Exulansic / TT Exulansic / Sierra Weir / Sierra Dullea Weir - TERF detransitioner/desister who has a crusade against the "I Am Jazz" phenomenon and also a massive collection of Party City wigs.

It's interesting to see them all calling each other lunatics, but never questioning their tactics and deciding maybe they should try something more effective that brings them into contact with saner people.

Most of them are fighting for Twitter likes & small amounts of money more than they're trying to actually influence social policy.

Chicana Feminista may have relationship drama but at least she can have relationships, Exulansic can't handle that. Her cat posts make me really sad, I think the cat is her only friend. All of these people are basically tragic.

About a month ago, Sierra basically diagnosed PigeonAndFries/Elleot's kid with a language issue on her Twitter and Substack. And the title of the video is "reply to @randomfollower" so it's clear she did it for the Twitter points. If someone reported her to ASHA over calling herself a "pathologist" I can't imagine that no one has reported her for that. There's no way Jon Uhler, Brittany, all these people Exulansic has falsely reported are just going to let these kind of opportunities pass them by. I think her 15 minutes is about to be up.

I like some of Sierra's content but I feel like she's about to find herself sued or deplatformed. There's a lot of drama among these TERFs but mostly it's limited to name-calling. It's usually pretty low stakes. She keeps doing things that are going to get her license pulled if she's not more careful. She's already got a roommate, right? She can't afford to lose her actual job.

Sierra's great because she's more autistic and detail oriented than most of these activists. But that's also going to be her undoing: it's going to be her lack of ethics not any of these more popular girls name-calling her. She's really confident but she has no common sense. She needs to find a way to team up with these more sociable women not get them constantly angry at her.
 
I like some of Sierra's content but I feel like she's about to find herself sued or deplatformed
Maybe if she acquired the ire of Liz Fong Jones. I've witnessed more biomen than biowomen thirst for deplatforming/legal coercion since the era of gamer gate onward. Lawsuits cost $$$ and none of these women have the influencer bucks to do it for fun, but I bet they each have their fingers crossed some rich programmer tranny will serve the other.
 
Her cat died, which is of course sad and poor cat. However, I do think the cat obituary is slightly funny because her cat was also subject to a mystery attack, allegedly by a neighbor's dog, that caused damage no one noticed for years. Sort of like her incident with Brittany

cat tribute.png


Either Sierra sees dog attacks everywhere after the trauma inflicted on her cat, OR she just sees dog attacks everywhere, period.
 
Her cat died, which is of course sad and poor cat. However, I do think the cat obituary is slightly funny because her cat was also subject to a mystery attack, allegedly by a neighbor's dog, that caused damage no one noticed for years. Sort of like her incident with Brittany

View attachment 6477538

Either Sierra sees dog attacks everywhere after the trauma inflicted on her cat, OR she just sees dog attacks everywhere, period.
There's always this one addled hag in every trailer park or rural community or section 8 building, who is convinced that her neighbors are poisoning her pets.

It's an old lady specific form of psychosis. Under-researched.
 
Why be so offended if it's just a retarded allegation made by a retard? CPS allegation included. How many times is Brit gonna use that an excuse to lash out? For how many months now? Brit needs to grow tf up already, be the adult and move on instead of continuously poking the retard bear.
In this case I don't blame Brit for lashing out. Sierra could've dropped the issue and moved on but calling CPS was a real bitch move. That shit has consequences. And considering Sierra loves writing letters to people it's a case of an arsonist finding new things to burn. They'll never let each other go because the drama keeps the troons interested.

This same drama prevents any real world action from happening. Say what you want about KJK, she's out there trying. I'd respect Sierra a lot more if she stuck to analyzing Tiktok pooner content vs these petty arguments.
 
Say what you want about KJK, she's out there trying
Sierra doesn’t want change because if all the TikTok trans people go away she’d lose income. She’s not actually seeking change, she’s autistic Twitter era PT Barnum holding up ‘freaks’ for the public to gawk at.

Making false reports to CPS and about Uhler is a waste of resources and also pretty revealing about Sierra. She can’t face people head on, she makes her moves secretly via a third party. And it’s never against doctors doing trans surgeries. She’s not reporting that Irish lady who mutilated Jazz’s friend, she’s reporting activists who are more serious than she is.

Sierra hates being overshadowed, she wants doctor respect but without the credential. She won’t just take the MCAT and become one, she wants to be seen as a revolutionary new third category who’s better than the people who have more impressive credentials than she does.

Sierra is a REAL problem. She’s exactly smart enough to get herself and others into trouble, nothing more or less.
 
This is just morbid now. Writing a poem about the death of Gruffin "TentacleDick" and now the girl's mother tells her to fuck off.
https://x.com/TTExulansic/status/1841905428902642103

View attachment 6489436
What exactly does Sierra think she's accomplishing here? The kid is dead, the admittedly dumb mom doesn't have any more kids to kill. This isn't going to serve as some kind of deterrent for other dumb moms. The poetry, in particular, is just wankery pandering to the most devout of the converted terf base- everyone else finds it cringe.
 
What exactly does Sierra think she's accomplishing here?

Why, she's being an Activist, of course. How noble of her to devote so much of her highly compensated pathologist time to raising awareness of... stuff.

Snide indignation will save the world! And though it feels a lot like sucking a fresh, hand-spun milk shake through a narrow straw, by God it's getting her the attention of at least 628 people. Aaaaaaah, now she can sit back and savor her power as a public intellectual and social critic.
 
This is just morbid now. Writing a poem about the death of Gruffin "TentacleDick" and now the girl's mother tells her to fuck off.
https://x.com/TTExulansic/status/1841905428902642103

View attachment 6489436

Why, she's being an Activist, of course. How noble of her to devote so much of her highly compensated pathologist time to raising awareness of... stuff.
Here's the thing. Sierra's correct in that Griffin's no longer harass able. But harassing a mom who just lost her only child is arguably worse.

Sierra knows her followers on Twitter are harassing Griffin's family. The evidence is that she's told them to stop at least once before this. If Griffin's mom decides to contact a lawyer, this post is also evidence that Sierra's been asked to stop and didn't.

I just...for all her autism Sierra's not very smart. She is going to get her license pulled. There's no way one of these families isn't going to pursue her in court. Maybe they can't afford to do it alone, maybe if 2-3 of them band together they can.

I also feel like there's no way Jon Uhler isn't going to pursue her for filing a false report against him. That's some real bullshit. All he'd have to do is call the police or tell whoever licenses speech therapists in CA what she did. He probably wouldn't have to do it right away, if I had to guess the statute of limitations would be somewhere between 1-3 years on what she did.

Sierra is so high on her moderate Twitter popularity that she's going to blow up her actual life. She's so autisticly committed to shooting herself in the foot.

This isn't even activism. Posting Gruffin's dick pic on Twitter = attention seeking. Sending it to the medical board who licensed the doctor would be something closer to activism. Or to a congressperson in Gruffin's district with a note, "How can you support this, this kid is dead now." Sierra doesn't actually care, she just finally found a way to gain approval from a small group of people and can't let go of it.
 
Pretty damn dark comedy when, in the U.S. at least, the futures of tens of thousands of children soon to be born are riding on the ambitions of malpractice lawyers.

In the mid-20th century, tens of thousands of people were lobotomized when that Nobel Prize-winning procedure was trendy. While the procedure had been criticized from its inception and, in the U.S., subjected to examination by a presidential bioethics commission, what actually ended its use was the substitution of thorazine.

(It was also thorazine that led to the closure of so many mental institutions, fueling the stellar career of Lolcowboy Trail Boss J.C. Moon, and for that I am grateful.)

Will Big Pharma triumph again by rolling out a drug like Acceptselfazine that keeps dingalings from LARPing themselves to death and yields more profits than estradiol? I consent to growing old to find out.
I'm always pointing this out but-
Lobotomies are still carried out! Very rarely, not just sprung on the wife when she's getting a bit big for her boots, but they are still happening. Some cases it's the only thing that gives any relief.

Ditto Electroshock therapy. Much more widely carried out than Lobotomy, and again, offer very high relief in cases where absolutely nothing else is working, when people are utterly catatonic.
The difference being that people are properly sedated now so they don't break their own arms and bite their tongues off and stuff.

Everyone thinks these procedures are resigned to history, they ain't.
Bit of a different alley, but same for Thalidomide. It's actually a very useful drug. I think maybe used in leprosy but my memory isn't 100%. It's got some cancer uses and stuff too.
And it's cheap because it's got an awful stain on its name still, obviously.
 
I'm always pointing this out but-
Lobotomies are still carried out! Very rarely, not just sprung on the wife when she's getting a bit big for her boots, but they are still happening. Some cases it's the only thing that gives any relief.

Ditto Electroshock therapy. Much more widely carried out than Lobotomy, and again, offer very high relief in cases where absolutely nothing else is working, when people are utterly catatonic.
The difference being that people are properly sedated now so they don't break their own arms and bite their tongues off and stuff.

Everyone thinks these procedures are resigned to history, they ain't.
Bit of a different alley, but same for Thalidomide. It's actually a very useful drug. I think maybe used in leprosy but my memory isn't 100%. It's got some cancer uses and stuff too.
And it's cheap because it's got an awful stain on its name still, obviously.

Consigned to history, you mean.

Convince me that the medical field is dealing with troonery and poonery in a responsible, science-based, or even humane manner and you will have achieved something.
 
Consigned to history, you mean.
Yeah. Auto error

Convince me that the medical field is dealing with troonery and poonery in a responsible, science-based, or even humane manner and you will have achieved something.

Why would I ever try to do that?

The point was just that those specific procedures still exist whereas nearly everyone thinks otherwise, which is mildly interesting.
 
Ditto Electroshock therapy. Much more widely carried out than Lobotomy, and again, offer very high relief in cases where absolutely nothing else is working
There's a budding scandal around this, at least where I'm living. Obamacare requires insurers to cover psych care now. There's at least one facility being sued because they were pressuring people to try electroshock. In this state the requirement is that someone tries 2 antidepressants first. So that's a pretty low bar, that could be zoloft and prozac.

Some facilities that took Medicaid patients in this state were pressuring really young people who were candidates for other options - maybe a newer antidepressant, or ketamine, or a different type of talk therapy - into electroshock. Electroshock has real side effects like memory loss. The people they targeted for this were teens/early 20s from difficult homes. They twisted their arms by being like, "After you try electroshock you jump to the front of the housing list, you'll never be homeless again." These were already at-risk young people and instead of trying to help them, the basically told them they'd always be in the system and that the best future they could envision for them was continued homelessness or at least inability to function & work normally.

I met a kid who had electroshock, he's about 20. His goal was always to be in politics. Comes from a poor family but bright, good speaker...until he forgets what he was saying because of the memory loss from electroshock. And he is one of the few who had a parent advocating for him. His mom was a single mom & a teen when he was born. She has younger kids and trusted these people who were recommending this to her kid, but he's had really bad side effects from it.

Yes, these procedures can be useful. Carrie Fisher had success with electroshock after decades of struggle. That's the kind of candidate it's appropriate for. But not some teen with a single mom who's depressed because he's poor and lacks support. That's who they're foisting it on now in some cases. Like the trans issue, because of the way money in American healthcare changed with Obamacare, private providers who contract with counties and states are trying to push these expensive, profitable treatments on candidates who aren't the best. And they lie to patients who don't have strong support networks.

The facility that did that to that kid also wasn't offering 2 groups that are on their published schedule (a morning & evening group). They used only travel nurses to do most of their staffing, so no one on staff was really there long enough to learn what was happening/why it was so messed up. They were out the door by the time they'd seen the extent of the scam. They were pressuring kids to sign documents to allow them to hold them beyond 72 hours. They were saying if they didn't, they'd take them to court and commit them forcibly, and that the court proceeding would show up in background checks from employers. They were scaring them into thinking they'd never work if they didn't agree to be held longer, be on really heavy meds, etc. And most of them, they probably didn't actually need to be held longer. I talked to another patient from there, her Dad raised hell and refused to let them hold her longer. But a lot of these people don't have anyone who's informed about what facilities are supposed to do. They don't have anyone to advocate for them.

There's still a TON of bullying that happens in mental health care. There are two lawsuits I know of related to that facility. One, the firm already won. However they weren't able to put the doctor who's on the paperwork out of business. He just formed a new business entity. It's even the same building he just changed the name. The second case, they're pursuing it as like RICO. The lawyers are trying to establish the scale of the fraud in the hope that federal regulators get involved and put the operator out of business for good. Again, after the first suit, he just changed the name of the facility and went back to it. This guy's still a licensed doctor in this state.

The facility's located in a downscale area near a trailer park, that's part of how they get away with it. Most of the people in the community are too distracted by other problems. But like the trans issue - Obamacare made it easier for unscrupulous providers to move into this area of healthcare. They knew they could get reimbursed from both public and private insurers now.
 
Last edited:
There's a budding scandal around this, at least where I'm living. Obamacare requires insurers to cover psych care now. There's at least one facility being sued because they were pressuring people to try electroshock. In this state the requirement is that someone tries 2 antidepressants first. So that's a pretty low bar, that could be zoloft and prozac.
That's fascinating, my country went through the ect route 15-20 years ago where they were handing it out like candy. Interesting to see that the US is so late on that as these things usually go in cycles that are pretty similar from country to country. Like the overprescribing of opiods, benzo, the anorexia wave etc etc.
 
That's fascinating, my country went through the ect route 15-20 years ago where they were handing it out like candy. Interesting to see that the US is so late on that as these things usually go in cycles that are pretty similar from country to country. Like the overprescribing of opiods, benzo, the anorexia wave etc etc.
It was kind of having a moment here back then, too. Things like the musical "Next to Normal" were partly about ECT and that premiered off Broadway around 15-20 years ago. But the thing that really has opened the floodgates IMO is the Obamacare reforms. There was an article in the NYT a couple weeks ago about unscrupulous chains of mental health care facilities. And it's just full of horror stories. I think one lady walked in to inquire about therapy and they committed her.

Because psych things now have to be covered bad providers have moved into the space. About 15-20 years ago a lot of psychiatrists didn't take private insurance.

In recent years they've also done away with some ethical guidelines for therapists. Now a therapist & client can have a "dual relationship" which was always prohibited in the past.

I know people personally whose therapists sound unethical to me. Giving them poor advice or doing weird things in session. But the guideline right now is basically "the patient has to vibe with their therapist, everything is okay." It's become the wild west now. And to quote Exulansic, your premiums are paying for this. Like that's one of her criticisms that's right on about what's happened in healthcare recently. The lawsuits from this will be epic.
 
Is Sierra Jewish or is this just another opportunity to sperg for attention on the back of someone else's crisis?
If I’m remembering correctly, Sierra is not Jewish and has no Jewish heritage. This came up earlier in the thread when she was crowing about a cartoon of her that was supposedly an offensive antisemitic caricature. The cartoon was drawn by a Jewish artist. It wasn’t a caricature of any kind, in fact it was a fairly realistic depiction. She’s just ugly.
 
Back