscle increase (and/or cardio) alone will not significantly decrease your fat, especially visceral fat.
If muscle mass made a real difference to basal metabolic rate, Eddie Hall would be the most shredded man in the world.



That comes down to the length of your fast. I have been fasting from 5pm to 7/8am every night for quite a while now and I can do it indefinitely.



Correct. And it doesn't even take long to adjust to "being hungry" (they're not actually hungry, they just aren't used to the feeling of not being constantly full), it takes two to three weeks, after which you get used to it and your stomach shrinks, so you cannot eat as much anyway. It's actually really simple and really easy...but most people have no self-discipline.
I fast mostly on the weekends. It's way easier that way.

I was diabetic. Long sugar was 7.2 which is in diabetic area.
Didn't do sports.
Ate a fuckton of spaghetti a lot
Many sweets like donuts.
Almost a medium cola bottle daily.
After lateshift work, drink a large beer mix with strawberry flavor 5x week.
Checkup at work told me get your blood levels checked.
Congratulations, you're diabetic.
2 weeks till have the appointment at my doctor.
Lay off all sugars, learn to read labels
Switch from lot of carbs to greens, fish and meat and eggs.
Start to watch youtubers (some diabetics) that test themselves how their bloodsugars react when eating specific foods or together but in specific orders.
Salads/greens ---> fats ---> proteins---> carbs.
Using that if any carbs.
After 2 days of this no longer hungry every 2 hours. No snacks until actually hungry.
Doctor tells me I don't need any pills, etc since I look determined.
3 months later new blood test.
Long sugar is at 5.0.
Congratulations you're no longer diabetic.
Keeping it that way.
Lost 35 pounds in the process.
Still don't do sports.
Just changed diet that's all there is to it.
And I still eat spaghetti but not as much as before and mixed with a salad at start. And I don't buy the typical ones anymore since the ingredients are a fucking book compared to ones like La Molisana.
 
This is a behavioral problem
Yeah. Add it to the other 4563 problems we have. All of which come down to living in a society where excess is celebrated, and where personal responsibility is seen as the worst thing ever, and there’s zero shame.
Don't get me wrong: any muscle increase is a good thing and ought to be encouraged but muscle increase (and/or cardio) alone will not significantly decrease your fat, especially visceral fat.
Muscle is good for you. It doesn’t have a huge effect on your calorie needs unless you’re at that very small tipping point where you’re not quite in a deficit. I used to hang out with a lot of ultra athletes, the kind who do triathlon and those insane week long runs and that level of activity? Yeah you need to eat and eat and eat or you’ll waste away.
That comes down to the length of your fast. I have been fasting from 5pm to 7/8am every night for quite a while now and I can do it indefinitely.
That’s fine.
What's starting to be frustrating is that med school doesn't teach you updated things. I was told you'll have a higher metabolic rate with more muscle but after looking at more recent studies from your claim, yeah it doesn't do much. bruh how are we supposed to be the most educated of new generation of doctors if they're still teaching outdated shit from 20 years ago.
You do but it’s a small amount. And yeah even a small amount helps if you’re looking at small long term add up effects. Remember 100kcal excess a year is a fair amount of weight - 100x365 = 36500 which is about 10lb. Where muscle is good is metabolically and strength - frail elderly are far more likely to die of all causes. Having a decent (not silly) amount of muscle is very good for you.
 
@Equal Rights for Androids
If you really want to learn about this stuff, look at the Low Carb Down Under YT channel. They're actual MD's.
Congratulations you're no longer diabetic.
Keeping it that way.
Lost 35 pounds in the process.
Still don't do sports.
Just changed diet that's all there is to it.
Winning, nigger. Fucking winning.
 
Both my aunt and father take Monjauro, and both have had lots of success with it.

Mind, my aunt goes to the gym twice a week and my dad bikes half an hour each day and they try to maintain a 1650 calorie and 2200 calorie digest respectfully.

Which I think is how the weight loss but is supposed to work, both are taking it to treat type 2.
 
Olestra was good stuff. I could eat an entire big bag of sour cream and cheddar chips for like, 500 calories
Again stomach paralisis was not a side effect in the label, the company even says that in the article.

Why do people here like to suck big pharma dick so much? If they can sue why shouldn't they? It seems some people here think only normal people should suffer the consequences of their actions but if big pharma fucks up ( like not mentioning a possible side effect) they should be left alone. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
part of it for me is that as I increasingly got off my ass and exercised I've grown to resent people who put on a huge show of what an impossible task getting of your ass and exercising is
 
or the best one, the low fat chips that gave people “anal leakage”?
Ah, Olestra/"Olean". :) "WOW!" Chips certainly were. But it wasn't "WOW!" as in "WOW! Look how much weight I lost!" it was more "WOW! I can't believe the human body can hold that much shit!"

PL: I had a bag back when they were popular to see how good they were. The anal Slip-N-Slide that occurred approximately 3 hours later certainly made me go "WOW!"
 
It can be tricky, not to pl, but I was prescribed ozempic to try and combat another medication's side effects fucking with hunger signals(I was literally bloated with food and still starving at one point), and as other medical issues have cropped up it kept my weight stable,(instead of having my weight balloon)

I'm on a temp pause(that I requested) and working with a dietician to confirm if the issues I had at the start are still in play, and the dieticians advices was basically I was eating healthy, and they just helped point out foods they thought I should swap to while I am dealing with this other thing that is brutally fucking up my life lol
 
It isn't sucking big pharma dick to point out that nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, constipation, and diarrhea are all clearly listed on the fucking label as the most common adverse reactions. Pharmaceutical companies do shady shit all the time and I don't consider them any different from any other drug cartel, I just don't care for whiny litigious retards with entitlement issues or ambulance-chasing scumfucks, either, and I don't especially care about them all tearing chunks out of each other as part of their round-robin grift. But think about it: Big pharma wouldn't even be able to exist in the form it does if people weren't spineless, whiny, entitled, victimhood worshippers desperately willing to place all responsibility for their own shortcomings on others, demand instant fixes for their problems that require zero work on their end, and consider it a grave injustice to ever experience the slightest hint of discomfort ever. There is plenty of shit to be slung at the "healthcare" industry at pretty much every level, big pharma egregiously so, but let's not pretend it isn't a thoroughly symbiotic relationship with contemptible niggercattle.
Yeah much of the side effects people are claiming are difficult to prove. It’s like diagnosing fibromyalgia or IBS in most cases.

I know this one guy that swears he has horrible IBS, then found out he’s an intense alcoholic. So the reason he was shitting himself was clearly the alcohol rather than some genetic disorder.

With this story, it largely seems fake with people claiming their shitty diets or trauma from being unable to eat all they want is from the drug. Lot of them also clearly hate drinking water which would help move things along in their digestion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Prokhor Zakharov
Back