Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

[Stasi]

She might be on to something

 

[Megaton Punch]

I've never understood that Woman thing of wanting to be "mysterious" and "magical", etc, etc. How is it that women still do not grasp that men only see that as playing games/manipulation, and get extremely annoyed by it?

It's the direct parallel to men wanting to be badasses with no emotions just like in my Japanese animes or male wish fulfillment slop like Mad Men.

The difference is men start getting beaten back into the ground the instant they start emulating fiction, but women don't. Men are called cringe incel virgins. Women are called creative and independent. Men are bullied. Women are protected and enabled. Thus, harmful behavior in men is corrected, but in women it's fostered and simply grows forever.

Really, this dynamic is behind almost everything wrong with modern women. Everyone starts off as a moron who doesn't know better. But people are only unwilling to correct women when they're being retarded, so they just stay retarded forever while men get the benefit of criticism and discipline.

 

[The Ugly One]

Women are protected and enabled. Thus, harmful behavior in men is corrected, but in women it's fostered and simply grows forever.

The only thing a woman can do in our society that results in public criticism is be white and have more than two children.

 

[VeteranOfTheRetardWars]

I would say now I am more comfortable with someone who has learned perspective on their own terms then one who has read a profound thought in a book (a hard lesson to learn if you’ve read too much too early). Schopenhauer was right that too much book learning is like wearing a wig: you might be able to refer to facts and quotes, but it is not a part of your character. It is like reading a thousand romance novels but never falling in love.

Literature courses are dominated by women, and they tend to do quite well because they are great at regurgitating theories and know what to write to achieve a quality grade. Often my seminars featured women verbatim quoting essays as opinions. Women are liberal only because their teachers, those in power, tell them to be. It really is all about power.

I don’t remember the exact quote off the top of my head, but in an introductory chapter of An Inquiry Regarding Human Understanding Hume basically said “alright, we’re going to get real deep into some skepticism but just remember you should go outside and look at the real world.” I know too many people, educated people both men and women, who cannot for the life of them remove their gay political philosophy wank books from the real world with titles like How Being A Black Whamen Is Hard An’ Sheit and Five Hundred Variations Of Huwhitey Being The Devil.
I, being a dickhead, would read those books of my friend’s roommate’s coffee table when she was out and just roast them. They were the dumbest shit I’ve ever read in my entire life and I grew up on Fanfiction.net, words cannot describe how absolutely retarded everyone from the author to the consumer was with those books.
I have had deeper, more complex conversations and debates on literature and philosophy with mailmen and construction workers who just listen to audiobooks or read on their free time than with actual degree holders, those who are educated and especially educated women tend to crumble the second you go “I disagree with that premise and here’s why.” Meanwhile, Jorge at the site is like “well, here’s my rebuttal to your rebuttal fool.”

 

[JoseRaulChupacabra]

I know lots of women who read, very few of them have read classics that weren't required reading in school. The rest is Twilight, HP, Hunger Gaymes, or whatever Nicholas Sparks has recently published.

 

[Unyielding Stupidity]

I guess "powerful" was the wrong word. I meant to say that these books and movies where the heroine pushes away the "boring guy who loves her" and chases after the "X factor bad boy who treats her like shit but can be fixed" is such a trope it makes me wonder if it was propagated by the writers themselves to make women willing to cheat with them

Not really.
If it's a male author (which it rarely is), they just write this generic YA slop because it's what sells the best to women.
If it's a female author, it's just her writing her own masturbation fantasies. Never forget that Fifty Shades of Grey was literally just the female author's Twilight fapfic rewritten with some names changed.

I understand why women are biologically trained to go after someone with more power and security and dump their provider, but why go after some bum who is "edgy" and can be fixed?

That's the thing; they want to tame the "bad boy", which is usually a fruitless endeavour that usually ends with them being beaten, raped or murdered. But in the rare off-chance that they do actually manage to tame him, they end up getting bored with him like they would a regular man, because he's no longer a bad boy.
They just end up having a fetish for wanting to tame him, because if they just admit "I don't want him to change", it makes them either seem insane or like they're also a terrible person.

The difference is men start getting beaten back into the ground the instant they start emulating fiction, but women don't. Men are called cringe incel virgins. Women are called creative and independent. Men are bullied. Women are protected and enabled. Thus, harmful behavior in men is corrected, but in women it's fostered and simply grows forever.

Really, this dynamic is behind almost everything wrong with modern women. Everyone starts off as a moron who doesn't know better. But people are only unwilling to correct women when they're being retarded, so they just stay retarded forever while men get the benefit of criticism and discipline.

Yes, women's weird behaviours in general are never really beaten out of them in the same way that men's are. Granted, it's not all women's fault; men will enable these behaviours in hopes that doing so will give them access to her genitals.

 

[The Ugly One]

I guess "powerful" was the wrong word. I meant to say that these books and movies where the heroine pushes away the "boring guy who loves her" and chases after the "X factor bad boy who treats her like shit but can be fixed" is such a trope it makes me wonder if it was propagated by the writers themselves to make women willing to cheat with them.

It's no more a psy-op as porn where a big-tittied bimbo with whore makeup sucks a guy's dick to thank him for delivering her pizza is a psy-op to make guys willing to cheat. It's just a typical fantasy.

 

[stares at error messages]

/threads/her-state-bans-gender-affirming-care-for-teenagers-so-she-travels-450-miles-for-it.201233/
Women turn their son into trannies. This makes women feel special for having a disabled "Special" son, which gives them attention too. It's peak Munchausen's Syndrome. Women are defective. What more proof do you need other than filicide?

 

[The Ugly One]

I can't think of a single example of a father pooning out his daughter.

 

[Great General Ri Shin]

/threads/her-state-bans-gender-affirming-care-for-teenagers-so-she-travels-450-miles-for-it.201233/
Women turn their son into trannies. This makes women feel special for having a disabled "Special" son, which gives them attention too. It's peak Munchausen's Syndrome. Women are defective. What more proof do you need other than filicide?

Clearly this is the MOID son’s fault. He probably just wants to RAPE innocent beautiful lesbian kweenz! Shame on him for dragging his poor mother into his deluded fantasies!

 

[Executive Petrel]

It's the direct parallel to men wanting to be badasses with no emotions just like in my Japanese animes or male wish fulfillment slop like Mad Men.

The difference is men start getting beaten back into the ground the instant they start emulating fiction, but women don't. Men are called cringe incel virgins. Women are called creative and independent. Men are bullied. Women are protected and enabled. Thus, harmful behavior in men is corrected, but in women it's fostered and simply grows forever.

Really, this dynamic is behind almost everything wrong with modern women. Everyone starts off as a moron who doesn't know better. But people are only unwilling to correct women when they're being retarded, so they just stay retarded forever while men get the benefit of criticism and discipline.

Tbh the male side is more annoying and sometimes threatening.
That's why women get away with it.

Media is a psyop anyways.
Whoever bases their identity off TV tropes is confirmed as an easy victim for manipulation and deserves to be bullied.
For women it's okay, as they need this kind of mental escape to cope with being weaker than men and even with near equal rights are still vulnerable to rape and violence.
They at least get in touch with the people surrounding them instead of using the role in a way that damages themselves and others, like men do.

Also giving yourself labels other than badass alpha male helps alot to build up conversation, for both sexes.

 

[Megaton Punch]

Tbh the male side is more annoying and sometimes threatening.
That's why women get away with it.

Media is a psyop anyways.
Whoever bases their identity off TV tropes is confirmed as an easy victim for manipulation and deserves to be bullied.
For women it's okay, as they need this kind of mental escape to cope with being weaker than men and even with near equal rights are still vulnerable to rape and violence.
They at least get in touch with the people surrounding them instead of using the role in a way that damages themselves and others, like men do.

Also giving yourself labels other than badass alpha male helps alot to build up conversation, for both sexes.

I mean, I'm not here to excuse weebs or consoomers who think that women are just waiting for the right guy to pseudo-rape them into loving them like they see in fiction.

even though a lot of mentally ill women are!

I just don't think basing your personality off what you see on TV is healthy no matter what your gender.

Women can cope with the hand life gave them in healthier ways, like carrying a gun. Pretending you're a Hogwarts student will always get BTFO by an actual .22 every time, both figuratively and literally. And as much as people like to dab on 22s, one of those entering your braincase is gonna be a problem no matter how badass you are. Why escape mentally when you can even the playing field for real?

I know that the answer is "because leftist propaganda has convinced women that guns are the root of all evil and carrying one makes them just as bad as the evil men", but that's a stupid answer.

 

[stares at error messages]

Clearly this is the MOID son’s fault. He probably just wants to RAPE innocent beautiful lesbian kweenz! Shame on him for dragging his poor mother into his deluded fantasies!

The mother drives him hours to get the trans treatment. If she wasn't going a long with it the tranny could get a bus or arrange some other transport. Women do this all the time to their sons. Mothers love destroying their sons.

 

[Dante Alighieri]

Friendly reminder that women prefer murdering their offspring more than they do literally anything else including having food and a place to live.

Dear women: condoms are cheap, and abstinence is cheaper.

 

[The Ugly One]

Women can cope with the hand life gave them in healthier ways, like carrying a gun.

A woman with a gun will get fucked up by a nigger who means to do her harm most of the time. Most negro attacks on women are sucker-punches with little time for her to fumble for her ladyfinger, shakily point it while screaming and crying, and shoot a bystander. The best way a woman can cope with reality that she is small and weak is to do two things.

One is to be racist. If you are a racist, most of the danger in the world won't find you, because you'll never be near it. The second is to find a man. Throughout history, a woman's best weapon against someone who means to do her harm is a man who sees her as his own.

While women bawl and wail about how women used to be "property," one mustn't forget that a man won't hesitate to kill a nigger who tries to take his property.

 

[NoIdeaWhatImDoing]

I am a woman but i fucking hate the whole
>I'm an independent woman who needs no man
but when it's convenient
>you should treat me as a little girl

It's very obvious in trials, they will use things from CSA cases in grown ass woman cases like saying a 29 year old was groomed, nah you fucked and regret it.

The Kavanaugh case was a good example, she was speaking like a little girl even through she was like 50. She also kept lying about important shit but when people thought Kavanaugh lied about stuff that wasn't even that important they were asking for his head.

The democrats also became super sanctimonious about a teen talking about sex even though the accuser was way more promiscuous than Kavanaugh when they were teens /college. You wouldn't know by the way she was portrayed.

I can't think of a single example of a father pooning out his daughter.

I can, a lot of pooners got kiddle diddle by some family member. The mechanism is different, the result the same.

 

[The Ugly One]

The Kavanaugh case was a good example, she was speaking like a little girl even through she was like 50.

Some chick did a breakdown of her video and called out her "pretty pose," where she'd try to look small and cute and peek out over her glasses. That old hag thought she was still 22.

I can, a lot of pooners got kiddle diddle by some family member. The mechanism is different, the result the same.

I mean an example of a father deliberately grooming his daughter to specifically be a pooner from the time she was little. Like "I knew when she tossed a baseball back at me that she was really a boy!" and then started refusing to let her be pretty or play with dolls.

 

[California Newt]

Back from my ban.

I've been reading a book called "Orality and Literacy" by some guy named Walter J. Ong, about pre-literate cultures. It's really throwing me through a loop: the way it describes pre-literate culture and cognition sounds a lot like how I and many in threads like these have been describing the average woman—oriented towards the external rather than internal; preoccupied with the concrete rather than the abstract; world-understanding centered on persons (leading perhaps to a relativistic bias in thought—see the concept of "Hottentot morality", if that's a legitimate anthropological phenomenon) rather than objects (leading to an objective bias); poor ability to entertain hypotheticals and thought experiments in isolation from immediate, lived, and holistic experience; selective memory based on immediate utility (this one's a bit of a stretch; for illiterates this refers to inter-generational knowledge such as genealogies); the apparent similarities keep piling up.

Is it possible that women have resisted the cognitive transformations that literacy brought to human society? I don't know if I believe that, but I think it's worth looking into. Gotta finish the book.

On the other hand, if many or most of these issues relate to literacy rather than sex somehow, then it means that the "woman model" I and others have been working with is totally off. That'd be interesting.

Many female writers, primarily novelists, obsess either about crass moralism (always lacking in gravity) or self-indulgent neuroticism. Contemporary poetry is basically venting about trauma, true or otherwise; there is no genius or mystery to be found in it. Could a woman write about guilt and sin in the way Baudelaire did? Could she write the grotesque characters of Browning? What about the playfulness and irony of Shakespeare's sonnets? Great poetry, as with great prose, requires cold precision in self-judgement, but also an awareness of all human emotions (good and bad), to convey experience convincingly. The reason why free verse is so predominant now, other than its general ease, is because writing in metre is too strict, too cold. It excludes those who do not write in it ("poetry is aristocrat" said Hazlitt). This does not gel with society's obsession with levelling everything down to mediocrity. That the best writers of Free Verse, TS Eliot, Wallace Stevens, Pound, were aware of metre -Eliot basically wrote in traditional Blank Verse without line breaks- is proof enough that the other 99% that is published is simply bad prose masking itself as something higher.

I haven't read Ursula K. Le Guin yet, but would you say this applies to her? I've got something from her lying around I've been meaning to get to about a sci-fi society where sex doesn't exist, and I keep seeing her book on writing—"Steering the Craft"—show up in recommendations on /lit/ (not that that should mean anything).

 

[Megaton Punch]

I mean an example of a father deliberately grooming his daughter to specifically be a pooner from the time she was little. Like "I knew when she tossed a baseball back at me that she was really a boy!" and then started refusing to let her be pretty or play with dolls.

Girls troon out because they were molested and hate their own femininity. Boys troon out because they were psychologically abused and hate their own masculinity. They can't really groom a pooner the way they groom a tranny because "it's better to be a boy, you'll be happier that way" is a demonstrable lie obvious even to relatively young children. It only works on fundamentally broken girls. It doesn't really take much to convince a boy that he'd be happier as a girl because basically every facet of society caters to and encourages girls and women. Most boys learn this lesson the first day of school.

Or, in both cases, autism works as a shortcut. Autism is a groomer's dream come true.

 

[stares at error messages]

Friendly reminder that women prefer murdering their offspring more than they do literally anything else including having food and a place to live.

View attachment 6474142

Dear women: condoms are cheap, and abstinence is cheaper.

Who the fuck cares about abortion? That's a fake issue. How young are the votes? 40 to 50? Also Democracy is code for Fascism.