US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
I like your post. But the DNC isn't gonna groom, politically, younger talent. They salted the earth after 2008 to prevent someone from rising in the ranks like Obama. And to make sure Hillary go the nomination in 2016. They didn't plan on AOC winning her seat over the man Pelosi groomed to be her successor. Until the leadership over there at the dnc changes, the salting will continue. They will probably run Newsom or Whitmer in 28. And those are their young blood. The leadership at the uniparty are old fucks who will hold on to their power until their dying breathes.
For all their positioning as the squad who's hip with their fellow kids, the Democratic party cementing their "disconnected old fucks who can't let go of power, let alone realize it's not the 20th century anymore" image is pretty funny.
 
I referenced several cases where inadequate care post Roe lead to dangerous and even fatal mistakes in women’s healthcare. As for many, over 1 in 3 women have or will experience rape, stalking, and domestic violence and the resources to support them are inefficient. There are for instance, decades worth of rape kits that lie collecting dust and have not been tested, cases left to turn cold, and women left undefended as they are preyed on. Women’s healthcare institutions like Planned Parenthood which provide more than just abortive care continue to be attacked, defunded, and threatened with legal attacks by mistreated by well meaning but ultimately foolish groups. The main cause of this is ignorance in the necessity of women’s healthcare compared to more independent and dismissive male perspectives.
This was absolutely written by chatgpt. I respect the bait hustle
 
I saw a second Harris sign today. It was on my Mormon hoarder neighbor’s house.

No idea why they of all people decided to vote blue, but at least they’re nice enough.
Funny you mention the signs. Slight pl I live in a really gay, young, liberal part of SLC, I see trans, gay, those stupid "in this house signs" all the time. Since Harris took over the candidacy, I have seen a total of 7 I repeat 7 Harris/Walz signs in the areas I frequent. This is absolutely nothing compared to 2020 and even further cry from 2016 when Clinton and Sanders signs where everywhere. I don't know who's voting for this bitch, but no one seems to give a fuck about her.
 
Last edited:
Funny you mention the signs. Slight pl I live in a really gay, young, liberal part of SLC, I see trans, gay, those stupid "in this house signs" all the time. Since Harris took over the candidacy, I have seen a total of 7 I repeat 7 Harris/Walz signs in the areas I frequent. This is absolutely nothing compared to 2020 and even furth dry from 2016 when Clinton and Sanders signs where everywhere. I don't know who's voting for this bitch but no one seems to give a fuck about her.
Bro Utah is not flipping for Harris, not after what the legislature did to gerrymander the map lol. LOL LMAO even.
 
the three angry black lesbians from those videos in order: (not an exaggeration, all three are lesbians)

diamond deshields:

View attachment 6473929

chennedy carter:

View attachment 6473931

dijonai carrington:

View attachment 6473934
I'll be sure to point to these three next time people defend men in women's boxing because one of them's a Person of Sand.

"People just don't want a PoC KA-WEEN to succeed! Ya'll just wanna keep the whites on top!" Well what do you call this? What do you call tripping and scratching someone in a non-contact sport? Clark has the most fouls committed to her out of ~110 players, and that's just the ones that the refs actually cared about. She's not a Diogenes woman, she actually belongs there.
 
Last edited:
I don't plan to watch the VP debate live. That's literally only because of the moderators.

If the entire debate becomes "JD Vance has to defend the Orange Man, who is bad," then I am seriously not going to waste my time. If it's actually about policies, then I will watch it the next day.

In regards to Walz's debate performance, I anticipate that he's going to try to act like Biden circa his 2012 debate against Paul Ryan. He's going to try to be the loudest person in the room, trying to brand his own version of "Malarkey." I would probably bet good money that he's going to use the "It's none of your damn business!" line about abortion tomorrow night. lol.


I mean ... Pretty much everyone who has ever worked for Kamala has said that she's a gigantic, do-nothing bitch.

I wouldn't be shocked if people working in her campaign feel flustered, defeated, and pissed off right now and want their feelings to be known.

Senator Vance, first question, when did you stop beating your wife?

Next question Mr. Vance, what did you think when you saw Donald Trump directly ordering rioters at the Capitol to kill your fellow Congressmen?

Now to the issues, senator Vance why do you want all American women to use coat hangers for abortion?

Speaking of Kopmala, it's telling that the one issue I keep hearing most about in her campaign ads is "MUH REPRODUKTIV RITES"! It's self-parody at this point

Her campaign has seemingly buried its heels into the abortion issue which I think Trump has done a solid job of defusing redirecting back to the states and the few things she has mentioned are either phony as shit or typical progtard bullshit like "the rich paying their fair share" or forced gun confiscations for law abiding Americans.

Have you tried just not being a whore? Seems effective.

But condoms and birth control pills are so boring, I can't get excited unless doctors rip apart the fetus inside my womb
 
Makes sense. The Dems are the party of the professional managerial class and its culture, now.
On that note:
For all their positioning as the squad who's hip with their fellow kids, the Democratic party cementing their "disconnected old fucks who can't let go of power, let alone realize it's not the 20th century anymore" image is pretty funny.
Same goes for their posturing about the working class. The ones still assblasted about Sam Brownback's supposed failures are the same ones with McMansions in Mission Hills or Brookside, and still have enough disposable income left over for country club memberships, Lexus SUVs, and season tickets to KU basketball games.

Maybe I should cancel my data-removal subscription. Cyberbullying Sharice Davids' staff for sending me spam texts was my finest hour.
 
I referenced several cases where inadequate care post Roe lead to dangerous and even fatal mistakes in women’s healthcare
Cool, guess anecdotes are worthwhile empirical evidence now. In that case, I know someone who got shot by a black guy, guess it’s time for TND.
for many, over 1 in 3 women have or will experience rape, stalking, and domestic violence and the resources to support them are inefficient
Define rape, stalking and domestic violence. And define resources. And inefficient.
There are for instance, decades worth of rape kits that lie collecting dust and have not been tested, cases left to turn cold, and women left undefended as they are preyed on
Again, anecdotes aren’t empirical evidence. And moreover, this isn’t a sound logical argument (I’m not even sure it’s a valid one tbh, but I’ll give you that for the sake of argument.)
You’re simply asserting that untested rape kits exist, therefore women have ineffective support. But this ignores the myriad of other reasons that could explain why that occurs. For example, the CW may have decided that they no longer wished to press charges. Or the investigation revealed that the alleged actus reus didn’t occur even before they sent the kits to the lab.
Women’s healthcare institutions like Planned Parenthood which provide more than just abortive care continue to be attacked, defunded, and threatened with legal attacks by mistreated by well meaning but ultimately foolish groups. The main cause of this is ignorance in the necessity of women’s healthcare compared to more independent and dismissive male perspectives.
This is just a bunch of liberal nonsense that begs the question that Planned Parenthood is an objective good that needs federal funding, and boldly asserts only ignorant dismissive men would think otherwise.
Fun fact: many women also dislike planned parenthood. Including women ITT.
Another fun fact: Planned Parenthood was founded by a virulent racist who supported eugenics. That’s reason enough for many people to hate that particular organization, even if the actual mission wasn’t controversial.
Here is a report on the gap in care between men and women
https://www.gavi.org/vaccineswork/gender-health-gap-its-more-womens-issue-heres-why
Here is a study on the impact to women’s healthcare post Roe
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9824972/
I’ll give you a fair shake and read these, but that will take a while. If you want people to take your arguments regarding facts in a discussion seriously, you should cite the key facts, explain the necessary context and definitions, and then argue based upon them, rather than just saying “here’s some studies that totally prove me right.”
Fun fact: it was legal to rape your wife until 1993 in America. That’s the past Trump promises to return to with his attempts to invoke nostalgia.
Fun fact: under the Constitution, that’s entirely a state law issue, because the fed lacks a general police power. Meaning Trump and the Federal Government has exactly 0 power over that whatsoever. Just like with abortion.
Another Fun fact: you should understand the basics of US law, especially constitutional and criminal law, before making cutesy asides about the law. Especially to a lawyer.

Edit: fixed some really gay looking formatting
 
@Exterminatus The very REAL possibility of the moderators shitting up the debate like this is exactly the reason why I'm not going to watch it in real time. After the Trump v. Kamala debate covering pretty much none of the important issues because of the moderators, I felt like I had completely wasted my time and I don't feel like doing that again.

You forgot one possible "question" from the moderators though: "Senator Vance, you need to explain yourself for teaming up with the Orange Man, who is obviously bad. Muh J6, muh suckers and losers, muh fine people on both sides, etc. etc. etc."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back