I might be in the minority, but I could never consider the cgi clone wars show as canon. It introduced too many kiddish elements and stories. nb4 kids movies, the 2003 cartoon Clone Wars was for kids while still being somewhat serious.
I consider Filoni Wars to be Republic propaganda, spinning war crimes like false surrender and the dubious legal standing of Clone Troopers as good things.
That's because it wasn't considered canon when the Prequelverse EU and the movies were being made. Those two cited each other, they didn't leave much room behind for TCW; TCW was made as a last-ditch attempt by Lucas after the fact because the dumb normie critics rejected the Prequels and denounced them as a sin to cinema. Notice how the Clone Wars was a conflict that supposedly had a lot of nuance; a lot of media showed the perspective of both sides and tried to make the conflict as gray as possible to show that the Jedi were losing their way. Instead, TCW made the conflict black and white, with almost every sympathetic Separatist character either dying off of turning to the Republic side.
It's this one-sided morality that made Star Wars dumber, since back then, you could find lore that can justify the Republic, the Separatists, the Sith, the Jedi, the Empire, and the Rebels, and you're free to choose which side you feel is good. There's enough lore to show that the Rebels were right, and there's enough lore to show that the Empire was right. But TCW just made the Separatists cartoonishly evil, despite the fact that when compared with the Empire, they're supposed to be more sympathetic, because they only wanted their freedom, as opposed to the Empire which wanted to take away freedom in the name of order and peace.
But it worked. Notice that the normies ate it all up. They actually like simplified morality and bad guys who are goofballs. Instead of having the B1s be portrayed as this wall of cold, unfeeling blasterfire like in TPM, they became comic relief. Instead of an unstoppable juggernaut, Grievous became a punching bag. Even in ROTS Grievous was more of a juggernaut than in TCW, to the point where Kenobi had to break his own rules and use a blaster to kill him. If it wasn't for that gun lying on the floor, movie Grievous would've killed Obi-Wan. Unlike in TCW, where Kenobi usually sends Grievous packing over and over again.
Yet normie critics like the Nostalgia Critic who hated the Prequels openly loved TCW and stated that it's an improvement. So no shit, the show got 7 seasons and the kind of morality it showed was mimicked by future Disney Star Wars shows when it comes to ''good guys=good, bad guys=bad''. Disney saw Lucas go for gray morality with the Prequels and their EU, and he was crucified, but when he went back to basic morality in TCW, the show was lauded for it, to the point where fans were mad when Disney canceled it, so Disney brought it back and continued it via the Bad Batch show.
I said this before but I think Lucas is just allergic to writing grey characters or grey morality in general. You're either good guy or bad guy, end of discussion and it feels like the people in charge of Star Wars now are intentionally trying to emulate his style not understanding how retarded it is.
I'll say it yet again but there's a reason why all of the best Legends content was written without George being directly involved other than to give his stamp.
And the original trilogy was good because Lucas actually gave a shit to listen when his crew told him something was a bad idea.
That's because Lucas belongs to that old generation of hippies who hated ''THE MAN'' and just saw him as evil. That nuanced portrayal of the Empire was a total accident, and most of that nuance came from the SWEU. If Lucas could make them more blatantly evil, 40K-style, he would have.
The Original Trilogy was not supposed to have any gray at all. The only morally gray character on the good side was Han Solo, and he had that moral grayness beaten out of him in ESB, so by the time he gets rescued in ROTJ, he's a full-on cheerleader for Leia and the Alliance cause. He even lends his ship to Lando, uncharacteristically forgetting that this man betrayed him and that he's the original owner of the Falcon.
Just look at what happened to Boba Fett. The epitome of a morally gray but cool character; a bounty hunter who decides for himself what is right and wrong and who to work for, and he gets punked by a blind man and eaten by a hentai sand vagina. Only in the SWEU is he awesome; in the actual movies, at best, he's a good scout, at worst, he's fodder for the good guys, and he had a humiliating end, to boot. That's how the OT dealt with morally gray characters. You either become a damsel in distress/cheerleader like Han, or you get beaten in the most humiliating way like Boba.
Lucas originally went for a morally gray conflict with the Clone Wars; on purpose, he made the Jedi fight for the oppressive regime, the ''enemies'' of the Jedi were people who just wanted their freedom, and the clone troopers, the ''soldiers of democracy'' as one might call them, were all cloned from a homicidal maniac who has no problems doing 9/11-style bombings against innocent people. Said soldiers betray the Jedi down the line along with Anakin, and they formed the core of the oppressive Empire when Anakin becomes Darth Vader and the clone troopers become Stormtroopers. In essence, Lucas put the Jedi in the shoes of Vader and Tarkin, and the Separatists they were fighting were the original Rebel Alliance. You can't get any more morally gray than that.
Yet the normie critics hated that shit, so Lucas went back to the drawing board, and went with the tried-and-true, black-and-white morality for TCW, and guess what? The same normies who condemned him for the Prequels ate it all up. So no shit, Lucas can't help it with the black-and-white morality, because not only was that the way he did the OT, but he tried gray morality in the Prequels and people hated it, but when he went back to black-and-white morality with TCW, people ate that shit up like it was the next best thing since sliced bread.