Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 87 27.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 52 16.3%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.3%

  • Total voters
    320
They did not address anything material about the case at all.
Barnes knows full well that their retarded Franks motion just forced a judge to review all evidence in the case and make a legal finding of facts.
I agree that Barnes did not say anything directly about the case. That's why I'm surprised you followed that with mention that Barnes knows... well, literally anything.

I am not convinced Barnes actually knew literally any details at all other than that there was a denial (from a shower text?). He didn't mention any particularities of the case. The bald man screams bloviator.

I remember listening to Viva a few times, and I didn't think he was retarded until this clip. However, I don't know how anyone but Kayla could just let Barnes run his mouth like that. We should watch for Viva wearing a flag pin upside down.

At around 5:30, Barnes also seems to be comparing Nick to other well-known "victims" of the court system including Jeffery Epstein, p diddy, Giselle Maxwell and Sam Bankman-Fried,
Epstein died of natural causes, not the court system. If you have dirt on the wrong people it's natural that you're going to die.

Wait, there's an odd man out. Did SBF diddle kids?

Barnes has always reminded me of those shameless NY Mob lawyers who used to get guys like John Gotti off.
Since this isn't a law thread, and we are talking about Barnes, I will assume you mean sexually.
 
IMG_4703.jpeg

he’s just been busy with all the activities.
 
The case started in 2016. Joe was trying to collect a judgement against this guy for unpaid rent on a unit at 635 West 42nd Street in the amount of $13,000. The guy turned around and sued Joe three months later. In 2021, both parties requested summary judgement of the case. And somehow the judge decided in favor of the plantiff in the amount of $500 actual damages.
In reviewing all the documents, its difficult to figure out exactly what Joe did wrong (other than trying to collect from what seems to be a very influential person). The debt he was collecting seems to have been real.
I've pulled the original complaint, Order on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment and the Court's Report and Recommendation for judgment for the thread's perusal.

The basic problem is that Joe sent a bunch of threats in his demand letter that he was not permitted to do as a debt collector. In collecting consumer debt, you are pretty tightly constrained in the type of things you can say to collect that debt and you cannot make threats of things you are not actually permitted to do. Joe stated, in part, that Mr. Levy could face jail or fines should he fail to reply to the demand, which were both untrue threats and simultaneously illegal debt collection practices.

Pretty stupid thing to do considering debt collection as an attorney typically relies on interchangeable forms that you plug and play the names and debt amount.
 

Attachments

View attachment 6473766

he’s just been busy with all the activities.
His internet has been a massive issue for years and he always promised to get a second service to solve the issue. Unless i have a false memory, at one point he 100% committed to getting Starlink and bragged how he could and would write it off on his taxes.

That doesn't matter because he is back to the normal lies. I bet he looked at the amount of locals subs coming up for yearly resubs and had a bit of a panic. Seems likely the lapsing will be higher this year than last year.
 
In reviewing all the documents, its difficult to figure out exactly what Joe did wro
It is pretty simple.

Joe tried to collect debt, claimed to have a judgement, created a fake legal document ordering someone to show up in court.
The threatened person (plaintiff in the case against Joe) then got himself a lawyer (for a flat 3000$ fee to start) who contacted Joe.
Joe said "No problem, I will send the documents!" and then ghosted the lawyer.

The lawyer then contacted the courts in New York and requested information about the suppoed judgement, which did not exist.
Joe tried to threaten someone into paying money by making up a judgement AND creating a fictive legal document.

Since it was made up, they counter sued for the cost.
Then Joe dragged it out for 7 years and now has to pay over 100000$ in lawyer fees alone.

He is just as retarded as Nick Rakieta and they deserve each other.
 
I think that a lot of people do like being told what to.
Perhaps not commanded, but directed. Some people aren't good at self directing themselves towards productive ends but when they are pointed at a particular problem they'll apply themselves towards solving it.

Rickety Rackets ain't one of those people.
 
That doesn't matter because he is back to the normal lies. I bet he looked at the amount of locals subs coming up for yearly resubs and had a bit of a panic. Seems likely the lapsing will be higher this year than last year.
:story:

I didn't even think about the annual subscription issue.

You're right, obviously. It's about to be the 2 year anniversary of his brief ban from YouTube when his Locals subscriber base surged peaking at over 5k paying subscribers.

A decent chunk of his remaining subs are likely to be annual subscriptions up for renewal in the next couple weeks.

he’s just been busy with all the activities.
He PROMISES he's going to stream on an unknown day that's not today because of darn kids. Basically, no update.

He claims to have fixed his streaming setup, but he recently appeared as a guest on a stream where he was using a bad microphone outside of his studio room, suggesting it hadn't been fixed as of yesterday.
 
That's why I'm surprised you followed that with mention that Barnes knows... well, literally anything.
Since it was Barnes and Frei who were at the front of pushing the narrative of "Nick already won" and how "they lied to arrest him", I think it is pretty clear that communications must have happened between Nick and them.

So I assume that Barnes had the information and brain capacity to process it and come to the same conclusion everyone else did.
The only reason to lie about that stuff is because its good for content. Nick is now partly their lolcow.
 
So uh, Nick's appearance on Joe's stream ended up resulting in a blowback effect with someone pointing out that Joe lost a court case for violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by making a "false or misleading statement" on an Elissa Clips' video (farms crosslink).
I wonder if being in sustained contact with medallion wearers tranfsers the curse...
View attachment 6472807
Is nick himself now the sonichu medallion of lawtube? :story:
 
Those damn keeedz stealing’ his cocaine bandwidth smh
His daughter was also caught using ten times the amount of bandwidth! No wonder his setup looks like a Microsoft PowerPoint! It's a multi-layer conspiracy by the Biden Adminstration, the Minnesota government, Swede-American Christian Prudes, and Kandiyohi County police fucking with his WiFi.
 
Back