US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: ThisIsGonnaBeGood, The Shredder, ActualCracker and 120 others
Click to expand...
Betonhaus said:
Is this going to be the thing where it takes a couple days for it to percolate that the Democrats lost the debate badly?
Click to expand...
Happened with the Biden debate, happened with the Kamala debate...just the way the media and most democrats process things. Denial, followed by quiet acceptance.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Glowing In The Streets, spiritofamermaid, Exterminatus and 7 others
Slimy Time said:
This and "the eyeliner" are their spin to try and make this not look like a disaster for Walz.
Click to expand...
Most of the pics I saw of Vance's eyeliner were taken by taking a pic of a screen using a phone, which often makes things look weird color and contrast wise. Vance looked completely normal when viewed on TV.

Cope, seethe etc.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Synthetic Smug, spiritofamermaid, Exterminatus and 12 others
Save the Loli said:
Jimmy Bowman-Hamel-Vance is a black hole of charisma who can only win a debate when his opponent is having a bad night. Again, his own electoral history says it all. Even Kamala did better in her elections. Dude will implode if he ever goes for the presidency unless his sugar daddy Thiel convinces the WEF and Bilderbergs to put him in office. I'm not gonna take the W for "my team", I'm going to criticize my team the same way I did when I used to watch football and my team would play like shit half the game and if they won they'd luck their way into a garbage 10-7 victory and promptly lose the next week. For some reason I was allowed to do that without being criticized.

"Doomer" is to the right what "conspiracy theorist" is to the left. I'm giving you previews. And given 2015 pre-Trump America might as well have been the 1950s with how free and conservative it was compared to today, maybe Trump might not be so good?
Click to expand...
I mean, assuming you don't just show up randomly to try and make people upset, I'm genuinely wondering what you honestly hope to gain by popping in here from time to time to shit on everything. It's usually it's when something "good" happens for "your team" as well. Is it really criticism when all it is is calling the people you don't like trash or exclusively pointing out "flaws"? It's not going to give anyone energy, and it's too annoying and predictable to actually demoralize anyone. What's the point? I'm sorry you have to find out this way, but the candidates are locked in, and even if you don't like them, we're past the point of picking other ones, and it's clear one choice is worse than the other. If your reveling in "everything is going to be shit forever" and "every positive development is bad or won't change anything" isn't dooming, then what the hell is?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: 0713, Glowing In The Streets, spiritofamermaid and 19 others
The moderator claimed in the debate that all the judges 'looked at the evidence and determined there was no widespread fraud', but this is doubly wrong. They didn't look at the evidence at all, they were always thrown out before the evidentiary phase, and even if they had, you don't need 'widespread' fraud to steal an election that's close. You'd only need 2, maybe 3 states, and one city creating the fraud in each.

Although it's hyperbolic, it's basically the same process as the Tianman Square Massacre. China murders a bunch of its people, pretends they didn't, and anyone who mentions actual historical events becomes a criminal dissident. The cheat happened. It's blatantly obvious it happened. The only question is how severe the cheat happened. But saying what is factually true has you treated like a wild conspiracy theorist out to destroy democracy by the very people who did the cheating.

They can only get away with such blatant lies because media and tech is in their pocket.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: The Howlers of Mars, Nitro!, CEO of Gay and 36 others
Fapcop said:
DEM: Suck Israel cock! And wrote a handwringing op-ed about how SAD we are about all the Arabs they kill with the bombs they get for free.
Click to expand...
Progtard niggerfaggots like TYT running talking points that Trump is going to start WW3 because he killed just one IRGC figure.

Under Boden, the heads of Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran have been killed plus multiple IRGC officers and even an embassy bombed.

But the VBNW progtards, slowly turning into shitlibs, have no shame in insisting even now that Trump is worse.

And won't even name Biden or Kamala as well.

Any muzzie or Arab voting D this election, should be honest with themselves that they want gibs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Glowing In The Streets, spiritofamermaid, Exterminatus and 7 others
I watched a video earlier which predicted the electoral college if the state polling averages are used as the data and they came to the conclusion that Trump only needs I believe 2 of the swing states (which were between 0.1 and 3 points difference) to take the election.

Tim Walz did not do well, up until now I think Vance has been a weak choice but he might have done well enough to take away some of the democrats' lead.

Of course polls said Hillary was +3 like Harris is right now on average and look how that went, still kinda interesting.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: 0713
Gondolindrim said:
Israel is at war with 3 countries but your concern is "Hamas Sympathizers" eh?
Click to expand...
I'm gonna say it.

If folks want to simp for Hamas, so be it.

It's not like there are people who simped for BLM in much larger numbers. And suffered little to no consequences.

Or the fact the groups like La Raza exist. Or that Soros is buying out radio stations and groups like the National Lawyers Guild have not been given a reality check.

And that is before we get to black supremacist militias.

Or something like Mexican Drug cartels operating with the support of the Democratic Party.

Newsom just two days signed a law, preventing Voter ID at the local level while using niggers and old poor niggers as excuses. Nevermind California will subsidize IDs and you can't get federal welfare like SSI without IDs.

But I guess the Hamas sympathizer label means mainstream conservatives have given up on naming the shitlib for what they are.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Exterminatus, indomitable snowman and 7 others
MrJokerRager said:
But I guess the Hamas sympathizer label means mainstream conservatives have given up on naming the shitlib for what they are.
Click to expand...
It is a pretty bizarre brand of shit in general the usual suspects try and Scientology style "What about your crimes?" flip on you.

"I hate the entire region and don't want to be involved."
"DO YOU CONDEMN KHHHAGHMAHAS?"
"I hate you both and don't want to give either of you money."
"BUT DO YOU CONDEMN *garbage disposal full of cocks and spit sounds* HHHGHGHGHGMAMAAS?"
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Rome's rightful successor, spiritofamermaid, Exterminatus and 14 others
After rewatching some segments, I'm amazed at his climate change response. All these fucking redditor climate cringe activists never, EVER acknowledge that the lion's share of carbon pollution comes from third world countries, not the U.S., so he really nailed a two-in-one there on boosting the economy while also dunking on performative activism.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: wopirish, the_real_debbil, Seventh Star and 31 others
Harkalar said:
Do we know what Waltz was actually trying to say? School shooting victims? What a knucklehead!
Click to expand...
He 100% meant that he's "friends with school shooting victims." The issue is, of course, that Vance's hypnotic eyes made him so gaily flustered he lost the ability to put sentences together several times (such as him saying he was proud of his service when he wasn't even talking about his military career).
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: 0713, spiritofamermaid, Exterminatus and 13 others
Hey Johnny Bravo said:
To be fair, wouldn't the National Guard be activated for natural disasters like this? The 82nd Airborne are a fighting force. I understand the soldiers worrying about their loved ones, but the 82nd Airborne have a different purpose.
Click to expand...
I was going to go all Reddit-tier acktchually on you, like the faggot that I am, and explain how it's also illegal, but when searching for sources to back me up, I found out I was wrong. The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 (archive.ph) prohbits the use of the armed forces for domestic law enforcment unless authorized by Congress. The Insurection Act of 1807 (archive.ph) is one such exception authorized by Congress, and is the biggest. However, this again, addresses using the armed forces for law enforcement purposes, e.g. putting down rebellions, major riots, etc.

I couldn't actually find anything that forbid deploying the federal armed forces domestically for emergency relief after natural disasters.

I have mixed thoughts on this. You are right, the National Guard would be the ones to be activated and deployed, perhaps with some federal assistance. That's part of why each state keeps a National Guard unit. And the National Guards of the various impacted states have been activated and deployed (archive.ph).

However, it's not like the 82 Airborne hasn't been deployed in the wake of major disasters in the past. In 1992 they were deployed to South Florida after Hurricane Andrew, and then in again in 2005 after Hurricane Katrina. They're one of the US' foremost expeditionary infantry divisions, so their skills and equipment would definitely useful in the search and rescue, and humanitarian relief efforts.

But the sandbox is heating up, and Israel and Iran are starting to trade blows. The Establishment very much would like to add an Iran chapter to their Middle Eastern Forever War to distract from the election. In light of that, I'm not surprised that people at Fort Bragg are being told to stay put. If our Greatest Ally calls for aid, or the Establishment decides its time to go blow up some sandniggers now now now Now NOW, then the 82nd Airborne are going to be sent to the sandbox to blow up some sandniggers, even if we need them here at home..

I don't like it. I understand it, but that doesn't mean I have to like it.

And so, I leave this message in draft, go outside and do things besides poltisperging and come back to 100 new pages. Was the VP debate that fun?

I have some catching up to do. Anyone want point out posts that I might miss if I surf the highlights forward?
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Feels
Reactions: Drifty Shifter, 0713, Gog & Magog and 13 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back